|
221b Series: Black Shag
| Brand: |
McClelland |
| Blender: |
McClelland Tobacco Company |
| Tin Description: |
Sherlock Holmes kept it in the toe of a Persian slipper nailed to the mantelpiece. It was dry and strong. Kept at what we today have deduced to be proper smoking moisture and smoked gently, this excellent Stoved Shag will provide hours of smoking pleasure. Examine the ash carefully. A shag cut Black Virginia tobacco, making it very easy to pack a pipe and burn evenly. |
| Country of Origin: |
US |
| Curing Group: |
Air Cured |
| Contents: |
Virginia
|
| Cut: |
Shag |
| Packaging: |
50g Tin |
| Blend Notes: |
The first in the 221b Series is Black Shag, introduced at the 1997 Sherlock Holmes meeting of the Richmond Conclave of Pipe Smokers. |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Extremely Mild
|
| Taste: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Somewhat Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 62 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Kilmarnock Piper
|
08/24/2009 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Black Schwag. I don't like to give a tobacco one star. I would even give most drug store tobaccos two stars. Except Mixture 79. I wouldn't even review that one. Black Shag has no horrible flavors. It seemed to smoke well at first. But then I found that it was not at all pleasant and not like any McClelland I had smoked, but not in a good way. Harsh taste if you push it, no taste if you don't. I give it two stars only because pipe tobacco appreciation is highly subjective and others might like the blend. The tobaccos in the blend seem to be quality and I might like them if they were blended...differently.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
pipe_organist
|
07/28/2009 |
Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| UPDATE: After letting the open tin sit (with the lid on) for about a month, and trying this blend in several different pipes, I've concluded that it smokes best when well-packed and in a smaller pipe. It's not my favorite blend, but given the price I paid for it I'll smoke it until it's gone, or trade it with someone who likes this kind of stuff. I raised my rating to 2 stars.
+++++++++++
I picked up a tin of this just to try something different. It was an expensive mistake, as it was purchased in Michigan, so between the federal, state and local taxes plus the shop's markup it was one of the most expensive tins of tobacco I've ever purchased.
I've tried every method to pack it: loose, tight, air-pocket method, layer method, Frank method. It fought to stay lit every step of the way; it didn't char light and had to be relit constantly, burned unevenly, tunneled down the middle of the bowl almost every time, and gurgled and smoked wet in a pipe that has never had a wet smoke issue. It left a heap of grey/black ash in the ashtray with plenty of blackend chunks of half-burned charcoal-like bits.
It bites back hard if you over-stoke, which you have to to get the wretched stuff to light and stay lit.
About the only positive things I can say is that the room note is pleasant enough and the flavor on the pallete, when not scorched, is sweet and pleasantly tangy, without the usual McCelland "hot ketchup" taste.
I think I'm going to cellar this tin for about a year and then come back to it to see if it improves with age. It was too costly a purchase to either throw away or put into a catch-all "Hoover blend" tin.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
mrmiloboy
|
04/17/2009 |
Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| Upon opening the can, I wasn't sure about this blend. As I kept with it I developed a taste for it and have grown to really like it. I thought is filled the pallet and had a "round" flavor. Give it a chance, it might grow on you.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
bigjonburley
|
02/02/2009 |
Medium
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I originally purchased this blend nearly 5 years ago to the the day. my mason jar is labelled 02-14-04. Though at the time I though that this tobacco was very similar to 2035, though the volitized esters were constricted, at the time, due to the cut and presentation. With nearly a decade of age, this is sublime. If anyone else out there has a similar specimen let his opinion be heard because I want to know. This has the taste of prunes, black pepper, and citrus. I recently opened an 8oz jar of 2035 from the same vintage and it is very similar, yet because of the cut it smokes very different. If you can get this one aged it is different than anything you've had. For you you sherlockians(I ain't one, I'm a southern boy with a fetish for fine tobacco. not someone smoking a certain pipe shape living out a fantasy) this one wont find its home in the toe of a slipper. It will enjoy itself burning to a nice ash in the belly of a peterson.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Jon Tillman
|
12/13/2008 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| Well, the best thing I can say about this particular offering from McClelland is that it isn't offensive. There really isn't anything here to make me reach for it again, but I was not put off by it in any way, except for its complete mediocrity. Flavor is decent, strength is negligable, and room aroma is not particularly bad nor pleasant. If tobacco blends were created by government oversight comittees, this would be the end result.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Pipemanuk
|
10/07/2008 |
Mild
|
Extremely Mild
|
Very Mild
|
Unnoticeable
|
|
| If this is supposed to be a reflection of the kind of tobacco Holmes would have known, it fails miserably. It's thin, flat, bitter and really not worth the money. Absolutely NOTHING like an english shag tobacco...
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Big bad Jon
|
10/05/2008 |
Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I was not sure what to expect on this one. I like Arcadia fairly well, but as we all know liking one in a series does not make the entire series worth smoking. I would like to make a warning to novice smokers *** be careful *** the cut of this blend (somewhat like cigarette tobacco will burn hot. If you have the discipline and a smallish pipe, read Dunhill group 3 or smaller, this tobacco has some good attributes. There is a slight casing of spice, like cinnamon that is present on match, but what I mostly taste while smoking is a nice warm earthy taste that is not very sweet. I do not know what a newer tin is like on moisture content, but my nine year old tin was drier than most McClelland tobaccos. There was still a vinegar smell but not as strong as most of their blends. I did like my tin a bit better after letting it dry out more, but it was smokable as soon as the tin was open. Over all there are a lot of other VA blends that I like better, and the possibility of third degree burns on my tongue if not careful leads me to go elsewhere for my VA fix.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Captain Pete
|
09/24/2008 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| I feel that this may possibly be one of the more under rated blends on this site. This may be due to the fact that it doesn't really fit into any particular category of tobaccos; it's an oddball. Neither an oriental, nor a typical va. mixture, it is all together its own beast. But, I have spent many enjoyable hours contemplating how to pigeonhole this blend while smoking it.
As its name implies, it is a dark shag cut tobacco. The black to light brown strands are nearly cut like cigarette tobacco, meaning that some measure of care needs be exercised when loading the pipe. I find that it smokes best in a medium sized dublin bowl, but will do fairly well in a group 4 size bull cap/ rhodesian. If you have cellared your tin so that it is 3-5 years old, then you have done all that is necessary to turn what ordinarily can be a fairly mundane blend into a spectacular tobacco. Time does wonders for this.
Getting past the charring light has always been a little problematic for me with this blend, perhaps due to my extra caution in trying to light a shag cut va. (a bowl of Cardiff, anyone?). But once lit, this blend burns pretty well. I notice ocassionally that it will require an additional relight halfway down if I'm smoking it in a deep bowl. But, it always burns down to a fine gray ash.
The flavors in Black Shag are petty simple, but then again, not always so. Sometimes, with the right measure of puffing, in the right weather, this blend develops a wonderfully complex body. The flavors range from a cinamon-like spiciness to a rich smoky caramel sweetness. Intermingled with this is a distinct background note of orientals, but done with a fairly light touch so as to provide only a slight lingering mustiness. I suspect there is some dark fired leaf in here somewhere. The flavor is similar to Bombay Court, but deeper, and with a less refined edge to it.
I like it; it's gentlemanly without being too genteel. This is for the guys who refuse to adorn themselves with colognes and hair gels; for the aqua velva crowd only. My wife comments on how 'strong' and 'overpowering' this tobacco smells, but I think she secretly likes it. She says it smells like man.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
al1
|
08/04/2008 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I thought this was decent. It did not make much of an impression on me. It will be only an occasional smoke for me, but it is decent enough that I will smoke it once in a while to mix things up. The shag cut packs and burned pretty well. Had not so good results in a small pipe. It went better in a medium one for me. Seems to go ok with coffee.
It just had that already burnt taste like when you smoke half a bowl and then let it sit all day and get back to it later to me off the start- probablly due to the dark va not being a good blender. I like dark va alone. Just not my cup of tea. By far I think Mclelland has better blends.
I could see some english smokers really liking this though, so I will say try it. Just don't order more than one tin till you see how it treats you is all I'm saying. I like the #25 va more than this. The cut is simillar but it is rich dark stoved va without the latakia. I'd rather see more latakia in the 221b honestly.
I like the honeydew in this series much better and that is on my "A" list.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Latakia
|
04/05/2008 |
Medium to Strong
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Beutifully shag cut. Bouught this at JR's out of whim not knowing anything about it. Not bad but nothing to rave about either. Very fruity and reminded me a bit of Dunhill Royal Yacht but then it has been a long time since I had that. Burned well. Something missing. Perhaps it is just that I don't like a full Va Stoved blend and need more latakia but this will not be a regular. I will keep it stored for a break from my usual English and Oriental blends that I prefer much more.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
pop-pop's pipe
|
02/19/2008 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| Strong shag cut VA. Stoved. Not a wife pleaser. The wife didn't complain when I smoked Peterson's Irish Flake but complained on this one, go figure! Even Penzance only got a funny look, but this got a verbal opinion! EEWW! I like it. It's better than Honeydew, I like heavier smokes. This isn't too sweet,but isn't too strong either. I imagine drying out a bit would increase it's stregnth, but it would also make it a bit harsh too. I can't down this tobacco but it won't be in my rotation no more either. I imagine this would be overwhelming to a newbie, but after smoking Irish Flake, 1792, and Penzance, this is like BCA to me.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
constantsmoker
|
09/27/2007 |
Medium
|
Mild
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Probably McClelland's weakest entry in its 221-B series of tobaccos. I presume that it consists predominantly of stoved VA and, if so, McClelland does it better with their MC 5105 Stoved Virginia product. An unremarkable product, at best.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
petersonsmoker
|
08/31/2007 |
Mild
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This blend is a little underrated. It is a great Virginia tobacco with which to start the day. I have smoked pounds of this over my morning coffee and never experienced tongue-bite or a hot bowl. My only criticism is that I wish Black Shag was a little bit more of a proper English blend - but I guess that is why McClelland gave us Arcadia. A great AM tobacco!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Moe
|
04/01/2007 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Interesing shag cut. More reminicent of RYO cigarette tobacco. for the way its cut you would expect a bit more flavor. But you can puff and puff and it always seems like somthings missing. I think this ones kinda boring, and what flavor is there, isnt all that appealing. McClelland has some really good blends. This isnt one of them.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
donk93953
|
12/27/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Mild
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Ok, I'll try to think of something nice to say....the tin will be great for keeping something in...paper clips. In a word, awful. I've read the other reviews about lightness on the tongue, etc...I found it to smoke way to hot, the tobacco cut lends to that, flavor...uh, what flavor...smelled like cigarettes...I liked stoved Virginias, but with some taste..I'll stick with Rattray's Black Virginia...
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
A. Morley Jaques
|
08/19/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Very Mild
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| Enough has been said, said by Sherlockians far less knowledgeable than myself, but said all the same, as to how, in spite of the name, 221B Black Shag is nothing like what Holmes actually smoked, so I won't belabor that point.
I have occasionally found it sad that there are so few blends found today that employ black Virginia. It really is a wonderful tobacco providing such an interesting take on Virginia by right of such a simple process. It then donned on me that there is no real need for very many examples, as black Virginia is a tobacco best left by itself. It simply does not blend well. Its good, dry, toasted flavor is fine by itself, but will cause any other tobaccos it is blended with to taste bland, bitter, or already burnt. This is what has happened with Black Shag. Even something so endearing as McClelland's red Virginia is rendered very weak and flabby tasting in the combination affected. I even smoked this stuff on the streets of London and it didn't help. Rattray's Black Virginia, composed of 100% black Virginia, by contrast to Black Shag, realizes to unsociable nature of this type of Virginia, and that wonderful tobacco, for me, proves my point.
