Peter Stokkebye Whiskey (No.2)
(2.06)
Mild Ready-Rubbed Cavendish consisting of quality mild flue-cured Virginia Tobaccos with some light Burley tobaccos. Straight Cavendish cut. Aged Whiskey tobacco flavor.
Details
| Brand | Peter Stokkebye |
| Blended By | |
| Manufactured By | |
| Blend Type | Aromatic |
| Contents | Burley, Cavendish, Virginia |
| Flavoring | Whisky |
| Cut | Ready Rubbed |
| Packaging | Bulk |
| Country | Denmark |
| Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
|
2.06 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 Reviews
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2002 | Very Mild | Medium | Mild | Very Pleasant |
Most Stokkebye blends, while of excellent quality, are just plain too sweet for me. Whiskey blend was no exception. It reminds me of Iwan Ries & Company's China Black Whiskey in that there is lots of whiskey flavor with very little bite.
I did not really enjoy the smoke to a great extent because it was just too flavorful (i.e., cased). If you have a sweet tooth and enjoy quality virginia/burley mixes with lots of added juice, this stuff is for you. It does leave a bit of a wet heel and you'll need extra pipe cleaners for this one!
I did not really enjoy the smoke to a great extent because it was just too flavorful (i.e., cased). If you have a sweet tooth and enjoy quality virginia/burley mixes with lots of added juice, this stuff is for you. It does leave a bit of a wet heel and you'll need extra pipe cleaners for this one!
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2020 | Very Mild | Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Smoking now.
Pouch aroma is sweet, vanilla, molasses, and a little zest I assume from the whiskey topping.
Very easy aromatic. Light body, hints of vanilla, molasses. Some grassy notes, mild sweetness from the Virginias and a mellow sweetness from the cavendish. Retrohale will tingle your nose. Burns hot, can bite. Just sip it slowly.
Pouch aroma is sweet, vanilla, molasses, and a little zest I assume from the whiskey topping.
Very easy aromatic. Light body, hints of vanilla, molasses. Some grassy notes, mild sweetness from the Virginias and a mellow sweetness from the cavendish. Retrohale will tingle your nose. Burns hot, can bite. Just sip it slowly.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2020 | Mild to Medium | Medium | Mild | Tolerable to Strong |
My father in law likes smoking Whiskey blends (in part due to no longer being able to drink them), so I'm always on the lookout for a good one. The bag aroma on this one was OK, with a sweet, almost fruity casing, that 'sort of' reminded me the caramel finish from some Whiskies, but was otherwise pleasant on it's own merits.
The ready rub cut was nicely moist, almost ribbon in size, and oddly soft, like smooth fabric. The lit product was mostly mild, deriving any strength from the veneer of the flavoring which never offered much beyond an oily finish that was neither sweet nor boozy. Had a little bite as well. The room apparently smelled of "burnt oregano", so any bystanders will not be pleased.
This one fell flat for me. While I'm giving it 1 star, it is possible it just didn't sync with my palette and may be to your liking, but what a set of taste buds you will need.
The ready rub cut was nicely moist, almost ribbon in size, and oddly soft, like smooth fabric. The lit product was mostly mild, deriving any strength from the veneer of the flavoring which never offered much beyond an oily finish that was neither sweet nor boozy. Had a little bite as well. The room apparently smelled of "burnt oregano", so any bystanders will not be pleased.
This one fell flat for me. While I'm giving it 1 star, it is possible it just didn't sync with my palette and may be to your liking, but what a set of taste buds you will need.
PurchasedFrom:
tobaccopipes.com
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Oct 07, 2005 | Mild | Medium | Very Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
This, along with Lane's 1Q was one of my early tobacco selecting mishaps. Bland, uneventful stuff. I prefer my Scotch in a glass, as it apparently doesn't do much for cavendish tobacco.
Note: Having sampled both, I would agree with aadelma that the Highland Scotch blend is indeed quite a bit better than the one reviewed here.
Note: Having sampled both, I would agree with aadelma that the Highland Scotch blend is indeed quite a bit better than the one reviewed here.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Aug 18, 2005 | Mild to Medium | Medium | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
I agree with a couple other reviewers here that PS Highland Whiskey is clearly a better blend. I could not find a happy medium for this stuff when it came to long term storage. Too wet, or too dry. When it gets too wet, it develops a musty smell. Too dry, it bites like a rattlesnake on the tongue. At no point could I taste real tobacco, not to mention the gurgle halfway through the bowl. PS Whiskey just not for me.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2003 | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Mild | Tolerable |
"Well" I tried it. And it made no great impression on me! If I had nothing else to smoke,then & only then I might consider lighting it.This left me with similar memories of B/Riff Whiskey.(NOT GOOD)In it's class-I'll give it a half Star out of 4 Star's.
target="_blank"
