tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4440 (2 new)   /   reviews: 51735 (66 new)   /   Users Online : 704   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Three Nuns Original

Brand: Bell's
Blender: Orlik Tobacco Company A/S
Tin Description: A blend of dark fired and sun cured tobaccos mixed with the finest Brazilian Lights to produce the unique flavour and mellow smoking characteristics for which Three Nuns is famous.
Country of Origin: DK
Curing Group: Flue Cured
Contents:
Kentucky
Virginia
Cut: Curly Cut
Packaging: 50 or 100g Tin
Blend Notes: In the original formula, from Imperial Tobacco, Three Nuns was a VA-PER mixture. Pipe Tobacco Hall of Fame Inductee.

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Medium to Strong
Flavoring: Extremely Mild
Taste: Medium to Full
Room Note: Pleasant to Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 114 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Sir Claude 03/10/2013 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
I have finally had the opportunity to taste this famous classic, and in the coin version this time.

I have never tried the original with PER, only the Ready Rubbed version still available in the UK, but that was years ago, so i do not know if it was with PER or DFK.

One thing is certain. This is one solid offering. I am wondering if that is why Orlik has replaced the PER with DFK. To make Three Nuns even better than it was.

Golden Va coins with some darker core, the smell is sweet with barely a touch of smokiness.

I was a bit concerned when I saw the light coloured tobacco, but this barely bites and, when it does, it is because I have puffed too hard.

The flavour, and its increase in richness, builds as I smoke down the bowl with great pleasure and satisfaction.

This is good tobacco, mates.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
CoolPilot 03/05/2013 Medium None detected Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
After two tins of this tobacco, I still havent understood what it is about. There will be not a third attempt, I give up. Two solid stars, and that's all about it, for me it is not a memorable experience, despite the good reviews.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Adam_Beckmark 02/20/2013 Medium to Strong None detected Medium to Full Tolerable somewhat recommended


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
WeCamps 02/03/2013 Medium Mild Mild Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
So here is my experience with Bell's Three Nun's..... I have enjoyed it most of the tins I have had (around 5 or six with one in the cellar)... BUT, (and yes it is a big 'BUT'), I had a couple tins that I questioned if it really was Three Nuns. Those that were good tins were Great!!!! Almost creamy smooth and so different than any other tobaccos (I have tried) I questioned why it wasn't being produced and carried by another blender. (I am sure that blend recipe is out there somewhere LOL) But then, the tins that weren't great were so off-putting that I could understood why this is soon to be a blend of the past. My overall take on it? I still buy tins when I see them and keep my fingers crossed it contains the savory creamy delicious smoke I know it should be. It's that great when it is the right stuff in the tin!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
TheJayBee 12/02/2012 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
I bought this tobacco because it was included in the hall of fame of the website and even my doctor, yes my doctor (bad bad doctor) recommended it.

I had never tasted a tobacco with Kentucky in it. I have to say that I felt much more the presence of the Virginia as I still don't know how Kentucky should taste like. However, the "other" taste was absolutely fabulous blended with high quality Virginia. I really would not know how to describe the taste, but it is very pleasant. This tobacco is really top quality and I just loved it.

The smell from the tin is fruity, and I thought, hmm, is it going to be aromatic? Thank goodness it wasn't. Just a nice dry and cool tobacco. My pipe and my taste buds are happy!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
JimInks 10/07/2012 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
The current tin version is good. The light Virginias give you exactly what they're supposed to: a light, semi-sweet fairly natural taste with a slight sour note. The Kentucky is not too strong and gives it what strength the blend has. It's a near perfect blend of quality tobaccos and for me, is an all day smoke. The coin cut is loose enough that you can easily rub it out or stack them without getting a tight draw. It's very expensive for Americans to get, so you'd really have to like it to pay the high tin and shipping prices.

