Samuel Gawith X Blend Limited Edition
(1.78)
This very special blend of cavendish tobaccos and Orientals is limited to a run of just 500 tins. X blend has been in the making for some years, conceived, blended and tinned long before its release.
Details
| Brand | Samuel Gawith |
| Blended By | Samuel Gawith |
| Manufactured By | Samuel Gawith |
| Blend Type | Cavendish Based |
| Contents | Cavendish, Oriental/Turkish |
| Flavoring | |
| Cut | Coarse Cut |
| Packaging | 50 grams tin |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Overwhelming
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 Reviews
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 01, 2008 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Mild | Tolerable |
I too am disappointed with X Blend. I am a lover of orientals and I honestly thought that the combination of orientals and an aged cavendish sounded intriguing. I imagined the cavendish would add a bit of sweetness and a mellow aftertaste to balance some of the anticipated spiciness from the orientals. My tin, I should note, is number 290 of 500 produced and has been on my shelf unopened for about 2 years. I popped the tin just prior to a trip to PA and NY last week for Thanksgiving. I am currently half way through my first bowl and am terribly underwhelmed. I think the real mistake here may have been a too heavy percentage of the cavendish. This MAY be a salvageable blend if it was heavier on the orientals... I was really looking forward to trying this and now I'm sure I won't finish this tin. It's very mild tasting, not a hot-smoking blend at all, just sort of bland. I keep thinking of damp cardboard while I'm smoking it. Not a recommended sensation or blend. Sorry, Samuel Gawith, I tried to find some redeeming characteristic but it just escapes me.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Sep 27, 2018 | Mild | None Detected | Overwhelming | Very Strong |
Alright. Not a well thought of blend to be sure. I’ve had tin number 496/500 since July of 2007.
I opened it today. (9/26/18). I’m reviewing this off of two bowls in different pipes.
Tin aroma is decidedly feet. Sweaty feet l. I don’t get it but, it was first thing that popped in my head. Not pleasant at all.
Mild moisture, leaf color mostly black with some Browns here and yonder in a ribbon cut. No mold or anything on the product.
I shrugged and started packing, first light is strangely burnt hair? This has to be the strangest smoke I’ve ever experienced to be honest. However, puff dictates taste and flavor. No problem at all lighting. It went up like a car in a Michael Bay movie however did run into issues keeping it lit for the first 3rd.
Slowing down orientals came through big time, lots of oiliness, earth, and sour with the background note still being the burnt hair/faulty electrical wiring. I reckon that’s the cavendish. I really don’t know to be honest. However, if you more than gently sip this stuff turns harsh in a heartbeat. Back to the unpleasant side I mean. However slow sips and yes there’s something there. Not all good but I will endeavor to smoke more of this to find out. Who knows a few days of air time on a 12 year old tin may help.
Room note is terrible btw, and I prefer Latakia blends but this? No.
Won’t recommend it as they’ve never remade it and hard to believe out of 500 tins there’s only 7 reviews. Might have been a hint honestly and it’s a big part of why I didn’t open it, did try to use it as trade bait but I reckon folk were reading reviews here. Not much of a nibble.
Coming to terms that I only like SG flake tobaccos though, I’ve not had a ribbon they’ve made that I’ve ever really cared about and I’ve tried a few.
Though if you do find one? Give it a go, you only live once right?
I opened it today. (9/26/18). I’m reviewing this off of two bowls in different pipes.
Tin aroma is decidedly feet. Sweaty feet l. I don’t get it but, it was first thing that popped in my head. Not pleasant at all.
Mild moisture, leaf color mostly black with some Browns here and yonder in a ribbon cut. No mold or anything on the product.
I shrugged and started packing, first light is strangely burnt hair? This has to be the strangest smoke I’ve ever experienced to be honest. However, puff dictates taste and flavor. No problem at all lighting. It went up like a car in a Michael Bay movie however did run into issues keeping it lit for the first 3rd.
