Sutliff Tobacco Company 1M

(2.46)
A blend of burley, Virginia and world famous Green River black cavendish, expertly blended for the utmost in taste then topped with a secret flavoring recipe to achieve outstanding flavor and aroma.

Details

Brand Sutliff Tobacco Company
Blended By Carl McAllister
Manufactured By Sutliff Tobacco Company
Blend Type Aromatic
Contents Black Cavendish, Burley, Virginia
Flavoring Other / Misc, Vanilla
Cut Ribbon
Packaging 2oz, 8oz, 1lb, 5lb
Country United States
Production Currently available

Profile

Strength
Mild
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming

Average Rating

2.46 / 4
3

10

9

4

Reviews

Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 26 Reviews
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Sep 18, 2010 Mild to Medium Medium Mild to Medium Very Pleasant
Fabulous tin note and room note; a true "crowd pleaser". Seems to stay lit easily, and produces lots of sweet tasting smoke and doesn't bite. Seems to remind me of good pastry or Grandma's pancakes, with a touch of raisin and vanilla. A very enjoyable aromatic, perfect for beginning pipe smokers, aromatic lovers, or a change of pace.
2 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Sep 21, 2020 Mild Mild Mild Very Pleasant
I am new to Pipe smoking, Coming from the cigar world mostly smoking Bold cigars I.e. Pedron, Olivia. This came in my Brigham Starter kit. So far between this and the Smoker Friendly whiskey aromatic (also made by sutliff apparently) I like this one substantially more.
Pipe Used: Capri Gozzo & Missouri Meerschaum
PurchasedFrom: www.pipesandcigars.com
Age When Smoked: I am assuming less than a year
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Dec 10, 2019 Mild Strong Mild Very Pleasant
As many others have compared this to Lane 1Q, I will do the same, and right up front say that I would prefer 1Q to this. Not that this is a bad blend. I am primarily an English smoker, but I do like Aromatics every now and then. And it scores brownie points with the Mrs. as well! This, like 1Q has an extremely pleasant room note. This is what most non-pipe smokers probably think is a traditional pipe tobacco smell. That is what I like about the blend. Here is what I do not. I don't care for the long ribbon cut. Its just a mess to load, especially into a smaller bowl. I like the cut of 1Q more, just seems more manageable. It seems to smoke a bit too wet for me, and I dont have the patience to mess around with trying to dry it out. Like I said, aromatics are just something I poke around with a bit. So, to summarize, as compared to the old standbys in the aro market, I would say this is better than BCA, but not as good as 1Q. I may try some blends moving forward to play around a bit with it and will update if I stumble upon anything earth shattering.
Pipe Used: medium billiard, pot
Age When Smoked: new
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Dec 03, 2017 Mild to Medium Medium Medium Pleasant to Tolerable
A long time ago I had the misfortune of smoking a Sutliff creation that had left me avoiding their stuff at all costs. Recently however, I decided to purchase a P&C deal that "battled" Lane's 1Q with Sutliff's vanilla counterpart. To be fair, I only wanted the 1Q half that I very much enjoy, but I suppose everyone gets a second chance.

The spirit of the deal was to compare the two blends, so let's open the bag and begin. The initial aroma is quite similar with both having a nice graham cracker or vanilla scent, 1Q is a bit stickier and sweet and 1-M has a slight cardboard smell that was present the last time I smoked their stuff. I did however prefer 1-M's ribbon cut, as it had more body and packed nicer (1Q is so thinly shredded it burns like powder).

Once lit, things drifted apart. 1-M wasn't as sweet and didn't maintain it's vanilla, rather it transformed into a nondescript sweetness underneath a kind of no frills "basic" tobacco taste. Both have a artificial topping taste, with 1-M's being more chemical in nature.

This was a far better experience from the last time I had a Sutliff product, but it still tasted cheap and left me worrying about what chemicals produced the flavor that stayed on my saliva and gave me a little cough.
PurchasedFrom: pipesandcigars.com
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Aug 01, 2014 Very Mild Mild Mild Pleasant
Very mild, smells good, not a whole lot of taste. It can burn hot too. Not unpleasant, very well priced. I like Cavendish, but also wanted to try more blends with burley. I don't detect much burley, as the Cavendish seems to be the main component.
Pipe Used: Cob, Missouri Meerschaum Hardwood
PurchasedFrom: smokingpipes.com
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Dec 07, 2010 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant
I received this as a sample also. it took me a few months to try it. All I say to say is this is why i got into pipe smoking. the smell reminds me of good day hanging around my grandfather and his friends it has that old fashioned smell and taste. ill be stalking up.
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Oct 19, 2010 Mild Mild Mild Pleasant to Tolerable
Fairly monochromatic, but a nice smoke. The flavor is smooth and mild and it burns very nicely with without much attention. Just the thing for smoking while doing something else.
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Aug 12, 2005 Mild Medium to Strong Medium Pleasant
The first bowl of this Altadis blend was probably the only one I would somewhat recommend. The more I smoked, the more I disliked. Even for a sweet toothed pipe connoisseur (which I can be at times) I think this lacks real tobacco taste, complexity, and balance. There is maybe half a notch separation between 1-M and drugstore blends. The taste can be described as a coffee-toffee-mint-coco flavored blend. The experience from one bowl to the next was a half bowl worthy smoke. It got bitter, bit like a copperhead, and finished too wet leaving 1/3 to 1/2 a bowl of unsmoked tobacco behind. This was a little surprising, as this blend did not feel wet or sticky to the touch as I was packing it.
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Sep 29, 2002 Mild Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant
Another nice smelling, nice tasting and no tongue biting aromatic. On par with many other ala vanilla tobaccos. (with maybe coconut?)

Good beginner smoke. One inwhich didn't offer me anything unique.

I have no idea what the "secret flavoring recipe" might be.
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Mar 30, 2023 Extremely Mild Mild to Medium Very Mild Pleasant
An uninspiring aromatic with no nicotine content to speak of. Vanilla-esque, but not as vanilla forward as some others, to my taste. If you're really into aromatics, you'll probably like it, but I'm not.
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.

target="_blank"