Details
Brand | Robert McConnell |
Blended By | Kohlhase, Kopp und Co. KG |
Manufactured By | |
Blend Type | Other |
Contents | Perique |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Coarse Cut |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | Germany |
Production |
Profile
Strength
Strong
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium to Full
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.25 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2015 | Medium | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
Although this is an enjoyable, fairly rich and flavorful version of Perique substitute, you can tell upon opening the tin that it isn't authentic (or entirely authentic) perique. It comes in thick, crinkly ribbons of not entirely uniform shades ranging from tawny amber to dark brown. Still, it has a wonderful aroma and is nicely packaged, but if you want authentic perique the obvious choice is "McClelland Blending Perique" (from their excellent and reliable "Tinned Blenders" line).
Conversely, is nice to blend with if you know what to expect. It has a rich, almost creamy/velvety feel and adds a taste that might be more easily enjoyable for those not ready to use St.James Perique for their own blends. Also, I find its nicotine potency a little less likely to overwhelm. It makes a nice sort of VaPer component, especially in taming some stronger Virginian bright tobaccos that might create a bit of a 'sharp' or overwhelming blend, especially in conjunction with an authentic Perique. Note that it's hard to assign this tobacco a really accurate room note because its aroma it is, by definition, blended with other components.
I haven't included a review of the McClelland perique for the simple reason that theirs "is what it is", nor have I listed the McClelland's under "similar to" because it is similar only in taste and not in actual species.
Conversely, is nice to blend with if you know what to expect. It has a rich, almost creamy/velvety feel and adds a taste that might be more easily enjoyable for those not ready to use St.James Perique for their own blends. Also, I find its nicotine potency a little less likely to overwhelm. It makes a nice sort of VaPer component, especially in taming some stronger Virginian bright tobaccos that might create a bit of a 'sharp' or overwhelming blend, especially in conjunction with an authentic Perique. Note that it's hard to assign this tobacco a really accurate room note because its aroma it is, by definition, blended with other components.
I haven't included a review of the McClelland perique for the simple reason that theirs "is what it is", nor have I listed the McClelland's under "similar to" because it is similar only in taste and not in actual species.
Pipe Used:
meerschaum, Stanwell, Comoy
PurchasedFrom:
online
Age When Smoked:
unkown
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 01, 2018 | Medium | None Detected | Medium to Full | Tolerable to Strong |
The tobacco doesn't smell nor taste like Perique to me, but is quite good as it is! The tin note is rather cigar-ish, woodsy and somewhat smoky... with a bare hint of the signature "dark fruit" real Perique offers.
As it's marketed as "Perique", I'll only give it 2-stars! But by itself it's a solid 3-star blending tobacco, that spices up a blend quite nicely! 😉
Edit: Ah, people mentioning it to be "Green River Burley"? Isn't GRB supposed to be somewhat Cavendish-ish? This tobacco definetly isn't! It's a rather stout tobacco with some cigar-ish (mind the "-ish", no real cigar flavors in here) notes to it for me.
As it's marketed as "Perique", I'll only give it 2-stars! But by itself it's a solid 3-star blending tobacco, that spices up a blend quite nicely! 😉
Edit: Ah, people mentioning it to be "Green River Burley"? Isn't GRB supposed to be somewhat Cavendish-ish? This tobacco definetly isn't! It's a rather stout tobacco with some cigar-ish (mind the "-ish", no real cigar flavors in here) notes to it for me.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2017 | Very Strong | None Detected | Full | Extra Strong |
I smoked this straight from a freshly opened tin. It was very moist, and the paper "lid" soaked. The smell of the content is rather foul and sour. It is easy to pack. The smoke is warm, eventhough it is necessary to re-light the tobacco often. It burns quickly to fine ash. The taste in my opinion is very similar to a cigar, strong and spicy-peppery. It leaves and ashy taste in the mouth. The tobacco is not too strong nicotine wise, and it was okay to smoke it indoors on an empty stomach and three cups of coffee, although not to pleasant. As this is the only Perique I have smoked straight I cannot verify it's authenticity, regarding the other comments, nor can I recommend it for blending - yet. As for smoking it straight, I might do it again in a couple of months.
Pipe Used:
Briar
Age When Smoked:
freshly opened