B&B Tobacconists, llc Beck's Ol' Limey Bastard
(3.49)
A blend of several Virginias, latakia, and a bit of cavendish. Reminiscent of 965 of old.
Notes: The description from 4noggins: Dunhill MM965? This fine hand blended pipe tobacco has been approved by the members of the Pipe Club of London. If you believe the late Bill Ashton-Taylor, at a meeting of the Pipe Club of London, who exclaimed, "That's it!", you no longer need to look about. It's as rich as MM965 but all who smoke it say it's so much smoother. You can taste Virginias and latakia equally. No sharpness to it. Just light 'er up and enjoy the sunset with a bowl of this exceptional English blend.
Details
Brand | B&B Tobacconists, llc |
Blended By | Randy Beck/David Barnes |
Manufactured By | |
Blend Type | Virginia/Latakia |
Contents | Cavendish, Latakia, Virginia |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | Bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
3.49 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2014 | Medium | Extremely Mild | Medium | Tolerable |
When I smoked it, I wasn't aware it was supposed to more or less be like Dunhill 956, but I noticed some similarity. It doesn't have the tanginess of 956 and has less black cavendish, but it's smooth and the Cyprian latakia is richly smoky and woody sweet. The Virginia is smooth with a fruity sweetness and a little earthiness. The nic-hit is mild. No bite or harshness. Burns at a regular pace, cool and clean with a bit of smoothness, and a consistent flavor. Requires few relights and leaves little moisture in the bowl. While the latakia is the star flavor, and it's a good nearly all day smoke if you're used to English blends, it doesn't have enough complexity to stand out from the burgeoning crowd of English mixtures. Deserves two and a half stars, but not the quite three I gave to 956, so I reluctantly settled for two stars.
-JimInks
-JimInks
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 09, 2017 | Medium | Very Mild | Medium | Tolerable to Strong |
B&B Tobacconists - Beck's Ol' Limey Bastard.
The blend's presented as well rubbed ribbons, has a great moistness, appears to be an equal dissemination of black and brown tobaccos, with nothing untoward about the aroma.
It lights easily and I enjoy the smoke for the first few puffs: a touch of Lat'-smokiness, some clean Virginia traits, and a tiny amount of Cavendish. I even note a mild toastiness, it's quite a savoury smoke. But then, I begin to get a strange sort of bitterness coming through. I'm guessing this is subjective as no flavourings are listed; either way, it doesn't suit me. Assuming it's just a personal issue, I'll return to the more pragmatic things! It burns well, and doesn't get warm unless I really stress my pipe; and then it's just 'warm', not hot. It's a medium weight smoke, and doesn't bite me, at any point.
I don't like the room-note, and the nicotine's about medium.
I'll give this the benefit of the doubt and put the bitterness down to my palate. That said, two stars not one.
Somewhat recommended.
The blend's presented as well rubbed ribbons, has a great moistness, appears to be an equal dissemination of black and brown tobaccos, with nothing untoward about the aroma.
It lights easily and I enjoy the smoke for the first few puffs: a touch of Lat'-smokiness, some clean Virginia traits, and a tiny amount of Cavendish. I even note a mild toastiness, it's quite a savoury smoke. But then, I begin to get a strange sort of bitterness coming through. I'm guessing this is subjective as no flavourings are listed; either way, it doesn't suit me. Assuming it's just a personal issue, I'll return to the more pragmatic things! It burns well, and doesn't get warm unless I really stress my pipe; and then it's just 'warm', not hot. It's a medium weight smoke, and doesn't bite me, at any point.
I don't like the room-note, and the nicotine's about medium.
I'll give this the benefit of the doubt and put the bitterness down to my palate. That said, two stars not one.
Somewhat recommended.
Pipe Used:
Brebbia Fat Bob
PurchasedFrom:
4noggins
Age When Smoked:
Six weeks
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2018 | Mild | Mild | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I bought this Bulk from 4Noggins about 6 months ago, the price was right. Upon reading many of the other reviews , there seems to be a consensus that this is a match for Dunhill's 965. I've never been a fan of D's 965, find it harsh, this is smooth and mild. Do I really like it enough to buy again ? No, it's got a top note of mild Vanilla , that's not for me. I think it reminds me of one of the "Frogs" . I really think many would like this if you're looking for a mild English.
Pipe Used:
Maple
PurchasedFrom:
4 noggins
Age When Smoked:
6 months
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 02, 2023 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Medium | Tolerable |
What we have here is an attempt at not too light, not too heavy, meet in the middle blend that will satisfy, if not wow, most smokers. Unfortunately there are some negatives which turn the balance away from a potential three star MOR recommendation to a more tepid and cautionary two star “somewhat recommended” status.
