tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4419 (2 new)   /   reviews: 51395 (88 new)   /   Users Online : 550   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Scottish Flake

Brand: Robert McConnell
Blender: Kohlhase, Kopp und Co. KG
Tin Description: A basic mixture of Mottled Red Leaf Virginia and Carolina, with a small amount of Havana leaf and Turkish. Kentucky is added to achieve a balanced effect. Everything is mixed, stored for some days to be fully merged and then pressed in cold for several weeks while this process is achieved in a natural way to harmonize and made a very slow burning Flake.
Country of Origin: DE
Curing Group: Flue Cured
Contents:
Kentucky
Virginia
Turkish
Cigar Leaf
Cut: Flake
Packaging: 50g Tin

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Medium
Flavoring: Extremely Mild
Taste: Medium
Room Note: Pleasant to Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 58 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Psyktek 07/05/2009 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
"Coal to Newcastle" could be the title of this review, since there are plenty here already. But I liked this so well that I have to comment. I'm not generally a "straight Virginia" smoker. I like my latakia and perique and usually don't care for blends without them. This tobacco changed my mind. On opening the tin, I found these lovely, thin and lightly moist flakes. Easily folded, crumbled, rolled into a ball, they lit nicely and burned well. I quickly found that if I hurried, my tongue would get a quick message telling me to slow down. Once I did, a wonderful flavor and volumes of smoke were the results. After just one bowl, this has a place in my regular rotation. Now to try some of the other McConnell blends.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
orka 05/22/2009 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Scottish Flake came as a pleasant surprise, and for me as well, it is indeed strange that I didn't get around to trying it sooner. I guess I've always thought of RMC tobaccos as too underwhelming. But I'm glad I tried this. Its thick, lusciously sweet and spicy smoke hasn't let me down yet. To my surprise there was also a strong oriental (Turkish) presence, and while I usually don't find this very appealing, it works great with S.F. Very flavoursome stuff. Perhaps not the most potent in nicotine I've smoked, but the good and enjoyable taste makes up for it. Also, I can't say I find much resemblence between this and Scottish Cake (S.F is much better in my opinion).

Tin aroma is sweet and fruity, rich and redwine-like. The tobacco comes rather moist, but behaves perfectly well after folding. No excessive moisture buildup disturbing the peace. Sadly, the tin doesn't hold moisture very well (typical of all K+K 50g flake tobacco tins), and it does seem to lose a little of that delicious flavour as time goes by. A solid three stars never the less. It has a good unit price, too, which is never a bad thing.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
frankluke 04/21/2009 Medium Very Mild Medium to Full Pleasant highly recommended
i'm a big fan of scottish cake and for the life of me i can't understand why i've never tried this blend until a few weeks ago. you can't go wrong with SF, it smokes sweet and cool. by far the most underrated blend from the K&K blending house.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Scottish Steve 02/16/2009 Mild to Medium None detected Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
Addendum:- After a couple of years of pipe-smoking, my palate/mouth seems to've become more able to deal with more robust tobacco and I have to say that this is now a little too mild for my taste. Its as if the volume has been reduced gradually and after returning to this blend, I had to blend it with a more robust tobacco (Revor Plug). I think/hope my original comments are still valid.

I like McConnell's Sc. Flake very much. preferring it to Scottish Cake, as it seems more honest and less honeyed or topped. There is a creamy, butterscotch mouth-feel, but its not overtly syrupy or unnatural and still has that "brown" tobacco goodness. This could almost be a fine cigar, re-worked for a briar, with slight chocolate & vanilla overtones which don't overwhelm the main body of the smoke, which is subtle yet satisfying. It always has me wanting more and I find myself anticipating the bottom 1/3 of the bowl, where it gets richer and at times somewhat caramelised, in a very pleasing way. I find this easy to manage when well-rubbed and is a fine smoke, tho I too experienced the "mashed-up flake" problem, which was a tiny bit exasperating after several tins of perfectly prepared McB's Navy Flake. The most important thing about this to my mind is, it doesn't try too hard, having confidence in the smoker's palate. I could imagine some smokers wanting this a bit stronger and think a couple of strands of Peterson's Irish Flake would darken and and enrich this beautifully.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
strongirish 02/02/2009 Very Mild Extremely Mild Mild Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
As one who tends to burley I had my reservations on this one but I recieved some in a trade and I will try anything as sometimes I'm pleasantly surprised. I am just that with this one. Robert McC just seems to be an excellent blender. As his others, this one is nice and cool smoking, very flavorable, and burns right to the bottom leaving a grey ash with no gunk or wetness. This blend was made to smoke in a Pete as I did and I was lulled into a nice relaxing smoke and when I hit bottom, I yearned for another bowl. I am always impressed when I get a VA that causes no tongue bite as I tend to get it from VA's but not this one. I have to give it four star for being so gentle yet so full of a creamy sweetness that just performed all the way down. Highly reccommended!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
hagen 01/29/2009 Medium Very Mild Medium Pleasant recommended
latest update: going through my reviews here, i find that i'll have to downgrade a good deal of the praise i've given so many blends. 4 stars should, i feel, be reserved for the blends i find truly exceptional. so, this is downgraded a bit. end update.

updated review: okay, i surrendered out of curiosity, to the brutal method of "baking" a tin of s.f. - and the change was radical. not only did it develop some deep natural fruity notes it had been missing, it also suddenly appeared a good deal stronger. a very nicely balanced tobacco for smoking in the afternoon, really. oh, and do yourself the favour of smoking it in a rather narrow bowl, as the flake is thinly sliced.

upgraded from 3 to 4 stars.

original review: tin aroma: fruity, winey, raisins. a topping is present, but not in a way that scares me away. i find it quite inviting, as it seems to accentuate the kind of notes you get from an aged flue cured tobacco.

the rather light brown flakes pack and light easily - and then comes the disappointment: this virginia is rather flat and monocromattically sweetish in taste for the first half of the bowl. i think it could have done with some more aging to match the topping. also, i seem to sense some of that infernal propylene glycol. still, smoked slowly and carefully, the second half gets a lot more interesting, it gains in strength and flavour, and it ends up as a very nice smoke, with a hint of kentucky and turkish. the room note, though, was not appreciated by my wife for the last third of the bowl...

not the most interesting of tobaccos, perhaps, but quite decent. it will almost certainly benefit greatly from a few years of aging (if there's not too much topping and pg in it). i may be back with further comments by then!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
cut-shot 01/07/2009 Medium None detected Full Very Pleasant highly recommended
Ahh, Scottish Flake what a wonderful tobacco! The smoke is so full and satisfying right down to the bottom of the bowl. Rich smokey, creamy and never bites always clean burning. I would highly recommend this tobacco. One of my all time favorites!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
IHT 01/07/2009 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
My impressions are from a large sample a "Pardner" sent me, was from the mid to late 90s.

I'm not someone that normally seeks out or enjoys a "kitchen sink" type of tobacco, where every known weed is thrown in to the mixture, but this one works and is excellent.

Very smooth, and initally started off like GH&Co Broken Scotch Cake (which is a lakeland scented VA flake). after that, it gave way to a nearly syrupy sweetness, not like a nasty goopy aromatic, mind you... almost like it coats the tongue with a sweetness. Again, it's silky smooth, with a little tingle if you push it out the nose, where you can catch a little floral notes. It's got a little nicotine hiding in it for those of you that require that feeling.

Too bad "Pardner" didn't send me the entire tin!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Sasquatch 11/16/2008 Mild to Medium Very Mild Medium to Full Pleasant highly recommended
This is delicious. Creamy and sweet - a lovely virginia. No tongue bite, no worries. I loaded 2 flakes into a Peterson 606, with room to spare. Smoked it for probably 2 hours, over a period of 2 days. Finally dumped the pipe and found quite a bit of tobacco at the bottom! A very slow smoking weed indeed, and friendly all the way.

It's not complicated, just tasty. I like it better than Scot Cake and will order more.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Slow Triathlete 11/10/2008 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
I guess that I have been spoiled with too much Scottish Cake. I picked this tin up when the local B & M was out of Cake just to see how this one compared.

Like some of the other reviewers have stated, most of my flakes were stuck together so there was no way for me to fold and pack this one. I ended up having to rub out most of it. Maybe this detracted from the taste because I found this blend to be a bit boring.

The taste was pretty monochromatic through the whole thing. There were no surprises, which could be a good thing or a bad thing.

I didn't find it to be Scottish Cake without the Perique but rather a different blend all together. Straight Virginia smokers should really like this blend. Smokers who prefer some kind of spice added will find this one subpar.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pseudo Nim 08/26/2008 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant highly recommended
Thanks to this site, I have strayed from the usual offerings of Sam Gawith and tried a few Rob McConells, this being one of them, and I love it !!!! from the moment I lit up I knew this was going to be a good one, and a couple of tins later, nothing has changed my opinion, a smooth light,slightly on the sweet side easy going smoke with a nice creamy taste which reminds me somewhat of Dunhill Light Flake, though a little more fuller in flavour.

An excellent eye opener and good daytime smoke, flake during the day and Cake for the evening.

Having said all that, there are a couple of cons, but nothing that would stop me from buying it, the first being the "orangey" aroma exuding from the tin, I like a pure tobacco smell, but as I'm more into burning than sniffing, thats only a minor, the second being that the flakes in both tins so far are all stuck together, and as the tobacco is quite dry, they must have gone in pretty wet. So in order to get any out, I find I have to take the whole lump out and break a peice off to rub out, finaly, maybe it's me, I do get a few gurgles from this one, (in the first quarter of the bowl) even though it's pretty dry, so I always make sure I have plenty of pipe cleaners on hand for this.

Burns a little faster than I would like, but then this is one of those tobacco's that I want to go on and on.

All in all, the taste outweighs any drawbacks, will definately keep a few tins of this on hand. Four well deserved stars, and come to think of it, this might well be a good one for new smokers of the pipe (I hate the term Newbie's) and for aromatic smokers looking for a good quality flake.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Dubinthedam 07/05/2008 Medium to Strong Mild to Medium Full Pleasant highly recommended
I picked up a tin of Scot Flake seeing PipeStud had marked it higher than Scot Cake. On first impressions, I thought, "this is just 633 (Solani) without the Perique". By the end of the tin, it had surpassed 633 (a good quality VA flake) and was up there with Capstan and Marlin Flake as one of my fav's...it's as if it's a flake version of Old Gowrie and Scottish Cake mixed together...either way a solid VA flake...However I have yet to pop my tins of FVF yet so I can't really measure it against the definitive benchmark.

Edit: popped a 10yr odd old tin....It ages superbly....heavy laden with crystals...supereb....this one cellars extremely well.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
SirLoirn 11/14/2007 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant somewhat recommended
Tin: SF smell much like strong grape juice. It's a mix of brown hues spotted with blonde. The flakes do not peel off lengthwise as a whole piece but break up into little twigs and rub out as a stringy, stiff ribbon. It felt on the verge of being dry. The square tin doesn't reseal snugly.

Packing & Lighting: I was a little put off by the way the flakes rubbed out, but it packed easily enough, and of course, started with one match. It was surprising that there was a fair amount of gurgle, given that the tabacco did not feel moist, requiring several relights towards the end of the bowl.

Taste & Aroma: Nothing really stands out, no subtle or strong flavors to delineate amongst, just rather mild and monochromatic. Right at the end of the bowl, there was a fleeting fruity sandalwood aroma, slightly grassy, not sweet. The bowl is left with this same scent. A smooth smoke with no bite. Two stars, not bad.

Nicotine: medium, borderline strong

Room Note: Nothing until the end of the bowl, then mildly winey sandalwood; no unpleasant smokiness.

Overall: Unimpressive; no strong VA component. It's not a quality oriental blend. It leaves a sandalwood and wine scent to the room, leaving no unpleasant smokiness, just nothing special; there are better VA blends.

Second Effort in large Bowl:

Top third: monochromatic.

Halfway: fruity sandalwood

2/3: complex mix evoking bursts of mild VA, Kentucky, oriental, sandalwood

Bottom: sandalwood-oak scent, which is a contrast to the fruity tin aroma.

Smoke this in a tall bowl, to develop this aroma transition. One could be tempted to call this a plain, uninteresting tobacco if smoked in a small bowl. It was never really sweet. 3.0 stars

Addendum: After consuming about 1/2 of the tin, the tobacco had become bland, losing any contrasts in taste and aroma. At this point, it is plain VA that is light, smooth, and has no unpleasant qualities, vaguely sandalwood, leaving no sharp or smokey aspect lingering around. Moderately recommended for not leaving oa sharp or strong aroma. But, by the end of the tin, SF had lost any topping which could no longer hide a lingering, slightly sharp, smokey, mildly cigarish aroma. 2.7 stars


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Ads 08/29/2007 Medium to Strong None detected Full Tolerable highly recommended


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
gnossos 03/25/2006 Medium None detected Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
While this is a good tobacco, I'd say go with Scottish Cake. I think someone referred to this as Cake's "rustic" companion, or something to that effect, and I'd say that's accurate. Good in a pinch, and good for travel, but overall I'd say the taste is much more rough around the edges than the Cake, which makes me give it only three stars.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
bando 01/04/2006 Medium to Strong Medium Medium Tolerable recommended
It is an honest tobacco. It's strange to understand cause have also havana leafs in thee mixture. This flake gives to you a regular and honest smoketime. This is my favourite tobacco when I don't know what I will smoke.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
GeoLogger 12/20/2005 Mild to Medium Very Mild Mild to Medium Unnoticeable recommended
Grampa would have loved this tobacco and couldn't we all learn a bit from Grampa? This is a plain old good and decent blend. Basic tobacco, very slightly aromatic. One of the few "sort of aromatic" Virginias which I really like. I don't know what dull or boring is in tobacco. I do know what "Yuck" is for me. For me yuck is easy to achieve and step one is usually to add goop that is intended to add flavour or aroma. But I really don't personally care much what the room aroma is like, within reason, and I don't really want other flavours because I like tobacco flavour. Perhaps that is precisely what bores some folks. This blend takes a baby step toward addressing the flavour, and manages to not really do it badly at all. Of course I happen to like red Virigina. I give this 3 stars. Nothing wrong with this blend at all, I just want to rate it a half step behind my very favourite blends. I buy this and smoke it. If we had a ten point system this would be a nine, not a seven. And the tins fit in my hip pocket.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Warwick 10/08/2005 Medium to Strong None detected Medium Strong somewhat recommended
10/8/05 - Initial impressions review:

The tin aroma was unusual but inviting -- a VA plum/raisin aroma along with a "grassy" aroma. I did not find it "musty".

The flakes were compressed into the small tin, and it was easy to peel off roughly 1/4" wide pieces of broken flake as needed. Moisture content was only a smidge higher than optimal. The flakes themselves were variegated/mottled, with the mostly dark color interspersed with lesser amounts of various lighter colors.

Given the good moisture level, I did not bother to rub it out, but simply folded a few strips into the bowl. Upon lighting, the flavor of the VA was superseded by a burst of other brigher and lighter flavors. Spicy, grassy. I could imagine that it is from some combination of the Carolinas, Kentucky and orientals.

The flavor strikes me as a rather complex mixture, and definitely not a monochromatic blend, or a rich VA-only, nor the binary flavor combination of a VA/Oriental blend.

The flake burns very nicely, is smooth and has little tendency to bite. The orientals dry the throat a little (which Dunhill Durbar also does to me) and perhaps it is the Havana (which I've not experienced before) which lends an odd pungency in the background that is a bit offputting. This has a fair bit of nicotine - not SG-Brown-Rope#4-strong, but stronger than Dunhill Nightcap.

As it burned further down, I found the room note to be fairly strong and not entirely pleasant - somewhat like a mild spice-scented candle mixed with cigarette ash aroma. The bowl also became somewhat "ashy" and dumping out the ashes on top allowed the remainder of the bowl to return to the "brighter" flavor it had at first light. After its all done, the aftertaste of orientals and a bit of ashiness lingered quite awhile.

I think this blend has to be considered on its own terms, and not as if it were a VA flake, because the import of all the other flavors renders it quite unique. It's simply not in the same genre as Marlin Flakes, Old Gowrie, Hal o'the Wynd, Best Brown Flake, Peacehaven, etc. If I were looking for a strictly VA flake, I would bypass this one.

I do think some aging will improve it - I kept feeling that the flavors were more "raw" than they ought to be. I look forward to finding out what 3-6mo on the shelf will do for it.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
DrDNA 09/17/2005 Medium None detected Mild Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
Notes: There is certainly some confusion as to the exact ingredients of this blend -- whether it is a straight virginia blend (as it says on the tins I've purchased) or whether there are other condiment leaves as well. In any case, any contribution the latter may make is subtle indeed, acting only as supporting players to the lead character, red virginia leaf. When considering this, treat it as a virginia flake, as it smokes and behaves as such. I like it best in a thin tall chimney pipe.

Appearance: A firmly pressed thick broad-cut 3" flake, compactly stacked in a 3" x 2.5" tin, very similar to the way that Krumble Kake presents itself. The blend however comprises a melange of light to darkish brown strands.

Aroma: Quite sweet as natural flakes go. Honey, salted peanuts, vinegar, cupcakes, natural tobacco flavor, whole grains.

Taste: Flour tortilla, steel-cut oats, wheat bread, vinegar, plain tobacco flavor. Can burn a bit if you are overly aggressive with puffing. A complex flavor profile, for such a quiet, mild blend, with everything bubbling below the surface of perception.

Comparisons: Very much in the same line-up as Rattray's Hal O' The Wynd, with a similar nutty-Virginia disposition, but less nutty, harsher, austere.

Bottom Line: If you enjoy nutty Virginias, like Rattray's Hal 'O The Wynd, but are searching for a less expensive, more portable alternative, this may be a good choice.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
sasha 07/29/2005 Medium Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant recommended
A strange combination of tobaccos, that's for sure, but it works. It's sweet, VERY sweet upon opening the tin, and this you can find during the smoke too, but not an overwhelming sweetness. The greatest point about this is its smoothness, it smokes easily without even the least edge. I really can't figure out a category to put this into: it's good, and that's all!


Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 58 reviews of this tobacco

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics