tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4440 (3 new)   /   reviews: 51732 (82 new)   /   Users Online : 671   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Chocolate Flake

Brand: Samuel Gawith
Blender: Samuel Gawith
Tin Description: The first of a collection dedicated to Samuel Gawith 1st, Chocolate Flake is a luxury blend of Virginias, Burley and long-leaf Latakias. To complete the luxury a rich, dark chocolate has been added after cutting. Excellent smoking qualities with good smoke and a delicious room-note. Medium strength.
Country of Origin: UK
Curing Group: Flue Cured
Contents:
Burley
Virginia
Latakia
Cut: Flake
Packaging: 50g Tin / Bulk

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Medium
Flavoring: Mild
Taste: Medium
Room Note: Pleasant to Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

Showing reviews 41 through 60 of 121 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
JLong 10/03/2009 Medium Mild Medium Pleasant recommended
Upon first opening, the tin aroma reminded me of a dental office. Like leather soaked in novocain.

I get the best satisfaction out of this tobacco by rubbing out the flakes, letting them air dry for four hours or so, and plugging a small bowl suited for flake tobacco. Similar to the method described in the Mac Baren web site for smoking flake tobacco.

When smoked in this fasion, it is a smooth burning tasty tobacco with some tang to it. It comes off a little bitter at first but the palette adjusts. As others noted, there is a hint of chocolate. The after taste is very pleasant and lingers for hours.

I doubt this will be a go to tobacco for me but it is definitely a keeper. Something to relax with on a cool fall night with a good book.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Alguhan 09/05/2009 Mild to Medium Very Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
It has an apetizing smell and look in the tin. As many othe SG flakes the humidity level is high, so dry the flakes befor packing into the bowl.

Lights easily, and stays lit. It has a generous smoke and satisfies my nicotine needs. The chocolate sweetness is a shade which covers the nice flavors of the mixture. This is the only disadvantage of the blend for me. Lots of other pipe smokers can find this unique particularity unbeatable. For me the excellent VA, burley and the latakia touch mixture might have the priority.

Even if it is dried well you may have steam problems. Try to smoke very slow, and keep some pipe cleaners nearby.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pip 08/18/2009 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Medium Pleasant somewhat recommended
The chocolate is very subtle. You can smell hints of it in the tin. Latakia is very faint.

None the less the flakes were big and dark and rubbed out well. Have to let it dry out a bit before packing otherwise it clumps up. I packed my pipe loosely and it lit up fine. It smokes smooth and cool and every so often you get a chocolate hit. No bite at all.

I enjoy this blend with a galss of Drambuie on ice. It really accents the tobacco's flavors.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
doc'spipe 07/29/2009 Medium Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
I have wanted to try GHs Bob's Chocolate Flake and SGs Chocolate Flake for a good while now.

As with Bob's Chocolate Flake, I was off-put by Sam's version of Lakeland florals - way too perfumy for me to taste and appreciate the tobaccos within. Actually, both made me a bit nauseous and it took a while for the aftertaste of both to leave my palate. Not a pleasant experience for me.

Moisture content of both was just about right for a flake, although SGs was the drier of the two and the easiest to pack, light, and keep lit. I did get a bit of a nicotine hit with SGs Chocolate Flake, but nothing noticed with Bob's.

I intend to keep the lids off both of my tins for about a month to see if it minimizes (I hope rids them) of the soapy/perfumy tastes that made smoking these blends so not enjoyable for me. 1 star.

UPDATE 4-20-10: I had a similar experience as with Bob's Chocolate Flake (see 4-20-10 update under that heading). Deciding to re-visit since my original review, time has allowed all but a trace of the Lakeland presence to vanish, leaving a tobacco that was smokeable - and enjoyable - for me. After smoking both chocolate blends, I tend to favor Bob's Chocolate Flake more so than Sam's version due to a more pronounced (yet not over the top) chocolate flavor present throughout the smoke. Can't taste chocolate at all in Sam's version. I can definitely taste the Latakia in this one as it was minimal with Bob's (I'm not a big fan of Latakia so this was just fine). Sam's Latakia adds a subtle background presence and is more dominating than with Bob's. The soapy presence in Sam's was very minimal in the tin aroma, and nil while smoking this time around. Both are high quality tobaccos and I can now appreciate the 3-4 star reviews each has garnered. While perhaps never becoming daily smokes for me, both are definitely worthy of weekly rotation; but if I purchase any new tins, I will need to let the Lakeland presence dissipate off long before I smoke either blend. Sam's dries out quicker which was ok. The flakes were almost crunchy, but ladden with beautiful sugar crystals adding a subtle, non-cloying, sweetnes.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Skando 07/26/2009 Mild to Medium Mild Mild to Medium Tolerable to Strong somewhat recommended
Chocolate Flake is the only SG's I have left unreviewed, because I always felt uninspired to do.

Seems to me that the Burley plays the main role; Latakia and chocolate are applied in very small quantities. It's the whole blend that doesn't inspire me anything and, like the brothers Balkan Flake and Sam's Flake, is dull and flat.

