Davidoff Argentina Cavendish
(2.62)
Davidoff Argentina Cavendish is a medium strength blend contrasting in appearance created from double fermented black cavendish and ripe Argentina flue cured Virginia with a pleasant honey flavour.
Details
Brand | Davidoff |
Blended By | Orlik Tobacco Company |
Manufactured By | Orlik Tobacco Company |
Blend Type | Aromatic |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Virginia |
Flavoring | Honey |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 50 grams tin |
Country | Denmark |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium to Strong
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Tolerable
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Average Rating
2.62 / 4
|
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 11 - 13 of 13 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2017 | Mild to Medium | Medium to Strong | Medium | Tolerable |
I like Lakelands and scented tobaccos and I also dip, albeit infrequently, in a Danish blend, but generally I regard full-fledged aromatics with trepidation. I would never have bought these new Davidoff products to start with, but I was kindly given a generous sample of each and I did smoke them.
They all smelled exuberantly, Malawi smelled of butterscotch, Brazil of tropical fruit and Argentina like a sweet Christmas pastry.
They all seemed to need some drying time and I obliged without letting them dry out completely. All took to light easily and burned well, fairly dry and cool, without need of relights. None produced any tongue bite to me and all smoked well to the end without becoming harsh or moistening the pipe excessively. So these blends do not seem to consist of inferior tobaccos heavily cased to mask the dullness or harshness of the tobacco, on the contrary these are extremely well crafted aromatics.
Now as far as flavor is concerned I got what I smelled from all three. With Argentina in particular there is a sweet dark cake quality which I cannot better describe. That in combination with the Cavendish taste are the main elements, but there is some nice sharp Virginia taste to prevent the blend from becoming cloying. I also tried it completely dry (still burned cool and did not become harsh) and it did taste even more of tobacco. I actually preferred it completely dry. Because the taste is subtler here than on the other three new Davidoff products, it’s actually as much an added sweetness rather than flavor, I think I prefer Argentina Cavendish to all three.
They all smelled exuberantly, Malawi smelled of butterscotch, Brazil of tropical fruit and Argentina like a sweet Christmas pastry.
They all seemed to need some drying time and I obliged without letting them dry out completely. All took to light easily and burned well, fairly dry and cool, without need of relights. None produced any tongue bite to me and all smoked well to the end without becoming harsh or moistening the pipe excessively. So these blends do not seem to consist of inferior tobaccos heavily cased to mask the dullness or harshness of the tobacco, on the contrary these are extremely well crafted aromatics.
Now as far as flavor is concerned I got what I smelled from all three. With Argentina in particular there is a sweet dark cake quality which I cannot better describe. That in combination with the Cavendish taste are the main elements, but there is some nice sharp Virginia taste to prevent the blend from becoming cloying. I also tried it completely dry (still burned cool and did not become harsh) and it did taste even more of tobacco. I actually preferred it completely dry. Because the taste is subtler here than on the other three new Davidoff products, it’s actually as much an added sweetness rather than flavor, I think I prefer Argentina Cavendish to all three.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2024 | Mild | Very Mild | Mild | Very Pleasant |
I will give my comments straight to points as they are many good reviews already.
I tasted it outdoors at 27 celsius, 69% humidity and 8 km/ hr wind.
It burned fast and lost most of the aromas I am used to when it is smoked indoors. The biggest factor the wind that washes the flavours. Smoked in a Sav 173 rusticated, no wind cap.
So definetely not a blend under such conditions. For indoors and cooler situations enjoyable. 3 stars.
I tasted it outdoors at 27 celsius, 69% humidity and 8 km/ hr wind.
It burned fast and lost most of the aromas I am used to when it is smoked indoors. The biggest factor the wind that washes the flavours. Smoked in a Sav 173 rusticated, no wind cap.
So definetely not a blend under such conditions. For indoors and cooler situations enjoyable. 3 stars.
Pipe Used:
Savonelli Fuoco 173 KS
PurchasedFrom:
Abu Dhabi, UAE
Age When Smoked:
4 months.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | Mild | None Detected | Extremely Mild (Flat) | Tolerable |
The blend has strong smells of Figs from a pouch. The tobacco was pretty wet and bit my tongue very strongly. I was able to smoke it after 3 days of drying it on paper towels and even though I needed to use charcoal filters. The smoke itself is absolutely tasteless. I think I will not buy this blend anymore.
Pipe Used:
briar
PurchasedFrom:
Local tobacco store
Age When Smoked:
after three days on paper towels