Davidoff Mild Mixture
(2.00)
A mild, lightly sweet blend of choice Virginia leaf. A satisfying, refreshing blend for the all day smoker.
Details
Brand | Davidoff |
Blended By | Orlik Tobacco Company |
Manufactured By | Orlik Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Caramel, Vanilla |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | Denmark |
Production |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.00 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 19 of 19 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 02, 2009 | Medium to Strong | Strong | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
definitely not my kind of tobacco,it says mild on the tin but think its far from beign mild...and it gets dry soo quickly in the tin after opening
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 02, 2009 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
After having gone through all the Davidoff Brands, this indeed a great smoke. The room note is well tolerated, the blend feels typically Danish with a hint of vanilla and a after note of cinnamon. Its a great tin to have in ones arsenal, and have never regretted purchasing it, even though all Davidoff Brands are priced higher than their competitors. Incidentally, in our neck of the woods its known as the 'Red Mixture' - but then again whats in a name.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2007 | Mild | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant |
Not my kind of stuff, but still an interesting aromatic. On the same line that Danish Black Vanilla, but relying more on the Black Cavendish and less in the vanilla flavoring. A must try for those who love Planta's offering (and believe me, I know a couple). For the rest, just another decent aromatic worth sampling.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 04, 2007 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
Please see my review of Davidoff Light Mixture. It is much the same, but the Mild Mixture has a slightly more flavorful taste, although this is still a pretty light blend. The tin aroma is still fruity, but this time some depth is added by what seems to be vanilla flavoring. When lit, it burns dry for me and leaves me looking for a glass of water afterwards.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
A very pleasant, light Danish-type aromatic. Easy to miss subtle aromas (vanilla and a fruitiness) and taste hints of a 'something else' I can't categorize. After the first couple of puffs, I tasted something akin to stale beer (!), but that (thankfully) disappeared. My sample lit easily, burned steadily and did not bite. A nice blend of Virginias with a light, fragrant aroma and taste that was consistent for the entire bowl. My sample did not seem to have the level of moisture or sweetness reported by other reviewers. However, if you are not into any type of aromatic, the room note might put you off (although, in my experience, women liked the aroma).
This is one of those 'love it or hate it' mixtures. IMHO, this tobacco is worth a try IF you are looking for a mild aromatic.
This is one of those 'love it or hate it' mixtures. IMHO, this tobacco is worth a try IF you are looking for a mild aromatic.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 07, 2006 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Unnoticeable |
ok, I have smoked only two bowls of this stuff. One was three years ago, and one was yesterday. What can I say, time does not heal all wounds.
Ok, but that's not a very fair review. The second bowl, which was smoked with my Great Father in mind, who smokes mostly tinderbox aros and Rattrays english. . . .. .. .well, ok gotta say is, it sort of had me. I had several tounge dancers, and they were momentary, but they were there. We'll wait and see what Daddy thinks, shan't we? more soon. Please don't expect much from this tobacco. There is a good base but far too much flavoring.
Ok, but that's not a very fair review. The second bowl, which was smoked with my Great Father in mind, who smokes mostly tinderbox aros and Rattrays english. . . .. .. .well, ok gotta say is, it sort of had me. I had several tounge dancers, and they were momentary, but they were there. We'll wait and see what Daddy thinks, shan't we? more soon. Please don't expect much from this tobacco. There is a good base but far too much flavoring.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2005 | Mild to Medium | Medium to Strong | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Oh, come on, this tobacco is not as bad as some are saying! I received a tin as a gift from my in-laws, and decided to smoke it even if I don't usually care for aromatics. This one is very typical in its genre, not worse than many others... and at times also decent.
It's a very sweet vanilla-something else flavored blend (with lots of black cavendish), but it's not goopy or sticky. If you smoke extremely slow, it remains moderately sweet and tasty to the very end: of course, if you puff it fast it will become very empty tasting, even a bit sour, and terribly wet. But this is normal: with lots of self-constraint in your smoking pace, this is actually better than other aromatics I have tried.
Of course it is quite boring and monodimensional, and there is little to no tobacco taste... but at least it doesn't bite.
I would never buy a tin, and I wish my in-laws had found something more to my taste... but it was not a bad experience.
It's a very sweet vanilla-something else flavored blend (with lots of black cavendish), but it's not goopy or sticky. If you smoke extremely slow, it remains moderately sweet and tasty to the very end: of course, if you puff it fast it will become very empty tasting, even a bit sour, and terribly wet. But this is normal: with lots of self-constraint in your smoking pace, this is actually better than other aromatics I have tried.
Of course it is quite boring and monodimensional, and there is little to no tobacco taste... but at least it doesn't bite.
I would never buy a tin, and I wish my in-laws had found something more to my taste... but it was not a bad experience.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2004 | Mild to Medium | Extra Strong | Mild | Strong |
Being 40% more expensive of usual tobacco, I don't think I will buy this one. It is rich aromotic blend. It is aslo a very ambitiuos blend. It tried to mimic coffee with a bit of chocolate, oh yes, mocha it is call, with a lot of fruit flavored cream topping. If the above combination interests your taste buds then this unique blend is perfect for you. It is easy to light and keep lite. Great for weekend social smokers. they will certianly be the center of attention when the super flavor room note hit people noses.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 09, 2003 | Extremely Mild | Extremely Mild | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Very Pleasant |
I just flat out did not like this tobacco at all. Sort of like the song goes, No Filter, No Flavor, just the cotton pickin paper.