Samuel Gawith Celtic Talisman
(2.76)
Bright Virginias, burley and black cavendish with a dash of kirsch and vanilla gives Celtic its light and aromatic personality.
Details
Brand | Samuel Gawith |
Blended By | Samuel Gawith |
Manufactured By | Samuel Gawith |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Virginia |
Flavoring | Alcohol / Liquor, Cherry, Kirsch, Vanilla |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | United Kingdom |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.76 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 16 of 16 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2010 | Mild | Strong | Very Mild | Very Strong |
Upon opening the tin, the cherry scent is extremely strong. Besides being strong, the scent is also very chemical in my opinion.
This tobacco is somewhat wet when freshly opening the tin which makes it harder to pack. The amount of moist in it makes it hard to keep lit, requiring more relights than average.
The taste however is the opposite. Little to nothing of the overwhelming smell is left in the taste. Upon lighting this tobacco, without first smelling it, you wouldn't know it's a cherry aromatic.
Personally, this is the tobacco in my collection which I like the least. Due to my not liking it, I haven't smoked it very often, so my opinion might change later through the tin...
This tobacco is somewhat wet when freshly opening the tin which makes it harder to pack. The amount of moist in it makes it hard to keep lit, requiring more relights than average.
The taste however is the opposite. Little to nothing of the overwhelming smell is left in the taste. Upon lighting this tobacco, without first smelling it, you wouldn't know it's a cherry aromatic.
Personally, this is the tobacco in my collection which I like the least. Due to my not liking it, I haven't smoked it very often, so my opinion might change later through the tin...
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2022 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Medium | Strong |
I don't know if I got a bad tin of this stuff or what, I didn't get it from the store with the freshest stock, but I cannot recommend at this point. I may come back to edit this at some point if I try more, but until then this is the experience. It's a straight-forward blend of potpourri. I mean, when I first popped the tin, it smelled like the bowl of flakes in my grandmothers bathroom when I was a kid. It didn't seem dry or moist. It burned okay, but just had a musty dry bitter old quality and room-note. No berries or cherries and zero vanilla, just a taste of perfume. I threw it in a jar, left it for a year, came back to it, same thing. I gave it to my buddy who loves aromatics, particularly cherry and vanilla, to try with full disclosure. He smoked a bowl and just handed it back. It sat for another year and I opened it recently and it actually smelled a bit better, more plum and a very light vanilla wisp. I'll brave it for one more bowl at some point, maybe, and see. The room-note is particularly putrid and musty. Like I said not sure if it's just a bad tin, so take this review with a grain of salt, but if not then this is one of the worse tasting anything that I've smoked. I cannot recommend unless potpourri is your bag, in which case look no further.
Pipe Used:
Cob
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2021 | Mild | Medium | Medium | Pleasant |
I love a load of Gawith house blends, i am a mostly non-aro smoker, but really consider some of the Kendall aromatics as a class of their own, sublime and unsurpassed.
Not this one.
The taste was chemical, acrid, cloying, and simultaneously bitter for me. Really did not like it at all, couldn’t finish a bowl.
Not this one.
The taste was chemical, acrid, cloying, and simultaneously bitter for me. Really did not like it at all, couldn’t finish a bowl.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2010 | Mild | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant |
I agree with fruktflugan's review below word-for-word. I'll only supplement it with three adjectives of my own: hot, harsh & chemical.
Maybe we got a bad batch, because it's difficult to believe SG would intentionally release a disaster like this.
Maybe we got a bad batch, because it's difficult to believe SG would intentionally release a disaster like this.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2020 | Mild | Strong | Full | Tolerable |
Di buono ha solo il nome. Una vera fetecchia, un pasticcio di gusti nauseanti e stucchevoli. Mai più. Davvero pessimo...non saprei che altro aggiungere e mi stupisco che sia un SG.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 02, 2020 | Medium to Strong | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I personally did not like this tobacco. Wishy washy sweet Hodge podge mix of chemical flavours. Quite sour at the bottom. It put me off Samuel gawith for a long time but st James plug is a masterpiece. I am not experienced with aromatics. So it could well be a good one.i shall not be buying anymore however.the room note is like josticks I used to disguise my smoking as a boy.
Pipe Used:
Country gentleman corncob
PurchasedFrom:
Online
Age When Smoked:
New