Peter Stokkebye Golden Dansk (No.48)
(2.31)
A fermented Black Cavendish blended with ripe Virginias and a small amount of selected Burley. The Black Cavendish adds sweet fruit and caramel aroma.
Notes: This blend uses some 14 different flavorings to achieve the final product. This is a mild gold and black blend with an aroma everyone will love.
Details
| Brand | Peter Stokkebye |
| Blended By | |
| Manufactured By | |
| Blend Type | Aromatic |
| Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Virginia |
| Flavoring | Caramel, Fruit / Citrus, Other / Misc |
| Cut | Ribbon |
| Packaging | Bulk |
| Country | Denmark |
| Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
|
2.31 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 13 of 13 Reviews
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Feb 03, 2012 | Very Mild | Very Mild | Mild | Very Pleasant |
I bought an ounce of this from a bulk dealer. The bag aroma was appealing. The tobacco was as moist as any I can recall.
What I found with this was that I had to give the bowl time to develop after lighting. The first quarter-bowl or so had almost no taste at all. After that, it more of the flavors came through. No real surprises - generally sweet and fruity with the Virginia becoming a little more pronounced mid-way through.
I was pleasantly surprised on two counts: that the tobacco stayed lit despite the bag moisture, and that it didn't bite despite its sweetness.
As for the rating, this is the kind of tobacco that makes me wish this site used a five-star rating instead of four. If it did, I'd give it three. It's like a lot of blends, particularly aromatics; there's nothing really wrong with it - it's a decent little blend - but I can't find a reason to recommend this ahead of any number of others. That said, if you can find it cheap, that might qualify.
What I found with this was that I had to give the bowl time to develop after lighting. The first quarter-bowl or so had almost no taste at all. After that, it more of the flavors came through. No real surprises - generally sweet and fruity with the Virginia becoming a little more pronounced mid-way through.
I was pleasantly surprised on two counts: that the tobacco stayed lit despite the bag moisture, and that it didn't bite despite its sweetness.
As for the rating, this is the kind of tobacco that makes me wish this site used a five-star rating instead of four. If it did, I'd give it three. It's like a lot of blends, particularly aromatics; there's nothing really wrong with it - it's a decent little blend - but I can't find a reason to recommend this ahead of any number of others. That said, if you can find it cheap, that might qualify.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jun 28, 2011 | Mild | Very Strong | Medium | Pleasant |
I picked up two pouches from a local discount tobacco shop for $0.99 a piece. I suspected it might have been a pricing gun error and they should have been marked $x.99 where "x" is between 7 and 9. Taxes alone here should make a 99-cent pouch impossible.
Nope. It's a $.99 blend.
Ok, it's not horrid, but it's close. Thick, thick, thick flavorings with a hint of burning plastic. The smoke is almost black in color, and for some reason gives me a heck of a stomach ache (and I'm no tobacco lightweight). The thing is - it could be a richly flavored, tasty tobacco, if it wasn't so heavily cased with cheap flavoring. I think.
Nope. It's a $.99 blend.
Ok, it's not horrid, but it's close. Thick, thick, thick flavorings with a hint of burning plastic. The smoke is almost black in color, and for some reason gives me a heck of a stomach ache (and I'm no tobacco lightweight). The thing is - it could be a richly flavored, tasty tobacco, if it wasn't so heavily cased with cheap flavoring. I think.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jan 23, 2011 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Mild | Pleasant |
This is a tasty mild blend much like Lanes 1Q, with a bit less strength, the same sweet flavor, and a bit less tang. It is dryer than 1Q, and fluffy in the bag.
A ribbon cut black and tan mixture, at the perfect moisture level, lit easily and burned with billows of smooth white smoke. If you like 1Q give this a try.
A ribbon cut black and tan mixture, at the perfect moisture level, lit easily and burned with billows of smooth white smoke. If you like 1Q give this a try.
target="_blank"
