McClelland TGL - Toasted Cavendish Latakia
(2.75)
Toasted cavendish, burley and golden Virginia seasoned with just enough Cyprian latakia to produce a cool-smoking, sweet, full-bodied, slow-burning tobacco.
Details
Brand | McClelland |
Blended By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Manufactured By | McClelland Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Cavendish Based |
Contents | Burley, Cavendish, Latakia, Virginia |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | Bulk |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2009 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Medium | Unnoticeable |
McClelland's "Toasted and Smoked," a non-aromatic bulk blend, features a dark, musty Cavendish with a vaguely tart, leathery, and somewhat bitter flavor that I enjoy with a cup of black coffee. The smoky Latakia, though prominent, serves as a foil for the Cavendish. As the tin description states, it is a cool-smoking, full-bodied, slow-burning tobacco. I didn't find it to be especially sweet. The Burley and Virginia components don't stand out, but I suppose that's as it should be: everything working together toward a unified taste.
Latakia fans will probably think the Cavendish dominates; and Cavendish fans will think the opposite. For me, the Latakia becomes a bit tiring, but it does work with the Cavendish nicely. As described, this is a slow-burning tobacco -- a good choice for drivers on long trips. Besides, the taste is full and pleasant -- just right for preoccupied smokers: uncomplicated, straightforward if somewhat smoky, and not distracting in any respect. This is a quality smoke, but it is fairly unremarkable among existing Cavendish blends. I get the impression it was developed to fill a niche in the McClelland universe.
In sum: non-aromatic; no issues with packing, burning, or bite; smokes cool and dry; good smoke volume; fair nicotine hit; long burning; finish is dark, musty, smoky, slightly saline and it persists long after the smoke has ended.
Latakia fans will probably think the Cavendish dominates; and Cavendish fans will think the opposite. For me, the Latakia becomes a bit tiring, but it does work with the Cavendish nicely. As described, this is a slow-burning tobacco -- a good choice for drivers on long trips. Besides, the taste is full and pleasant -- just right for preoccupied smokers: uncomplicated, straightforward if somewhat smoky, and not distracting in any respect. This is a quality smoke, but it is fairly unremarkable among existing Cavendish blends. I get the impression it was developed to fill a niche in the McClelland universe.
In sum: non-aromatic; no issues with packing, burning, or bite; smokes cool and dry; good smoke volume; fair nicotine hit; long burning; finish is dark, musty, smoky, slightly saline and it persists long after the smoke has ended.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 03, 2017 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
This is the fourth of the McC Cavendish blends I took a punt on. This is probably the least objectionable of the bunch to me. If this isn't 2025 with Latakia replacing the Xanthi in that blend, then it must be something very close to it. The plum dominant Black Cav is far less prominent in TGL. Whether that is because the Lat counterbalances it or there is less of the Cav, or possibly a different McC Cav altogether, or any combination of the above, well I cannot say with any confidence.
The result here is workable and intelligible, at least to me. The previous 3 McC Cav blends were genre puzzles. But this one comes very close to being a Scottish blend. We're back in Kansas Toto.
Still not happy with the flavour profile of the Cav. But this one is at least smokeable.
The result here is workable and intelligible, at least to me. The previous 3 McC Cav blends were genre puzzles. But this one comes very close to being a Scottish blend. We're back in Kansas Toto.
Still not happy with the flavour profile of the Cav. But this one is at least smokeable.