G. L. Pease Haddo's Delight
(3.05)
Haddo's Delight is a stout blend of several Virginia tobaccos with a generous measure of long cut perique. Unflavored Green River black cavendish and a little air cured white burley ribbon provide fullness, body, and a bit of extra strength. Finally, an exclusive process darkens and marries the mixture, and gives the blend a subtle tin aroma of cocoa and dried fruit. The flavor is full on the palate, earthy, slightly sweet and intriguingly piquant, with overtones of figs and raisins. A wonderful blend for the perique lover!
Notes: Haddo's Delight was introduced in August, 2000.
Details
Brand | G. L. Pease |
Series | Original Mixtures |
Blended By | Gregory Pease |
Manufactured By | Cornell & Diehl |
Blend Type | Virginia/Perique |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Perique, Virginia |
Flavoring | Rum |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 2 ounce tin, 8 ounce tin, 16 ounce tin |
Country | United States |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Medium to Strong
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium to Full
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
3.05 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 29 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2013 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium | Tolerable to Strong |
Haddo's Delight has ignominiously ended my long-running streak of 4 star blends from Greg L. Pease. I gave it a last, college try this morning, then I unwound with a bowl of Sextant, which is a proper booze-laced GLP blend, IMO. Adding injury to insult, HD ghosted 4 of my pipes, bad, and it stunk up my clothes; and it's not even strong!
Popping a young tin quickly tells you most of what you need to know about smoking it as all else is obscured by the rising scent of plum brandy. No figs, and no "fruit" (fruit, schmoot...), just the plum brandy. Only after a period of acclimation could I barely discern the tobacco. The lot is deep, rich and pungent, all at once, but I'm hard pressed to say particularly and exactly what I smell (apart from the brandy...). If there's anything fermented in there (apart from the brandy...), I've missed it.
HD's rough, chunky ribbons have perfect, minimal water content in the tin, and they are easy to rough up, load and light. At first, given the strong tin note (and all the talk about it), I was surprised that the flavor (apart from the plum brandy...) took so long to arrive. Initially, there is - nothing. In view of the Perique, I would not puff hard, but the flavor picked up after the first 1/4. The Cavendish is almost tasteless vs. the Perique; ditto, the burly. The VAs finally arrive past 3/4, too little and too late, for my money. The Perique is another matter. It's first on the scene (after the plum brandy...), and it quickly snowballs. Fast, and/or strong puffers will get righteously "spiced", and how, and this may well be at the root of most of the complaints about HD's excessive "strength".
Revisiting the "strength" issue, I rate HD at just over "medium". If you think HD is strong, I recommend you be careful with many Pease blends, especially Triple Play and JackKnife Plug. OTOH, if you want something that is actually (quite) strong, with great, strong tastes, try Sillem's Commodore Flake.
All in all, if you really, really like Perique, and you love plum brandy, you might possibly like Haddo's Delight. And who knows, perhaps long aging can redeem this problematic blend. I'm not holding my breath.
Update: At 15 mos. the brandy is, IMO, the best part of the smoke, lending a nice aromatic quality to the initial "flavorless" period. After that, it's still just too much Perique, and not enough else, as before. While I like Perique, this "blend" is still lost on me.
Update: after almost 4 years rest in a Mason jar HD is finally ready for smoking! If you can find some that's been so aged, and you are good with plenty of Perique, I heartily recommend you smoke it. The alcohol is gone, settled into a rich, sweet plum that imbues and enhances the generally "fruity' smoke. There is not much in the way of the usual pepper, but there are very intense, Middle Eastern dessert spices that most will want to smoke slowly and snork gently. The VAs are still mostly subsumed, and the lot is well-melded. The white Burley puts a slight, bracing, bitter edge on it that I quite like. In brief, it's still "too much Perique", but now it "works", and all's well that ends well. I'm glad I hung onto my stash.
Popping a young tin quickly tells you most of what you need to know about smoking it as all else is obscured by the rising scent of plum brandy. No figs, and no "fruit" (fruit, schmoot...), just the plum brandy. Only after a period of acclimation could I barely discern the tobacco. The lot is deep, rich and pungent, all at once, but I'm hard pressed to say particularly and exactly what I smell (apart from the brandy...). If there's anything fermented in there (apart from the brandy...), I've missed it.
HD's rough, chunky ribbons have perfect, minimal water content in the tin, and they are easy to rough up, load and light. At first, given the strong tin note (and all the talk about it), I was surprised that the flavor (apart from the plum brandy...) took so long to arrive. Initially, there is - nothing. In view of the Perique, I would not puff hard, but the flavor picked up after the first 1/4. The Cavendish is almost tasteless vs. the Perique; ditto, the burly. The VAs finally arrive past 3/4, too little and too late, for my money. The Perique is another matter. It's first on the scene (after the plum brandy...), and it quickly snowballs. Fast, and/or strong puffers will get righteously "spiced", and how, and this may well be at the root of most of the complaints about HD's excessive "strength".
Revisiting the "strength" issue, I rate HD at just over "medium". If you think HD is strong, I recommend you be careful with many Pease blends, especially Triple Play and JackKnife Plug. OTOH, if you want something that is actually (quite) strong, with great, strong tastes, try Sillem's Commodore Flake.
All in all, if you really, really like Perique, and you love plum brandy, you might possibly like Haddo's Delight. And who knows, perhaps long aging can redeem this problematic blend. I'm not holding my breath.
Update: At 15 mos. the brandy is, IMO, the best part of the smoke, lending a nice aromatic quality to the initial "flavorless" period. After that, it's still just too much Perique, and not enough else, as before. While I like Perique, this "blend" is still lost on me.
Update: after almost 4 years rest in a Mason jar HD is finally ready for smoking! If you can find some that's been so aged, and you are good with plenty of Perique, I heartily recommend you smoke it. The alcohol is gone, settled into a rich, sweet plum that imbues and enhances the generally "fruity' smoke. There is not much in the way of the usual pepper, but there are very intense, Middle Eastern dessert spices that most will want to smoke slowly and snork gently. The VAs are still mostly subsumed, and the lot is well-melded. The white Burley puts a slight, bracing, bitter edge on it that I quite like. In brief, it's still "too much Perique", but now it "works", and all's well that ends well. I'm glad I hung onto my stash.
Pipe Used:
various briars
PurchasedFrom:
Liberty Tobacco
Age When Smoked:
3 months to rested 4 years
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 05, 2006 | Medium | None Detected | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Update 4/5/06: I somehow could not bring myself to throw away the rest of the tin, so I kept trying to smoke it. Vile, nasty stuff. Just kept getting worse and worse. Today, I poured the rest of the tin into the toilet and flushed it. Now I have an unopened tin dated Jan 7 2001 that I do not want. If anyone would like to trade for some Caravan, Odyssey or Samarra, drop me a line at [email protected].
This was the first offering from the house of Pease that I tried. I acquired a can on the strength of the reviews here. I opened my can in Deadwood while on vacation.
Very nice appearance in the can, and the tin aroma was heavenly. Notes of fruit and spices with a nice sweetness. I could not wait to pack my pipe.
I have since packed this stuff in several pipes ranging from a full bent CAO meerschaum to a full bent GBD to an il Ceppo to a Kirsten. I nearly always have the same result. The bowl starts out delicate with a very nice sweet and (I hate to use this word as it is in the tin description, but it is the perfect word) piquant taste. I am loving it. Then I start to get this tickle at the back of my throat. I smoke Escudo and Kingfisher and do not have the same tickle, so I don't think that it is from perique in general. Then the flavour goes all to pieces. I smokes with a burnt, charred taste that I can't get past. I end up dumping the bowl.
One time, in the CAO the entire bowl was delicious, but only one time.
I smoked about half the tin, and am now going to throw away the other half. Very disappointing.
This was the first offering from the house of Pease that I tried. I acquired a can on the strength of the reviews here. I opened my can in Deadwood while on vacation.
Very nice appearance in the can, and the tin aroma was heavenly. Notes of fruit and spices with a nice sweetness. I could not wait to pack my pipe.
I have since packed this stuff in several pipes ranging from a full bent CAO meerschaum to a full bent GBD to an il Ceppo to a Kirsten. I nearly always have the same result. The bowl starts out delicate with a very nice sweet and (I hate to use this word as it is in the tin description, but it is the perfect word) piquant taste. I am loving it. Then I start to get this tickle at the back of my throat. I smoke Escudo and Kingfisher and do not have the same tickle, so I don't think that it is from perique in general. Then the flavour goes all to pieces. I smokes with a burnt, charred taste that I can't get past. I end up dumping the bowl.
One time, in the CAO the entire bowl was delicious, but only one time.
I smoked about half the tin, and am now going to throw away the other half. Very disappointing.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2013 | Mild | None Detected | Full | Pleasant |
What moniker said below. I'll add that the room note is really very enjoyable, everyone liked it. But I kept tasting this constantly for four days after smoking it. I give it one star for my personal enjoyment. Others really, really like this tobacco; since it's GL Pease it's no doubt 4 stars for quality. But if you're not a fan of perique to the point of fantasizing about smoking it straight, I'd skip this one.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 03, 2015 | Medium to Strong | Mild | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Maugham called The Magician "lush and turgid" which I think could stand in for the perique in Haddo's Delight.
Looking forward to more literary influences - maybe Josef K's Kake where you keep getting a tiny hint of Red Virginia but you can never tease it out, or Ivan Fyodorovich's Flake, in which one doubts the existence of burley?
Looking forward to more literary influences - maybe Josef K's Kake where you keep getting a tiny hint of Red Virginia but you can never tease it out, or Ivan Fyodorovich's Flake, in which one doubts the existence of burley?
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2004 | Strong | Medium | Full | Tolerable |
A friend of mine recommended that I try Haddo's about a year ago. Here we are and I am working on tin # 2. As noted in the thirty-plus other reviews, this one is for the perique lover. I enjoy perique in an understated sort of way; however, Haddo's is too much for me. I do like the kick this leaf has, but I feel that it is too heavy handed. Perhaps it would benefit from some time in the cellar, but as it stands I can't put it in the rotation. NB-I find the room note much more appealing than the tobacco itself. September/04-Of the original 4 tins I purchased in 2002, I smoked 2, traded one and gave the last one to a friend who passed it over to the local pipe club. Last time I attended, it was still there, 2/3 full and not very popular. Doesn't ring my bell, nor those of the pipers I encounter. Enthusiastically overrated.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 08, 2003 | Medium to Strong | Strong | Full | Very Strong |
I have to go with hornsmoker on this review, Haddo's is the most overhyped VA blend in existance. I don't know that I can even call it a VA blend now that I think of it. There is a lot of Cavendish in this blend, along with Perique. I'm not a Cavendish fan...what can I say? I think many of Greg's blends are wonderful, but this one didn't do it for me. I'm anxiously awaiting his TRUE Virginia/Perique blend coming out this summer (2003). As for those of you who like the fig smell, get a fruitcake! 😉
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2020 | Medium | Medium | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
I tested about 40 blends of pipe tobacco in my piping life and i never really disliked any that i tried. This one might be an exception , not because of the heavy perique content but...that smell . I can't get over it , to me it smell really like foul rotten chocolate soaked in cheap liquor . Plus the tobacco was way too much dry , i gave the tin to one of my friend i hope he's gonna enjoy it like many seem to enjoy here . Not for me , Cheers !
Pipe Used:
Savinelli 316
Age When Smoked:
Fresh
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2018 | Medium | Mild to Medium | Overwhelming | Overwhelming |
I tried this for the rum, which I really enjoy on tobacco. However the perique crowds it out on this one, giving me the taste of dirt. I don't like the taste of dirt, and this tobacco has it in spades. Pun not intended. It is like shovelling dirt into one's mouth. Not recommended unless you enjoy that flavor profile. It does not smell nice either.
Pipe Used:
cob
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2013 | Very Strong | Very Mild | Mild | Tolerable to Strong |
There's mot much Delightful about this. Strong nic, not much flavor or interesting aroma, but at least some perique spiciness. Reminds me of cigarettes...if you like 'em, you'll like this.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2013 | Very Mild | Extremely Mild | Very Mild | Unnoticeable |
I read a lot of reviews about this Blend, so I finally bought a tin of it. When I opened the Tin....The first thing I noticed was the tobacco was very dry. Not happy! Anyways, I loaded it into a brand new unsmoked Radice pipe I was saving for the occasion. As I lit the pipe, I got nothing. Hmmm?? So I tamped it a bit and lit it again. Still nothing....Just like air! Well...I smoked the bowl down past the half way mark with little change so I dumped it out and that was that. Very disappointed with this Blend. Unless I got a bad tin? I will try and hydrate it a little and give it another shot but as it is now....It's tasteless.