Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake
(3.05)
Notes: 1792 Flake is a full-strength, mellow tobacco comprising a blend of dark fired Tanzanian leaf. It is Gawith's best selling premium grade flake. It starts as 7 lbs. of hand stripped leaf and goes through a steaming process prior to being pressed. The cake, having been prepared, is wrapped in a select leaf and packed by hand into a 12 inch square. This cake is pressed and left for a minimum of two hours. Then, the pressed cake is placed into a steam press where it is baked at full heat for two to three hours. The baked cake has then taken on 1792's characteristic rich, dark color. Its hardening occurs during cooling. Once the process of cutting the flake and adding a tonquin flavor is carried out, hand wrapping and packing finalizes 1792, making it ready for rubbing into your pipe.
Sold as "Cob Flake" in England.
Details
Brand | Samuel Gawith |
Blended By | Samuel Gawith |
Manufactured By | Samuel Gawith |
Blend Type | Virginia Based |
Contents | Kentucky, Virginia |
Flavoring | Tonquin Bean |
Cut | Flake |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | United Kingdom |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Strong
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Full
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
3.05 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 21 - 30 of 50 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007 | Very Strong | Medium | Medium | Strong |
Looked intriguing in the tin....smelled like something I have not yet encountered...still intriguing.
Wet and very dark...sticky and oily.
Packed well...a little tight...my fault.
Hard to light...but still too moist...could benefit from some drying.
The flavor....sorry to all you 1792 fans but...YUCK!!! It tastes medicinal...I'd swear its laced with camphor..good for my lip balm...not for my palate.
I had bought a cob pipe for $5.25 in case I didnt like this and did not want to corrupt my briar pipes.....I'm glad I did so....I don't like this.
No real overwhelming buzz from the nicotine, but to be fair I didn't burn this bowl more than one half down...it just tasted too badly to me....so I abandoned it...I threw away the tin since I dont have any close friends who smoke.
I think that one fella summed it up well...you either like this or you don't...I dont.
Wet and very dark...sticky and oily.
Packed well...a little tight...my fault.
Hard to light...but still too moist...could benefit from some drying.
The flavor....sorry to all you 1792 fans but...YUCK!!! It tastes medicinal...I'd swear its laced with camphor..good for my lip balm...not for my palate.
I had bought a cob pipe for $5.25 in case I didnt like this and did not want to corrupt my briar pipes.....I'm glad I did so....I don't like this.
No real overwhelming buzz from the nicotine, but to be fair I didn't burn this bowl more than one half down...it just tasted too badly to me....so I abandoned it...I threw away the tin since I dont have any close friends who smoke.
I think that one fella summed it up well...you either like this or you don't...I dont.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 08, 2007 | Very Strong | Strong | Very Full | Overwhelming |
I tried this because of overpowering curiosity, as many others no doubt have done and will continue to do. The tobacco itself has the sickly sweet smell of old garbage, or a landfill. Seriously, it actually smells like garbage - old, fermenting garbage. I tried the flake both folded and rubbed out to give it a good chance, but both tasted roughly similar. The taste was, to be honest, boring and yucky at once. The smell however (of the lit tobacco), was honestly one of the most unpleasant aromas I've ever experienced. It was smelt worse than dog doo. It was the sort of smell that is so bad you find yourself smelling it again, because it is so unusually pungent and awful. I seriously can't believe anyone likes this tobacco, and I find myself wondering if the people at Samuel Gawith are actually pressing their rubbish into flake and selling it as a premium tobacco. I declare that the emperor has no clothes; worse actually, he has no clothes and really, really needs a bath.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2006 | Overwhelming | Very Strong | Overwhelming | Tolerable to Strong |
I too was drawn in by the nostalgia of smoking a 200 year old style tobacco. Let me tell you, if this were the first tobacco I tried, I would have never continued smoking a pipe. I always get excited opening a new tin, taking the first whiff and then packing the bowl. It reminds me of the excitement I had as a kid when getting a new album. Tell me you didn't smell the record when you first pulled it out of the package. Anyway, from the first smell, I suspected there was a problem. Tonquin is to vanilla as carob is to chocolate. They are horribly different. Regardless of the sickly sweet smell, I continued to pack and light the bowl. After about five minutes I began to feel horrible. It felt like I was being poisoned. I had to lay down and relax until it wore off. Just thinking of the smell and taste makes me queasy. It wasn't until after my traumatic experience that I read the reviews warning me of the ill effects this tobacco might cause. All of you gents that gave this 3 or 4 stars must be tough old devils. I have read that if you let the tin dry it will make it much better. Since I am a glutton for punishment, I am going to try this method and give it another whirl, but if it fails me again, I will burn it in the back yard fire pit!!! Maybe Napoleon was smoking this stuff while brewing up his plans for world domination.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2006 | Overwhelming | Very Strong | Overwhelming | Extra Strong |
