Cornell & Diehl Haunted Bookshop
(2.80)
A predominantly burley mixture with a touch of red Virginia and perique.
Notes: Another of the late Bob Runowski's blends, named in honor of the famous novel written by Christopher Morley, Haunted Bookshop is a burley and Virginia blend with just a touch of perique.
Details
Brand | Cornell & Diehl |
Blended By | Bob Runowski |
Manufactured By | Cornell & Diehl |
Blend Type | Burley Based |
Contents | Burley, Perique, Virginia |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Coarse Cut |
Packaging | 2 ounce tin, 8 ounce tin, bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium to Full
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.80 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 48 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2014 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable to Strong |
I had a healthy sample of this given to me by a fellow forum member. It is similar to OJK, but maybe a little lighter in body. Little by a small increment as it is still a pretty heavy burley, but it stops well short of overwhelming. It is pretty typical of a number of C & D blends and, although I enjoyed it more than OJK, it didn't really stand out as something I would rant and rave about.
As it is a vaburper, it wouldn't even jump up into the top 5 that I would recommend in the genre. It may seem like I didn't like it. Lets just say, I didn't dislike it. Overall I would say, I will likely not be buying more. I think my preference with blends that contain these elements leans to those heavier in the Virginia element (HOTW, Strang, LBF) rather than the burley, or even Perique dominated. This, like most C&D blends is burley dominant and the perique is pretty strong too, but not as much as in OJK. And definitely not as overwhelming as Burley Flake 3.
As it is a vaburper, it wouldn't even jump up into the top 5 that I would recommend in the genre. It may seem like I didn't like it. Lets just say, I didn't dislike it. Overall I would say, I will likely not be buying more. I think my preference with blends that contain these elements leans to those heavier in the Virginia element (HOTW, Strang, LBF) rather than the burley, or even Perique dominated. This, like most C&D blends is burley dominant and the perique is pretty strong too, but not as much as in OJK. And definitely not as overwhelming as Burley Flake 3.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2018 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
So for the last 40 years I've been primarily a VA/Per or Balkan style smoker. For the couple of weeks prior to trying Haunted Bookshop I have been smoking my last tins of Frogmorton on the Bayou and St. James Woods (both purchased in 04/2012) Also I'm rating a bulk tabacco and not the tinned version of this C&D blend. I mention these two points because it may impact my review of this blend.
The aroma of the fresh tobacco in the bag is unremarkable - definitely the woody mushroomy smell of burley dominates. The fresh cut hay smell of the virginia is there, but you have to conciously look for it as it is overwhelmed by the burley. I could not detect the aroma of perique at all. I purchased 4 ounces of Old Joe Krantz at the same time. They look similar and smell very similar so I would suspect a very similar smell & taste while smoking.
It packs well in the pipe but has but has a "springyness" to it that is good to the extent that it will reduce the chance of under or over packing. It took the charring light well and after tamping once or twice the next light was even. It is easy to keep lit so re-lights are minimal.
I tend to be a controlled sipper and that worked well with this blaend. I would think that long heavy drarws and this stuff would give you a serious case of tounge bite and a real nicotene rush. But with small sips it burns nicely.
The flavor changes very little in the course of smoking, but I noticed about half way into it and I was getting a noticible nicotene kick - most likely from the burley. If there is any perique I coudn't taste or smell it, so it must be a very small amount. To finish the bowl I had to get a glass of water to counter the nicotene hit.
So overall I'm not impressed with this blend - maybe if you are primarily a burley smoker you would enjoy it more than I have. I'll take the remaining 4 ounces and cellar it for a year or two and see what happens. Off hand I couldn't think of anything to pair it with - the nicotene content is high enough that after a cup of coffee I'd be bouncing off the walls. Likewise with black tea. Spirits like Scotch or Whiskey would probably make this blend taste bitter.
The aroma of the fresh tobacco in the bag is unremarkable - definitely the woody mushroomy smell of burley dominates. The fresh cut hay smell of the virginia is there, but you have to conciously look for it as it is overwhelmed by the burley. I could not detect the aroma of perique at all. I purchased 4 ounces of Old Joe Krantz at the same time. They look similar and smell very similar so I would suspect a very similar smell & taste while smoking.
It packs well in the pipe but has but has a "springyness" to it that is good to the extent that it will reduce the chance of under or over packing. It took the charring light well and after tamping once or twice the next light was even. It is easy to keep lit so re-lights are minimal.
I tend to be a controlled sipper and that worked well with this blaend. I would think that long heavy drarws and this stuff would give you a serious case of tounge bite and a real nicotene rush. But with small sips it burns nicely.
