Sutliff Tobacco Company Tobacco Galleria - Fox & Hound
(2.04)
A traditional smoke for the discriminating English smoker, this mix of red Virginia, Turkish, burley, latakia and perique is of medium strength and guaranteed to please.
Details
Brand | Sutliff Tobacco Company |
Blended By | Carl McCallister |
Manufactured By | Sutliff Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | American |
Contents | Burley, Latakia, Oriental/Turkish, Perique, Virginia |
Flavoring | Fruit / Citrus |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 1.5 ounce pouch, Bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.04 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 23 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2009 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Mild | Tolerable |
First impressions, its OK. A mild OTC English with a good bit of burley and moisture to accompany it.
As far as English blends go, Fox & Hound is probably the lightest I've ever had. The presence of burley is interesting, but not bad. It has a little bit of latakia, but not much. All in all, it's just, light.
One thing it isn't light on, moisture. I let the tobacco dry overnight in my pipe before smoking. Even then, it still took some patience to light. Surprisingly, it doesn't leave any residue gunk behind, so that's a plus.
F&H leaves a weird aftertaste in my mouth, which I think is due to preservatives in the blend (like other Altadis blends). Though I'm not sure. Whatever it is, I strongly dislike it. My pipes also dislike it, and require a strong whiskey treatment before smoking any other tobaccos in them after this stuff.
I give the blend 2 stars and not 1, because there's enough flavor in the blend to make me come back for more. Now, I only come back once a month or so, but I still smoke it on occasion...
As far as English blends go, Fox & Hound is probably the lightest I've ever had. The presence of burley is interesting, but not bad. It has a little bit of latakia, but not much. All in all, it's just, light.
One thing it isn't light on, moisture. I let the tobacco dry overnight in my pipe before smoking. Even then, it still took some patience to light. Surprisingly, it doesn't leave any residue gunk behind, so that's a plus.
F&H leaves a weird aftertaste in my mouth, which I think is due to preservatives in the blend (like other Altadis blends). Though I'm not sure. Whatever it is, I strongly dislike it. My pipes also dislike it, and require a strong whiskey treatment before smoking any other tobaccos in them after this stuff.
I give the blend 2 stars and not 1, because there's enough flavor in the blend to make me come back for more. Now, I only come back once a month or so, but I still smoke it on occasion...
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2012 | Mild | Very Mild | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
smells awful, and my first bowl was as well. but i decided it was worth another shot. the second bowl was better, then the next was better still, and so on. definetly an aqiured taste.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2008 | Mild to Medium | Extremely Mild | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
This 1.5oz pouch came to me in a swap package. I tried one or two other Altadis blends and really had some doubts. Until I opened it and caught a whiff of the Latakia and the Orientals. Smelling it reminded me instantly of what I smelled in a few old pipes as a small child and found VERY intriguing. It packed very easily and was not too moist. The cut is a bit more coarse than I expected, being a rough ribbon. You can see all the different varieties of tobacco quite clearly. I can't tell if this has any ppg or not, but I'm sure it does, just not as much as some other blends from Altadis. It lights easily and gives off an initial bright white puff of VA smoke. I let it sit for a few seconds to go out, then tamp lightly and relight. It may not kick you in mouth with potent flavors, but there are a LOT of different things going on here in a rather subtle interplay. In the first third of the bowl I have been getting lots of back and forth between sweet VA on the tip of the tongue, and cool smoky Latakia in the back of the palate and through the nose. I didn't really detect any artificial flavors or the nasty mouth feel that sometimes comes with them. As I reached midbowl I started noticing a hint of vanilla, some carmel and some toasted nuts, this must be the bit of burley. Then out of nowhere another chunk of VA, then more Latakia, then a big spicy hit of Perique! I guess this is where the larger/rougher ribbon cut comes in. I think it may allow different portions of the blend to stick outand still play off the other tobaccos. By the last third of the bowl I had to perform a relight, but aside from that it behaved really well in my Peterson(non system). No excessive wetness, gurgling, or tongue bite. As others have stated, this would probably be a good place for a newbie to start experimenting with English style blends. While there is a lot going on in the flavor profile, I find it a better morning blend than evening as it got bland after I had smoked a few bowls of different tobaccos through out the day. When I finish this pouch, I plan on placing a order for a larger quantity.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2015 | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Driving by JR'S Outlet I just had to stop by. Super cheap bulk and tin prices at 5 to 9 dollars. Heaven in NC for sure. In the bulk section was this Fox and Hound. Sounded interesting. Asked clerk what it was and who made it. Total misinformed. So now the tobacco. Smells so strong but not sure why. Packs very well and easy to light. Smoked it for about an hour in one of my Italian pipes. This is a heavy smoke. I was very shocked as how much smoke that presented. Taste is very mild. Did not feel it was a very strong English blend. Super ash and embers in this was super Nova red. Rarely happens for me that it gets that hot. In all it was ok. I bought 2 ounces and will smoke it over the weekend to see changes.
Pipe Used:
Assets Rustic Mag.
PurchasedFrom:
JR'S Cigar Outlet
Age When Smoked:
Bulk direct from store
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 07, 2013 | Mild to Medium | Extremely Mild | Mild | Tolerable |
As a first time smoker, I went to my local cigar store for some direction. The clerk gave me a package of this as well as an all Cavendish from Altadis. I was surprised at how there was not much flavor after how it smelled. I am a cigar smoker and I can tell exactly how a cigar will taste just by smelling it, not so with this tobacco.
