Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) Mayflower No.1
(3.00)
A high contrast mixture canary yellow Virginia and pale brown burley tobaccos determines the mild taste.
Notes: Originally made by Theodorus Neimeyer. Black cavendish is and has long been one of the varietals, though it wasn't mentioned in the tin description.
Details
Brand | Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) |
Blended By | Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Manufactured By | Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Virginia |
Flavoring | Other / Misc |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | Denmark |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009 | Mild | Very Strong | Medium to Full | Very Pleasant |
I sincerely tried to appreciate this aromatic mixture. As my portuguese fellows Greytata and Sousa know, for ages this is one of the most omnipresent pipe tobaccos in Portugal's drugstores. It was one of the first I tried in the early nineties, when I began pipe smoking as a college student.
The pouch aroma is absolutely wonderful, full of promises of a delightful smoke. Yet it does not deliver at all.
I remember buying pouch after pouch of it, fifteen years ago, always expecting to have that aromatic experience. Puff after puff, I always got nothing but a foul tar- and-chemical taste in my mouth. Bowl after bowl I kept being disappointed.
Recently (December 2008) I decided to give it a second chance, after enduring more than a pipeless decade. Again, I kept great expectations. And once more I was disappointed.
To smoke this concoction is not unlike paving your tongue with chloride and tar. Such a shame: your neighbors will surely be delighted with your aromatic services, but you, the smoker, will very likely become sea-sick with such an organoleptic experience.
The pouch aroma is absolutely wonderful, full of promises of a delightful smoke. Yet it does not deliver at all.
I remember buying pouch after pouch of it, fifteen years ago, always expecting to have that aromatic experience. Puff after puff, I always got nothing but a foul tar- and-chemical taste in my mouth. Bowl after bowl I kept being disappointed.
Recently (December 2008) I decided to give it a second chance, after enduring more than a pipeless decade. Again, I kept great expectations. And once more I was disappointed.
To smoke this concoction is not unlike paving your tongue with chloride and tar. Such a shame: your neighbors will surely be delighted with your aromatic services, but you, the smoker, will very likely become sea-sick with such an organoleptic experience.