Rattray Black Virginia
(2.53)
A coal-black cavendish without any flavour additions. A mellow tobacco which can be smoked the whole day long. The smoker may detect flavours of liquorice, plums and nuts.
Details
Brand | Rattray |
Blended By | Kohlhase, Kopp und Co. KG |
Manufactured By | |
Blend Type | Cavendish Based |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Licorice, Nuts / Beans, Plum, Sweet / Sugar |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 100 grams tin |
Country | Germany |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.53 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 18 of 18 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2022 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Tolerable |
I know this isn't supposed to have any added flavors but, for me, it tastes and smokes like a mild aromatic. Maybe that's just the mysterious Cavendish process. It has a perfumed quality that's almost like a lighter version of a Lakeland tobacco. Also, like most aromatics, it heats up unless I'm more careful than usual. I like a bowl of this every now and again for a change but, even if I were looking for an all day smoke, this wouldn't be it. I will say, the second half of the bowl has less of the flavour I dislike and a more natural Va taste but I don't know anyone wha'd smoke half a bowl then hand it over. :::joke::: Take this review with a pinch of salt. This is a well-loved blend. Just not by me.
Pipe Used:
Various briars of various sizes
PurchasedFrom:
smokingpipes.com
Age When Smoked:
Right from the tin till a few years old
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 08, 2016 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Tolerable |
Short black ribbons with a vague prune aroma, once lit BV is lightweight in nicotine and mildly sweet with a faint fruity note without any variation of flavors. Not bad but boring after a while and, despite the blandness, room note is quite stale and a bit tarry. Fresh from the can it is too moist but when dried it burns effortless without bites, indeed it is useful on blending (e.g. to tame too strongly flavoured and/or biting aromatics) but good things end there. I ain’t gonna buy it again.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2009 | Medium | Mild | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
It does need a little more attention to keep it going, and the rewards are not really worth the effort. Although certainly entirely uncased, there is a natural liquorice- like flavour to Black Virginia, but other than that, it's a bit tedious. I find it draining on both the palate and general constitution. Next morning, my mouth felt very ‘ashy', so the smoke on this must be very heavy. Besides the widely noted extra effort in keeping it alight, the actual smoking is not unpleasant (for one bowlful when otherwise feeling fit and up for anything), but it's not very inspiring either.
The only way I would ever smoke this again is mixed with something else. I'm trying a blend of 5 parts Samuel Gawith's ‘Golden Glow' (aka Medium Virginia Flake) to 2 parts Black Virginia (by weight). The hay/grassy light quality of the GG is not on the face of it an obvious match for the liquorice of the BV, but it works quite nicely. I like the ‘Black & Gold' concept that comes with this blending, and the light and dark flavours makes for a smoke of greater dimensions than offered by either tobacco unmixed. This is my first go at blending, and I wonder whether a dash of perique might make it something more heroic. I'd be interested to hear of other blends by other smokers here using Black Virginia.
On its own, this is a two star tobacco - in my GG blend, it's an interesting three star (my blend is, of course, four star).
The only way I would ever smoke this again is mixed with something else. I'm trying a blend of 5 parts Samuel Gawith's ‘Golden Glow' (aka Medium Virginia Flake) to 2 parts Black Virginia (by weight). The hay/grassy light quality of the GG is not on the face of it an obvious match for the liquorice of the BV, but it works quite nicely. I like the ‘Black & Gold' concept that comes with this blending, and the light and dark flavours makes for a smoke of greater dimensions than offered by either tobacco unmixed. This is my first go at blending, and I wonder whether a dash of perique might make it something more heroic. I'd be interested to hear of other blends by other smokers here using Black Virginia.
On its own, this is a two star tobacco - in my GG blend, it's an interesting three star (my blend is, of course, four star).
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2007 | Medium | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
As Black Mallory, I've tried this one only in bulk.
I'm sure it's a nice tobacco, the only disadvantage is that it took way too long to smoke a pipeful, and a small one, that is.
Smoked unmixed, this bakkie requires a lot of attention to remain lit and smoked way too slow for my own preferences. But the taste was very pleasant, full and just a bit sweet.
Smoked mixed with something else, it doesn't really stick out but rather stays in the background.
Too bad, the tin aroma was nice, a bit of dried figs and semi bitter chocalate, with the aroma of pure aged VA.
If you like to spend hors smoking a pipeful, and solely pay attention to your pipeful, this bakkie is for you.
A shame, and a pity. I will try it with a different mixture and review again.
I'm sure it's a nice tobacco, the only disadvantage is that it took way too long to smoke a pipeful, and a small one, that is.
Smoked unmixed, this bakkie requires a lot of attention to remain lit and smoked way too slow for my own preferences. But the taste was very pleasant, full and just a bit sweet.
Smoked mixed with something else, it doesn't really stick out but rather stays in the background.
Too bad, the tin aroma was nice, a bit of dried figs and semi bitter chocalate, with the aroma of pure aged VA.
If you like to spend hors smoking a pipeful, and solely pay attention to your pipeful, this bakkie is for you.
A shame, and a pity. I will try it with a different mixture and review again.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 08, 2006 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
This is difficult for me to smoke. The stoving leaves an oily residue that stains the fingers and presents problems with trying to keep it lit while not getting tongue bite that Virginia leaf is notorious for. It mixes favorably with Hal 'O the Wynd without excessive taste clashing. The only way I can appreciate smoking it is to let it dry for a couple of days outside the can. I guess I've learned that I'm not a zealot for stoved tobacco.
Meerschaum Man Smoking an old noname Meer
Meerschaum Man Smoking an old noname Meer
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | Strong | None Detected | Full | Pleasant |
This is a nice tobacco but a little strong for me. I like stoved virginias but this one didn't have any of the sweetness usually found in a stoved virgina. This one wouldn't be good for a beginner smoker or someone starting out with virgina tobaccos. It would be good for someone looking for a full bodied virgina. It might be better with about 10 years of age on it. But just not my idea of a every day smoke. It burned good and never got harsh. I liked everything about this tobacco except the strength.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2005 | Mild to Medium | Extremely Mild | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
I agree completely with Beer on this one. I will note that I opened a 100-gram tin at least two years ago, and it is still a bit damp for smoking. In that time, I have smoked about 50 grams of the tobacco. I suspect I will continue to nibble at this tobacco for few more years, mostly out of curiosity to see if it ever dries out.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2005 | Strong | None Detected | Full | Tolerable |
I found the start of this bowl better than the midway or finish. It is top quality leaf which emits a nutty, tangy taste to start. This gradually develops notes of cigarette, mustiness, and a hint of chestnut.
This is a good tobacco, but out of all the dark stove blends I've tried, I don't think this rates as highly as Stonehaven or Dark Star.
It is a different leaf - erring more on the side of strong, straight tobacco flavor than the other two mentioned offerings.
Towards the end I detect a bitterness not unlike a burley blend. Though I don't find this bad, this isn't really the experience I am looking for when smoking stoved VA.
Good. I'd smoke it again, but I don't plan to stock up.
This is a good tobacco, but out of all the dark stove blends I've tried, I don't think this rates as highly as Stonehaven or Dark Star.
It is a different leaf - erring more on the side of strong, straight tobacco flavor than the other two mentioned offerings.
Towards the end I detect a bitterness not unlike a burley blend. Though I don't find this bad, this isn't really the experience I am looking for when smoking stoved VA.
Good. I'd smoke it again, but I don't plan to stock up.