I tried this a while back and actually after puffing on this (gently!) for about 20 minutes I got the cold sweats,the shakes and actually threw up before feeling better..all of which took several hours to pass! I am a huge fan of full flavored, latakia based tobaccos and love a good "kick".....but this tobacco is flat out dangerous, not to mention disgusting with it's Tonquin flavoring. If given a choice between this and mixture no. 79, I would smoke 79!!!!!!!!!!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2006 | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Medium to Full | Very Pleasant |
This is an update and a downgrading from a previously Highly recommended review - in September of 2005
I found the latest iteration of 1792 Flake to be far off the quality mark. The tobacco was stuffed in the tins and the flakes were not at all uniform. I was totally disappointed in the manner in which this was packaged.
As far as quality - it's downgraded too. It was as though someone rushed to get this out the door. This is not a tobacco (in my opinion) that should be smoked without at least some moderate age on the tin. One would expect that when it's purchased it's ready to smoke, and I don't believe that to be the case here. I'll leave the sloppily manufactured tins I have in seclusion and visit them again sometime next year. In the meantime I'll be very harsh with my review based on the departure from quality that SG displayed in this batch.
VC
I found the latest iteration of 1792 Flake to be far off the quality mark. The tobacco was stuffed in the tins and the flakes were not at all uniform. I was totally disappointed in the manner in which this was packaged.
As far as quality - it's downgraded too. It was as though someone rushed to get this out the door. This is not a tobacco (in my opinion) that should be smoked without at least some moderate age on the tin. One would expect that when it's purchased it's ready to smoke, and I don't believe that to be the case here. I'll leave the sloppily manufactured tins I have in seclusion and visit them again sometime next year. In the meantime I'll be very harsh with my review based on the departure from quality that SG displayed in this batch.
VC
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2005 | Overwhelming | None Detected | Overwhelming | Overwhelming |
Putrid is the only word I could find to adequately describe this blend.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2005 | Strong | Strong | Full | Strong |
To sum it up, YUK !!!
It has been said that smoking is bad for your health but this over-dose of tonquin is yukky. "Check out the web re. tonquin.
It has been said that smoking is bad for your health but this over-dose of tonquin is yukky. "Check out the web re. tonquin.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | Strong | Extra Strong | Full | Tolerable to Strong |
I have tried very hard to like this blend - it's apparently very close to how some of the earliest tobaccos tasted and I consider it a piece of living history in that regard. All I can say is I'm glad I'm living in the present. No matter how hard I tried, up to and including blending it with other tobaccos, the Tonquin flavour was just too overpowering. It reached a sickly stage within a third of a bowl.
The tobacco looks gorgeous, smells ok (if you like Tonquin/Vanilla) but unlike many vanilla-flavoured aromatic I just couldn't taste anything but the tonquin.
So if you like tonquin - fill your boots, but if you prefer the taste of tobacco (like me) then I'd strongly suggest looking elsewhere.
The tobacco looks gorgeous, smells ok (if you like Tonquin/Vanilla) but unlike many vanilla-flavoured aromatic I just couldn't taste anything but the tonquin.
So if you like tonquin - fill your boots, but if you prefer the taste of tobacco (like me) then I'd strongly suggest looking elsewhere.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2004 | Overwhelming | Mild to Medium | Overwhelming | Very Strong |
Good Golly is this a strong tobacco! If you like nicotine then give this one a try. Me, I got woozy and had to sit down for several minutes after half a bowl.
Not my thing.
Not my thing.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2004 | Very Strong | Mild | Very Full | Tolerable to Strong |
Sorry guys this one just kicked my butt. Very good flavor just too strong. Smoking this is like playing with a gorilla, the first 5 seconds are great after that you're screaming for mercy.