It isn't terrible, but it does bite a little bit, kind of more like a cigarette or a cheap cigar. It served its intended purpose for me, which was to determine the tobacco direction for me (Cavendish vs Latakia I guess). I can see that I would like this style, but I will need to find a higher quality smoke than this one.
Not sweet like the Cav, but it smelled great, earthy and leathery perhaps, it just lacks any real depth of flavor to me.
It isn't terrible, but it does bite a little bit, kind of more like a cigarette or a cheap cigar. It served its intended purpose for me, which was to determine the tobacco direction for me (Cavendish vs Latakia I guess). I can see that I would like this style, but I will need to find a higher quality smoke than this one.
Not sweet like the Cav, but it smelled great, earthy and leathery perhaps, it just lacks any real depth of flavor to me.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2010 | Medium to Strong | Mild | Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I was pleasantly surprised to find such quality tobacco from a drugstore brand and for such a great price. It tastes a little like Rattray's Red Raparee, which cost more than twice as much and is one of my very favorite tobaccos. My wife and I both like the roomnote. I did find that this blend boars on my taste buds after a while. It became a little overbearing to smoke a lot. I would recommend this as an occasional smoke for those who like latakia and perique at the same time. It can be a little much if smoked too frequently.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2009 | Mild to Medium | Extremely Mild | Mild to Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
A cheap version of one of those Revelation-style kitchen sink blends. C & D Bridge Mixture is a better example of this style, as I am sure original Revelation itself was, though I have never tried it. I got this for free in an internet promo, and since I don't think it is too bad, can't complain too much. The first half of the bowl is better than the second-there is something artificial here that rears its ugly head more and more as the pipe progresses, until towards the end it actually hisses (or snaps, crackles, and pops) at you. I can smoke it, though. The beginning of the bowl was pretty good, and I thought it would be a decent off-English blend for the price, but there is an additive-wearing monster lurking beneath. He is not so scary, however, as to render the blend unsmokeable.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
In my opinion, this was the best of the bunch in the Altadis sampler. And in that respect, my rating compares primarily to the other included blends, most of which were coated in unmentionable vats of casings.
I suppose that's why I found comfort in this blend; it was something familiar to what I normally smoke. Fox & Hound has that discernible Latakia odor upon smelling a fresh envelope. When lit, it behaves like a mild English. Everything appears in a balanced proportion, no single constituent dominating another. Supposedly there's Perique added to the mix, though it's lost on me.
I do detect a slight aftertaste, which leads me to believe there is a topping, similar to Old Dog, in that regard. It fades rather quickly, but does taint the smoking, which is probably my only complaint.
With such a flood of English mixtures already upon the market, I'd likely pass up another serving. Though I'll certainly find time to finish what I've got, and I can't say the same for the many other Altadis blends sitting in the box.
Three of Four.
I suppose that's why I found comfort in this blend; it was something familiar to what I normally smoke. Fox & Hound has that discernible Latakia odor upon smelling a fresh envelope. When lit, it behaves like a mild English. Everything appears in a balanced proportion, no single constituent dominating another. Supposedly there's Perique added to the mix, though it's lost on me.
I do detect a slight aftertaste, which leads me to believe there is a topping, similar to Old Dog, in that regard. It fades rather quickly, but does taint the smoking, which is probably my only complaint.
With such a flood of English mixtures already upon the market, I'd likely pass up another serving. Though I'll certainly find time to finish what I've got, and I can't say the same for the many other Altadis blends sitting in the box.
Three of Four.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2006 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
I received this, along with a large assortment of other blends, in a sampler from Altadis. I am in agreement with the previous reviewer that this is an innocuous, English style blend.
Other reviews have compared this to Walnut but, since I have not smoked that for many years, I can't really comment.
I will say that this is a decent light English, with a bit too much PG, it lights well enough and does not leave much gunk in the bowl.
I realize I am damning the blend with faint praise, but I do prefer this to most drugstore tobacco and it is pleasent enough for an introduction to English style tobaccos.
Other reviews have compared this to Walnut but, since I have not smoked that for many years, I can't really comment.
I will say that this is a decent light English, with a bit too much PG, it lights well enough and does not leave much gunk in the bowl.
I realize I am damning the blend with faint praise, but I do prefer this to most drugstore tobacco and it is pleasent enough for an introduction to English style tobaccos.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2005 | Mild | None Detected | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Usually light English mixtures burn too hot for me but not this one. So I like F&H better than Walnut, which it resembles.
This is quite tasty and all the traditional English elements are here, just like it says on the package, except in such small quantities that you have to do tongue-detective work to find them. However the result is, for me, not bland at all, but very pleasant and cool.
Extremely easy to smoke, I cannot imagine a better introduction to English blends for the new piper. Or a good hot weather morning smoke for the more experienced.
This is quite tasty and all the traditional English elements are here, just like it says on the package, except in such small quantities that you have to do tongue-detective work to find them. However the result is, for me, not bland at all, but very pleasant and cool.
Extremely easy to smoke, I cannot imagine a better introduction to English blends for the new piper. Or a good hot weather morning smoke for the more experienced.