Sutliff Tobacco Company Mixture #79

(2.20)
From Smoking Pipes website: A rich, old-fashioned burley blend, topped with a drop of whisky, natural vanilla extract, and a kiss of anisette makes Sutliff's Mixture 79 a soft, sweet smoke, nicely-rounded, and free of bite.

Details

Brand Sutliff Tobacco Company
Series #600
Blended By H. Sutliff
Manufactured By Sutliff Tobacco Company
Blend Type Aromatic
Contents Burley
Flavoring Alcohol / Liquor, Anisette, Other / Misc, Vanilla, Whisky
Cut Ribbon
Packaging Bulk
Country United States
Production Currently available

Profile

Strength
Mild
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild -> Overwhelming
Flavoring
Medium to Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
None Detected -> Extra Strong
Room Note
Pleasant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unnoticeable -> Overwhelming
Taste
Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extremely Mild (Flat) -> Overwhelming

Average Rating

2.20 / 4
2

2

2

4

Reviews

Please login to post a review.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 Reviews
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Dec 27, 2016 Mild Medium to Strong Medium to Full Pleasant
This tobacco is one of the better aromatics, but has the problem of all aromatics: the toppings obscure the tobacco flavor, which ruins a lot of the fun and produces an acidic coating to the throat. The famous toppings here seem to be a mixture of vanilla, whisky, anise, wintergreen and something floral, and this mixture while more pleasant than most aromatics, is still chokingly strong. Underneath it, a salad of Burleys and what looks like Cavendished Burley produce a sweet and nutty undertone, but it is hard to detect through the blitzkrieg of toppings. All that being said, this tobacco is far from terrible, as someone who has experienced the "Lakeland" topping and strong anise flavored tobaccos like "Irish Flake" can attest, and something about the ingredients used to flavor it forms a synergistic effect that creates a lush, opulent smell and flavor, like frankincense in tobacco form. It is unlikely that this will find its way into a shopping cart again around here, but while it is here, it will be enjoyed, and appreciated for being more interesting and flavorful than the usual fruit, liquer and sugar the people dump on ordinary aromatics.

Thanks to Pipes Magazine forum member "pipesmokingtom" for this sample, and for the accompanying pipe, which replaced a caption contest pipe lost in the mail by UPS.
3 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Nov 02, 2020 Medium Strong Medium Tolerable
I picked up an ounce of this blend because SmokingPipes was having a sale on Sutliff bulk blends, and I wanted to try the blend that everyone seems to hate.

Sutliff's Blue Note has a similar amount of hate on TobaccoReviews, but I actually kind of like Blue Note, so I figured maybe this one might have something to it as well. It doesn't. This is an intensely muddled blend, I really don't even know how some reviewers pick out all the various toppings. The first few puffs seemed to me to taste/smell like some sort of cleaning product, chemically bitter and foul. Someone else said a "urinal cake", and I'm not even kidding... that's pretty accurate. I'm not saying that to be insulting, or to imply that it taste like urine... it just really does have that same chemical scent, like deodorant or... yeah, a urinal cake. I actually like black licorice and anise... the problem is, I don't taste any of that. I also like Lakeland blends... this is nothing like that.

Halfway through the pipe... it's mellowed out and become more smoke-able. It's only now that I'm starting to even taste anything other than horror. Before now it was just an overwhelming muddle of perfumed cleaning product. It's weird... that chemical taste is starting to transform into a root beer-ish taste that isn't totally unpleasant.

It actually doesn't taste half bad now, I can pick up the anise and a kind of nice burley taste. I won't buy this again, but I'm going to experiment with the rest of the ounce I have. I'm going to try drying it out quite a bit... and trying to "burn off" the nastiness by packing the pipe, lighting it up, and letting it sit. I'll do that a few times, lighting it up after it goes out, and then see if it makes it past the "grossness boundary".

Bottom line: First half of the bowl is pure horror; second half is mediocre.
Pipe Used: GBD Conquest
PurchasedFrom: SmokingPipes.com
Age When Smoked: New
2 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Jun 23, 2017 Medium Medium to Strong Medium Tolerable
Sutliff Tobacco Co. - Mixture #79 (#600).

I don't get this blend. The alcohol doesn't really give an actual idiosyncratic flavour, just more of an alcohol sharpness. The anisette/liquorice goes hand in hand with this, increasing the piquancy. If it weren't for the vanilla assuaging things it would become even more cutting a taste, but the slight vanilla note smooth's things out, somewhat. Something that the vanilla can't placate is the heat, it's far too warm. As well as being warm, another negative from #79 is the speed.

I don't like the note, and the nicotine's medium.

I hate to slate a blend, but try as I may this doesn't work for me. I can only give it one star:

Not recommended.
Pipe Used: Cob
PurchasedFrom: Smokingpipes.com
Age When Smoked: New
2 people found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.
Reviewed By Date Rating Strength Flavoring Taste Room Note
Sep 10, 2017 Very Mild Extra Strong Medium Tolerable to Strong
Ok, I am all for a heritage blend, I am a historian, I love appreciating a slice of history and thinking about the context and time from which it came. Dunhill Durbar is one of my favorite blends, the oldest in the Dunhill catalog and one of the most polarizing, but it the grandfather of Balkan blends and truly for the pallete of another time. Both Prince Albert and Carter Hall are favorites for their simplicity and elegance, a stark contrast to our time when we are bombarded with "flavor bombs" and complexity explosions. I wanted to feel this way about No. 79. I read the history, I know it's legendary, my father used to smoke it, I really wanted to like this- it sucked. The pouch note was that of anise, which I like in food and thought would be tasty in tobacco seeing as it was a standard condiment in the early 20th century. But the pleasantries ended the second I lit the bowl- it was nasty, soapy and perfumed, it tasted like my grandmother's closet. I got a 1/4 way into the bowl praying it would transition into something magical, but I kept getting disgusted with every puff- I had to ditch it.

Taste is indeed subjective and I'm sure the millions of people who listened to Montovani back in the day were surely into something I must not be getting through my modern perspective, just like No. 79....I just don't get it.

Oh, and not only did this ghost my pipe after 1/4 bowl, it ghosted my mouth, I had to gargle and rinse as the tobacco I loaded in a different pipe immediatly after still tastes like it. May have to do the Everclear/salt purge....and then do it on my pipe.
Pipe Used: Dunhill Group 4 author
PurchasedFrom: Pipes & Cigars
Age When Smoked: 2 weeks
1 person found this review helpful.
Please login to upvote this review.

target="_blank"