The combination of the elements in CF gives a faintly sweet & salty (even ashy...) smoke which doesn't really mean a thing to me.

As Hagen says just before me, nothing to complain about the leaves, it's just the boring combination.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
hagen 07/25/2009 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Medium Tolerable somewhat recommended
this IS a strange blend. at present - after 4 pipefulls - i must say that it is no favourite of mine. the chocolate and the latakia really clash in my mouth, and the notes never seem to unite. i can't imagine sage, pine nuts and chocolate uniting either, for that...

interesting, perhaps, but not for me. still, as most sam gawith, there's nothing wrong with the leaf.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Nachman 07/25/2009 Mild to Medium Very Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Samuel Gawith Chocolate Flake is a pleasant tobacco. When I first lit it I noticed it has a silky feel on the tongue like a good quality chocolate and I thought that was why it is named Chocolate Flake. I couldn't taste or smell any chocolate, but as I got down to the last third of the bowl I started to taste a hint of dark chocolate. I don't know if that is the result of a chocolate topping or just a similarity. This tobacco would deserve four stars but (to my taste) it has two flaws. The first flaw is minor. It is a flake and I prefer my tobacco ready rubbed. To me the second flaw is major. It doesn't have any Latakia. To some that would be a plus. So if you are a fairly mild virginia flake lover this could be your dream tobacco.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Ranger 06/15/2009 Mild to Medium Very Mild Medium to Full Pleasant highly recommended
I really liked this blend. Moist right out of the tin, a few minutes drying is all that is needed. The tobacco is dark, rich in taste, low levels of latakia but noticeable, and a nice background of cocoa; not the sweet candy bar kind, but a more bittersweet cocoa used in baking. Not A plus material, but very good.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
sweetpipes 05/23/2009 Mild Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Very Pleasant recommended
I can't say that I experienced chocolate on any sensory level, though I enjoyed the unique flavor that resulted from Gwaith's attempt. I would have to assume that naming this tobacco chocolate has more to do with the creamy and somewhat bitter flavor that one associates with very dark chocolate, but cocoa--no way. Nevertheless, a mild and flavorful smoke is still had. Needs to dry out a bit after rubbing out. Room note's out on this one.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Plunket 05/09/2009 Medium Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
It's interesting how palates differ: from 2006 to 2008, this was my main-stay tobacco and I enjoyed it very much. I smoked a tin last month, the first in about 18 months, and I am reassured that that my first impressions back in 2006 were spot-on.

This is a traditional English style flake (plenty of pipe cleaners at the ready) with interesting flavours and a dense, rich and heave smoke emanating from the smoke. I preferred it fully rubbed-out with a little advanced drying.

A good smoke - highly recommended.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
bryantm3 04/14/2009 Medium Extremely Mild Very Full Tolerable not recommended
I don't like this. It tastes like a combination of Hershey's chocolate syrup and McClelland Red Cake. There is no consistancy; they're both just there and the flavors don't work. It makes me feel sick. Avoid.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Dov of the Galilee 04/09/2009 Medium to Strong Medium Full Very Strong recommended
I'm an aromatic man so bear that in mind but this too is an aromatic in a sense. I enjoy flake tobacco it's the rubbing it out and the build up to the smoke that I occasionally enjoy. The blend itself reminds me of Frog Morton which I like in its own right. Chocolate? I can't detect that in the least and that's what I want in a product that states it so boldly in its name. If a product is going to say chocolate or Cherry it should first and foremost be evident to anyone who walks into the room. For me as the smoker I want the flavor too. Aromatics are notorious for their gunkiness and this burns perfectly and leaves behind a pleasant pile of ash that ole Sherlock himself would find welcoming to investigate. I've given the mix three stars because it deserves it overall but it's not what I expected.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
kg0mz 03/08/2009 Medium Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Someone said it below...Stonehaven with a little latakia and more chocolate. Bob's CF is different from this one, not that it has more chocolate. BCF smokes cooler and has that Lakeland District flavor, soap if you will. I enjoy them both, and I highly recommend them both.

07/27/09 UPDATE: I am revising some of my reviews. I have given out more 4 star ratings than anything else. That practice is probably not helping. So, I am reducing Chocolate Flake to 3 stars, not because I like it less than I did before, but because I am limiting 4 stars to fewer than 25% of all my reviews. One day I may use the 4 star rating to designate my top five.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
beaupipe 02/15/2009 Medium Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Hmmm?. When I first tried Gawith and Hoggarth?'s Bob?'s Chocolate Flake, I didn'?t much care for it. Too large a Lakeland signature made me feel like I was licking chocolate sauce from my lady'?s perfumed hoohaw. I had the opposite reaction to SG'?s Chocolate Flake. I liked it immediately.

I'?m sure you can tell where this is going.