Slowing down orientals came through big time, lots of oiliness, earth, and sour with the background note still being the burnt hair/faulty electrical wiring. I reckon that’s the cavendish. I really don’t know to be honest. However, if you more than gently sip this stuff turns harsh in a heartbeat. Back to the unpleasant side I mean. However slow sips and yes there’s something there. Not all good but I will endeavor to smoke more of this to find out. Who knows a few days of air time on a 12 year old tin may help.
Room note is terrible btw, and I prefer Latakia blends but this? No.
Won’t recommend it as they’ve never remade it and hard to believe out of 500 tins there’s only 7 reviews. Might have been a hint honestly and it’s a big part of why I didn’t open it, did try to use it as trade bait but I reckon folk were reading reviews here. Not much of a nibble.
Coming to terms that I only like SG flake tobaccos though, I’ve not had a ribbon they’ve made that I’ve ever really cared about and I’ve tried a few.
Though if you do find one? Give it a go, you only live once right?
Age When Smoked:
12 years
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Dec 13, 2006 | Medium | None Detected | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
This tobacco to me was pretty disappointing, as until now I've had nothing but positive experiences with SG blends. It seems maybe the aging has not been kind to the cavendish here - either that or it was crummy to begin with. The predominant flavor here is kinda like the burned fatty gristle on the edge of cheap steak. I think SG shoulda cracked a tin open and sampled it before releasing this funky baccy on the pipesmoking public. Yikers...
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Sep 12, 2006 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Very Mild | Strong |
Unfortunately, I received a very generous sample of this in an exchange with a fellow pipe smoker. X Blend is, thankfully, a limited-edition release. I should have taken that as a sign.
I couldn't quite wrap my head around how an Oriental/Cavendish blend might be tasty in the least, and my skepticism was justified when I set all good reason and judgment aside to try X Blend. I suspect that Gawith had some tobaccos sitting around, perhaps from other experiments, and, for the sake of a good joke at the expense of those who snap up anything limited edition, tossed these bottom-shelf weeds together and tinned them. Slapping a Limited Edition label on the tins was a slick way to move this foul stuff.
Ever wanted to taste heat, smoldering plastic, charred pork, acid, and all things bitter, burned, and sour at the same time? Pack your pipe with X Blend. Want to get back at that son-of-a-bitch brother-in-law of yours who has all the $2000 high-end pipes? Encourage him to fill his best bowls with X Blend. He'll be using his fancy Danish briars as kindling to start the grill at the next family cookout.
I'd sooner use my favorite pipe as an instrument to assess my dog's stools via combustion than punish the briar with a bowl of X Blend. In fact, I feel sorry for the landfill that must accommodate the rest of the sample I discarded.
I couldn't quite wrap my head around how an Oriental/Cavendish blend might be tasty in the least, and my skepticism was justified when I set all good reason and judgment aside to try X Blend. I suspect that Gawith had some tobaccos sitting around, perhaps from other experiments, and, for the sake of a good joke at the expense of those who snap up anything limited edition, tossed these bottom-shelf weeds together and tinned them. Slapping a Limited Edition label on the tins was a slick way to move this foul stuff.
Ever wanted to taste heat, smoldering plastic, charred pork, acid, and all things bitter, burned, and sour at the same time? Pack your pipe with X Blend. Want to get back at that son-of-a-bitch brother-in-law of yours who has all the $2000 high-end pipes? Encourage him to fill his best bowls with X Blend. He'll be using his fancy Danish briars as kindling to start the grill at the next family cookout.
I'd sooner use my favorite pipe as an instrument to assess my dog's stools via combustion than punish the briar with a bowl of X Blend. In fact, I feel sorry for the landfill that must accommodate the rest of the sample I discarded.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jul 25, 2006 | Medium to Strong | None Detected | Overwhelming | Strong |
My first review here, so keep that in mind. I generally like SG blends. In fact, they're some of my favorites. So I was eager to try this limited edition leaf. It's now up for trade or gifting to someone who might like it, because I certainly don't. Harsh to the tongue, offensive to the nose, and generally lacking in any taste to recommend it. Unless you like the aroma of grilled beef in your tobacco, then this might be just the ticket for you. I'll give the benefit of the doubt to the idea that further aging might do the trick. But since it was tinned and aged before release, I don't hold out much hope.
target="_blank"