However, this version is still a pale reflection of the previous blend that had perique instead of Kentucky. Why in the world this reformulation was made, I have no idea. Until the change, this was my all time favorite tobacco and as many know, a very legendary blend. That mixture had more strength and spice, all perfectly balanced to give the smoker great pleasure. Some people say it was not an all day smoke, but for me, it was. There have been several attempts by other companies to replicate this mixture, and all have fallen short of the mark. While I have quite a number of the older version tins stashed away, I sure wish the manufacturer would go back to the previous formula. I'd pay current prices without complaint to stock up if they did. 4 stars for the older version? That's an understatement for me. This current version only gets 3. I'm just glad I have enough of the old tin version to last me for a few more years.

Btw, stay far away from the rubbed out pouch version. It's awful in darn near every way. Burns too fast, has a flat taste, and just doesn't taste good.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
strongirish 09/18/2012 Medium Extremely Mild Full Pleasant highly recommended
I have always wanted to review this blend as i have heard so much about it! Imagine my pleasure to acquire two tins of this wonderful mixture, one I bought from a pipe store and one I found in an antique store. I have now smoked theentire tin from the antique store. It was somewhat dry of course but still very smokable with a slight crumbling but still with the little disks mostly intact. I rehumidified this tin over the course of one month with distilled water so as not to change the taste and to bring it back like it was years ago when made. This tin is marked as made in Wcotland with US distributor James B Russel, Inc in Englewood New jersey. I see no date code but the tin is marked as selling for $2.45 so it obviously is quite old.

After bring this fine blend back to life the tin aroma is a little like shoe polish in aroma, very much like some of the black ropes made today. It is a dark broiwn mixture composed of mostly little round cut disks and one rehydrated they are full and fluffy in appearance. This blend loads easily into the pipe, and once lit, it emmits a very pleasant aroma and a soft full taste on the plate, very much like a dark fired VA with some spicyness, most likely the perique in it. It just tastes so wonderful that my taste buds watered and I savored the smoke all the way down to the bottom of the bowl. It burned well and clean leaving just a fine ash in the bottom of my bowl. I could smoke nothing else until I fisnished this entire tin. It is just a wonderful smoke, has a rich full spicy flavor that just works! Why this blend is no longer made is a real shame as it is one of the best i have ever smoked and I would most likely make this my blend of choice if that was an option. For sure it would be in my top five list. The brown tin with the golden lettering along with white says "None Nicer" and I have to agree. if someone could come even close to reproducing this blend, I would be a devout smoker of it and I am sure many others would agree! If you ever get a chance to try it, do so! No matter the price, it is worth every penney of it!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
JerseySmoker 07/13/2012 Medium to Strong Medium Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Keep in mind that I was the proud owner of a 20 year old tin of Three Nuns, until I smoked it all during the last week after reviving it in a humidor for a month. I have read about the change in ownership and possible change in blend, and I hope the talk isn't true. I don't want to wait another 20 years for another Great Tin.

This is Christmas pudding in a pipe. It is very raisiny and very mellow. This is a "Hall of Fame" tobacco. It is slow burning like a yule log, as contrasted against Carter Hall, which is like burning dried bamboo in a chiminea.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
GreatestShowOnTurf 02/03/2012 Medium Extremely Mild Medium Tolerable not recommended
Well, what can I say... This is some rotten stuff, and it's a crying shame really.

I had some of this about 7 years ago. I honestly cannot recall if it was the curly/coin cut back then, but it was a lot better than the current incarnation that I ordered, smoked and immediately binned yesterday was.

The stuff I had back in 2005 was from a 25gm packet and consisted of a much darker leaf than that of today's mixture, which is a very bright looking springy ribbon cut. Back then it smoked like St Bruno without the soap, and with a hint of musty spice.

What I tried yesterday was awful. In the packet it smelt promising, sweet raisins and figs. It came at a dryish consistency which packed and took to the flame very well. Unfortunately that's where the positives end.

In short Three Nuns 2012 in a 50gm plastic packet smokes like a cigarette. The smoke is very voluminous, but not in the nice thick/silky way pipe smoke should be. It's more like the consistency of cigarette smoke, and behaves in exactly the same way.

It's true that there is little to no bite, and it doesn't burn that hot. But neither does a cigarette. I had bought this from the memory of what I had smoked in 2005. Whilst that may too have been ready rubbed, it was certainly nicer and darker than the god awful stuff it is now.

