|
Craftsbury Series: Grey Havens
| Brand: |
McClelland |
| Blender: |
McClelland Tobacco Company |
| Tin Description: |
A harmonious blend of lightly fragrant Matured Virginia and premium White Burley with just a hint of Louisiana Perique. You experience the rich taste of fine natural tobaccos and those around you enjoy a mellow and pleasing fragrance. |
| Country of Origin: |
US |
| Curing Group: |
Air Cured |
| Contents: |
Burley
Virginia
Perique
|
| Cut: |
Ribbon |
| Packaging: |
50g Tin, 100g Tin |
| Blend Notes: |
The name Grey Havens is taken from the works of JRR Tolkien. Grey Havens: Mithlond, the harbors of Círdan at the eastern end of the Gulf of Lhûn, from which the Elves of the north of Middle-earth passed into the West during the later Ages. |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Mild
|
| Taste: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 57 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Glorfindel
|
03/06/2008 |
Mild
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Good balance of burley and perique here - very light on perique and that's the way I like it.
Grey Havens is a dependable smoke that performs well with no bite no matter how you puff.
The extremely light topping burns off quickly and serves only to begin the smoke smoothly and quickly transition to the burley supported by perique. Essentially preventing "perique shock" which many of us (especially me) can get from time to time.
If nightcap is your regular (or similar) this blend was not designed for you, save your time and money and move on.
However, this is not what I consider an aromatic tobacco, it is simply a light burley/perique blend, and might appeal to English as well as aromatic folks looking for something on the edge of their normal taste profiles - at least that's what it does for me.
I liked Grey Havens, a good solid blend that can satisfy but likely won't make you turn flips.
Recommended,
3 stars,
Thanks,
Ethan
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
imago
|
12/14/2007 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I'm not sure what it is about Grey Havens that perplexes me. Sometimes, I find that I thoroughly enjoy smoking it; others, I merely tolerate it until I've managed to smoke the bowl's contents. I have problems identifying any of the constituent tobaccos in the mix (were it not for my ability and willingness to read the label on the tin and the reviews, that is) other than perique. I'm a seasonal perique fan. For me to thoroughly enjoy anything containing the spicy weed, I must have cold temperatures and hot coffee. Lately, however, the area in which I live has been experiencing unseasonably warm weather, and I'm sure that has clouded my analysis of this tobacco. Grey Havens isn't a bad tobacco; I just simply have many others that I prefer to spend money on.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Rusty
|
08/01/2007 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| My tin of Grey Havens was six years old at the time of opening. Still too moist, however, to properly enjoy. The first pipe was hard to keep lit and delivered little flavor. After a day's drying, the subsequent experiences were vastly improved.
The tin aroma, devoid of any McClelland ketchup smell after the drying, comes across as smelling like a spiced fruit compote. At the match the flavor comes through fresh and sweet. Quite sweet, actually, with a light and pleasant room aroma. I don't notice much complexity of taste in this blend, and not much change from start to finish. Rather, it's just good burley, virginia, a touch of perique, and a casing I'm still trying to identify (honey, perhaps?)
A good change of pace smoke for me, and recommended.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
tonyg
|
07/30/2007 |
Strong
|
Mild
|
Very Full
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| I believe that GH has been highly underrated by most of those whose reviews appear above. I bought a tin reluctantly based on the reviews. My tin was unlike most Mc Clelland blends, having the perfect moisture content. If you even think you like burley blends, you owe it to yourself to try a tin. And if you don't think you like burley, based on experience with drug store brands, give this one a try. One of my top three burley favorites following Stonehaven and Dark Strong Kentucky.
Update 12/23/05. My last tin of GH was not quite as good as were the earlier ones. I mixed it with 2035 (50/50) and found it even better than my original experience with this blend.
Update 7/30/07. While never a great fan of aromatics, GH ranked near the to op the list. As I grow less enchanted with aromatics, so does my liking for this one.
Add a star if you like aromatics and two stars is aromatics are all you smoke.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Ego Archive
|
04/26/2007 |
Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| What can I say? This is a McClelland blend, and I have yet to find a McClelland that I don?t like. That said this isn?t at the top of my list, but it could see some serious time in my rotation. Out of the tin the smell of this tobacco is very pleasant, Virginia tangy sweetness, and a bit of nuttiness from the burly. When I lit this tobacco up I was surprise as how well the VA/Per came through, it is much milder then many of my standard VA/Per?s but it also burns well without any biting, so I would score that as a distinct positive.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
speckchaser
|
03/11/2007 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| A fantastic blend,smoking abowl right now.The perique does not overshadow the burley or virginias.Virginias waft in and out giving delectable sweet tease and the burley anchors evrything together in a harmonious blend.
Upon opening the tin the famous McClelland ketchup was not as overpowering as their other blends,a figgy note was prescent,like a fruity steak sauce.
