Sutliff Tobacco Company St. George's Blend
(2.80)
Black Cavendish and Rich Virginias with the sweetness of Black Cherry.
Notes: Today's pipe smoker is like a paladin of olde. Who better to fight for a noble cause? Enjoy all that is good by smoking this exceptional mixture of Black Cavendish, Rich Virginia and Sweet Black Cherry.
Details
Brand | Sutliff Tobacco Company |
Series | Sutliff Private Stock |
Blended By | Carl McCallister |
Manufactured By | Sutliff Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Cherry |
Cut | Coarse Cut |
Packaging | 1.5 oz tin |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild to Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Very Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.80 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 08, 2013 | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Medium | Very Pleasant |
A mild black cherry blend, milder than I expected after smelling a freshly opened tin, which, if you are a cherry fan, will prove pleasing to your senses. Even though it's mildly moist fresh out of the tin, it burns at a reasonable pace, smooth, cool and clean with a very consistent flavor. The grassy Virginia mostly acts as a cooling base for the black cavendish, the latter adding a little vanilla note and plum hit. Requires few relights, and leaves little moisture in the bowl. Won't bite, and has no dull or weak spots. The nic-hit is mild. The after taste pleasantly lingers. An all day smoke.
-JimInks
-JimInks
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Medium | Pleasant |
This is a pleasant aromatic that does not overwhealm. The black cherry is nicely done, and while there is not a lot of tobacco flavor, it is mild and burns cool. There was a slight chemical aroma initially when lit, but that went away quickly. The flavor was good and the room note was pleasing. It became a little more mellow as the bowl progressed, but was a fairly consistent black cavendish w/ black cherry topping for me.
For my own taste buds, this is a a 2+. Judged strictly as an aromatic, it is a solid 3. If you are a fan of this genre, give it a try.
For my own taste buds, this is a a 2+. Judged strictly as an aromatic, it is a solid 3. If you are a fan of this genre, give it a try.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2020 | Very Mild | None Detected | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Don't make the mistake I made when opening a tin of Sutliff St. George's Blend. I filled my head with images and remembrances of the most familiar cherry blend in pipedom; namely, Cherry Blend by Middleton. Wrong; St. George's Blend is a whole different animal. Dark, pungent, and noticeably damp to the touch; this is the opposite of my remembrance of Cherry Blend by Middleton. Opening the pull top was a neutral experience with no off-gas pressure release. The color was in a very narrow range from dark brown to black and looked somewhat wet. Then there was the aroma. Not a hint of cherry, black or otherwise, anywhere. When I took a good snort from the tin, all I got was ethyl alcohol. This aroma subsided steadily in my sample smoke as it aired out and this also happened to the contents in the tin as it sat around. I have observed over the years that aromatic blends mature the least successfully of all pipe blends; losing their fragrances over the years. That is what happened here. So, what do we have? A very mild aromatic of, now, unknown fragrance that never bites and smokes super smoothly. I found it weak; too weak to be of much enjoyment and rather a nowhere smoke. I decided I had nothing to lose and began to insert it into micro blends where it was, surprisingly, positive. It's blending properties are far superior to it's smoking properties and I recommend it at three stars.
Pipe Used:
Michael Parks large 3/4 bent billiard
PurchasedFrom:
an Ebay seller
Age When Smoked:
unknown, but about ten years old
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 09, 2013 | Very Mild | Medium | Mild | Very Pleasant |
This a great aromatic with medium black cherry flavoring and I can smell chocolate in the mix as the opened canister mellowed. While I like hand mixed stuff from my local Tobacconist this would be my go to commercial tobacco. I find it lights, stays lit, and tastes better than other commercial cherry's like Captain Black (and black cherry as opposed to cherry is itself hard to find). It's room note is fantastic and my wife absolutely loves it.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Medium | Very Pleasant |
Purchased on a whim. Disclaimer - I'm a VaPer, English blend, and straight-up burley man. The only cherry infused tobacco I ever smoke is Middleton's Cherry Blend for nostalgia and the primo room note alone, but any tobacco named for a professional dragon slayer is worth a ride. Tin note decidedly cherry and not the cloying medicinal type that usually greets me. Something biochemically off-putting on the charring light gave pause. This disappeared on the second run about an hour later. Burn acceptable needing only a couple relights at a slow cadence. Minimal dottle. At this, I emptied the tin onto a plate for a three-day drying session and the chemical problem was solved. It was then a well-behaved aro with a noticable cherry/chocolate vibe, though happily not overstated. Vitamin N nothing to write home about yet not AWOL either. No bite on a puffing trial. It didn't float my boat but I wouldn't turn down a bowl either. For you aro fans and especially cherry blend lovers, this quality weed is certainly worth a spin.
Pipe Used:
Falcon with apple bowl
PurchasedFrom:
National Cigar, Waterloo, Iowa
Age When Smoked:
new
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 02, 2015 | Mild | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Very Pleasant |
On a bet, I tried a bowl of St. George's Blend. Why 'on a bet'? Because I believe that Cherry Blends have turned many potential pipe smokers away from the pipe because many Cherry Blends smoke hot, foul and goopy.
This is the only Cherry Blend I've smoked that tasted like Cherry and didn't bite at all. Most importantly, there's a little oomph in the virginia tobaccos that give it some depth of flavor.
Would I smoke this again? Absolutely. Not bad at all in a yard pipe.
This is the only Cherry Blend I've smoked that tasted like Cherry and didn't bite at all. Most importantly, there's a little oomph in the virginia tobaccos that give it some depth of flavor.
Would I smoke this again? Absolutely. Not bad at all in a yard pipe.
Pipe Used:
Yard Pipe
PurchasedFrom:
Unknown
Age When Smoked:
Unknown