First, the positives: Has a fairly pleasing sampling of nutty flavors (black walnut, roasted chestnut, pine nut, sunflower seed) and subtle suggestion of gingerbread. Latakia is not overbearing or sooty. Now for the negatives: Soapy flavor upon first light, an acrid bitter note of walnut shell with the slightest elevation of heat stress, and here and there an occasional bitter Bay Leaf herbal flavor. Meerschaums tended to emphasize the bitter herbal notes and grassy chlorophyll, a 9mm filtered briar tended to soften and mute the overall negative tastes. My favorite four-star blends don’t have any soapy Propyl during lights, my favorites are not so temperamental about puffing cadence, and my favorites don’t have unpleasant episodes of bitterness which detract from the overall enjoyment. So there's no way this gets four stars from me.
It’s been decades since I last had the original Dunhill 965, and I do recognize the positive attributes here that others have mentioned, but certainly don’t recall the negatives I’ve described here. I also wonder about the bitter herbal note and what the cause could be. My batch is from May 2021, and my best guess is a rogue batch of bright Virginias that escaped proper pH treatment. If that’s the case, then once that supply is used up subsequent batches may be better, and this could also explain why some older 4-star reviews from smokers I tend to trust may be essentially reviews of a product different than the one I got. Hard to say.
I did my usual due diligence in comparing this with six others of its genre, meaning non-Lat-bomb blends, but allowing for Turkish varietals. In that class, which did not include unobtanium favorites like Germain Eighteen-Twenty, Arango Balkan Supreme came in first, Bastard came in last. So that helps me know how this fits into the overall hierarchy of which blends I want to spend time with. But the only way that can help you is if you are fairly certain that our tasting chemistry is similar. So I’ll simply suggest that if you’ve tried Arango Balkan Supreme and like it, then out tastes may be fairly similar. If you tried it and didn’t like it, then you can probably disregard anything I have to say about English/ Balkan blends. But also keep in mind that if you have an older batch than mine that you like, we may not be talking about the same thing.
First, the positives: Has a fairly pleasing sampling of nutty flavors (black walnut, roasted chestnut, pine nut, sunflower seed) and subtle suggestion of gingerbread. Latakia is not overbearing or sooty. Now for the negatives: Soapy flavor upon first light, an acrid bitter note of walnut shell with the slightest elevation of heat stress, and here and there an occasional bitter Bay Leaf herbal flavor. Meerschaums tended to emphasize the bitter herbal notes and grassy chlorophyll, a 9mm filtered briar tended to soften and mute the overall negative tastes. My favorite four-star blends don’t have any soapy Propyl during lights, my favorites are not so temperamental about puffing cadence, and my favorites don’t have unpleasant episodes of bitterness which detract from the overall enjoyment. So there's no way this gets four stars from me.
It’s been decades since I last had the original Dunhill 965, and I do recognize the positive attributes here that others have mentioned, but certainly don’t recall the negatives I’ve described here. I also wonder about the bitter herbal note and what the cause could be. My batch is from May 2021, and my best guess is a rogue batch of bright Virginias that escaped proper pH treatment. If that’s the case, then once that supply is used up subsequent batches may be better, and this could also explain why some older 4-star reviews from smokers I tend to trust may be essentially reviews of a product different than the one I got. Hard to say.
I did my usual due diligence in comparing this with six others of its genre, meaning non-Lat-bomb blends, but allowing for Turkish varietals. In that class, which did not include unobtanium favorites like Germain Eighteen-Twenty, Arango Balkan Supreme came in first, Bastard came in last. So that helps me know how this fits into the overall hierarchy of which blends I want to spend time with. But the only way that can help you is if you are fairly certain that our tasting chemistry is similar. So I’ll simply suggest that if you’ve tried Arango Balkan Supreme and like it, then out tastes may be fairly similar. If you tried it and didn’t like it, then you can probably disregard anything I have to say about English/ Balkan blends. But also keep in mind that if you have an older batch than mine that you like, we may not be talking about the same thing.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 02, 2011 | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Very Mild | Unnoticeable |
This is a very mild english with a very mild taste. I would say that it would be a good choice for someone who is just starting to explore the english blends.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 03, 2009 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
My initial smokes with this were a solid 2 stars, but I've had a couple recently that were better.
Good overall English tobacco. I don't consider it anything special, but the elements are pretty harmonious.
My earlier smokes had some problems with tongue bite, and this blend tends to smoke wet for me, which is unusual for an English.
I prefer many other blends to this one including Squadron Leader and Westminster.
Good overall English tobacco. I don't consider it anything special, but the elements are pretty harmonious.
My earlier smokes had some problems with tongue bite, and this blend tends to smoke wet for me, which is unusual for an English.
I prefer many other blends to this one including Squadron Leader and Westminster.