Lane Limited HS-3
(2.25)
Aroma, one of the most important aspects of any smoking tobacco, is the paramount consideration in this blend Dark and light Cavendish tobaccos.
Details
Brand | Lane Limited |
Blended By | Lane Limited |
Manufactured By | |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Cavendish |
Flavoring | Other / Misc |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | Bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Very Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Very Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.25 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 07, 2015 | Very Mild | Very Mild | Mild | Very Pleasant |
This light and darker grassy, lightly tart and tangy citrusy, sugary Virginia cavendish blend has light vanilla and honey toppings. Gets weaker toward the finish, and isn't strong to begin with. Has very little nicotine and strength. The taste is mild. Won't bite, or get harsh. Has no rough moments. Burns cool and clean at a reasonable pace with a very consistent sweet flavor, and a weak, pleasant after taste, and room note. Leaves little moisture in the bowl, and requires an average number of relights. An all day smoke.
-JimInks
-JimInks
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2017 | Very Mild | Very Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Lane Limited - HS-3.
My blend appears to be made almost entirely of brown Cavendish, it only includes a very small amount of black flecks. The aroma from the pouch is delicately aromatic, but it's hard to pigeon hole what exactly the additives are. Chocolate and nuts maybe? The ribbons are just below medium in size, and the hydration's very good.
The smoke's quite nice from HS-3, but I find the same problem with identifying the aromatics as I did in the aroma. Again, it tastes of something sweet, and maybe a few nuts. The tobaccos give me a cleaner Cavendish taste, as opposed to the heavy, sticky, vanilla type one I'd expect to get from a regular Cavendish blend. A bowl of HS-3 burns well, but it can give me a small bite, if I puff with force.
The room-note's pleasant, and the nic's mild.
HS-3? To me, it's only a 'two star, alright' blend. A bit boring.
Somewhat recommended.
My blend appears to be made almost entirely of brown Cavendish, it only includes a very small amount of black flecks. The aroma from the pouch is delicately aromatic, but it's hard to pigeon hole what exactly the additives are. Chocolate and nuts maybe? The ribbons are just below medium in size, and the hydration's very good.
The smoke's quite nice from HS-3, but I find the same problem with identifying the aromatics as I did in the aroma. Again, it tastes of something sweet, and maybe a few nuts. The tobaccos give me a cleaner Cavendish taste, as opposed to the heavy, sticky, vanilla type one I'd expect to get from a regular Cavendish blend. A bowl of HS-3 burns well, but it can give me a small bite, if I puff with force.
The room-note's pleasant, and the nic's mild.
HS-3? To me, it's only a 'two star, alright' blend. A bit boring.
Somewhat recommended.
Pipe Used:
Altinok Lee Van Cleef Meer' (Friday pipe)
PurchasedFrom:
4noggins
Age When Smoked:
One month
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 02, 2013 | Mild | Mild | Overwhelming | Very Pleasant |
Lane Limited Bulk No. HS-3
Star Rating = 2
Rating Scores - 10 is the Best and 0 is the Worst
Pouch Note = 8
Room Note = 7
Flavor = 6
Bite = 6
Burn = 6
After Taste = 5
Raw Score = 38
Rated Percentage = 63%
Comment = Fruity, a little Hot at the end, has an Fruity After Taste
Star Rating = 2
Rating Scores - 10 is the Best and 0 is the Worst
Pouch Note = 8
Room Note = 7
Flavor = 6
Bite = 6
Burn = 6
After Taste = 5
Raw Score = 38
Rated Percentage = 63%
Comment = Fruity, a little Hot at the end, has an Fruity After Taste
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2012 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Bought this to try and also to mix with some other tobacco that I had. In the bag, I can't detect much aroma at all, and once lit, it's really mild. Room note is OK, but nothing to get to excited about. I have mixed it with Lane TK-6 and together I get sort of a chocolate-cherry aroma in the pouch. Once lit, room note is very slight, but certainly would not offend anyone. Just really not enough flavor. Not topping, not tobacco, not......, but that's just my taste. Can't get any bite, so this might be a good place to start for a new pipe smoker.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 08, 2012 | Mild | Very Mild | Very Mild | Very Pleasant |
I received an ounce of this as part of a blind test (which I failed) a month or so ago and finally got around to finishing it. Mostly a lightly creamed coffee color with some streaks of black in it. Excellent pouch aroma, if you like the aroma of non-tobacco ingredients in tobacco... which i do.
