Details
Brand | McClelland |
Blended By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Manufactured By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Broken Flake |
Packaging | Bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Strong
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Extremely Mild (Flat)
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
1.79 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2010 | Mild | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
Having a rough day, I felt the need to purchase a "headier" blend, something that would spin my vision a little and chase away the blues. I proceeded to browse the bulk tobacco, whiffing those that looked somewhat nasty. I then stumbled upon Bulk No.600. As Special Black's color is indeed charcoal black (as well as having a stench that reminds me somewhat of burnt molasses), I figured that this would be a good one to try. I purchased an ounce and proceeded home.
I grabbed a Peterson half bent and loaded up the bowl. The tobacco itself was quite moist and sticky to the touch. I packed it in nicely and went to light. This particular blend required an initial light to dry out the weed, and then two more after tamping down into place. Once it was lit however, no relights were required.
Expecting something that would hit me hard, I was shocked to discover that I was smoking an aromatic. It somewhat reminded me of McClelland's 2009 edition of Holiday Spirit. Although not an exact match, the room note is quite similar as is the taste. The main difference I noticed is that it is just a smidgen stronger in the vitamin N department - but not much.
Starting out, the experience was somewhat nice. All the aromas and tastes were there. However, I quickly found myself in need of a pipe cleaner as goop built up rather fast. About a third of the way down into the bowl, the taste started to disappear as it was replaced with some "nice" heat. Although it did not give me any tongue bite, it certainly didn't soothe the palate. About two-thirds into the bowl, it required another application from the same pipe cleaner. From that point on, all I noticed was heat. Yes, the room note was there, but the taste had all but vanished.
It did smoke all the way through to nice gray ash, but now I'm left with a coating on my tongue that only strong coffee, an engine degreaser or coke will remove. Yet thanks to the tingling sensation due to heat, I'm not ready to apply any "harsh" liquids to my abused tongue.
As I was not expecting an aromatic, and prefer to stay away from them, its hard to say if this is a horrible tobacco or not. Perhaps if I was more "experienced" with them, I could give a more detailed review. However, as it stands, this is not a blend that I will purchase again. I'll keep this 1 oz bit around for the rare occasion where I need something "different," however, I will finish up my 2009 Holiday Edition tin before going to this weed. As the room note is quite nice, and it wasn't a horrible smoke, I've decided to give it two stars instead of one. On a scale of 1-10, I'd probably give it a 3.
I grabbed a Peterson half bent and loaded up the bowl. The tobacco itself was quite moist and sticky to the touch. I packed it in nicely and went to light. This particular blend required an initial light to dry out the weed, and then two more after tamping down into place. Once it was lit however, no relights were required.
Expecting something that would hit me hard, I was shocked to discover that I was smoking an aromatic. It somewhat reminded me of McClelland's 2009 edition of Holiday Spirit. Although not an exact match, the room note is quite similar as is the taste. The main difference I noticed is that it is just a smidgen stronger in the vitamin N department - but not much.
Starting out, the experience was somewhat nice. All the aromas and tastes were there. However, I quickly found myself in need of a pipe cleaner as goop built up rather fast. About a third of the way down into the bowl, the taste started to disappear as it was replaced with some "nice" heat. Although it did not give me any tongue bite, it certainly didn't soothe the palate. About two-thirds into the bowl, it required another application from the same pipe cleaner. From that point on, all I noticed was heat. Yes, the room note was there, but the taste had all but vanished.
It did smoke all the way through to nice gray ash, but now I'm left with a coating on my tongue that only strong coffee, an engine degreaser or coke will remove. Yet thanks to the tingling sensation due to heat, I'm not ready to apply any "harsh" liquids to my abused tongue.
As I was not expecting an aromatic, and prefer to stay away from them, its hard to say if this is a horrible tobacco or not. Perhaps if I was more "experienced" with them, I could give a more detailed review. However, as it stands, this is not a blend that I will purchase again. I'll keep this 1 oz bit around for the rare occasion where I need something "different," however, I will finish up my 2009 Holiday Edition tin before going to this weed. As the room note is quite nice, and it wasn't a horrible smoke, I've decided to give it two stars instead of one. On a scale of 1-10, I'd probably give it a 3.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 05, 2009 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
This is an OK tobacco. The first time I tried it it was good enough and had no bite, but I quickly became bored with its lack of flavor...a bit goopy near the end.
room note was somewhat pleasant.
Might make a good candidate for blending?
the search continues for my perfect smoke!
room note was somewhat pleasant.
Might make a good candidate for blending?
the search continues for my perfect smoke!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2013 | Very Mild | Very Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Unlike most black Cavendishes, I found the casing to be rather on the mild side...This is not a bad thing...Light casing allows the natural tobacco flavor to come through...Of course, most black Cavendishes are very mild...If your put off by heavily cased black Cavendishes, you might try this...Also, because of the light casing, can be used as a blender without fouling the other tobaccos in the blend...If your looking for a pay no mind all day smoke, this will do.
Pipe Used:
various for testing
PurchasedFrom:
Smokingpipes.com
Age When Smoked:
newly bought
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2009 | Extremely Mild | Mild to Medium | Very Mild | Very Pleasant |
From the "What's Dad got on the table for smoking today" file, comes Special Black.
For being touted as a (if it is so) Black and Moist pleasant sweet, it occurs as one most certainly, if devoid of such a crutch.
Nothing is further (from it) that it sucks except than possibly it does.
I have yet to decide, but am not still certain as to my ability to do so. (given the need) Having heard what I have read.
For being touted as a (if it is so) Black and Moist pleasant sweet, it occurs as one most certainly, if devoid of such a crutch.
Nothing is further (from it) that it sucks except than possibly it does.
I have yet to decide, but am not still certain as to my ability to do so. (given the need) Having heard what I have read.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 04, 2007 | Mild | Extra Strong | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant |
Wet and hot is the best description that comes to mind.Had in mind that it might be a good everyday smoke around the house and friends.Unfortunately 600 is to wet to burn decently.The taste upon lighting is mild and pleseant but the goop generated after a few puffs reminds me of the Texas marshes,sticky,almost quicksand like as I sank.At this point the bowl needs to be relit dont worry about burning the house down #600 will not stay lit long enough.Tounge bite would be nice but Hades on the tounge is a better description trying to stay lit.
Set aside hoping over time and little drying this blend will become another McClelland homerun.Until then moving on to some other great blends.
Set aside hoping over time and little drying this blend will become another McClelland homerun.Until then moving on to some other great blends.