pipesandcigars.com Scotty's Trout Stream
(3.42)
This is a mixture of golden cavendish slices mixed with a sweet black cavendish. Perfect for tying flies or stepping out of your tent on a cool misty morning.
Notes: PipesandCigars.com now lists this blend on its website as "Scotty's HPCS Trout Stream" as of Aug. 2015.
Details
| Brand | pipesandcigars.com |
| Blended By | Eric Nicolas |
| Manufactured By | Pipes & Cigars |
| Blend Type | Aromatic |
| Contents | Black Cavendish, Cavendish |
| Flavoring | Caramel, Other / Misc |
| Cut | Ribbon |
| Packaging | Bulk |
| Country | United States |
| Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild to Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Very Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
|
3.42 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 101 - 104 of 104 Reviews
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jan 27, 2015 | Mild | Mild | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant |
I almost feel a little guilty not saying I enjoyed this blend but, in the interest of others who rely on honest reviews to make decisions regarding what blends to buy, I'll give my honest assessment of TS.
In short, people who don't particularly enjoy aros will probably like TS.
I'm not sure if it was my doing but, TS burned a bit hot. It also tasted sour towards the bottom of the bowl. According to my pipe-critic girlfriend, the room note was "meh."
This was my first order with 4 Noggins and I could tell the quality is definitely there but, I'm afraid this blend just doesn't do it for me. I neither liked it or disliked it. It was just "there."
In short, people who don't particularly enjoy aros will probably like TS.
I'm not sure if it was my doing but, TS burned a bit hot. It also tasted sour towards the bottom of the bowl. According to my pipe-critic girlfriend, the room note was "meh."
This was my first order with 4 Noggins and I could tell the quality is definitely there but, I'm afraid this blend just doesn't do it for me. I neither liked it or disliked it. It was just "there."
Pipe Used:
1960's GBD Prehistoric Billiard
PurchasedFrom:
4 Noggins
Age When Smoked:
2014
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2014 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
I read great reviews about TS and was eager to smoke down a bowl. The smell was delightful when opening the bag. As one who enjoys a puff of aromatic smoke once in a while, I was disappointed with a bitter/sour note in TS that I find in many aromatic blends from local corner tobacco shops. My best experiences with aromatics have been high quality tins. A great example of a high quality aromatic, diametrically opposed to potpourri in a bag, would be Devil's Holiday.
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jul 26, 2008 | Very Mild | Mild to Medium | Very Mild | Very Pleasant |
I had high expectations on this one, because of the good reviews. But I was rather disappointed. The room note is terrific, but the taste is blend, almost non existing. Both strenght and taste way mild for me. 2 stars only because of the nice room note (pancakes).
| Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jan 20, 2007 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Medium | Very Pleasant |
It does smell like butterscotch in the bag and tastes sweet too. Did provide me with a bit of tongue bite, probably from all that sweetness. Not a bad tobacco, but I've had better Cavendish.
target="_blank"