A few months later and I'?ve re-ordered BCF and I?'m struggling to finish this little number. The two flakes have a lot in common. They?'re both based on brown Virginia (though Sam's claims Latakia), both are fairly generous of tobacco flavor and nicotine, both are delightfully smoky, and both are pretty subtle as far as aroma is concerned. If I?'d never experienced BCF, I would probably make this flake an occasional houseguest. Where I think BCF bests Sam's flake (at least for me) is in the level of complexity, the layering of flavor. It?'s got more to say, I suppose.

But at least one other reviewer here had precisely the opposite reaction. (I though you should know.)


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pipe-billed Grebe 01/29/2009 Mild to Medium Very Mild Full Tolerable to Strong highly recommended
Chocolate Flake's tin aroma is something that I cannot help but compare to smoking meat and perhaps tires on a hot summer day, which perhaps doesn't sound appealling but smells very intriguing and enticing. The flavor is sweet and tangy, rich and smoky all at the same time. I find that rubbing it out makes it brighter and tangier, whereas simply rolling up the flake and stuffing it in the bowl yields a fuller, richer, deeper smoke. I prefer the latter. The Virginia is deliciously sweet and full. The latakia is like a catfish I used to have in my aquarium; I would go months wondering if he was still alive, and then he'd pop up and I'd wave and smile and he'd go back under his rock. Which is not necessarily bad, unless you're looking for a lot of Latakia; in Chocolate Flake it's content to swim around the bottom, mostly unnoticed; it's very much a condimental leaf here used with the lightest touch. As for the eponymic chocolate, we must bear in mind that chocolate is not sweet; it is rich and bitter, and much sugar must be added to create chocolate candy. I suspect that however SG employs the chocolate, it is in its natural form, dark, bitter, and unsweetened, and I catch a whiff of it as such, adding a certain elusive savor to the smoke. That is what I like best about Chocolate Flake: it is essentially a very tasty quality VA flake with a couple of inconspicuous condiments added which very delicately yet very definitely add interest and depth to the smoke.

One of the very best smoking/imbibing combinations I have experienced was SG Chocolate Flake + North Coast Red Seal Ale. Greatly recommended.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
MAXYSDAD 12/23/2008 Mild Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant not recommended
Easy pack , easy smoke , easy on ya tongue , then !!! O. M .G - They are right -the soap smell!!it stinks in the tin of soap , even when it dissipates in the smoking process , once you latch onto the pre-smoke stink [ the pinky phenolic stuff @ school when you had short pants} it spoils the whole road show ,don,t be fooled by the room note- its the decoy{ as it is OK ] blec


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
rocket_man77 12/09/2008 Mild to Medium Very Mild Medium Tolerable not recommended
Not what I was expecting to find in the tin. I do like English tobacco but only once did I seem to find the ideal conditions to get a satasfactory smoke from the tobacco. It seemed unbalanced.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pipe-arazzo 12/03/2008 Medium Extremely Mild Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Lakeland Tour Stop 14

I tried this alternating with Bob's Chocolate Flake from Gawith and Hoggarth. I liked this one better overall, principally because it was more interesting to my palate and had no soapy flavor to it.

Some reviewers say this is Best Brown with the addition of latakia and chocolate flavor. For my money, I think Best Brown is better by itself. This was ok, once it had aged enough. At first, though I gave the open tin a month to mellow before smoking it, it was a bit bitter and, for lack of a better word, "muddy" in flavor. This subsided finally, especially after I had to rehydrate it, leaving a nice rich virginia flavor.

I never noticed any latakia or chocolate. That was ok; I probably would not have wanted something that tasted like a chocolate bar. But I do think just a bit more sweetness would have done wonders for this tobacco, bringing out the flavors and taking the edge off. This smelled very sweet in the tin, by the way. Certainly worth a try if you're looking for a nice virginia tobacco. Aromatophiles and latakia junkies will definitely be disappointed.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Society of the Briar 12/01/2008 Medium to Strong None detected Medium Tolerable to Strong somewhat recommended
I've not much else to add to the list of reviews for this tobacco, only to echo the sentiment that while this isn't a bad tobacco by any stretch, chocolate it is not. There is an "old fashioned" aroma in the tin from the Latakia, but honestly I challenge anyone to find anything remotely chocolate about it. And while that isn't necessarily a bad thing, hey, I did buy it because it was called Chocolate Flake. If you're looking for a pressed VA/Latakia flake, this very well might be your bag.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Big Nick 11/24/2008 Medium Extremely Mild Medium Tolerable recommended
Calling this blend "Chocolate Flake" might be a little deceptive. Although the tin description implies some sort of chocolate flavoring, I did'nt detect it. That being said, this is a good Virginia/Latakia flake that does produce a sort of bitter chocolate nuance similar to some premium cigars. This is a fairly sweet blend as can be seen by the flakes themselves which seem to be secreting sugars to the surface. Latakia smokers might find this flake a little weak. Aromatic smokers might feel a little decieved, but all in all it is a good smoke.


Showing reviews 41 through 60 of 121 reviews of this tobacco

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics