|
Anniversary 1977-2002
| Brand: |
McClelland |
| Blender: |
McClelland Tobacco Company |
| Tin Description: |
An elegant matured Virginia ribbon-cut blend, naturally sweet with that clarity of flavor possessed by only the best Virginias. Seasoned lightly with fine, cool-smoking Cyprian Latakia. Aged for months to mellow. |
| Country of Origin: |
US |
| Curing Group: |
Fire Cured |
| Contents: |
Virginia
Latakia
|
| Cut: |
Ribbon |
| Packaging: |
100g Tin |
| Blend Notes: |
Originally released in 2002 to commemorate 25 years of quality tobacco manufacturing, a total of 3000 tins were issued wrapped in commemorative ecru paper with a red wax seal. A second issue, bearing a green wax seal and an updated date span on the paper wrapping (1977-2005), was released in 2005. A third issue, bearing a brown wax seal and updated date span (1977-2010), was released in 2010. |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Extremely Mild
|
| Taste: |
Medium
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 41 through 58 of 58 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Cooksmoke
|
03/18/2004 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Twenty-fifth Anniversary is for me an all time favorite. The rich blend of latakia and virginia tobaccos was just right. This is all to rare a blend. The pack and burn were perfect. Rich and smokey the blend was a delight to savor.
I especially enjoyed this in a meerschaum in the evening where I could relax and enjoy it. It has plenty of high notes. The strange, McClelland taste was in the background to be sure, but not as pronounced as in some blends, and I like it anyway. This is an excellent blend well deserved of its appelation. There are several tins of this stored away in the cellar.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Mephisto
|
01/25/2004 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Very nice and unique a soft and balanced blend with high quality all over it. A limited blend and a treat if you can find some. I do like itbut it is a special occation kind of thing.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
ArtGuy
|
12/03/2003 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I found this to be a very well balanced blend throughout. Enough smokiness from the latakia to make things interesting and healthy amount of sweetness to satisfy my love for Virginias.
For a latakia mix, the room note is not bad. I smoked this over the holiday and even my sister in law commented on the nice pipe smell emanating from the patio.
One of McClelland's best to date. If you find a place that still has it, buy all of it.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
omegapd
|
05/05/2003 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This is the perfect blend for the Virginia smoker who wants just a little bit more complexity. That said, I don't care for very sweet Latakia mixtures unless there's a whole lot more Latakia than whats in here. The quality of tobacco is top-notch and it would probably be a great ageing tobacco. I did get bit a little trying to sap out more flavor than what's actually there. The tin aroma is typical McClellands and while I don't hate it, I don't go searching for other blends that have the same. Overall, a nice blend but I'll stick to things that suit my tastes more...
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
RCUSElder
|
04/28/2003 |
Medium to Strong
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Strong
|
|
| While the quality of this blend is very apparent, I have to say that the room note is a "killer" My wife stated that it smelled just like cigarettes and I had to concur. This for me was definitely an outside smoke. As i smoked this, two things came to mind: First, smoke slowly, even though this is rubbed out, the virginia will toast your tongue if you are not careful. Second, not enough latakia for my palate. I kept hoping the latakia would develop near the bottom of the bowl but such was not the case. This is one of those quality blends that just didn't work for me.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
gryan
|
01/12/2003 |
Mild to Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| After being cellared for about one year I decided that it was time to enjoy this much discussed blend from our friends in Kansas City.
I choose a vintage Savinelli Capri for this tasting, The Savinelli Capris are some of the driest and coolest smokes that I own.
After opening the tin, the first thing I noticed was that this blend did not have any of the common "acetic acid" aroma that I have noticed in freshly opened tins of other McClelland products. This may be a factor of cellaring; I have noticed that aged bulk blends of this maker also loose this smell over time.
Even though it is not mentioned in the tobacco description above, I can not help but notice some ribbon cut flue cured tobacco in the blend. This is mixed with a fully rubbed out Virginia Flake and dark ribbon cut tobaccos, some of which may be fire cured virginias and of course Latakia.
The blend loaded easily into the pipe. It is one of the few tinned tobaccos that are dry enough for me to smoke directly. A charring light took well and I was in business with the second match. One of the first things noticed was that the Latakia tasted more like a Syrian variety than the more "sweet" Cyprian variety usually found in McClelland mixtures.
This tobacco has more of the characteristics found in an English blend of decades ago and is reminisent of the original Scottish Rattray's I have been privy to. The tobacco would be ideal for many smokers all day blends, I found it just a little lacking in body. The flavor did not change at all from the first to the last puff, a rarity these days. All that was left in the bowl was some white ash and pleasant memories!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Crazyquilt
|
01/05/2003 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant
|
|
| For my first review, I'm going to review one of the first "real" tobaccos I've had the pleasure to enjoy. Previous to Anniversary, I'd tried a few aromatics, but I was interested in trying an uncased blend, and this was suggested to me.
