Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) Clan Aromatic (Original)

(2.04)
A blend of 14 different tobaccos. Mild, cool and slow burning with unique aromatic qualities.
Notes: Recipe was changed substantially after 1998, probably at the same time that manufacture was turned over to STG (Orlik). Due to EU regulations, this is renamed and sold in those countries as "Original".

Details

Brand Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG)
Blended By Scandinavian Tobacco Group
Manufactured By Scandinavian Tobacco Group
Blend Type Aromatic
Contents Black Cavendish, Burley, Cavendish, Kentucky, Maryland, Oriental/Turkish, Perique, Virginia
Flavoring Alcohol / Liquor, Other / Misc
Cut Shag
Packaging 50 grams pouch
Country Denmark
Production Currently available

Profile

Strength
Mild
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild to Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Mild to Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming

Average Rating

2.04 / 4
14

46

52

66

Reviews

Please login to post a review.
Displaying 31 - 40 of 52 Reviews
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Oct 01, 2017 Mild Mild to Medium Medium Pleasant
It's not as bad as they say. From the beginning you can appreciate the sweetness of the black cavendish and a note of chocolate from the burley. The smoke is pleasant, sometimes it has touches of incense. If it loads tight it burns at medium rate. If you smoke calmly do not bite your tongue and you will appreciate the flavors. In the end the flavors are flattened and finished in a topical burley-kentucky / virginia. It is a smoke for daily use It is recommended in the range of moderate price.
Pipe Used: Rotation
PurchasedFrom: Tobacco shop, Barcelona.
Age When Smoked: New pouch
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Apr 15, 2017 Mild to Medium Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant
Clan Original, an original mixture so hated as loved. First of all we have to say that its notoriety is due more to the pleasant scent you can smell when smoked rather than its real taste. Ok, the room note is pleasant, the taste so and so. All in all it’s a good aromatic, with a lot of sweet nuances, but you can perceive also the tobacco taste, according to the dutch tradition. A fairly good flavored mixture. In my personal rating system (from 1 to 10) my score is 7 and two and a half stars.
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Apr 11, 2017 Mild to Medium Very Mild Medium Very Pleasant
Scandinavian Tobacco Group - Clan.

Ok, so I reviewed this a few years ago, was fairly brutal, and when I read it back I thought I sounded like the proverbial tobacco snob. So, I deleted my former review, opened a fresh pouch up, and thought I'd be as impartial as is humanly possible.

To begin on a good note the blend has an appealing appearance: snippets of all shades of weed, and to be fair the moisture's good. The pouch note was made a little tricky to identify by the smell of plastic/chemicals from the seal glue, but forgetting those there isn't anything particularly preeminent about the note.

The smoke isn't as bad as I remembered it to be, as an otc blend it isn't in the league of St. Bruno or Condor, they get four stars but I wouldn't rate Clan with only one star. The added flavourings are very mild, the main tastes are the tobaccos: I get a very toasty note from the Burley. This seems to me the stronger of the leaves, the rest make a cornucopia of flavours: I guess that's the polite way of saying it tastes a bit messy! As subjective as it is, the tongue bite deters me somewhat: it's ok for the first quarter, but does begin to give me grief after that. The burn from Clan is reasonably good, but it tends to be a touch quick.

The room-note from Clan is its best feature, and the nicotine's below medium.

This isn't THAT bad, nothing spectacular, but not the worst:

Two and a half stars.
Pipe Used: Various
PurchasedFrom: My Smoking Shop
Age When Smoked: New
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Oct 24, 2015 Extremely Mild Extremely Mild Mild Pleasant
Well. I tried this as it was the first tobacco I saw and recognised. I was 19, a student and had only smoked Marlboro, Golden Virginia and the odd Hamlet Special Reserve (Remember them?) or Castella Panatella! (We won't be going into the other student kind of smokes although it might have improved my views on Clan....) OK, this nearly put me off pipes for life. Maybe it was me, my age, my penchant for cigarettes or something, but what I remember the most is that the pack smelled wonderful, like playdoh in the best possible way. I was really looking forward to it. On a par with Gold Block really. That said I've known people who swear by Clan and my old woodwork teacher used to smoke Gold Block all day long, so each to their own on this one.
Pipe Used: Cheap as in under £10.00 newsagent unbranded.
PurchasedFrom: A random Newsagent in Surbiton.
Age When Smoked: From packet
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Sep 25, 2015 Medium Mild to Medium Medium Tolerable
I purchased a pouch of this stuff on my recent trip to Europe. It was purchased out of necessity because though I had a couple of pipes with me, I neglected to bring any tobacco, figuring I could find some good baccy somewhere in Rome—it turned out I was wrong. The four Tabachi's I visited always seemed to stock the following: Clan, Skandinavik(s) and Amphora. I decided on Clan. I suppose I could have held out for something better, as I'm sure somewhere in Rome there's a shop that has better selection but, alas, I ran out of time (I should have held out for Milan, where in fact I did purchase some better baccy later).

I suppose, in a pinch, Clan's not all that bad, but, I really didn't enjoy the taste much, nor it's other rather displeasing characteristics, such as it being rather harsh and, despite what they claim, it burned fast and hot (not slow). Tastewise, it didn't remind me of an aromatic, more just a plain uncomplicated tobacco taste (which, considering how many different tobaccos are in this, rather surprised me. Also, the blender claims an alcohol additive—perhaps, I didn't really notice it).

Not the worst tobacco I've had, but no where near the best. A grudging 2 stars here, for me.

Keep on Piping!
Pipe Used: Roma bent
PurchasedFrom: A Tabachi near the Colloseo
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Oct 19, 2014 Mild Mild Mild Pleasant
'Blandly inoffensive' might be a good term for my reaction. I didn't get scorched, it didn't taste bad -- this seems to be a very mildly cased Cavendish with a trace of burley. What little casing there was might be somewhat dark fruit related? It was light enough I really couldn't tell. That combo doesn't appeal to me; I can see where it might to others.
Pipe Used: an old Wellpipe
PurchasedFrom: Synjeco
Age When Smoked: just purchased
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Dec 01, 2012 Mild to Medium Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant
As my first experience of pipe tobacco some three months ago i feel I should mention this one for my first review. I must mention also my girlfriend so hated my stinking cigarette smoking she bought me a pipe and a pack of this for my 40th! I've not stopped thanking her though not necessarily for this tobacco in particular.

However, I think as a supermarket regular easy to buy smoke which weirdly smokes best in my least expensive pipe it has given me a good introduction to pipe smoking. I'm not going to try and wax lyrical regarding the tastes i get being just a beginner, though i find it smooth, sweet and easy smoking.
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
May 19, 2012 Mild Mild Mild Pleasant to Tolerable
The smoke is very sweet but can become disgusting.
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Feb 06, 2012 Medium Very Mild Mild to Medium Tolerable
This isn't a real review, since I only had one bowl from a sealed yet very dried out pouch. I assume it was older, yet not classic. I reconstituted it a bit. I did conclude that I won't be buying any. There are just too many tobaccos in the blend that just seemed thrown together, it was boring (though not so spoiled that I couldn't tell what a newer pouch would basically taste like), and after sniffing the jar a few times over the months and deciding that I just didn't want to relive the experience of that one bowl, threw it out, something I rarely do. Since this was never sold in a tin, I can never really hope to try a well-aged classic sample, so I will have to take certain of the old hand's assertions on faith that this was at one time a decent smoke.
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
TEO
Oct 15, 2011 Mild Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant
I rate this stuff "somewhat recommended" for 2 basic reasons:

- it is known as the roughest and "pop" tobacco of all the "historic" ones on italian market... -my beloved grandpa, now gone, use to smoke tons of this when i was a kid and its room note makes me think of those times....

After all I can't really understand what kinda floreal-candylike flavour they may have used to case this but it's weird...I can't taste any perique in it but I do taste some smokey flavour maybe cause of kentucky.

Weird. weird, weird but I smoked worse ones. That peasant tavern room note, I just can't forget...
0 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.

target="_blank"