Details
Brand | Smoker's Pride |
Blended By | Lane Limited |
Manufactured By | Lane Limited |
Blend Type | Burley Based |
Contents | Burley, Cavendish |
Flavoring | |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 12 ounce bag |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
None Detected
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.05 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014 | Mild | Extremely Mild | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
I have smoked exactly one pouch this and would probably not buy it again unless it were the only option. It is very dry in the pouch, and smells of a mild tobacco. I don't discern any particular "note" in the pouch. I tried hydrating it, and that did not help it much.
Smoked , it tasted like a slightly milder Prince Albert. There is a temptation to puff too fast to try to get more flavor out, and it goes from an "ok smoke" to really hot quickly.
This one falls in the "better than nothing" category for me. I can smoke it, but would not if I had a choice.
Smoked , it tasted like a slightly milder Prince Albert. There is a temptation to puff too fast to try to get more flavor out, and it goes from an "ok smoke" to really hot quickly.
This one falls in the "better than nothing" category for me. I can smoke it, but would not if I had a choice.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2005 | Mild | Very Mild | Very Mild | Pleasant |
This is an incredibly inexpensive blend that makes a decent corn cob blend. Take it fishing, rake the yard, work on the car, etc. It can have an ashy finish, but what do you want for the money?
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2011 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Tolerable |
For a cheap tobacco this is very pleasant and served nicely as a change from the English blends I tend to smoke. I must recommend that instead of purchasing this and smoking it right away,cellar it for at least a month before dipping into it and I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at what this turns into.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2021 | Extremely Mild | None Detected | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Unnoticeable |
Honestly, I don't get any flavor from this at all. Zip. Not really any sweet either. Odor from the bag smells like someone hurled in it. It came quite dry, seems of recent age. It burns, because I noticed the tendril of smoke, and could occasionally see a red glow from my pipe's "maw". I reckoned the opening as a "maw", because clearly my pipe was yawning. It is my opinion, this is a synthetic substance that has miraculously no impact on my environment in the burning state. Velvet is like an atomic explosion of flavor compared to this. There is amazing science involved here evidently, just not the kind that helps mankind.
I have smoked from old tins of mummified, probably dangerous vintage tobaccos, that had been forgotten in the back of grandpa's drawer of clip-on ties. These old crispy parchments had more tobacco taste left than this product.
I really like S.P Black Cavendish, and their Cherry is also pretty good. Their Vanilla is indeed bland, but you can still tell you're smoking something. I've even began to enjoy their Whiskey, if mixed with Bk. Cavendish. Their Natural? I bought 12oz, and I'll probably last me until 2473, unless I find a suitably strong blend partner that needs to be blended 50/0.
Oddly enough, the S.Value Natural is many times better than this.
Smoker's Pride "Classic Blend" is what you get now, and my sample tasted like sour lemongrass and citronella. Literally unable to smoke this "classic Blend" product.
I have smoked from old tins of mummified, probably dangerous vintage tobaccos, that had been forgotten in the back of grandpa's drawer of clip-on ties. These old crispy parchments had more tobacco taste left than this product.
I really like S.P Black Cavendish, and their Cherry is also pretty good. Their Vanilla is indeed bland, but you can still tell you're smoking something. I've even began to enjoy their Whiskey, if mixed with Bk. Cavendish. Their Natural? I bought 12oz, and I'll probably last me until 2473, unless I find a suitably strong blend partner that needs to be blended 50/0.
Oddly enough, the S.Value Natural is many times better than this.
Smoker's Pride "Classic Blend" is what you get now, and my sample tasted like sour lemongrass and citronella. Literally unable to smoke this "classic Blend" product.
Pipe Used:
various
PurchasedFrom:
various
Age When Smoked:
new
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 02, 2017 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Mild | Unnoticeable |
I've tried the Mellow Blend and this, Natural Blend. This has more flavor than the Mellow Blend, but this one burns a bit hotter. Sip it gently and it ain't too bad. Don't know if I'd buy this one again. Let me get through the 12 oz. bag and we'll see. Still for the price, it'll definitely get smoked...
Pipe Used:
Calabrese straight.
PurchasedFrom:
Discount Tobacco, Indianapolis, IN.
Age When Smoked:
Fresh from the pouch
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | Mild | Very Mild | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant to Tolerable |
For a time, some of the blends in the Smokers' Pride range were readily available in Mexico City. Regular was perhaps the best of the lot. Slightly dry and stale in flavor, it nevertheless delivered a passable tobacco smokiness (Burley). The added Cavendish (Burley again) makes it, in my opinion, richer than either SWR or PA, but it should be smoked slowly because it can bite. A very simple, undistinguished smoke, good enough to move about when nothing else is available.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | Mild | None Detected | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Well, its tobacco, and its cheap.
More of a natural cavendish, if such a thing makes sense. It isn't bitey, doesn't have a burley type flavor, isn't really sweet, doesn't really stand out one way or the other.
I got a huge bag of this stuff about a year ago and I've used it in blends of my own devising, and have smoked it on its own now and again. Its another of those no-brainer smokes good for mindless puffing. As others have said, its good in a cob.
A classic two-star. Its not disagreeable, but its pretty mundane.
More of a natural cavendish, if such a thing makes sense. It isn't bitey, doesn't have a burley type flavor, isn't really sweet, doesn't really stand out one way or the other.
I got a huge bag of this stuff about a year ago and I've used it in blends of my own devising, and have smoked it on its own now and again. Its another of those no-brainer smokes good for mindless puffing. As others have said, its good in a cob.
A classic two-star. Its not disagreeable, but its pretty mundane.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | Very Mild | None Detected | Very Mild | Pleasant |
Well, good for mixing. Cheap. Good in a Cob. That's about it. Burns better than the corner store brands, but tastes less. It's a toss between the two if I'm outta the good stuff.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2003 | Mild | None Detected | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Pleasant |
This blend is about as simple as it gets. No frills, no thrills, just plain old tobacco. The taste and aroma remind me of Sir Walter Raleigh Regular, although I think I like this a little better. It appears to be another predominantly Burley blend. It smokes well and doesn?t offend but it just doesn?t stimulate either. This would be good to use to mix into stronger blends that you want to cut the taste of.