I can only assume that there have been even more changes to this once hallowed blend since it was changed from curly/coin cut (whenever that was).

Don't waste your money.....


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
SMOKETSES 12/08/2011 Strong Extremely Mild Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
I always felt guilty, as I haven’t smoked this famed round cut tobacco. Sooooo, it wasn’t much of a loss all these years. A very strong tobacco, heavy. A single bowl per day is more than enough for me. It’s VaPer, with high density of Perique. The room note is amazing. Once you open the tin, the scent resembles to something like chocolate or raisins?? Not sure. It also has a bitterness that others like. But not me. Without being fond, in general, of VaPers, I’ll say that this one is not something exceptional for me. And to think that I smoked the tin and not the pouch, which everyone says is dreadful.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Jakob Kiilerich 12/07/2011 Medium to Strong Very Mild Medium Tolerable not recommended
Three Nuns without Périque... Three Nuns with Kentucky instead. Well why not substitute the latakia in Nightcap with black cavendish - afterall it does have the same color to a degree.

Why on earth have Orlik done this? As far as I know, they do have Périque in stock - cf. Nightcap, Deluxe Navy Roll and so on and so forth.

Okay, so let me rename this blend to Nee Thruns and get on with my review here.

This comes a bit too wet out of the tin, so I let it dry for six hours. This did the trick.

I do tend to stick too smooth VAs; you know, flakes with that natural sweet cookie-like aroma. This is dry, stout and peppery, but also musty and heavy further down the bowl. Nee Thruns is not sweet at all, and the pungent dried fruit aroma, from Three Nuns by Bell's, is no more.

It has this leathery cigar-like touch to it and I really don't like it. Actually, there's nothing "niceness" (to use hip lingo) to this blend, except for the high nicotine level. It does handle, pack and burn like a dream though.

If you like Three Nuns, don't try Nee Thruns.

Jakob Kiilerich, Denmark


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
FT 12/06/2011 Medium Very Mild Medium to Full Pleasant highly recommended
I had my first bowl of Three Nuns - and was very pleased with it indeed - I did not experience any tongue bit – I found it very Pleasant in my MM corncob pipe – while I was out walking the dog on a cold December afternoon – I will have it again – and I have no doubt that it will soon become one of my favourite smokes... give it a try – you will be surprised how you will like it....


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
SteelCowboy 08/18/2011 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Wow, this seems to be a love/hate blend and I think it's due to the different generations of this blend and pouch verses tin. This review is based on two tins, both from Denmark and both with the small coins. One tin, round, a new one just purchased weeks ago, and the other tin, square, with some age on it. The tobacco looked the same although the raisin like scent stronger as expected in the older tin. With all that said, I can see why the absence of perique makes this a different blend . Unlike comparing the same recipe of a blend from one blender to the next. (think Murray's Dunhill verses Orlik Dunhill) Tobaccos change over time, but the complete removal of the perique from the blend makes it a different blend so IMHO if should be called by a different name.

However, the name issue aside, this is really a good tasting tobacco and I love it, even with what seems to be a little manually added sweetness. "Three Nuns" quickly dries and I prefer it fully rubbed out and sipped in a small bowl. It's very good out of the tin, but the Virginia's age wonderfully and on that basis, it's Highly Recommended!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
The German 04/19/2011 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Mild to Medium Tolerable somewhat recommended
I took a long time getting a tin of this fabled blend. The extreme price was the main deterrant for me. It will remain so in the future.

I bought my first and last tin at a tobacconist's whose main pipe man claimed that this blend were pretty close to the even more fabled Escudo. I already had doubts about that even while he was speaking, as Escudo contained generous amounts of Perique. But I did expect quite a bit from this blend.

What a disappointment I ran into after opening the tin!

The leaf is a classic roll cut, similar in size to MacBaren's offerings. The tin aroma is mellow, leathery, creamy -- nothing out of the ordinary.

The coins rub out easily, stuff easily, burn easily, still nothing out of the ordinary. The taste is smooth and creamy, sweet and leathery notes in there, all very average. I seem to detect a slight top-flavour that is not objectionable.

Were this blend priced any more reasonably, I would probably rate it with three stars; it is an easy-to-maintain, enjoyable smoke without being in any way exceptional. Except for the rather excessive price. I can't get over that, sorry. For the same unit price, I get 150 per cent the amount of Stockton, which is a purely great and outstanding tobacco IMHO. So, sorry to go against the grain here, I can't give more than 2 stars.

-- addition: I once swore that I would never down-rate any blend because of its price. But this one is so hugely over-priced for what it gives that I am taking a time-out for this one only.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
The Antihero 04/06/2011 Medium to Strong None detected Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Three Nuns is, by far, one of the best English blends out right now. It saddens me to see a few?reviews on this fine blend that see it lacking or unfavorable. However, to each their own and I can only give my personal rating.

Where to begin? It is very traditional in its construction and very bold with its taste. This is not a blend for Aromatic-only pipe smokers and perhaps not for beginning pipe smokers. To paint a more allegorical picture: it is like asking a person, who only drinks his/her tea with lots of sugar and milk, to drink straight tea.

In Japan, the price is around 2,000 yen which is about the same as 20 US dollars. It does sound expensive, but you are paying for quality and it does not fail in this area. Here in Japan it is available in the 50g tins and by Odin's eye I am thankful for that.

On opening the tin there is indeed a unique sight that hits you; that all of the tobacco is sliced into coins. These are wonderful for people like me who enjoy the ritual of picking out our tobacco and rubbing it into the consistancy we desire.

On smelling the tin, the strong smell of something akin to Jagdwurst of my native Germany or for others - dried deer sausage. A "gamey" smell, if you will allow the term. This smell continues with the tobacco even as it is dried out further or even aged.

Smoking is a wonderful experience, but be careful! Too fast and too strongly of a puffer, if you are one, will result in a nicotine over-drive. It is to be smoked gently and calmly, just as a good clergyman would do while reading some sacred text.

The taste is full and natural and I, personally, highly recommend it for those of you with a taste for the English blends.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
fireball 02/28/2011 Medium Mild to Medium Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
To my tastebuds a sweetened VA, on my radar in around the same area as Mac B's Navy mix, VA No.1, and Navy Flakes. Great presentation in a square 50g tin, easy to rub curlies. Has a tad too much sweetness and bite at the moment from the fresh tin, expect this might subside with time. Compared to FVF or DNR, the artificial sweetness in TN is apparent, despite tasting like good quality tobacco. I actually have this FVF, DNR, TN combo in my VA pouch to rotate today for fun. Significant N levels here. Not bad at all, but there is 'better' around.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
rewozz 02/22/2011 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
risle-lariviere 02/10/2011 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable recommended
The taste is hayish with a nice aftertaste.

I just rub the curlies and stuff it for a small pipe and fill them on top of each other in bigger bowl.

In my rotation for long enough and i'll just keep it that way.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Doctor Max 01/30/2011 Extremely Strong Extremely Mild Very Mild Very Strong not recommended
What is this? I can see why this tobacco was popular in the UK; it smells like malt loaf and taste like malt vinegar! Maybe the massive dose of nicotine it delivers has something to do with its popularity as well? Enough to tranquilize a donkey. Anyway, the nuns come in really pretty small curly discs. Works well both to stack or rub; I find it smokes a bit better rubbed out, slightly more flavour comes out. And about the flavour, surprisingly little sweetness for a Virginia blend. It reminds me a bit of ketchup. I found it rather thin and harsh. Room note is smoky, sour and harsh as well. Such a shame on such a pretty tobacco.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Spencer 01/02/2011 Mild to Medium Medium Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Like many reviewers I had seen Three nuns around since I was kid and gave it a go with out thinking it would amount to much. However, I loaded up one of my pipes and what a suprise. I like to take big mouthfuls of smoke and blow it out of my nose to get the flavours and the three nuns never bit me and the tast of quality tobacco only increased as one smoked further down the bowl. A great all round smoke. Only wished I could have tried the tinned version before it disappered from the baccy shops of England.


 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 114 reviews of this tobacco

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics