House of Windsor Field & Stream
(2.23)
An aromatic blend of choice tobaccos superbly prepared for the utmost in smoking pleasure.
Details
Brand | House of Windsor |
Blended By | House of Windsor |
Manufactured By | |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Alcohol / Liquor, Other / Misc |
Cut | Cube |
Packaging | 1.5 oz pouch, 10 oz. tin, 2 oz. tin |
Country | United States |
Production | No longer in production |
Profile
Strength
Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant to Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.23 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 41 - 57 of 57 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 02, 2003 | Medium | Mild to Medium | Medium | Very Pleasant |
This is a plesent tobacco. I have smoked many House of Windsor blends, but for me, this one I could turn to again and again without getting bored. On first light, it has a pronounced aromatic flavor. Not sweet, but cool, and fresh. Soon after you begin, the blend settles into a full rich tobacco flavor that continually supprises you with a hint of the aromatic. President Ford found this to be his favorite blend. Not the most accomplished president, but he knew his tobacco!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2003 | Mild to Medium | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Very Pleasant |
I have really been impressed with the House of Windsor blends that have recently been re-released. I tend to steer away from heavily flavored aromatics, especially ones that have a perfumy aroma in the tin or pouch. I was very surprised by this blend. I smokes very cool and dry for as much flavoring as it has. It is very flavorful and has a great room note. When you light this stuff up, even the most ardent anti-smoking zealot will thank you for lighting up. This has been a nice change for me and I will continue to smoke it.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Jul 16, 2020 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium | Pleasant |
I have never had the original Phillip Morris Field and Stream so this is a review on the strengths and weaknesses of the HOW blend and some comparisons to the Sutliff Match Field & Stream. This was a gift from a friend and this package was from 2006.
When I opened the Humidor I was greeted by a strong, almost overwhelming perfumey aroma of Licorice with a mild earthy background that also consisted of light wood, a whisper of vanilla and a touch of liquor. The perfumey Licorice almost drowned out the other aromas. NOTE- The MATCH does not have this perfumey artificial Licorice aroma, it has a natural Anise/Licorice aroma and flavor. The Tobacco was a bit dry when it arrived and I re-hydrated it over several days and it was perfect for smoking.
Filling the bowl it seemed to be an odd assortment of chunks, ribbons and pieces just like the match. The tobacco seemed to burn pretty evenly except some of the chunks took longer to burn. It burned down to a nice gray ash with the perfumey licorice wanting to bite and it would definitely bite if pushed. I sipped this slowly. The smoke was nice and billowy even though I was sipping this slowly to savor the flavor.
Upon lighting the flavor of the perfumey Licorice that was somewhat pleasant and slightly overpowering appeared and briefly overshadowed the background flavors. NOTE-THE MATCH BY SUTLIFF has a natural Anise/Licorice flavor and aroma that is pleasant and balances with the other flavors and aromas in a much better manner The Burley was a beautiful medium strength and full flavored and smooth. I could taste a hint of liquor, light citrus and a touch of grass with a nice earthy and pleasant woody taste with a drop of honey in the background also and it became a bit more obvious after the original perfumey Anise/Licorice burned off a bit. This was however, a sweet tasting smoke just like the Match, but the Match was a bit more pleasant. At halfway the Perfumey Licorice declined a bit to a more natural licorice/anise flavor and A slight Soap taste with a touch of floral came through. The taste did not get harsh like some tobaccos and remained smooth and pleasant. When done there was a medium amount of moisture in the bowl. Average amounts of re-lights.
There was a pleasant aftertaste that lasted a hour or so after finishing this bowl. The room note was a pleasant though somewhat perfumey.
I do like the House of Windsor version of Field& Stream and found it to be a nice smoke. However, the main difference between it and the Match is this has a artificial perfumey Anise/Licorice and with Match Field & Stream it is a much more pleasant natural flavor that I believe matches perfectly the flavor in the HOW version with the exception of the artificial perfume flavor in the HOW version. THE MATCH does a great job at reproducing this with a natural flavor. While this will bite, the match won't. If they had used a natural Anise/Licorice flavor this would rate a 4 stars out of 4 stars like the Match. But, the perfumey Licorice causes a imbalance at first in the flavors and aromas, but as it burns off it becomes a wonderful smoke. A pleasant long lasting aftertaste during and after the smoke. This burns at a faster pace which combined with the perfume can cause a bite if puffed.
Having tried this and the Match gives me a deeper insight as to how a perfumey flavor can cause tongue bite, a perceived difference in flavors of these two blends when the only difference I found was the rate of burn and in the perfumey taste This gets a 3.3 out of 4 stars.
When I opened the Humidor I was greeted by a strong, almost overwhelming perfumey aroma of Licorice with a mild earthy background that also consisted of light wood, a whisper of vanilla and a touch of liquor. The perfumey Licorice almost drowned out the other aromas. NOTE- The MATCH does not have this perfumey artificial Licorice aroma, it has a natural Anise/Licorice aroma and flavor. The Tobacco was a bit dry when it arrived and I re-hydrated it over several days and it was perfect for smoking.
Filling the bowl it seemed to be an odd assortment of chunks, ribbons and pieces just like the match. The tobacco seemed to burn pretty evenly except some of the chunks took longer to burn. It burned down to a nice gray ash with the perfumey licorice wanting to bite and it would definitely bite if pushed. I sipped this slowly. The smoke was nice and billowy even though I was sipping this slowly to savor the flavor.
Upon lighting the flavor of the perfumey Licorice that was somewhat pleasant and slightly overpowering appeared and briefly overshadowed the background flavors. NOTE-THE MATCH BY SUTLIFF has a natural Anise/Licorice flavor and aroma that is pleasant and balances with the other flavors and aromas in a much better manner The Burley was a beautiful medium strength and full flavored and smooth. I could taste a hint of liquor, light citrus and a touch of grass with a nice earthy and pleasant woody taste with a drop of honey in the background also and it became a bit more obvious after the original perfumey Anise/Licorice burned off a bit. This was however, a sweet tasting smoke just like the Match, but the Match was a bit more pleasant. At halfway the Perfumey Licorice declined a bit to a more natural licorice/anise flavor and A slight Soap taste with a touch of floral came through. The taste did not get harsh like some tobaccos and remained smooth and pleasant. When done there was a medium amount of moisture in the bowl. Average amounts of re-lights.
There was a pleasant aftertaste that lasted a hour or so after finishing this bowl. The room note was a pleasant though somewhat perfumey.
I do like the House of Windsor version of Field& Stream and found it to be a nice smoke. However, the main difference between it and the Match is this has a artificial perfumey Anise/Licorice and with Match Field & Stream it is a much more pleasant natural flavor that I believe matches perfectly the flavor in the HOW version with the exception of the artificial perfume flavor in the HOW version. THE MATCH does a great job at reproducing this with a natural flavor. While this will bite, the match won't. If they had used a natural Anise/Licorice flavor this would rate a 4 stars out of 4 stars like the Match. But, the perfumey Licorice causes a imbalance at first in the flavors and aromas, but as it burns off it becomes a wonderful smoke. A pleasant long lasting aftertaste during and after the smoke. This burns at a faster pace which combined with the perfume can cause a bite if puffed.
Having tried this and the Match gives me a deeper insight as to how a perfumey flavor can cause tongue bite, a perceived difference in flavors of these two blends when the only difference I found was the rate of burn and in the perfumey taste This gets a 3.3 out of 4 stars.
Pipe Used:
70 year old MM Diamond shank bent cob
PurchasedFrom:
Gift from friend
Age When Smoked:
14 years old
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 08, 2015 | Medium | Medium | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
I guess if I was on a desert island and this was the only pipe tobacco, It would probably make do. But, in the real world with so many blends to choose from, Field and Stream falls into my mediocre/boring column. I smoked it once and threw the rest away. Life is too short to waste on a mediocre smoke.
Pipe Used:
Lasse Skovgaard
PurchasedFrom:
Pipes and Cigars
Age When Smoked:
New
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010 | Mild | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Pleasant |
this tobacco is easy to pack, and lite. taists outdoorsey. appears to be a burley base. try p.pesandcigars.com to find it. i am not really crazy about this tobacco.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2009 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Pleasant to Tolerable |
You have to dry this out if you don't like the soapy taste. Let the tobacco sit out on the table in an open container for a few days or a week and it smokes just fine. The flavor is OK. I probably won't be buying this again as there are so many others I like better. I didn't mind trying an oz though.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2008 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
when I first tried this blend (from the pouch) a few months ago, the "old lady perfume" smell was a huge let down, especially with the great picture on the box. I stuck it away and didnt even think about it, until an older fellow told me to rub it completely out, and use a cob...well I took his advise and I can say its allot better. the casing is less pronounced and the burly leaf comes through well. Overall I sort of like Field and Stream now, for a change of pace, and the fact that its the only HOW blend that acually has nicotine in it, Im sold...Two stars says I...and perhaps I'll even finish the pouch!!
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007 | Mild to Medium | Medium | Medium | Tolerable |
It took me a while to get hang of this blend. While FS is Sweet it is yet very smokey. Sort of like a drugstore Cigar with the wrapper being sweet but the cigar smoke itself being harsh,very 1940's Americana. Now once you relize this approach you will then understand this pipe tobacco better. Years ago a man smoked cigarettes Daily, Cigars for special occasions(or a night out with the fellas), and pipes on the weekends or after work to relax. All their tobacco needs were purchased at a local 5 & dime or candy store. The smokes were generally very close in taste. As to not sway you away from one or the other. Now as for FS the taste is close to a sweet cotton candy or sweet cream corn. FS burns fast no matter how slow you smoke it. You can go through a bowl quickly. The room note is alright but the aroma is closer to a sweet mildew aroma. A Good smoke to think about life during the old days. The one thing that I really like about this blend is the cut of the tobacco. Very easy to fill a bowl no matter how much falls on the floor.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 06, 2006 | Medium | Mild to Medium | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
07/19/2004 This one I didn't like initially. It tasted like soap the first time I smoked it. I put it in the "to give away" area of my various blends. A later encounter with this pouch found the soap taste barely noticable. In fact, I started to like this tobacco! Now when I light this blend it tastes like an honest smooth rich cubed Burley. I had no problems with tongue bite, maybe because it is strong enough flavored to not require any heavy puffing. Update 11/06/2006: No longer smoking this very often. Have found better Burley blends and have had some issues with consistency. Still a better than average "drug store" Burley.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Sep 06, 2006 | Mild to Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Decent Burley, with a strong licorice topping. Not destined to be one of my favorites, but not bad. (Unless of course you hate licorice) It can be tough to light at times.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 05, 2006 | Mild | Mild | Mild to Medium | Tolerable |
If you like licorice go for it, its not my favorite- But nothing is wrong with it.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 07, 2005 | Medium to Strong | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
A Cube cut, burley base, topdressed tinder. Dry as anything I have ever seen in the pouch. I tasted no Licorice, however, a flowery top dressing was noted. This Blend Scorched my Tounge upon the first match, but then settled right down into a clean dry tollerable smoke. 2.75 out of 4 stars.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2004 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Mild to Medium | Very Pleasant |
Another disappointment from the House of Windsor. As a lover of Mixture No. 79 and Grouse-Moor, two highly distinctive, love-'em-or-hate-'em tobaccos, I was hoping from the reviews here that Field and Stream would be right up my alley. As with Bourbon Street, however, Field and Stream ultimately left me cold. Not freezing, but cold nonetheless.
My fellow reviewers are right when they identify the major flavor of this tobacco as licorice. It's pouch aroma is immediate and powerful, and when lit, Field and Stream retains its strong flavoring. I didn't particularly care for it, but it is cool and somewhat refreshing, and you won't find another tobacco that tastes like this (for whatever that's worth). And yes, Gerald Ford, a dedicated pipe man until he gave it up 10 years ago, made Field and Stream his blend of choice.
My major complaint about this tobacco is its cut. This is simply too chunky for my taste; I prefer a ribbon cut any day. It is also, like Bourbon Street, ludicrously dry in the pouch, which, combined with the thickness of its cut, makes it something of a bitch to get and keep lit.
To each his own, however. I'm grateful that House of Windsor has revived these old blends and kept (mostly) their original packaging. They've done a service to us pipe smokers, and maybe the tin of Revelation that's in the mail will redeem the last two blends. We'll see.
My fellow reviewers are right when they identify the major flavor of this tobacco as licorice. It's pouch aroma is immediate and powerful, and when lit, Field and Stream retains its strong flavoring. I didn't particularly care for it, but it is cool and somewhat refreshing, and you won't find another tobacco that tastes like this (for whatever that's worth). And yes, Gerald Ford, a dedicated pipe man until he gave it up 10 years ago, made Field and Stream his blend of choice.
My major complaint about this tobacco is its cut. This is simply too chunky for my taste; I prefer a ribbon cut any day. It is also, like Bourbon Street, ludicrously dry in the pouch, which, combined with the thickness of its cut, makes it something of a bitch to get and keep lit.
To each his own, however. I'm grateful that House of Windsor has revived these old blends and kept (mostly) their original packaging. They've done a service to us pipe smokers, and maybe the tin of Revelation that's in the mail will redeem the last two blends. We'll see.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2004 | Mild to Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant |
I truly have enjoyed many of the H.O.W. blends but I have had a hard time getting this one to grow on me. The only problem I seem to have with it is the cut. The tin I had was cut much finer than say the Bourbon Street I tried and therefore burned hotter. I think the flavor is very comparable to Bourbon Steet, which I do like, however I will not re-order this blend.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2004 | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Mild to Medium | Tolerable to Strong |
It's worth trying. However,a little bit of this goes a very long way. The Lakeland Floral is overwhelming and it lingers in your pipe for a very long time.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | Mild | Medium | Mild | Pleasant |
First of all,You've just gotta love the nostalgic presentation here.It comes in a brown plaid pouch packaged in a box with beautiful art work of a mountain reflected into a lake in Autumn.When out purchasing some of my usual english blends at my local tobacconist I came across a few boxes of the stuff.It seemed quite a bargin at under three dollars so I purchased a pouch.I suppose I'm a little biased here because I just never warmed up to aromatics of any kind.However this is different.It's not harsh,does'nt burn the tongue and smokes fairly dry.In closing although it's not something I'd buy by the case,it was surely a nice change of pace.Highly reccomended to the die hard aromatic fans and those who need an un-offensive tobacco to smoke in public... Recommended To Aromatic Fans Everywhere! prep
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2003 | Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium to Full | Pleasant to Tolerable |
Like others have noted, a pretty interesting blend. I had wanted to try this for some time but didn't want to buy the big can from JR incase I hated it. I think the P&T mag helped a few on-line shops get the small pouch and thats what I wound up buying. Upon opening the pouch, I also got hit with a heavy aroma of black licorice. I usually hate licorice, so this didn't set in well from the get go. I do like the cut, though, and it loaded easily and burned slowly making that part an enjoyable smoke, although it needed a bunch of re-lights to get started. Thankfully, the lit pipe didn't taste like the aroma and it was very much like the scented flakes others talk about. Unlike pipestuds sample, mine was the perfect humidity and burned for a long long time, but the flavor wasn't what I had expected. I'll finish the pouch for sure and there's a slight possibility I'll buy another but it might be a longshot.