Erik Stokkebye 4th Generation 1966
(3.00)
1966 blend (taking its name from the birth year of Erik Stokkebye's younger brother) mixes mature Virginias, burleys, black cavendish, and a pinch of latakia, all topped with a dash of Caribbean rum.
Details
Brand | Erik Stokkebye |
Blended By | |
Manufactured By | Mac Baren |
Blend Type | Other |
Contents | Black Cavendish, Burley, Latakia, Virginia |
Flavoring | Rum |
Cut | Ribbon |
Packaging | 1.4 ounce tin |
Country | Denmark |
Production | Currently available |
Profile
Strength
Mild to Medium
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Mild
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming
Reviews
Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 Reviews
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2017 | Mild to Medium | Mild | Medium | Very Pleasant |
The rum element really does come through, even with the presence of the Latakia which is hard to accomplish properly in a lot of blends, but handled well here by Stokkebye. The Virginia is also of good quality and had no rough edges, which is unusual for fresh leaf. And finally the rum soaked Black Cavendish was actually a body builder, so, this one had some palate filling capabilities, too. Just a very nicely done blend.
Reviewed By | Date | Rating | Strength | Flavoring | Taste | Room Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | Medium | Mild | Medium to Full | Very Pleasant |
This is another blend that I had never smoked until receiving a half ounce sample/gift from an Ebay seller with whom I had made purchases recently. When I gave it the sniff test, it came off as a lightly aromatic blend with some Latakia content and neither was all that strong. I looked up the formula on this site and, sure enough, that is what it was. I first smoked this blend while visiting a longtime pipe smoking friend; an environment that often thwarts truly understanding what a new blend is really like. In the middle of our conversation I began to say things out loud about how good this tobacco was smoking and how much I liked it. It has been all uphill from there. I don't know whether the aromatic component is truly rum or not and I don't care. The top third of each bowl smoked in such a way as to slow my pace down by mild tongue warming and I made the adjustment willingly. When a blend is as interesting as ES 4th-1966, you can ignore andor accept quirks of blending; you can ignore a mild amount of heat in initial light up. When I finished smoking my second bowl I exclaimed - "What a beautifully crafted little blend this is" - and that is, in essence, what the only other reviewer at this time, Pipestud, said in his review. Once again he and I agree on a blend at four stars.
Pipe Used:
Ardor Canadian (2012 NASPC pipe)
PurchasedFrom:
gifted by an Ebay seller
Age When Smoked:
unknown, but probably relatively current