Regards,
A. Morley Jaques
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Joseph Durham
|
08/03/2006 |
Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| McClelland?s 221-B Series is surrounded around the famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. We grew up reading and watching the films of the witty detective smoking his pipe, and finding clues, solving cases left and right. Now, we have a special line dedicated to the man himself.
The first blend in this series is ?Black Shag.? The tobacco is contained within a small tin containing 50grams of this wonderful blend. The covering of the tin makes anyone that is a Sherlock Holmes lover to tear right into it. On entering the store, I grabbed a tin, removed the plastic cover, and pulled back the seal. I loaded up my pipe and enjoyed a full bowl before even buying. On the cover is a picture of Holmes smoking a bent pipe staring into his magnifying glass. While the design is simple, it is nice to look at.
Upon opening the tin you are greeted with not only the aroma but fine cut strands of brown, red, and black delights. The tin has the slight hint of the famous McClelland ketchup, but very little. After smelling the tobacco for a while the ?ketchup? disappears and you are left with the real thing.
Load the pipe as you like, there is no science to smoking this blend. It lights right away and it stays lit. With the first puff you will be welcomed with a slight spice, very enjoyable.
One should make sure that they smoke this bowl at somewhat of a slow pace. You do not need to smoke extra slow, but tone it down a bit compared to your usual speed. If you go a bit fast you will be victim of tongue bite.
This tobacco remains the same throughout the entire bowl; this is a real pleasure to get your hands on. I recommend this to anyone that wants to smoke a good Virginia blend and one that will not hurt your wallet. I truly enjoyed it and this will be a continual line in my cellar. I can?t wait to tear into the other two blends which are seated right next to me.
Pipeing Joe ______(_)
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
jackal
|
07/25/2006 |
Mild
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| This the kind of blend you love or hate. I love it. The lightness on the tongue and the smooth but spicy taste keep this blend interesting from the lighting to the ash. This could be an all-day smoke. I liked it best in a churchwarden.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
bernie c
|
07/11/2006 |
Mild to Medium
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| My first couple of bowls of this were most dissapointing. Little taste, infact rather bland all round. Maybe I dumped the bowl out too soon instead of letting it really get going? My last smoke started just the same, and I had to really persuade myself to keep smoking. "Life`s too short to smoke stuff like this" I kept thinking to myself. The pipe was a very deep Comoy Oom Paul. A full 2 inches of bowl depth. Maybe this had something to do with the experience that unfolded. As I smoked away, it eventually hit me that this was actually "sort of o.k" and half an hour into my smoking, I suddenly got it. It was starting to taste sweet and deep and full. Rather like one of the Rattrays virginias like Old Gowrie. The sweetness also reminded me quite a lot of Escudo Navy Flake! After some time I was actually really enjoying this smoke. It does seem to take a long time to manifest itself, but when it does...a delightful sweet smoke will reveal itself to you. Most suited to large pipes with a deep bowl in my opinion. The impatient puffers need not apply. This needs dedication and patience.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Cosmoline
|
04/06/2006 |
Medium
|
Mild
|
Medium
|
Strong
|
|
| I've approached this tin from several directions. The first smoke burned me badly. I switched to a HCA churchwarden and took wee little puffs, but it still burned and I had to relight it several times. I let the tin sit for a few weeks, and approached it again with a different pipe. Smoking carefully after the leaf had dried, I was not bitten or burned. But the taste isn't pleasant. And the smell is pretty nasty. I know Holmes kept his stash in the toe of an old Persian slipper, but ths stuff smells like it crossed the desert riding in one. I'll take the 7% solution, or better yet the excellent Arcadia blend in this same line.
EDIT: I let the tin dry for a few weeks and smoked another bowl in a church warden today. It's still not exactly good, but it's much better now that the leaf has dried out. I also packed it more loosely. It did not burn me this time, but the taste isn't really there. I'm going to stow it for a few months in a sealed container and see how it is after that.
|
|
Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 62 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|