Not much to say about this one. The description above is very accurate, as this one has very faint flavor and tons of room note. I get hazelnut from this one, but I won't swear to that, as I'm terrible at placing non-tobacco tastes in a blend. But the flavor is very subdued. As a result, this one screams to be a mixer, so I picked up another few oz from a local tobacconist (who was loathe to tell me his house blend was really this!). Using my favorite blending tobacco that's not named perique, C&D's Kelly's Coin, yielded... Kelly's Coin that can be smoked around others. Which was the point. The KC completed obliterated any flavor this HS-3 had, even when only 10% KC was added. I experimented further with this but the results were either not so good or pointless... which is how I'd lean towards describing this blend. 1.75 stars. Try it if you like very, very mild taste with an incredibly luscious but not overpowering room note.
Not much to say about this one. The description above is very accurate, as this one has very faint flavor and tons of room note. I get hazelnut from this one, but I won't swear to that, as I'm terrible at placing non-tobacco tastes in a blend. But the flavor is very subdued. As a result, this one screams to be a mixer, so I picked up another few oz from a local tobacconist (who was loathe to tell me his house blend was really this!). Using my favorite blending tobacco that's not named perique, C&D's Kelly's Coin, yielded... Kelly's Coin that can be smoked around others. Which was the point. The KC completed obliterated any flavor this HS-3 had, even when only 10% KC was added. I experimented further with this but the results were either not so good or pointless... which is how I'd lean towards describing this blend. 1.75 stars. Try it if you like very, very mild taste with an incredibly luscious but not overpowering room note.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Medium | Pleasant |
HS-3... Sold as a bulk blend, that is made up of long thin strands of tobacco, mostly brown in color, with only traces of the black Cavendish said to be in this blend. Its aroma is typical of other Lane tobaccos.
As for the taste of HS-3, there is plenty, but is unlike any other Lane tobacco I've tried, it has some sharpness to it, that I kind of enjoy, but this sharpness will ghost a pipe in short order. So I would suggest you use a dedicated pipe for this blend, because IMO HS-3's unique flavor does not mix well with many other tobaccos.
Personally I found zero tongue bite, and considering its fine cut, HS-3 gave me a surprisingly long and cool smoke. Judging by the few reviews HS-3 has on this site, many ARO smokers out there have for some reason passed on this one. This stuff is not my favorite, but I smoke ARO's only as a change of pace, but for those that prefer ARO's, IMO this tobacco is worth a try.
As for the taste of HS-3, there is plenty, but is unlike any other Lane tobacco I've tried, it has some sharpness to it, that I kind of enjoy, but this sharpness will ghost a pipe in short order. So I would suggest you use a dedicated pipe for this blend, because IMO HS-3's unique flavor does not mix well with many other tobaccos.
Personally I found zero tongue bite, and considering its fine cut, HS-3 gave me a surprisingly long and cool smoke. Judging by the few reviews HS-3 has on this site, many ARO smokers out there have for some reason passed on this one. This stuff is not my favorite, but I smoke ARO's only as a change of pace, but for those that prefer ARO's, IMO this tobacco is worth a try.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 05, 2006 | Mild | Mild | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
I smelled a slight vinegar tone when I opened the pouch, once lit it made the room smell of vanilla. The flavor I got was of a plain nutty Burley. I will come back to this from time to time.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 02, 2008 | Mild | Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Plain ol' sweetend golden sliced Cavendish. On it's own, it's a flat, boring, one dimesional aromatic. However, as a blending component it shines. Throw together of 50/50 mix of HS-3 and McClelland VBC and your have one tasty butterscotch flavored aromatic. It also mixes well in other more complex aromatic recipes.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | Mild | Very Mild | Mild | Tolerable |
this tobacco was a bit of a disappointment to me. I was really hoping for more of a sweet smoke which this isn't. It has a little musky taste and aroma which I can find elsewhere. It is smooth smoking but not one I would want to make my wife endure very often.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2005 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
Compared to other vanilla aromatics I have smoked (Danish Black Vanilla - yuck!), this is honestly not too bad. My local tobacconist sells it under the name of Brookwood. It starts off very mild, almost flat, then builds in fullness and body throughout the bowl. You can't really taste the vanilla flavour except towards the last quarter of a bowl. That's a bit disappointing since, if I'm going to smoke an aromatic, I'd at least like one that tastes like it's supposed to.
The room note on this is pretty nice. Its a nice change of pace, but I won't make it a regular smoke.
The room note on this is pretty nice. Its a nice change of pace, but I won't make it a regular smoke.