I liked it from the first, and, several months on, I still smoke it fairly regularly. It has a nice sweet tone to it, which seems to be perfectly balanced (at least to my admittedly inexperienced palate) with the nuttier Latakia. It packs easily, even for me, and smokes well. In some ways, it is similar to Frog Morton, although, of course, with a much lighter Latakia content and a more pronounced VA taste. It has sharper 'teeth' than FM, but it doesn't bite hard or easily, with some care.
Unlike some of the other McC blends I've since tried, it isn't overly moist; in fact, it seems to be a bit on the dry side, which I like. It also doesn't have quite as strong of a tomato-vinegar smell as some of the other McC's do, either, which, imo, is a Good Thing.
While I certainly like the taste, and consider it well balanced, I would not say it's complex, like one of the Pease blends. That isn't bad; sometimes I want fine Indian food, and other times I want a nice, rare steak -- but that doesn't mean one is bad, and the other good. Still, I'm more likely, now, to go for Samarra or Raven's Wing, yet there are still times when Anniversary is a comfortable, pleasant, and delicious experience.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
tomgrega
|
11/22/2002 |
Medium
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I love the way the tin is packaged and presented. I found that it packed and lit well right after opening. It was a wee bit stronger on the Cyprian Latakia opening scent than I was lead to believe based on opening. However, while smoking the Virginia really came to the front and the Latakia stayed nicely in the background. I personally tend to prefer blends heavy on the Latakia side, but have come to really appreciate the subtle nuances one can obtain from a good Virginia blend. I felt this blend married both in a wonderful way. At the end of the day, I would recommend this blend to anyone, but especially to those that would like to try a bit of latakia without fully committing themselves. I would add this to my regular rotation, and have several stored away, however I got the impression, (and this could just be marketing), that it would be limited, hence the only reason that I categorized it to only smoke occasionally. I highly recommend that you buy this while available, and hope that I am wrong and they continue to market this blend.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Stan
|
10/28/2002 |
Strong
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This is an aged virginia blend consisting of rich red ribbon, stoved virginia, and some latakia. That's all. The black leaf is not all latakia. But there is no other condimental leaf in the mixture.
Virginias, not latakia, dominate the flavor, but the black stoved virginias add depth and the subtle latakia adds coolness.
When I first tried the blend after the first of the new year in 2002, the bottom half of the smoke developed too much in strength. I realized the blend, probably already aged for over a year by the manufacturer, still needed another 6 months plus aging. Now, after 7 additional months in my "cellar" (boxes), I am smoking up the final two-three ounces in a medium large Wiley rusticated horn. I have a few bowls left. It is much smoother now but still on the strong side of straight virginia blends.
It is heavier than Oriental No. 1 (which is a mild-medium English and which has more of a red virginia base and less dark leaf) by the same manufacturer, but not as dark tasting or rich as Mc Crainies' Murdocks Pipe (which is Scottish and has more dark leaf including more latakia, added perique, etc.), also by the same manufacturer. So it is a middle of the road between these two but still weighs in closer in fullness to the latter, Murdocks (which is much smoother and more balanced to me even though it has heavier tobaccos). The manufactuer has other somewhat similar red-stoved va. blends and flakes, like Butera's matured ribbon, but the latakia here is what makes this one different.
You can still taste the red virginias in the blend even with the darker leaf which adds a deep contrast to the flavor. It has weight, is not hot, and is fairly steady burning after you have the bowl going good. If you are a straight virginia smoker and want somether with a little more weight than virginias alone, give this a try. I understand the manufacturer will continue to make this into the future and so it will not remain a limited edition.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Tigerdad
|
10/06/2002 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I just came back from CORPS in Richmond Virginia. On a table outside the hall sat an open tin of Anniversary.
Let me say that I don't like latakia blends because IMO the latakia usually overpowers everything else. Moreover. smoking latakia makes me cough. But in a moments madness I began to pack my Ashton OC XX Billiard. I noticed first the rich virginia tin aroma with the characteristic McClelland fruit with just a hint of smoke. [Land sakes, I don't get this ketchup business. What you're smelling is high sugar Virginia tobacco.] The tobacco packed well and lit easily. The first taste was of rich virginia with the slightest taste of latakia. As I smoked, I noticed the latakia began to assert itself but did not overpower the smoke. Anniversary burned well with few relights until the last quarter bowl.
I hope MClelland continues to favor us with this blend as a change of pace for Virginia smokers. In Anniversay we have latakia used as a spice but not the whole meal.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
sonny
|
09/15/2002 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| What can I say, it's absolutely terrific! From the very first time that I smoked this I thought it was terrific. I smoke this occasionally in a Sasieni Richmond, the same pipe that I use whenever I experiment with different tobaccos. Has a nice bowl and I'm partial to bent pipes anyway. I would most definately recommend this to anyone that likes Virginias and even those who don't care for them, it's a most welcome change from the same old same old. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give it a 9.5. Happy Smoking!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Daniel Morlan
|
09/06/2002 |
Strong
|
None detected
|
Very Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Without a doubt, the absolute best of the best as far as full-flavored pipe tobaccos go. It is an absolute treat. The flavor is rich, complex, and has that McClelland's saltiness to it that makes it an unmistakably McClelland tobacco. I've never had a tobacco that can be so smooth and so harsh at the same time. I love the beginning of the bowl, but it gets a bit rough towards the end. I have to remind myself to sip slower near the conclusion of the bowl. I can't wait to get my hands on (or make) a churchwarden so I don't have to worry about the bite so much.
I give this tobacco a whopping 8/10. It's hands down my favorite non-aromatic tobacco.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
afranks
|
06/27/2002 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I have just started smoking a pipe after many years of cigarets. This is one of the first tins that I have bought, and so far it has to be my favorite. I'm sure my ability to taste will improve as I learn more about pipe tobacco, but I really like the smokiness of this blend.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Pipestud
|
05/29/2002 |
Mild to Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| First, let me say how much I appreciate McClelland's tobacco company for all it has done for our hobby. They have many wonderful blends to choose from, including 25th Anniversary. My pipe club popped a tin of this at our 5/28/02 meeting. All 16 members who attended tried a bowl and the reviews were very, very mixed.
About half the group enjoyed the upper part of the bowl, but agreed that the blend turned harsh and bitey as the smoke progressed. It starts out sweet with the virginia and smidgen of latakia intermingling well. But, as the smoke continued, it was obvious the virginias could have used a bit more aging. This led us to believe that cellaring the blend for a year or two will make this an awsome smoke.
The other half of the group enjoyed the blend from top to bottom. Their impression of the virginias was that it was stronger near the bottom, but not harsh. My personal belief is this group boasts leather tongues!
I suggest you grab a tin or two, stick it in your cellar, and pop the tin a year or two on down the road.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
tobaccoman
|
04/17/2002 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| upon opening the tin, I discover to my nose a smell of sweet virginia with a undertone of smokey smell from the latakia. Packed into a peterson Sherlock holmes pipe, A very old one not from the current series, the initial taste reveals the same. Latakia in the background with a nice viginia sweetness upfront. Burned a little hot for me but that may be me more than the tobacco. Fresh opened can too. I have 3 cans in the storage area. Taste was consistant to the end and the burn was quite nice reducing to the tell tale white ash dottle. looking forward to this blend in the future
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Briar Snob
|
03/18/2002 |
Medium
|
Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Generally, I do not like tobaccos with even the slightest amount of latakia. Yet, this tobacco is appealing and tends to grow on me each time I smoke it. It's got just the right amount of smokiness to it to offset the wonderful flavors of the Virginias to make it a memorable smoke.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
mparker
|
02/02/2002 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Excellent blend. Smells like your standard McC virginia in the tin, but the first puff reveals the latakia's presence. I also pick up a fair bit of Turkish (esp Smyrna) in the aroma, though the tin copy is silent on this. After a few minutes the Virginia begins to assert itself, but it remains a very balanced smoke throughout. Some minor bite, but not much for McC. Smoked all the way to the bottom, and it was great all the way. They've certainly got a winner here.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Bear
|
01/31/2002 |
Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Like a lot of folks, I remember the old McClelland tobacco tins. Beautifully wrapped in white paper, with a giant, red wax seal displaying a Whale breaching the Ocean's surface in the moonlight, the tobacco was a stand out in it's market, even before you opened the freakin' tin.
Packaging: 100g tin, labeled with ecru paper, gold embossed logo and script. Covered in Ecru paper, sealed with red wax. Tobacco appearance and fragrance: Fully rubbed, good uniformity, overall very dark in composition. Upper olfactory registers the ever so faint McClelland signature acetic acid, with delicate hints of Latakia, rounding the lower realms. *Perfect* moisture content, by my tastes. Packs well, let take 'er for a drive!!! Flame hits weed, releasing soft clouds of muted fragrance, soft? This stuff makes velvet seem like sandpaper. The scent is primarily Va, with utterly no edge. Latakia is present, but in such small amounts that it only provides a slight darkness for the Moon (Va) to hang in. The Bear's palate can detect no orientals (save Latakia, if you choose to categorize it thus), and no perique. Burn was consistent all the way through, developing an extra dimension of nuts in the bottom third of the bowl. Bottom line: Outstanding example of a soft, all day, indoor English tobacco. Displays great finesse and breeding. Would especially recommend to those who prefer their weeds with less Latakia, and to Va lovers that would like to add an occasional Latakia into their rotation, but who have been put off by "Big Shouldered" Lats. 9 out of 10 Bear Claws.
|
|
Showing reviews 41 through 58 of 58 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|