McClelland Virginia Woods
(3.00)
Formulated for a smooth, rich flavor with an incomparable woodsy aroma. Blended from finest matured red cake, stoved black Virginia, wide-cut bright Virginia and other premium tobaccos. Virginia Woods offers one of the ultimate experiences in fragrant matured Virginia blend smoking.
Notes: Community note: There is some debate about whether this blend is an aromatic or Virginia (straight or otherwise) offering. There is definitely a noticeable top-note, and the blender admits such. Most reviewers find the fragrance and taste obvious, so classification as an aromatic may make sense.
Details
Brand | McClelland |
Series | Craftsbury Series |
Blended By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Manufactured By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Straight Virginia |
Contents | Virginia |
Flavoring | Other / Misc |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin, 100 grams tin |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
3.00 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 13 of 13 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Medium | Tolerable |
Somewhere in my cellaring frenzy when McClelland was broadly available, I managed to put up a tin of this that managed to age nearly five years before I popped it. It was all but forgotten until I seen someone singing its praises on a forum to which I replied that I also enjoyed the blend.
I popped onto TR, where I review every tobacco that I have smoked enough to form an opinion. It was then that I discovered I was talking out my ass, and in fact, had never tried this. Needing to remedy the same I popped my sole tin immediately.
I was indeed talking out my ass, as this struck me as kind of ordinary and boring for a McClelland VA. This puts to rest a weird feeling I have been having lately when I smoke McClelland blends. It seems the last few that I have had as repeat smokes have tasted better to me than the first time around. I was starting to theorize that the fact that the tobacco was no longer made and heavily sought after was, in fact, influencing my tastebuds.
I can say that I will not miss this one. It is a rather eclectic Virginia as it contains many different varieties of the leaf, but still manages to be boring to my tastes. It does have the same McClelland aroma as all of the other MC Vas. "ketchuppy"; this does lift as you work your way to half bowl.
I guess the description let the cat out of the bag on a topping, but I did not notice one. I will take their word for it. The blend is just kind of boring, and with the different varieties of Virginia, it still manages to maintain a rather monochromatic taste, that is rather dull. YMMV It is also pretty weak in the Nic strength category, which is something I come to expect with MC blends in general, but usually the taste makes up for this weakness; not with this one.
If you seen this tin at a B&M at the price it sold for when it was available, I would recommend buying this, but in no way, would I recommend paying Christmas Cheer prices for this. You will be disappointed.
I popped onto TR, where I review every tobacco that I have smoked enough to form an opinion. It was then that I discovered I was talking out my ass, and in fact, had never tried this. Needing to remedy the same I popped my sole tin immediately.
I was indeed talking out my ass, as this struck me as kind of ordinary and boring for a McClelland VA. This puts to rest a weird feeling I have been having lately when I smoke McClelland blends. It seems the last few that I have had as repeat smokes have tasted better to me than the first time around. I was starting to theorize that the fact that the tobacco was no longer made and heavily sought after was, in fact, influencing my tastebuds.
I can say that I will not miss this one. It is a rather eclectic Virginia as it contains many different varieties of the leaf, but still manages to be boring to my tastes. It does have the same McClelland aroma as all of the other MC Vas. "ketchuppy"; this does lift as you work your way to half bowl.
I guess the description let the cat out of the bag on a topping, but I did not notice one. I will take their word for it. The blend is just kind of boring, and with the different varieties of Virginia, it still manages to maintain a rather monochromatic taste, that is rather dull. YMMV It is also pretty weak in the Nic strength category, which is something I come to expect with MC blends in general, but usually the taste makes up for this weakness; not with this one.
If you seen this tin at a B&M at the price it sold for when it was available, I would recommend buying this, but in no way, would I recommend paying Christmas Cheer prices for this. You will be disappointed.
Age When Smoked:
4 yrs 10 months
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2011 | Mild | None Detected | Medium | Tolerable |
This is my first straight virgina, and I'm still not too sure about it. When I opened the tin I got the tomato sauce smell, and could taste it a little in the first few puffs. The strength of the tobacco builds the more I smoke it, the last bit is the best. I would describe this tobacco as high frequency, none of the earthy flavours here, just sweet and sharp. This could easily burn your toungue if you're not careful.
I'm not sure if its this tobacco, or virginias in general, but although its good quality, this one is not for me.
I'm not sure if its this tobacco, or virginias in general, but although its good quality, this one is not for me.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2007 | Medium | Medium | Medium | Tolerable |
I was more disappointed in this blend than any other I can think of. It has a wonderful name, description and label.
It tasted like it had a strange topping. I could not put my finger on it.
For a lightly aromatic english, go with Deep Hollow.
It tasted like it had a strange topping. I could not put my finger on it.
For a lightly aromatic english, go with Deep Hollow.