|
Luxury Navy Flake
| Brand: |
Peter Stokkebye |
| Tin Description: |
Very mature Old Belt flue-cured Virginia's spiced with Louisiana Perique. |
| Country of Origin: |
DK |
| Curing Group: |
Flue Cured |
| Contents: |
Virginia
Perique
|
| Cut: |
Flake |
| Packaging: |
Bulk |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Extremely Mild
|
| Taste: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 61 through 80 of 124 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Kilmarnock Piper
|
10/12/2009 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| A very nice simple Virginia flake. Nothing could be farther from those aged McClellands (which I love) than this. Grassy, naturally mild and sweet; and I have enjoyed it on its own and also as one of my favorite Virginias to blend. I have been meaning to get more of it and certainly will. The only Stokkebye I prefer to it is Bullseye. I do not taste much perique in it but sometimes add some, which for perique fans such as myself, complements beautifully.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Alguhan
|
10/04/2009 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Actually belong some tobaccos which I've rated with 2 stars, the Luxury Navy Flake deserves the third star. But for a good Virginia-Perique blend I think it is very mild on taste and strength.
This blend has a good quality Virginia leaf in it. The flakes are smelling really apetisant. It lights and smokes easy. The very first taste is a good sweet Virginia taste with just a touch of peppery Perique. I expected it to reach a satisfactory richness of taste and strength. It didn't. It smokes in its light way.
When you want the smoke to be richer at taste and strength you may puff the pipe harder. This is a kind of reflex we do without thinking sometimes. If this tobacco bites your tongue this may be the reason. You need somethin stronger.
I'll recommend it for the beginners to experience how a high quality Virginia-Perique blend tastes whit a well balanced puffing cadence.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
The Piper at the Gates of Dawn
|
08/27/2009 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild
|
Mild
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| Esrly on in my pipe smoking carrer/hobby/fascination(1972 and onwards to 78) I tended to have a rather limited view or much appreciation of many tobacco supply houses. Peter Stokkebye happened to be one of these. I smoked MacBaren's tobacco(mostly Dark Twist, Club Blend and a few others) and quite a few of the English/Balkan blends but Peter Stokkebye was out of the range of my rather snoobish attitude. I regret this blind spot now and though I still can't appreciate the heavy aromatics they produce I am more than pleased with the "Luxury" blends they provide. All of them I've tried, in fact.
The Bulleye Flake and the Navy flake are superb. As of the present I have not sampled the Luxury Twist Flake but I will soo remedy that lack. I am sure it will be as exemplary as the others.
Navy Flake and Bullseye are remarkable tobaccos at any time of the day. Strength-wise they are exactly right when a light to medium smoke is called for. Personally I don't have the capacity to tell what the flavoring agents are as some of the commenteers do;I just either like or dislike what I'm tasting and Peter Stokkebye seems to have gotten this exactly right in both of the abovementioned blends. It just tases great without overpowering either the taste of the constituent tobaccos or the room note. The room note is fine with me and my good wife and as far as others are concerned I am not all that concerned. I smoke the Kendal tobacco companies' products regularly and a range of Latakia blends as well and Peter Stokkebye's two(and most likely the third untried offering) fit quite nicely into my taste inventory qite handily.
A Highly Recommended acclade for these tobacco blends is obvious.They both fill and burn exceptionally well and have just the right amount of nicotine as well.
Bravo to Peter Stokkebye and sorry I took so long getting to know thee!
The Piper at the Gates of Dawn (more eclectic than previously)
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
pandabearzx2
|
08/16/2009 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant
|
|
| This gets most interesting about half-way through the bowl. The perique starts to at a bit of complication to this tobacco. It has a nice roomnote, and a friend and myself agreed, this is not bad tasting for a Virginia tobacco. Both of us lean more towards the English side but if you just want a straight up tobacco to smoke in a social setting, or perhaps a light tasting smoke for mid-day it is worth trying. It loads well, smokes well, and its something both you and people around you can enjoy.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Coolmojo
|
07/07/2009 |
Extremely Mild
|
None detected
|
Very Mild
|
Pleasant
|
|
| The appearance upon opening the bag was wonderful. You could easily tell this was a quality product. The bag aroma was very pleasant but not overpowering, and very grass like. I had very high expectations as I packed the first bowl....
And I was completely and totally disappointed through the entire bowl. There was no flavor, and I don't mean the flavor was bland or you could hardly taste it, I mean no flavor whatsoever. I could just as easily been drawing on an empty pipe. Or for that matter I think I would get more flavor FROM an empty pipe.
I really wanted to like this tobacco, its appearance and price were just to good to give up after just one bowl. So I came here in the hopes I would find stellar reviews and hopefully find I had gotten a bad batch. What I found was some very sage advice from Pipe4ever. Smoke 10-15 bowls without smoking anything else. Well sure, why not. I figured since I had bought several ounces anyway all I had to loose was 10 bowls with no flavor to speak of.
Around bowl 8 I started noticing a sweet, hay like flavor begin to develop. By bowl 11 the flavor was strong enough I honestly wondered how I missed it for so long. It doesn't nock you over, the flavor is very nice and subtle. It does scream fresh cut hay but in a very good way.
Even with the initial disapointmemt I have to give this tobacco the highest rating. I prefer stronger and sweeter VA's but even though this isn't my normal "cup o tea", I will certainly buy this tobacco again, and have a big ol smile on my face as I anticipate loading my pipe..
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Lawrence G. Foster
|
06/07/2009 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Like its brothers Twist flake and Bull's eye flake, this is a quality Virginia flake. A stronger presence of perique makes this a spicier smoke that can still yield the sweetness of Virginia's if puffed slowly enough.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Pipe4ever
|
04/08/2009 |
Mild
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Luxury curly cut, Luxury Twist Flake, Luxury Bull eyes flake, and Luxury Navy Flake.
After smoking 1 pound of each, here below I write a small review for all:
Luxury curly cut: I wasn?t terribly happy with this blend, there is some topping with unpleasant flavor and it is hot on the palate, the good news is that it has been discontinued. 2stars
Luxury Twist Flake: very pleasant hay/ burnt caramel flavor, great first WOW effect, high impression when you start smoking few oz of it, unfortunately there is a diminishing return effect, after smoking 7 to 8oz of it, the caramel topping starts to be boring, the flavor is great in the beginning, but this is not a natural VA flavor. Try Astley's No.109 Virginia Flake for the same flavor but with true and natural VA and without casing. 3stars.
Luxury Bulleyes flake: This one is really good, natural flavor with minimum perique and delicious Cavendish, Great Virginia!!! However, despite the very low price, it is not as good as Davidoff Flake Medallions or Escudo Navy Deluxe. This is a very good choice for money saving pipers, with Hi quality VAPER spun cakes, but if we talk strictly about enjoying a VA/Per pipe, this blend is not the best of its category. and since I do not care how much the tobacco costs, not because I am rich, but because life is too short, also because I smoke 1-2 bowl only per day and I believe that the best way to save your money is to sell all your pipes on Ebay and stop smoking for good, therefor I Definitely prefer Flake Medallions over LBF. 3star
Luxury Navy Flake: This is my favorite one so far, it will not impress you with WOW flavor when you start smoking it, but it will start revealing its hidden secrets after maybe 10-15 bowls, it just needs your patience and commitment (do not smoke anything else while smoking it) this is truly a great smoke, with unmatched quality for a Navy Va flake, extremely well balanced, natural flavor with slight sweetness that comes from the very light rum casing, creamy and fresh, very pleasant all day smoke. Definitely one of the best in the "navy" category. I am very happy with this one, this is my preferred one, 4 stars.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Puff Daddy
|
02/16/2009 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Like many blends reviewed here, the Recommendation ratings have been all across the board. Yet, there are some common denominators. This is a straightforward blend, light in VaPer, a good all-day smoke. I'd guess that cellaring might yield a greater maturity to it, but it likely won't be monumental. I'm sure that the base tobaccos are of high quality, but it will never lead any list of best VaPers. It rubs out well, burns well, I got no tongue bite whatsoever. It's just not very complex. As has been stated, a pound of this represents a great bargain, and that has prompted me to give it a low 3-star rating. If this blend cost any more, I'd have dropped it to 2-stars. Their Luxury Bulls-Eye is a lot better blend, and is still a bargain.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Final Identity
|
02/15/2009 |
Very Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| An average plain tobacco. Didn?t thrill me. Dries the mouth and nose rapidly.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
kilted1
|
12/03/2008 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| While I love several of Peter Stokkebye offerings, this one leaves me a bit flat. Expecting something labeled ?Luxury Navy Flake? I expect Rum flavoring, and a cavendish treatment. This product is simply Vaper flake and light on the Perique.
Appearance: A mostly chestnut brown with some lighter brown and tan mottling with a few yellowish bits leathery flake of uniform thickness.
Tin aroma: The first thing that is apparent when opening a tin of Luxury Navy Flake is quite simply tobacco. You couldn't possibly mistake this for anything else. I don't detect any casing or topping at all, just a fresh tobacco smell, deep and rich. There are nice stewed fruit tones, with leather and spiciness and a lighter almost citrus note.
This tobacco is absolutely perfect for smoking, no drying time required. As with most flake tobaccos I simply take several flakes together, fold them in half and insert them length-wise into the bowl trimming off the excess. I find it has a much better burn this way and makes for a long enjoyable smoke.
For this review, I?ve chosen an Nording Silver Series Canadian which is dedicated to Virginia based flakes.
A first light is brings billows of rich white smoke, followed with a brief visit of the tamper to settle the light crowning effect and then a tamping light. Immediately there is a citrus note followed with medium bodied Virginia flavors. When exhaled nasally there is a slight sharpness and citrus quality and deep leathery flavors and scents. The first third of the bowl gradually builds in slowly increasing intensity. This has a very rich creamy mouth feel which I find irresistible. What seems absent is Perique.
Mid Bowl: Approaching mid-bowl, the fullness tends to build and while I wouldn?t call this mixture particularly complex, the flavors slowly deepen into a rich harmony. The Virginias build in depth and character while the Perique remains so far in the background as to remain un-detectable. The quality of tobaccos used in this mixture are very fine, and it remains a cool even burning Virginia, and quite flavorfull, sadly the Perique is in such a small portion that I've never really tasted it.
Home Stretch: As end of the bowl approaches, I find that it really is a fine ?autopilot Virginia flake? lacking enough Perique to be of much interest. This really doesn't detract from it being a fine product, I just prefer a larger dose of Perique. As for it being Navy, well forget it. There is nothing navy about this at all. All things considered, it's a fine Virginia Flake, at a very reasonable price.
Supplemental Notes: This might make the grade for a Virginia Flake without other expectations for a budget minded smoker. ** stars
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
SmokeKing David
|
11/11/2008 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| A lighter styled VaPer that seems consistent, bowl after bowl. Luxury Navy Flake has more body and I taste a little more perique than in its brother Luxury Twist Flake. I like this better for that reason. The price is good, too; althought that does not influence my ratings. A good, reliable smoke.
Govern Yourself Accordingly,
SmokeKing David
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Russell
|
10/15/2008 |
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| This stuff is simply bland, and the tobacco does not taste very good. It bit like hell, and I tried to DGT it, which only make it taste so acrid I had to dump the bowl. The perique, which I can smell, but not taste, is so lightly applied it is a waste.
The aroma is alright but not that great.
Where is the nicotine?
I do not think this is very high quality weed. The flavoring isn't any good either. Tastes like the faintest hint of brown sugar and such a small hint of anise, that you can just barely taste it.
Yuck.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
endubito
|
09/25/2008 |
Mild to Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I don't know what the problem is. It made me sneeze and I threw it out. I'll come back to it later after I give up the Ryan perique cigarettes for good. Maybe then I'll be man enough for this minor straw/perique whiff.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Dug
|
08/16/2008 |
Mild
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| AUGUST 2008 UPDATE: Well, after a year and a half of aging, I popped (or, more accurately, strained and pried) open my heat and paraffin-sealed jar of this blend.
Time has mellowed it, but more as a matter of degree than metamorphisis. In the jar, it still does not evoke the deep, fermented VA sweetness of, say, McC 2015, but is robustly assertive in ways that suggest tomatoes and metal (think sun-dried tomatoes and the taste of keys, or a low-voltage battery on the tongue, if that makes any sense).
I'm smoking it well rubbed-out, and am finding it a reputable and economical -- even if not superlative -- example of a VaPer flake. It shifts and develops throughout the bowl, beginning with a the sour brightness of cut grass, before settling into broader mid-tones that intermittently suggest yeast and toasty figs. The perique tickle is there throughout and -- although it has been friendly to me -- hints that modest sipping is advisable. Toward the end there are insistent murmurs of a sour mash tang, punctuated by momentary flashes of Eggo waffle left in the toaster a bit too long.
All in all, it credibly (though temporarily) fits the "non-latakia" niche in my home rotation, even if it doesn't threaten to supplant any of my beloved English and Balkan blends. As something "different" it fits the bill just fine. If you're a VaPer afficianado, you may want to buy, age, and try some for the experience, particularly given the bulk price. It has earned my respect, but not my raves. I would enjoy it more if it were sweeter. Still two stars.
ORIGINAL REVIEW: In my experience so far, this is a very temperamental tobacco, or else of uneven production quality. My first couple bowls (a sample from a friend) were fantastic: Sweet, grassy, and complex. A revelatory break from my usual rotation of English blends.
Based on that experience, I purchased my own stash, but have since not been able to wring more than a mediocre smoke out of it. Sadly it has been flat, one-dimensional, and ashy tasting during the last half of the bowl. I've jarred it up, and hope that it will blossom with several months on the shelf, into something more like the bewitching flakes I first encountered.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Johnny River
|
08/04/2008 |
Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| The great thing about this web site is being introduced to a blend that you can't get locally but find through one of the many available online tobacconist that ship to your door.
I got my "Luxury Navy Flake" through pipesandcigars.com and was excited when I saw the 1.5 X 2.25 inch light brown slices. It flaked out to a light, soft mound of great smelling tobacco.
Like many Virginia tobaccos, Navy Flake's flavor evolves as you smoke through the bowl. For me, it starts out tangy and develops it's sweetness. What I especially like is it has no bite. If you have a problem with puffing a little fast, as I do, you will be pleased with this blend. It won't bite you. But you will get the bug to order more. Keep this one on hand - you can't go wrong!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
BriarChef
|
07/20/2008 |
Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Ditto Past Master, especially choice of beverage.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Past Master
|
06/10/2008 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Its a good day to be alive when you have a full two-ounce pouch of Stokkebye Luxury Navy Flake, backed up by a half dozen other pouches of Stokkebye blends on my side table. I'm almost tempted to just eat it right out of the pouch.
I just finished a full pipe of this wonderfully spicy, but mild tobacco. Sitting on the back porch, listening to the frogs croak in the back pond, the cool breeze was not strong enough to rob me of the additional second-hand pleasure of enjoying the complex aromas that still linger in my memory.
I paired this with a glass of Aberlour 16-year-old single malt Scotch whisky. I'm glad I chose a bit stronger malt to go with it. A weaker Speyside or a Lowland malt would have been lost on the palate. Next time I'll try a more expensive 18 year-old Macallan, or something else with a strong oakey complexity. As I said, life is good.
The wife, who tolerates my more masculine quirks with a guarded feminine fascination, even asked me what it was. (Note that she did NOT ask "What the aytch-eee-double-el IS that?" as she is often wont to say). So that's a good thing.
I originally reviewed this in the summer of 2008. As of November 2012, this blend has earned a solid 3-star rating. Of the 116 ratings, over 75% have granted it either 3 or 4 stars, and only five reviewers have given it a 1-star rating. One of those is an Australian who complains that there isn't enough Perique. He should try the P.S. Bullseye flake. Another admits that its the first Virginia/Perique he's tried. And a third complains that its too hot, and is probably just packing it too loose or puffing too fast. This blend needs a slower more peaceful opportunity to explore its complexities.
For those of us who consider it a 4-star blend, it hits the right spot. I hope to enjoy this the next time my Lodge brethren meet on the level after a hearty steak dinner.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
XDipper
|
04/20/2008 |
Mild
|
Mild
|
Mild
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This was my first flake tobacco in a series of tests to arrive at my 12, that is the 12 best tobaccos in 3 categories: Burley, Virginia/English and Flake. Needless to say there are many exceptional tobaccos out there in all three of these categories. Unfortunately, this is not one of them. No, I'm not prepared to totally tank this tobacco but I found it rather bland and unremarkable. Every once in a blue moon, a fair virginia taste emerges but if there is perique here I surely could not detect it. Technique with this one is huge and it becomes very hot and bitey when puffed even a bit too fast. If you're looking for straight virginia taste (which is, on a good day, all you'll get here), I would have to recommend Old Gowrie or even MacBaren Va #1 to this. This is not a horrible tobacco mind you, just a bit bland and a bit of a disappointment. I only have four seats in my 12 for flakes and I suspect this one probably won't make the cut.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Slow Triathlete
|
04/08/2008 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Tolerable
|
|
| To summarize the whole smoke I would say that it was bland. Bland to the point of monotony. I kept hoping that maybe, just maybe the taste, strength, or spiciness would develop somewhere but it didn?t. Nothing stood out to me with this blend. Oh and it had a bite like a rabid dog when I smoked it a bit too fast.
**Update** After smoking more of this and aging it for a bit it really developed in a good way.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Big Jim
|
04/03/2008 |
Very Mild
|
None detected
|
Mild
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Nothing overly exciting here, just a very solid easy smoking tobacco. This blend lights and burns very easily all the way to the bottom of the bowl. The Virginia is very mild with a slightly sweet taste. Perique is used sparingly; enough to taste but not to overpower the smoke. I didn?t experience any tongue bit but it did burn hot due to me puffing harder than normal due to the mild nature of this blend. This could easily be an all day smoke when giving your palate a break from heavy latakia blends.
There are better VAPER blends out there but you?re looking to try this type of blend or looking for a mild blend for you rotation, considering the price it?s hard to beat.
|
|
Showing reviews 61 through 80 of 124 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|