The leaf itself is predominately leather brown with a sprinkling of dark leaf.Finely shredded it packs and lites easily in a medium Savinelli.Upon liting once burning billowy clouds of smoke erupt.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Ewoth
|
01/02/2007 |
Mild
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| A sweet flavor, I've been smoking this for a few months now and have yet to tire of the taste or the pleasant aroma.
I would say this is better than Deep Hollow, not by much, but it seems to excel wherever Deep Hollow fails.
I can't seem to find anything bad to say about this blend! So far I would have to say that this is my favorite!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
ChicagoPipe
|
10/03/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| Liking burley mixtures, I had to try this blend from McClelland. I must admit when I first smoked it right out of the tin, I wasn't too impressed. It has a light flavoring, but I can't quite determined what it is, burley, VA and a touch of perique. I was hoping for a little more flavor from the perique.
I put the tobacco in a mason jar and let it sit for about 3 weeks, and then tried it again. Wow! It tastes like a completelly different tobacco. The burley had a nice nutty flavor, good sweetness from the VA, and spice from the perique. I convinced, the longer this tobacco ages, the better it will get. As other reviewers noted, it is a good warm weatner smoke. If you like burly based tobaccos, give this one a try.
10/3/06 I'm going to have to downgrade my recommendation on this tobacco. The last couple of times I smoked it, it really started to bite. I thought it would mellow out in a couple of months, but that's not the case. Mc Clelland has much better tobaccos than this one.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
emmbee
|
08/09/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| McClelland for people who hate McClelland, right down to the Alphonse Mucha type tin art. I know nothing of the Tolkien writings so I can't ply any literary comparisons. Still, this is an excellent summer blend. I first tried this during a very hot week in July when temperatures soared around 100 degrees and the taste for english latakia laden blends was not desired. The tin is smoky and chocolatey, without the typical McC BBQ sauce. Taste is creamy and crisp and downright pleasureful. This is nicer and less aromatic than Deep Hollow and none of the stickyness of McC's luscious, but syrupy aromatics. The perfect warm weather blend, but I'm eager to try it in the autumn as well.
Three and a half of five stars
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Kiltman
|
08/04/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| As I look at the other reviews of this particular blend of pipe weed, I think you either love it or hate it. I fall into the former category, but it took me a while to get there. I bought a tin of it last month during a trip to Kansas City, Mo. My wife said to me, ?Mike you?re in KC MO. You have to buy a can of Mac C?s.? She being a LOTR fan said I should try Grey Havens. I was apprehensive. I didn?t like burley, being a fan of matured Virginias and VA Perique blends. The tin wasn?t cheap either. I?m not really a fan of the burley because of disasters like Cherry Mixture # 79 or various drugstore blends that I loaded into a Dr. Graybow when I was a teenager and pipe-smoking neophyte. Have no fear; this is NOT one of those blends. Upon opening the tin it had MacClelland?s signature ketchup/fermenting fruit aroma and revealed dark orange and mahogany ribbon. The blend is a bit wet and needs a few minutes or in very humid areas a few days to dry out. If you are a fan of burley blends, try it. It?s a nice change of pace from aromatic blends and is a great transition to non-flavored tobacco. If you absolutely can?t stand burley blends, try this one, you?re in for a treat. The VA?s provide a great top note; the Perique is piquant and the burley lends a nutty flavor to the blend that rounds out the whole.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
thedstnguishdgntlmn
|
07/21/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This is HADDO'S DELIGHT LIGHT!!! A McClelland version of the same weed. Very Ketchupy aroma in the tin, but not in the bowl. This is how folks should be introduced to McClelland Virginias. They are present ,but not the backbone of the blend. The "Essence" used is very similar to that of Deep Hollow. An extremely pleasant smoke. Very light and enjoyable in the summer. It is a little tingly on the tongue for the first 5 minutes, then settles nicely into a natural aromatic smoke. A great diversion for every pipe afficianado. The room note is not however Aromatic! It is quite smoky. A solid 3 stars, and hats off to McClelland for their successful foray into the world of Burley!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
BEN
|
04/16/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Thumbing through the recent reviews,I came across a review of this blend. I totally forgot I had a tin of this in my humidor. I got it out and looked at the date of production on the bottom. 1999! I was excited to try this again. I had originally purchased this because in my opinion it smokes extremely well in a meerschaum. So I opened the tin and..WOW!!..one of the things I love about this blend is that "rotten fruit smell", which seemed to have strengthened with the aging process. I then filled a very interesting meerschaum I have (which is a bust of President John F. Kennedy!) with the tobacco and lit up. All I can say is once again WOW!! My recommendation is buy some tins of this and put it away for 6-7 years...this in my opinion is one of the finest blends in it's category! While I am not a fan of the other blends this firm produces..this is fantastic! I will soon be buying more and putting it away...Highly Recommended!!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
caddad
|
04/15/2006 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I purchased two 100 gram tins of this in a row a couple of summers ago, and I truly enjoyed this blend. A saw a negative review on this blend by Serad and it surprised me very much. I think that this tobacco smokes very much like 2015 only it is already rubbed out for you. The only problem I had with this tobacco was that the tin emptied very quickly. It was not packed in the tin very tightly and as you filled several bowls the level dropped very fast. The 2015 is bulk blend and seemed like the wiser choice in the future. However if you like Virginia -Perique blends this one should not go untried.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Cactus John
|
12/21/2005 |
Mild
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| This is an ok tobacco I don't know why it hasn't gotten better reviews than it has. I have a hard time tasting the Perique. But it is there. It could be nicer than it is. If your looking for a Burley/Virginia/Perique blend Kingfisher & Junkyard Dawg are much better than this.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
prison chaplain
|
01/19/2005 |
Mild
|
Very Mild
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| 01-19-2005 Buying an (what is for me) expensive tin of premium has become a crap shoot. All too often I end up kicking myself for laying out $8-10 for a disappointment.
That was the case with Grey Havens. I initially could taste nothing. I began drawing harder, attempting to capture what taste was there and the bowl and my mouth got a little hotter than I like.
I am going to put it up for a month and come back to it. For now, it has shown itself to be a bland, thin, vaporous thing. The "room note" was OK, but that is about it.
My own efforts have proven more satisying. I mixed a pouch of Revelation that had only a couple pipe fulls missing and an equal amount of MC 5100, added a measured teaspoon of MC blending Latakia and a measured tablespoon of MC blending Perique. I mixed it, let it sit overnight and on the way home tonight had a smoke that was much more satisfying that Grey Havens.
Just a hint of smokiness, just a hint of Perique and the 5100 sweetened and rounded out the Revelation. And it didn't cost me almost $9.00. Yes, I can be a tighwad. And sometimes it pays off.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
The Keeper
|
01/13/2005 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Medium
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| One thing I've noticed about McC blends in general - they require age to really come to fruition. Lots of age. The tin I have is about 50g worth of 7.5 year old Gray Havens. This is really fantastic stuff. I could envision a newer tin being hard to get through - thin and harsh - much like some of beloved "young" C+D and GLP mixtures. But the sample I'm currently treasuring is dense in flavor in complexity. Truly quality stuff with an interplay of light nuttiness, tangy perique, delightfully sweet topping and natural VA. A very mild cigar note creeping in every now and again adds robustness. No bite or wetness with the topping actually enhancing - instead of overpowering the smoke.
This is in sharp contrast to my experience with other McC Craftsbury collection series. Frog Morton is, IMO, abysmally boring. Deep Hollow kind of like attempting to smoke a caramel apple (though quite tasty if you hit a sweet spot). But Gray Havens is to date the only one of the bunch I'd actually keep around. Though I have a feeling I should hunt down some old tins or else stow away a bunch for savoring later...
I will add that while topped, this seems to promote much more appeal in taste than to room note. While the perique and topping function well in the blend - the air left in the room is exceptionally acrid and stale.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Darth 69
|
01/06/2005 |
Mild
|
Strong
|
Mild
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| In description it sounds interesting and like a real winner, but after opening the tin and smoking a bowl, this is amoung the group of really bad McClelland products. A base of broad rough-cut burley with some black stoved/cavendished(?) broken cake and supposedly some perique which I can't detect. The smell of the tin suggests that it was heavily flavored with Hershey's chocolate syrup. A rather overly flavored product that does'nt reflect it's description on the tin. It would have been better if it was produced with a restraint on the flavoring to just barely case the white burely along with a noticable amount of perique. Or maybe the heavy flavoring is masking it. In the final analysis a monochromatic aromatic without refinement.
-Not recommended
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
OSR
|
10/31/2004 |
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Unnoticeable
|
|
| This is very flat and thin. I smoked one bowl and got rid of the rest. No redeeming qualities, even the lable on the tin is mundane.
Hot, flat and 'blah'.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
CaptnDan
|
08/11/2004 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| The only Grey Havens I have tried has been aged five years, so my impressions may differ from the others due to the aging.
The tobacco was a bit damp, but a bit of time sitting out solved that.
The first 1/3 of the bowl was Burley all the way, until the Virginia got going well. The Va seemed to like to pop up boldly, then run back into the background. The topping was very mild, and the Perique? well, I had to double check when I first started smoking this blend. I was sure there was supposed to be some. It just stayed so far in the background that it was hard to tell if the taste I was getting hints of was Perique or the topping. McC says it?s a hint of Perique ? and they speak the truth.
Overall, this is an interesting smoke, and I enjoyed it. It smoked cool, and other than the finish which left a bit to be desired (bitter), I would not turn my nose up at it. But I doubt I would buy it again either.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Briarabbit
|
08/11/2004 |
Very Mild
|
None detected
|
Very Mild
|
Pleasant
|
|
| A very bland tobacco that has the right componets, but at what I believe are wrong levels. I really like Burley tobacco,but the burley here is tired,and faint. The Perique is somewhere in there,(so they say). The Virginia componet is way back in the background,and can barely be heard. Try again Mc.
|
|
Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 57 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|