Details
| Brand | Peretti |
| Series | English Blends |
| Blended By | L.J. Peretti |
| Manufactured By | L.J. Peretti |
| Blend Type | English |
| Contents | Latakia, Oriental/Turkish, Virginia |
| Flavoring | |
| Cut | Ribbon |
| Packaging | Bulk |
| Country | United States |
| Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium to Full
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 Reviews
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 05, 2020 | Medium | None Detected | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Now this Peretti English fits my bill. 101 was flat and monotone to me, but 202 is more rich and chewy the way I like my English blends.
Appears to be comprised of the similar base components as 101 with more Latakia spread throughout.
202 has less moisture content than 101, as these both shipped the same day and have been stored the same since their arrival. 202 also has a less bready pouch aroma.
Burn characteristics are also more predictable, and less relights. The Latakia is definitely more center stage. It overrides a lot of the bready notes of 101. If you like your English more full, skip 101 and go for the gusto!
Appears to be comprised of the similar base components as 101 with more Latakia spread throughout.
202 has less moisture content than 101, as these both shipped the same day and have been stored the same since their arrival. 202 also has a less bready pouch aroma.
Burn characteristics are also more predictable, and less relights. The Latakia is definitely more center stage. It overrides a lot of the bready notes of 101. If you like your English more full, skip 101 and go for the gusto!
Pipe Used:
several
target="_blank"
