Nat Sherman 536 Empire English
(3.40)
This classic blend brings together the finest mellow, Georgian, Virginias, black cavendish, Mexican burleys and Cyprus latakia, while evoking an exotic flair uniquely its own. This distinctly non aromatic blend produces an astonishing array of refined flavors ranging from mild to medium strength.
Notes: According to sales associate Barrey Miller, 536 Empire English is the only latakia house blend that Nat Sherman provides now.
Details
Brand | Nat Sherman |
Blended By | |
Manufactured By | Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Blend Type | English |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Latakia, Virginia |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Coarse Cut |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
3.40 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 26 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2021 | Medium | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
The 50-gram tin didn't have a production date. But the excise stamp on it indicated 2008, so I was holding tobacco that was clearly over 10 years old. The tin was very tightly closed, and I had to make some effort to open it. The aroma from the open tin was calm and smooth, but very complex. Certainly, the main note was high quality latakia - but so softened by the oriental spicy musk scent and a slight woody note of cedar and sandalwood that I doubted its Cyprus origin. In Addition to this, there was a noticeable milky acidity, and to these notes there was a bit of breadiness from the ripe Virginia with a barely noticeable citrus tinge. All of this was smoothed out by a cautious wine note of cavendish. The smell of burley, though, was not even detectable. The full bouquet of tobacco, despite the significant difference in composition, resembled a smoother version of Robert McConnell's Boutique Blend flavor - and not a bit of chemistry.
The tobacco was coarsely cut and well-mixed, but the different varieties were easy to guess at, with colors ranging from light brown Virginia and slightly darker burley to almost black cavendish. Despite its age, the tobacco had perfect moisture, but it was slightly compressed. It needed a little kneading and was ready to be smoked.
The smoked mixture brought such a pleasant taste of latakia mixed with orientals and burley that I was willing to believe the description was wrong. It felt like an almost forgotten taste of latakia from Syria. Also present were white pepper, sun-dried fruit with a slight nutty flavor, and of course, the bread note of Virginia. Sour note disappeared immediately after lighting it, and I frankly enjoyed a luxurious English blend. It tasted a little different from the Boutique Blend, but could be called its "big sister" - denser, more substantial, and at the same time softer. As I smoked it, the softness increased, and the tobacco tasted very pleasant. The strength of tobacco was also slightly higher, it didn't change when you smoke, but you can get a nicotine kick if you inhale intensively. The tobacco is not hot and evenly smoked, it doesn't go out and has almost no moisture. The ash is fine, even gray in color, there is little of it.
The smoke from the tobacco repeats its smell, having smokiness latakia main, but a light note. It is not pleasant to everyone, but it does not hang in a carpet, but quickly disperses.
Bottom line: one word - "perfection". And it's amazing how different tobacco combinations can all result in a very similar flavor. I might call Nat Sherman #536 my personal benchmark among English blends, if it weren't for its complex composition and the fact that it is no longer in production. The latter particularly saddens me. But I have another closed tin, and I'll put this one in storage and smoke it on big holidays and as a kind of "tuning fork" for English blends.
The tobacco was coarsely cut and well-mixed, but the different varieties were easy to guess at, with colors ranging from light brown Virginia and slightly darker burley to almost black cavendish. Despite its age, the tobacco had perfect moisture, but it was slightly compressed. It needed a little kneading and was ready to be smoked.
The smoked mixture brought such a pleasant taste of latakia mixed with orientals and burley that I was willing to believe the description was wrong. It felt like an almost forgotten taste of latakia from Syria. Also present were white pepper, sun-dried fruit with a slight nutty flavor, and of course, the bread note of Virginia. Sour note disappeared immediately after lighting it, and I frankly enjoyed a luxurious English blend. It tasted a little different from the Boutique Blend, but could be called its "big sister" - denser, more substantial, and at the same time softer. As I smoked it, the softness increased, and the tobacco tasted very pleasant. The strength of tobacco was also slightly higher, it didn't change when you smoke, but you can get a nicotine kick if you inhale intensively. The tobacco is not hot and evenly smoked, it doesn't go out and has almost no moisture. The ash is fine, even gray in color, there is little of it.
The smoke from the tobacco repeats its smell, having smokiness latakia main, but a light note. It is not pleasant to everyone, but it does not hang in a carpet, but quickly disperses.
Bottom line: one word - "perfection". And it's amazing how different tobacco combinations can all result in a very similar flavor. I might call Nat Sherman #536 my personal benchmark among English blends, if it weren't for its complex composition and the fact that it is no longer in production. The latter particularly saddens me. But I have another closed tin, and I'll put this one in storage and smoke it on big holidays and as a kind of "tuning fork" for English blends.
Pipe Used:
Peterson 106
PurchasedFrom:
Online
Age When Smoked:
2008
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 04, 2017 | Mild | Very Mild | Medium | Very Pleasant |
Appearance - your basic coarse ribbon cut, mix of lights and darks including Cavendish. Tin note: good - the Latakia is evident. I used a gravity fill with light tamping. Pipe is a cheap briar with thin walls but a nice big bowl. Initial light: could really taste the latakia and burleys, but it also had a sweet licorice note, even though it's not an aro. Mid bowl: flavors melded pretty well, a very clean English, and the licorice abated but was still there. Bottom of the bowl - about the same as mid bowl, getting slightly damp, required a couple relights.
Pipe Used:
Briar
PurchasedFrom:
Nat Sherman store
Age When Smoked:
Fresh
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 01, 2016 | Medium | None Detected | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
This was my first tin of "high-end" tobacco. And my first foray into English blends, albeit an American-style English blend.
I wasn't sure what to think the first few times I loaded it. But now it tops my list of go-to 'baccys. After my first few times of smoking it I can only assume must have dried just a tad. This only made it better to my palate.
I have a Lucienne Walnut ( cheap pipe but smokes well for me ) with a fairly large capacity bowl. This pipe will accept quite a bit of tobacco. I pack the bowl a hair tighter than usual and light up. I can often get an hour or more of sheer pleasure using this pipe/method.
This tobacco produces prodigious amounts of cool, wonderful smoke and gives a good nic hit. There is a leather note to the taste, but nothing bitter or offensive to assault your mouth.
My wife is a non-smoker and says the room note is not offensive. But it is far from her favorite.
I will definitely purchase this tobacco again. And while I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to someone as their first pipe tobacco... I would recommend it to them when they are ready to step up to the next level.
I find this blend to be very similar to Dunhill EMP. But in my opinion is better. EMP tends to have a somewhat harsh pepper note that irritates my throat.
Happy Puffing,
Mike
I wasn't sure what to think the first few times I loaded it. But now it tops my list of go-to 'baccys. After my first few times of smoking it I can only assume must have dried just a tad. This only made it better to my palate.
I have a Lucienne Walnut ( cheap pipe but smokes well for me ) with a fairly large capacity bowl. This pipe will accept quite a bit of tobacco. I pack the bowl a hair tighter than usual and light up. I can often get an hour or more of sheer pleasure using this pipe/method.
This tobacco produces prodigious amounts of cool, wonderful smoke and gives a good nic hit. There is a leather note to the taste, but nothing bitter or offensive to assault your mouth.
My wife is a non-smoker and says the room note is not offensive. But it is far from her favorite.
I will definitely purchase this tobacco again. And while I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to someone as their first pipe tobacco... I would recommend it to them when they are ready to step up to the next level.
I find this blend to be very similar to Dunhill EMP. But in my opinion is better. EMP tends to have a somewhat harsh pepper note that irritates my throat.
Happy Puffing,
Mike
Pipe Used:
Cob, Briar, Hardwood
PurchasedFrom:
Tobacco Lane, Arlington TX USA
Age When Smoked:
Unknown. 2 oz. tin
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 03, 2015 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Mild | Pleasant |
A mild English that is my favorite as a morning smoke. Not a powerhouse blend by any means but great for rousing the tastebuds by the dawns early light. Much more mellow then Dunhill EMP. Very high quality tobaccos are used for blending. Good stuff!
.
.
Pipe Used:
variety
PurchasedFrom:
pipes and cigars
Age When Smoked:
6 mo.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2010 | Mild to Medium | Extremely Mild | Medium | Pleasant |
The only thing I regret is that I will not be able to smoke after I finish my reserve. As one can only buy it from Nat Sherman NY, so that being said I am going to miss it. It is something to smoke daily, excellently balanced.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 04, 2007 | Mild | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant |
I agree with CAMUS whole heartedly. I visited the store last May and regrettably only purchased one tin as a trial; not realising it would be my only opportunity to purchase it, (importing to Canada has become a fascist nightmare!). Moments ago I reviewed some syrian tobaccos and believe the sweetness in this is partly from this form of latakia. New to NY I happened by the store on Fifth Ave. by chance while exploring after a trade show. A real treat! If I'm ever in NYC again I'll be back for sure.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | Mild to Medium | None Detected | Medium | Tolerable |
A good smoke, down to my last two tins, Ill buy it agan if I can find it. think Ill save my unopened tins for a while. smoked in a cob last year on a fishing trip, And liked it.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 02, 2005 | Medium | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
As other reviewers noted, this isn't available in tinned form except at Nat's NY store. It is available in bulk through their web site, but then you miss out on the beautiful tin. This tatstes and smokes fantastic. The latakia is in the background, and the orientals are superb. It's medium-moist direct from the tin, but burns dry and with lots of smoke. Usually only one relight, even for the large pipes that I usually smoke. Along with McClellands Oriental #8 and Peretti's English 110, one of the best of the genre.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 01, 2005 | Medium | None Detected | Medium to Full | Pleasant |
Honestly, I bought this tobacco the first time because of the tin! It's so nice, one of the best around. The tobacco is one of the best around too. It's a perfectly balanced English mixture, the components are all of extreme quality and are blended to give a smoothness seldom seen nowadays. It reminds me a little of Butera Pelican, but the Virginias here add that sweetness missed in the Butera one.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 04, 2005 | Medium | None Detected | Medium | Tolerable |
This blend is very pleasant. Why do these companies quit selling a product right after I purchase them for the first time? Example: Edgeworth Slices, A&C Petersens' 421 Blend, Erinmore Flake. Well maybe Erinmore Flake was not a huge loss... This blend is a little like Skiff Mixture(Samuel Gawith)or Squadron Leader with less Latakia. The Turkish comes to the fore in this tobac and I enjoyed the quality of the ingredients as well. But these Nat Sherman tins are really tough to open. If you get too ham-fisted you'll bend it all up. I finally stuck a knife up under the lip and released enough vacuum to get it open. Well recommended.