The flavor changes very little in the course of smoking, but I noticed about half way into it and I was getting a noticible nicotene kick - most likely from the burley. If there is any perique I coudn't taste or smell it, so it must be a very small amount. To finish the bowl I had to get a glass of water to counter the nicotene hit.
So overall I'm not impressed with this blend - maybe if you are primarily a burley smoker you would enjoy it more than I have. I'll take the remaining 4 ounces and cellar it for a year or two and see what happens. Off hand I couldn't think of anything to pair it with - the nicotene content is high enough that after a cup of coffee I'd be bouncing off the walls. Likewise with black tea. Spirits like Scotch or Whiskey would probably make this blend taste bitter.
Pipe Used:
Ascorti Apple
PurchasedFrom:
Smokingpipes.com
Age When Smoked:
fresh
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 02, 2014 | Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
This is another Burley Mixture from Cornell and Diehl. For me, I note only the Burley and the Perique, but not the Virginia. Is somewhat good, decent, I like, but is clearly inferior to other Burley based tobaccos as: Butternut Burley and Old Joe Krantz. 2 Stars.
Pipe Used:
some, Brazilian made pipes
PurchasedFrom:
TabacosBR,Brazil
Age When Smoked:
recently purchased
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 04, 2015 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable to Strong |
I found this blend to be somewhat of a challenge, and after smoking my fair share of it I have decided that it's not to my taste. Haunted Bookshop is not without its merits. It does have ample strength, and those that enjoy strong burley with plenty of structure will likely appreciate it. However, I think that it lacks the counter sweetness of its big brother blend Old Joe Krantz. The flavor carries a light hint of burnt tire rubber and as well as an astringent bitter quality. However, minus OJK's higher percentage of Virginia leaf, Haunted Bookshop has a drier flavor and presents a smoke that's a bit lighter in body but more rough on the tongue. It's not as spicy, flavorful, or as inspired as OJK and as a result, not as interesting. The flavors improve towards mid bowl and smooth out quite a bit once a good layer of ash is formed, but altogether Haunted Bookshop is not for me.
Pipe Used:
Cob
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2020 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable to Strong |
I kept seeing people tout the positives of this weed, so I pushed down my aversion to C&D products, saddled into the Mystery Machine, and joined the gang to solve the "is it any good?" mystery.
The bag opened to some lackluster nose appeal. As advertised, there were no Aromatic flavors inside, nor was there much presence from the background Virginia, just the subtle damp earth Burley to greet you. The cut was pretty shaken apart for being coarse (likely due to being a bulk), but there were still a few flakes to rub apart. Great moisture and packed like a champ. My first puff (and I have no idea why) caught me off guard and I actually started coughing, my second puff (after calming down), while still strong, brought me to a world reminiscent of a cigar. The effect was a leathery, unapologetic, deep tobacco taste, which I didn't hate, but was overwhelming for my default Aromatic sensibilities.
I got used to the smoke midway, and ended up being less intense than a heavy English, so it was within the realm of smokable strength for me, just not something I personally crave (again, think cigar here). The room afterwards reminded me of the air that hangs in a well worn smoke shop, likely filled with dozen of customers who crave this type of concoction, so to that extent, I get why folks gravitate towards this Haunted Bookshop, but for myself, I'll be down the aisle reading another book.
The bag opened to some lackluster nose appeal. As advertised, there were no Aromatic flavors inside, nor was there much presence from the background Virginia, just the subtle damp earth Burley to greet you. The cut was pretty shaken apart for being coarse (likely due to being a bulk), but there were still a few flakes to rub apart. Great moisture and packed like a champ. My first puff (and I have no idea why) caught me off guard and I actually started coughing, my second puff (after calming down), while still strong, brought me to a world reminiscent of a cigar. The effect was a leathery, unapologetic, deep tobacco taste, which I didn't hate, but was overwhelming for my default Aromatic sensibilities.
I got used to the smoke midway, and ended up being less intense than a heavy English, so it was within the realm of smokable strength for me, just not something I personally crave (again, think cigar here). The room afterwards reminded me of the air that hangs in a well worn smoke shop, likely filled with dozen of customers who crave this type of concoction, so to that extent, I get why folks gravitate towards this Haunted Bookshop, but for myself, I'll be down the aisle reading another book.
