Tsuge Premium Pipe Tobacco Winter's Embrace
(1.73)
Winter's Embrace expertly blends bright flue cured Virginia tobaccos with mellow burleys and a soft black cavendish for a pleasant, mild smoke. A light topping of vanilla and fruit flavors create a terrific room note.
Hello! Light the Fire! I'll bring inside a lovely bright ball of snow. - Matsuo Basho (1644 – 1694)
Notes: "The Four Seasons" is a line of aromatic blends that are meant to capture the essence of the four distinct seasons in Japan. They were announced at 2014 IPCPR, and released in late 2014.
Details
Brand | Tsuge Premium Pipe Tobacco |
Series | The Four Seasons |
Blended By | Drew Estate |
Manufactured By | Drew Estate |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Burley, Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Fruit / Citrus, Vanilla |
Cut | Coarse Cut |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Extremely Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Very Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
1.73 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | Mild | Mild | Very Mild | Tolerable |
This one just did nothing to thrill me from the very start, although at the start the topping was much more apparent than it was a little more than a year after I popped the tin. The topping definitely lessened over this time, but the tobacco never got crunchy, so it never made it into a jar.
What was left behind from the topping was a very light Virginia, and although the toppings list burley, it is not a dominant player. While it is not so light as to have a cardboard type taste, there is very little tobacco flavor at all. This one ends up suffering from that hot air curse that plagues so many aromatics after the topping starts to flash.
The blend is very much like a European aromatic in that it is Virginia dominant. I would say it is a little like Davidoff's Danish Mixture just not nearly as good. DDM has much more topping than WE, but the problem with a blend like WE is that a light topping does not really work when the underlying tobacco flavor is so weak.
To give it some props I will say that the tin art is beautiful and may be the reason I made the purpose. And sticking with the packaging, it has an odd plastic coaster atop the tobacco and folded under the coffee filter enclosure as opposed to the heavier paper stock that is typically used. At first I thought this was pretty cool, but it tends to draw a lot of tobacco to it everytime you pull it out to pack a bowl. It is novel, but I prefer the paper.
In the aggregate, If this is smoked quickly one will enjoy it much more than I did after it sat awhile in the tin, I do remember much more presence from the topping in the beginning. Kind of fruity and honey sweet and it wasn't bad. So I am leaving this at two stars, but will always opt for a tin of Danish mixture or even Peterson Gold blend before I would pick up another tin of this.
What was left behind from the topping was a very light Virginia, and although the toppings list burley, it is not a dominant player. While it is not so light as to have a cardboard type taste, there is very little tobacco flavor at all. This one ends up suffering from that hot air curse that plagues so many aromatics after the topping starts to flash.
The blend is very much like a European aromatic in that it is Virginia dominant. I would say it is a little like Davidoff's Danish Mixture just not nearly as good. DDM has much more topping than WE, but the problem with a blend like WE is that a light topping does not really work when the underlying tobacco flavor is so weak.
To give it some props I will say that the tin art is beautiful and may be the reason I made the purpose. And sticking with the packaging, it has an odd plastic coaster atop the tobacco and folded under the coffee filter enclosure as opposed to the heavier paper stock that is typically used. At first I thought this was pretty cool, but it tends to draw a lot of tobacco to it everytime you pull it out to pack a bowl. It is novel, but I prefer the paper.
In the aggregate, If this is smoked quickly one will enjoy it much more than I did after it sat awhile in the tin, I do remember much more presence from the topping in the beginning. Kind of fruity and honey sweet and it wasn't bad. So I am leaving this at two stars, but will always opt for a tin of Danish mixture or even Peterson Gold blend before I would pick up another tin of this.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2015 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Unnoticeable |
As far as the tobacco goes...it was less than stellar. Very light in color and just as light in flavor. The grassiness of the Virginias was prevalent, but the casing was under-utilized. Not what I was expecting. On the other hand, the tin art is amazing.
Pipe Used:
Falcon Billiard
PurchasedFrom:
P&C
Age When Smoked:
Fresh
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2017 | Mild | Very Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
This is a very mild no frills pipe tobacco that burns quicker than most. It has been described as an aromatic, and if one looks at the blend closely it is a sentiment I concur with. However unlike most aromatics this blend does not burn hot at all. In fact while it burns pretty quick, my pipe was pretty cool to the touch despite smoking the whole bowl. The taste is not strong. Overall this tobacco blend isnt bad, but its not groundbreaking. Worth trying, but I wont be buying a second tin.
Pipe Used:
Savinelli - Clarks (Bent Billiard)
PurchasedFrom:
SmokingPipes.com
Age When Smoked:
New
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
I picked up some new to me tobaccos while back in the States. This is the first victim. I wasn't really impressed with this one at all. When I opened the tin for the first time, it was really dry and it didn't get any better afterwards. It reminds me of some of the C&D blends that are really on the dry side. I really didn't notice any flavoring or taste in this tin. Room note was pleasant enough, even got a compliment or 2 for it. Which is this blends only saving grace for me. YMMV. At best somewhat recommended.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 09, 2017 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Tolerable |
I usually like lighter touches of casing/topping on aromatic blends. This one is too light. Way, way too light. In fact, you can barely detect anything at all in the tin note, even less in the taste while lit. I feel like it could have been a decent blend. The leaf quality seems high, and the packaging is superb. But it needs to go back to the kitchen...its undercooked. On the plus side, it burned well and didn't bite me. On the negative side, my wife did not approve of the room note...or lack thereof.
Age When Smoked:
Fresh tin undated
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Mild | Unnoticeable |
Smoked this for my first review, and I have to say the tin art was the best part of the purchase. It smokes fine for a day to day smoke, but not particularly tasty or impactful. I found it to be bland but sweet, but I haven't had the other tobaccos from this line before so I can't compare it beyond other virginia blends. If you want nice tin art, and an okay smoke, I would recommend you to try it. It won't wow you but its something to put in the pipe and puff away at while you relax. Not complex, not something to write home about. 2.5/5
Pipe Used:
Nording Bulldog
PurchasedFrom:
smokingpipes.com
Age When Smoked:
Fresh