Dunhill Standard Mixture Mellow
(2.89)
Traditionally English, latakia, Orientals, east Carolina and Georgian, all lightly toasted.
Notes: Formerly known as Standard Mixture Mild.
Details
Brand | Dunhill |
Blended By | Dunhill |
Manufactured By | Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Blend Type | English |
Contents | Latakia, Oriental/Turkish, Virginia |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | United Kingdom |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.89 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 51 - 60 of 73 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 07, 2012 | Medium | Very Mild | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Even after 7 years in the tin, it still looks and smells new and fresh upon opening. The Oriental leaf is prominent, the Latakia present but not dominant, and the sweet Virginia provides an excellent foundation. It is an excellent English.
As others have noted, it bites if smoked vigorously. Nicotine dose is moderate.
Overall, an excellent smoke, an all-day English, but not a Nirvana experience.
Update, January 2013: I purchased a tin of the new stuff and thought it would be fun to compare and contrast Murray's versus Orlik's.
To begin, the tin note of the Murray's is classic English: Orientals with a touch of Latakia. Orlik's in the tin is much stronger smelling, sour/acidic and fruity. And the new Mellow blend has more bright orange color to the blend.
I suspect that Orlik has added a little sugar-water topping that makes their version a little more moist and causes a little more tongue-bite. But by mid- bowl the bite has disappeared from both versions.
I smoked both in identical small acorn briars, alternating between the two. They both paired well with my glass of Laphroiag. It was a wonderful experience, a great indulgence.
I could nit-pick and say that the Murray's is more 'mild' and the Orlik's less 'mellow.' Perhaps the older stuff has a broader flavor range. But really, the main difference was that the Murray's tin was 7 years older. I suspect that with age, I would not be able to tell them apart. Smoking them separately, I felt a tad more nicotine with Orlik's, earning the name 'Mellow.' But they are both still in the moderate range of Vitamin N.
Overall, I think Orlik nailed it and has faithfully reproduced this blend.
As others have noted, it bites if smoked vigorously. Nicotine dose is moderate.
Overall, an excellent smoke, an all-day English, but not a Nirvana experience.
Update, January 2013: I purchased a tin of the new stuff and thought it would be fun to compare and contrast Murray's versus Orlik's.
To begin, the tin note of the Murray's is classic English: Orientals with a touch of Latakia. Orlik's in the tin is much stronger smelling, sour/acidic and fruity. And the new Mellow blend has more bright orange color to the blend.
I suspect that Orlik has added a little sugar-water topping that makes their version a little more moist and causes a little more tongue-bite. But by mid- bowl the bite has disappeared from both versions.
I smoked both in identical small acorn briars, alternating between the two. They both paired well with my glass of Laphroiag. It was a wonderful experience, a great indulgence.
I could nit-pick and say that the Murray's is more 'mild' and the Orlik's less 'mellow.' Perhaps the older stuff has a broader flavor range. But really, the main difference was that the Murray's tin was 7 years older. I suspect that with age, I would not be able to tell them apart. Smoking them separately, I felt a tad more nicotine with Orlik's, earning the name 'Mellow.' But they are both still in the moderate range of Vitamin N.
Overall, I think Orlik nailed it and has faithfully reproduced this blend.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2012 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Having assigned the likes of TBS and it's imposter B.Sasieni to the ash heap, and having found little to love about My Mix.' 965, Standard Mixture Mellow fits quite nicely into the middle of my day. I don't think that this Latakia light blend will ever replace London Mixture, but there are times when even my revered DLM can spoil things for my night of reverie with my beloved Nightcap. Good stuff not a world beater by any means, but good. Next order, I'll try what is now marketed as plain-old Standard Mixture which I'm told is really SM Medium. While we're at it Mr. editor; how about getting rid of the "Mild" assignation, the EU killed the use of that word long ago, it's Mellow!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2011 | Mild | None Detected | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I note that the tin description has changed to: "A Mellow Blend of Virginia and Turkish Tobaccos - Soft Delicate Flavor"
Not having smoked any Dunhill Standard Mixture before I can't say that this is the old "Mild" or another blend entirely. However, after my dismal experience with the current MM965, I held little hope for this when I cracked the tin (only a week ago); it looked too similar to that impostor. However, one whiff of the tobacco contained therein piqued my interest. This smelled like a Dunnie - and for more like the classic 965 than the new 965 does (even if it doesn't purport to be like it.)
Lighting up I noted the similar flavor to the current 965, but here rather than being overwhelming to the point of rudeness the experience was very pleasurable. If this had been in my 965 tin I might complain it had changed but I would still like it. The Latakia here, while still the same as in 965, is in greater quantity and that I do appreciate. This is tasty, almost addictive. The Orientals are noticeable to the eye and on the tongue.
I bought the only tin I could find and it is dwindling quickly.
I almost hesitated to give this four stars as I have yet to crack my tin of Standard Mixture, but it does deserve it. I will buy more, if any shows up.
UPDATE: 10/10/12 My second tin of this was disappointingly different and NOT in a good way. This one was horribly astringent and very bitey - something I rarely encounter. I would lower the rating to two stars but an average would really be three.
Not having smoked any Dunhill Standard Mixture before I can't say that this is the old "Mild" or another blend entirely. However, after my dismal experience with the current MM965, I held little hope for this when I cracked the tin (only a week ago); it looked too similar to that impostor. However, one whiff of the tobacco contained therein piqued my interest. This smelled like a Dunnie - and for more like the classic 965 than the new 965 does (even if it doesn't purport to be like it.)
Lighting up I noted the similar flavor to the current 965, but here rather than being overwhelming to the point of rudeness the experience was very pleasurable. If this had been in my 965 tin I might complain it had changed but I would still like it. The Latakia here, while still the same as in 965, is in greater quantity and that I do appreciate. This is tasty, almost addictive. The Orientals are noticeable to the eye and on the tongue.
I bought the only tin I could find and it is dwindling quickly.
I almost hesitated to give this four stars as I have yet to crack my tin of Standard Mixture, but it does deserve it. I will buy more, if any shows up.
UPDATE: 10/10/12 My second tin of this was disappointingly different and NOT in a good way. This one was horribly astringent and very bitey - something I rarely encounter. I would lower the rating to two stars but an average would really be three.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I guess this would be a good start for someone wanting to try an English mixture.
Definitively an excellent tobacco. But I prefer its brother the medium mixture which is tastier.
Definitively an excellent tobacco. But I prefer its brother the medium mixture which is tastier.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2010 | Mild | None Detected | Mild | Pleasant |
Alas, I found this perfect allday smoke when it is no longer available. Only Aperitif is nicer in my opinion. Anyone who has this in the cellar and does not like it, please sell it to me!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Tin Aroma: A quite distinct sweet, must odor. Also, this sweet must smell is later present in the dottle.
Tobacco: A very predominant bright, light sand hue, with small amounts of dark-brown and black; lighter in color than SM Medium. Unless my eyes deceived me, by the next day, the overall hue had aged to medium to dark tan. Just the right amount of moisture, being rather light.
Standard Dunhill long thin ribbon cut. One of the key signatures of quality, the ribbon strands are intricately interwoven, producing a thick mat.
Initial: Packed easily enough, after the strands are pulled apart. Took to the match instaneously.
Taste: Mildly sweet VA, not much Latakia, very toasty VA in taste and aroma. Seemed to have a mild nutty honey character mid-bowl. The bottom of the bowl can get hot. Mild tongue bite is a rarity. A nice honey oat quality.
Aroma: Like a drive in the countryside with clover fields in the distance; moderate toasty VA. No Latakia blast, not at all; just a nice, cool honey oat softness.
Nicotine: Very mild, being milder the SM Medium. Still, SM Mild does give a mild buzz.
Room Note: As with other English blends, not extremely fantastic, but natural, like SM Medium, but milder. About as mild a room note as you can get with a traditional English blend, having a moderate toasty VA character.
Overall: Contrary to many others, I like it for the very fact that it *is* so mild, so VA. This is one of the best smokes I've ever had.
I swear this and SM Med act different in the pipe, and taste and smell different, depending on how they are packed. One packing technique gives less taste and more moisture. It seems that half a bowl, well-packed, works best. In a large bowl, there is initially a lack of flavor, and light moisture. Mid-bowl, the flavors and aroma seem to come to fruition.
This could be your all-day smoke.
This might well become that one perfect standard I've always been seeking.
Tobacco: A very predominant bright, light sand hue, with small amounts of dark-brown and black; lighter in color than SM Medium. Unless my eyes deceived me, by the next day, the overall hue had aged to medium to dark tan. Just the right amount of moisture, being rather light.
Standard Dunhill long thin ribbon cut. One of the key signatures of quality, the ribbon strands are intricately interwoven, producing a thick mat.
Initial: Packed easily enough, after the strands are pulled apart. Took to the match instaneously.
Taste: Mildly sweet VA, not much Latakia, very toasty VA in taste and aroma. Seemed to have a mild nutty honey character mid-bowl. The bottom of the bowl can get hot. Mild tongue bite is a rarity. A nice honey oat quality.
Aroma: Like a drive in the countryside with clover fields in the distance; moderate toasty VA. No Latakia blast, not at all; just a nice, cool honey oat softness.
Nicotine: Very mild, being milder the SM Medium. Still, SM Mild does give a mild buzz.
Room Note: As with other English blends, not extremely fantastic, but natural, like SM Medium, but milder. About as mild a room note as you can get with a traditional English blend, having a moderate toasty VA character.
Overall: Contrary to many others, I like it for the very fact that it *is* so mild, so VA. This is one of the best smokes I've ever had.
I swear this and SM Med act different in the pipe, and taste and smell different, depending on how they are packed. One packing technique gives less taste and more moisture. It seems that half a bowl, well-packed, works best. In a large bowl, there is initially a lack of flavor, and light moisture. Mid-bowl, the flavors and aroma seem to come to fruition.
This could be your all-day smoke.
This might well become that one perfect standard I've always been seeking.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 02, 2008 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
*Updated April 2, 2008* After letting the can sit a little while, I can smell some creosote in it. I guess I am an impatient person sometimes...
There is latakia in this? I'm pretty sure I have the new stuff. Never tried the old. I bought a tin, cracked it open and decided I like it well enough not to bother with aging it too much. Nice and mellow, packs and burns nice. I could puff on this stuff all day. I won't commit to saying it's my favorite, though.
There is latakia in this? I'm pretty sure I have the new stuff. Never tried the old. I bought a tin, cracked it open and decided I like it well enough not to bother with aging it too much. Nice and mellow, packs and burns nice. I could puff on this stuff all day. I won't commit to saying it's my favorite, though.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | Very Mild | None Detected | Very Mild | Tolerable |
This tobacco is very very mild (it should not be a surprise it is what the tin says it is). The tobacco is a bit milder than I would usually smoke. The flavors are subtle, and nothing really stands out, but rather all are well blended and in good balance. I could tell you that I would prefer a bit more Latakia or stronger oriental, but that would make it the Standard Mixture medium. The tobacco packs with some effort, but burns effortlessly to the very last drop. The ash is as fine as sawdust, and white as snow. So for what it is a very balanced, mild tobacco, it gets a nod from me.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2007 | Mild | None Detected | Mild | Tolerable |
Another classic blend gone to pot.
Add four stars if you have the real thing.
Add four stars if you have the real thing.