PurchasedFrom:
smokingpipes.com
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2002 | Medium | None Detected | Mild | Tolerable |
Haunted Bookshop is a mixture with a plain, grassy, natural aroma, predominantly from the Burley component. It is composed of mid to light brown leaf, and IMO the Perique and the Virginias are very lightly applied. Compared to many bulk tobaccos, this one comes fairly dry in the pouch, smokes very dry (not stale) and clean, and has an overall nutty and slightly piquant bouquet. I must say this is my first experiment with a Cornell and Diehl blend, and I was very impressed by the quality and excellent craftsmanship of Haunted Bookshop. Packing it in a rusticated medium size Savinelli Octavia was quite simple, and it took the initial light gracefully and immediately. A very cool and dry smoked followed, with that intriguing though rather dulled Burley flavour, alleviated by the somewhat impish presence of the Perique and the smooth, sugarless variety of matured Virginia. There were no surprising twists throughout the smoke, the flavour remaining consistent. Only had to relight almost at the end of the bowl, after DGT. Though I did enjoy this tobacco, I did not find anything particularly extraordinary about it, nor did it remind me of any bookshop, haunted or not. Rather, it projected a country like feeling, as if in open fields. Pardon me for saying so, but IMO this tobacco can be seen either as a sophisticated and highly upgraded version of Prince Albert, or as an unsweetened and brandy less version of Barbary Coast. The Burley here is superior than the variety used in PA, but not as rich and smooth as the one employed by G.L. Pease. All in all a very good quality smoke, light and simple, quite along the lines of Larsen?s Kentucky Gold, though not as strong.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 06, 2021 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable |
As a relatively new pipe smoker, this blend knocked me on my butt. Made me feel like a teenager again going green from ducking down their first cigar. Definitly an interesting flavor but something I will have to come back to when my palate developes
Pipe Used:
Comoy Bulldog
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Full | Tolerable to Strong |
This blend sealed is just not for me. I pick up nutty, woody, and earthy notes that are associated with Burley. Its molasses character comes through as well. The dark prune note from the Perique adds a bit more nuance to the character spectrum and it is consistent in its pepperiness.
The flavor is fairly full and the nic level is near strong.
I have a great enjoyment of Burley Flakes but this blend leaves me quite wanting in flavor and actually gives a bad after taste. Out of respect for its reputation and Matches860, I give it a 6/10. Unless I add additional Virginia to it (which I'll probably do), I wont return to it.
The flavor is fairly full and the nic level is near strong.
I have a great enjoyment of Burley Flakes but this blend leaves me quite wanting in flavor and actually gives a bad after taste. Out of respect for its reputation and Matches860, I give it a 6/10. Unless I add additional Virginia to it (which I'll probably do), I wont return to it.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2013 | Medium to Strong | Extremely Mild | Medium to Full | Tolerable |
The haunted bookshop I smoked to write this review was cellared in 2008, so be aware that this is the well aged version of this blend.
Haunted bookshop is a very interesting tobacco in the sense that it really separates the pipe smoking community. People seem to absolutely love it, or absolutely hate it. I don't mind it but it is not a favorite.
I have smoked this in the past and remember it being alot more brash and acerbic, but this ages sample was nice and mellow. The tobacco is pretty dry by today's standard but I find this to be the case with most C&D blends.
This blend lit well and stayed lit well. The first half of the bowl had this fragrant perfume like taste, but only in a natural tobacco kind of way, there is by no means any flavoring added here. That fragrant flavor that I loved eventually transitioned in to a nice mellow nutty burley flavor. Not bad.
Haunted bookshop is a very interesting tobacco in the sense that it really separates the pipe smoking community. People seem to absolutely love it, or absolutely hate it. I don't mind it but it is not a favorite.
I have smoked this in the past and remember it being alot more brash and acerbic, but this ages sample was nice and mellow. The tobacco is pretty dry by today's standard but I find this to be the case with most C&D blends.
This blend lit well and stayed lit well. The first half of the bowl had this fragrant perfume like taste, but only in a natural tobacco kind of way, there is by no means any flavoring added here. That fragrant flavor that I loved eventually transitioned in to a nice mellow nutty burley flavor. Not bad.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2013 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable |
What interested me at first was how dry and natural this tobacco is. Others have described a peppery taste, which dominates the first part of the smoke. As you progress the rich burleys come through and virtually no sweetness enters into the picture. This was a tough one to get used to but, one of the nice things was the strength--just right for me; a little kick of nicotine to relax the nerves.
Overall I think 7formy1911 nailed the description. My review comes somewhat recommended mostly because I'm an English lover at heart. Top quality tobacco though, as you'd expect from Cornell and Diehl.
Overall I think 7formy1911 nailed the description. My review comes somewhat recommended mostly because I'm an English lover at heart. Top quality tobacco though, as you'd expect from Cornell and Diehl.