Peterson De Luxe Mixture
(2.88)
This black cavendish aromatic is a selection of matured Virginia tobaccos from Brazil and Africa blended with a loose cut mellow black cavendish. A tasteful flavour consisting of vanilla, walnut and honey has been added.
Details
Brand | Peterson |
Blended By | Peterson |
Manufactured By | Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Honey, Vanilla, Walnut |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | Denmark |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild to Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.88 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2005 | Extremely Mild | Strong | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Unnoticeable |
A cliché schlurpy aromatic, like there are 9000 in the market, oozing with fake, chemical vanilla. What, for heaven's sake, is the point??
If you like a decisively aromatic blend with a luxurious high taste, try BLUE NOTE.
If you like a decisively aromatic blend with a luxurious high taste, try BLUE NOTE.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 07, 2017 | Medium | Extremely Mild | Mild | Tolerable |
Two mistakes I made...1] I will buy anything made by Peterson's once irregardless 2] I read their description of the tobacco and I had high hopes.
Opening the tin and smelling it I do get a sense of the walnuts which is pleasant. Most Peterson tobaccos are divine in the tin IMHO.
Smoking it though [ I have finish one 50g. tin] was not anything special; I felt like I labored through finishing this tin, if it had cost like in the old days $5 I'd have tossed but at $17 I'm not about to do that. I got a lot of complaints from the family on this one although I smoke only in my library it was spreading to the rest of the house in a not appreciable manner.
Opening the tin and smelling it I do get a sense of the walnuts which is pleasant. Most Peterson tobaccos are divine in the tin IMHO.
Smoking it though [ I have finish one 50g. tin] was not anything special; I felt like I labored through finishing this tin, if it had cost like in the old days $5 I'd have tossed but at $17 I'm not about to do that. I got a lot of complaints from the family on this one although I smoke only in my library it was spreading to the rest of the house in a not appreciable manner.
Pipe Used:
Czech Republic Jirsa
PurchasedFrom:
Little Odessa Haifa Israel
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 04, 2012 | Extremely Mild | Mild to Medium | Very Mild | Tolerable |
Was looking forward to this, but it disappointed in every way. Has a very odd chemical taste to it. The wife doesn't like the room not either. I will typically finish a tin I don't care for because I don't have a lot of money to throw away; this though I think I am going to toss.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 05, 2011 | Very Mild | Mild to Medium | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Pretty tasteless. The walnut really struggles despite being given centre stage. If the honey and vanilla had been allowed to do their job or the walnut propped up then this could have been smokable.
The etymologist in me is also slightly puzzled that Peterson have "De Luxe" and "Luxury" mixtures, but I'd overlook that branding tautology if the tobacco had some flavour.
Try luxury blend instead.
The etymologist in me is also slightly puzzled that Peterson have "De Luxe" and "Luxury" mixtures, but I'd overlook that branding tautology if the tobacco had some flavour.
Try luxury blend instead.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Unnoticeable |
Another tasteless smoke from Peterson.
Looks and smells great in the tin. Tried making cigarettes from it in the end.
Don't bust a gut to try this one.
Looks and smells great in the tin. Tried making cigarettes from it in the end.
Don't bust a gut to try this one.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 04, 2011 | Extremely Mild | None Detected | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant |
Take the $10 you were planning on spending for this blend and smoke that in your pipe instead. I'm sure there would be more flavor to it than this stuff. Don't know how they can claim it tastes like anything but air.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2009 | Very Mild | Strong | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
This could be one of those instances where a reviewer is giving an unfair review to a blend because it's not a genre he knows well or enjoys much. But I don't think so.
Though apprehensive, I've recently decided to venture into new territories beyond my usual english/balkans and stoved virginias, so I started giving aromatics a try. The first aromatic I tried, which I enjoyed more than I expected to, was Peterson's Connoisseur's Choice. So my first dip of the toe in aromatic waters promised new vistas of smoking pleasure. (Yeah, I know, mixed metaphor -- so shoot me.) So I figured if Peterson got one aromatic blend right, perhaps I should try their De Luxe Mixture, even though I was a bit wary because of all the negative reviews here, and besides which I think their Sherlock Holmes blend is mediocre at best; but for some all-too-human reason I decided that perhaps the reviewers were being unfairly harsh, and so I persuaded myself to ignore their prudent advice and give it a try.
So I tried a bowl. Then I tried another, 'cause I wasn't sure if I was "getting" it. My third bowl I started wondering if aromatics should taste like this or not. So I tried a fourth. The thing is, I wanted to like it, I tried to like it -- primarily because I didn't want to feel foolish for willfully ignoring the negative reviews and spend all that money I was ambivalent about spending in the first place on this blend.
I have decided that, aromatic or not, tobacco shouldn't taste like this. Indeed, I didn't taste any tobacco. Others here have commented on the chemical, artifical taste. I don't know that I'd agree with them -- I think the flavor was more metallic or industrial, with some notes I tried to convince myself were vaguely vanilla-like emerging into the foreground, steaming up from a substratum of burning mud. (I am being only somewhat hyperbolic...)
Ok, so it didn't have any bite, but it still smoked hot. And it didn't even taste like quality tobacco to start with that was polluted by the casing. The only positive thing about this smoke is that the room note was ok, but not good enough to put up with all the negatives. The only reason I don't hate this blend is because it's not worth the bother.
I'm sorry I didn't listen to the sage advice of the negatives on this one. I want my $24.50 back! (Yes, that's the amount I threw down the toilet in Canada for this.)
Run -- do not walk -- away from this "tobacco".
Though apprehensive, I've recently decided to venture into new territories beyond my usual english/balkans and stoved virginias, so I started giving aromatics a try. The first aromatic I tried, which I enjoyed more than I expected to, was Peterson's Connoisseur's Choice. So my first dip of the toe in aromatic waters promised new vistas of smoking pleasure. (Yeah, I know, mixed metaphor -- so shoot me.) So I figured if Peterson got one aromatic blend right, perhaps I should try their De Luxe Mixture, even though I was a bit wary because of all the negative reviews here, and besides which I think their Sherlock Holmes blend is mediocre at best; but for some all-too-human reason I decided that perhaps the reviewers were being unfairly harsh, and so I persuaded myself to ignore their prudent advice and give it a try.
So I tried a bowl. Then I tried another, 'cause I wasn't sure if I was "getting" it. My third bowl I started wondering if aromatics should taste like this or not. So I tried a fourth. The thing is, I wanted to like it, I tried to like it -- primarily because I didn't want to feel foolish for willfully ignoring the negative reviews and spend all that money I was ambivalent about spending in the first place on this blend.
I have decided that, aromatic or not, tobacco shouldn't taste like this. Indeed, I didn't taste any tobacco. Others here have commented on the chemical, artifical taste. I don't know that I'd agree with them -- I think the flavor was more metallic or industrial, with some notes I tried to convince myself were vaguely vanilla-like emerging into the foreground, steaming up from a substratum of burning mud. (I am being only somewhat hyperbolic...)
Ok, so it didn't have any bite, but it still smoked hot. And it didn't even taste like quality tobacco to start with that was polluted by the casing. The only positive thing about this smoke is that the room note was ok, but not good enough to put up with all the negatives. The only reason I don't hate this blend is because it's not worth the bother.
I'm sorry I didn't listen to the sage advice of the negatives on this one. I want my $24.50 back! (Yes, that's the amount I threw down the toilet in Canada for this.)
Run -- do not walk -- away from this "tobacco".
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2008 | Very Mild | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
I was in Miami for a week and ran out of tobacco, it was hard to find a smoke shop and I was excited to find this one. They only had peterson in tins, and since I had never smoked peterson I started looking at the tobacco descriptions. The description on the can made my mouth water, but it stops there. This stuff smokes like a rancid old shoe, it leaves a nasty bitter goop in your pipe that spoils the next few bowls of other tobaccos.
Stay away from this stuff
Stay away from this stuff
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 09, 2006 | Extremely Mild | Strong | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant to Tolerable |
De Luxe Mixture disappoints on just about every level. It is, as has already been noted, very boring to smoke. The taste of this is so mild I could hardly detect it! To be honest I threw the last third of my tin away! Fortunately, Sunset Breeze from the same Peterson stable affords those who enjoy an aromatic tobacco a much better experience. Stay away from De Luxe Mixture!