Peter Stokkebye Champagne (No.35)

tried this again, as ive had 2 ounces sitting. i think what pipe you smoke this out of makes a big difference. smoked out of previous filter pipe i had scorched tongue and had to stop smoking it.

out of a peterson system, this is excellent. some bite but not too bad if you take it slowly. doesnt gunk up bottom of bowl and leaves a pleasant smell.

very unique berry smell and flavor. i think champagne was just a trendy name to affix? not as strong or sweet as a wo larsen signature berry flavor.........but in the ballpark of taste.

now ill have to re-try the nougat soon.

a light tobbaco strength wise.

room note agrees with significant other.

This popular rendition combines the preeminence of singular Mexican-grown Burley, select Virginian strains, and a couple varietals of leveling Black Cavendish. Inspired as commemoration of the manufacturer’s 110th anniversary, as I understand it, this recipe features the delectable stylishness of a French berried additive flavoring, whatever that may be.

As a distinguished ribbon cut ensemble, bulk offering Champagne tenders with a level of ideal moisture. Predominately a thick matting of brassy red, golden orange, lightened tans, dark chocolate/blackened tinsels of richly textured tobacco provide the bubbling visage of Danish excellence that is to be expected. With an exquisitely polished pouch essence, Stokkebye’s creation brings every bit of sweet savor. Chiefly, the airs project a sugary nose that showcases the enlivening scent of lush, sweet fruits, calmed tang, and a comfortable base persona of earthen wooded tart.

This mild intensity tobacco proved to demonstrate a standard body that was reposed in quality and experienced texture. Offering an exceptionally gentle demeanor, Champagne premiers the true succulence of its fruity dressings. These additives circulate in a fashion more substantial in light of comparable Danish alternatives. And with that, I discovered that their registerable flavor held true to its intent for the greater part of the bowl, only relinquishing some of its sweet head by the final third. What is more, at least by my accounting, the tobacco does reveal a reasonable representation of the Mexican leaf and Cavendish, but lesser open commenting from the resident Virginias.

In specific, the prevailing French berry coating emerged cleanly on the lead registration. In actuality its nature was a tad elusive, bordering upon a couple of notable impressions. If I were to describe the taste imparted accurately, the additives endowed a sorted mixture of buttery blackberry/blueberry and tannic white grape, which rang with an agreeable sweet tartness. Now, I would not necessarily suggest that this individualized flavor was that of a common Champagne, but with a stretch of the imagination I guess you could consider what is there as sufficing.

Moving to the native ingredients, you know I have a quaint affinity for tobaccos grown inside of Mexico, in particular the maduro cigar leaves. But, let me state that this Champagne Burley is quite noteworthy in itself. Principally the inclusive crop Stokkebye has presented brings the best of native nuances, derived I assume from the properties of the related growing soil. The sorted robustness of this leaf engendered a zesty burnish peanut notation on the main, which was quite novel in the partaking.

Further Burley embellishment was provided with the influences of dark sugared, starchy sourness, toasty dense wood and a bitter-greenish vegetable quality that was similar to raw celery; very colorful indeed. Certainly, this Burley gave Champagne a degree of depth and character in its forward middle taste sphere.

For the Virginian counterpart, like I stated, it was a bit more contained, but I did record its garnishing bottom presence all the same. These docile strains generally showed an importance towards a Red seasoned sweet wood, which tended to be more earthy than not. In complement, an accenting node of some dilled sweet floral bundled nicely with eased tangy/orangish pale grass. Moreover, as the coatings lessened towards the close of the bowl, I did pick up an interesting twist of some spicing that I can only depict as diluted wintergreen, and yes it did leave an antiseptic residual sensation on my palate.

Last is the contribution of the Cavendish assortment deployed within this mixture. Overall, these strains enabled a little more vigor to the soothing headiness of the composite flavor. Largely pleasing in its effect, I found the Cavendish lent a string of perky charred spice and general smokiness. This footing of taste was further denoted by the softening traces of basic sugar and a dainty murmur of common vanilla.

Showing respectable mechanical performance and a spent room essence that was delightfully pleasant, simple natured Champagne presents itself as a genuinely enjoyable aromatic consideration. In being not too horrible on the nicotine concern and well-mannered in burn characteristics, this tobacco is a feasible Danish selection, no question. And on one last point, if I do view others’ comments on the specific blend being evaluated, it is only after I have documented and formed my own assessment. On this one, I felt the published reviews were a little inequitable with what I objectively found this tobacco to truly deliver. And on that note … 2.6 Pipes