|
Mixture No.79
| Brand: |
H. Sutliff |
| Blender: |
H. Sutliff |
| Tin Description: |
Rich burley tobaccos, blended to the original, time-honored formula of the Sutliff's of California, maintains the tradition of this perennial favorite. A topping of natural vanilla flavoring gives this basic pipe tobacco blend a soft, sweet aroma to enhance its already mild, biteless, round taste. |
| Country of Origin: |
US |
| Curing Group: |
Sun Cured |
| Contents: |
Burley
|
| Flavoring: |
Whisky
Alcohol / Liquor
Vanilla
Other / Misc
|
| Cut: |
Ribbon |
| Packaging: |
1.5oz Tin, 50 g Box |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Medium to Strong
|
| Taste: |
Medium to Full
|
| Room Note: |
Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Somewhat Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 41 through 60 of 120 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Dave Dupont
|
01/11/2010 |
Mild
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Wow, this stuff is fun to smoke, and very well behaved for an aromatic. I don't know about you guys, but I like women's perfume; no wonder Hef smoked this alot, being surounded by all those pretty girls. That fact alone is almost enough to make me want to smoke this. I have smoked my share of blends that have hit the toilet bowl for one reason or another but this is not one. It has a nice vanilla flavor, and stays lit reasonably well for an aromatic, which are always a bit syrupy in the bowl. Smoking this out of a black, sandblasted Vauen. I have some Dunhill 965 stored along with some Squadron Leader, so I won't be converting full time to this, but I like this blend for some reason and would always pick some up to keep around. Although I have to say, it won't be gracing my Dunhill Amber root any time soon.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
modelmanmodels
|
12/23/2009 |
Very Mild
|
Strong
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This was bad...I tried it months ago and revisited to make sure that it wasn't a fluke. It's bad stuff. The pipe I smoked it in still stinks of it. Too bad that something this dreadful is still around. To his own pallete be true...
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Kilmarnock Piper
|
12/16/2009 |
Extremely Mild
|
Extra Strong
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Overwhelming
|
|
| What happened to the first 78 mixtures? Oh that's right-they were all bought up by Saddam Hussein for use in his chemical weapons program. If he had had some of this for his last smoke before his execution, he might have cheated the hangman.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
colt25314
|
11/26/2009 |
Extremely Mild
|
Extra Strong
|
Extremely Mild (Flat)
|
Strong
|
|
| Hmmmm. It has been around a long time. Someone must like it.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Jimbo_
|
11/10/2009 |
Strong
|
Extra Strong
|
Overwhelming
|
Extra Strong
|
|
| Peoples' tastes are different. Viva la difference!
That said, I must report this is the most foul-tasting stuff I have ever put in a pipe.
I was fooled by the pouch scent which had a nice strong, floral and peppery nose. No hint of the horrors to come.
Once lit, I could not finish half a bowl. The taste so insulted my tastebuds that I dumped it and the rest of the sample into the toilet. I don't think I've ever disliked a baccy so quickly and that much.
It is said that Mixture #79 was Hugh Hefner's favorite when he still smoked a pipe. Don't worry, Hef... I still admire you.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Dr. Grabowski
|
10/05/2009 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild
|
Medium
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| The tobacco itself seems to be of a very high quality. Lights easy, stays lit very well. When I first opened the 1.5 oz pouch I really liked the smell. To me a bit like black licorice with a hint of chocolate. But when lit its smell is completely different; a strong weird smell of women's perfume. I'm nearly certain that it contains dried rose hips. In addition, it tastes like roses too. It's not horrible, but let's say you'd really have to be in the mood to smoke something like this. This is probably not something most people would want to smoke every day.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
dtcb
|
09/22/2009 |
Medium
|
Strong
|
Medium
|
Strong
|
|
| All,
In the interests of expirementation (and the fact that a pouch of this medusa landed in my corner) I am going to try and neutralize the casing with either bourbon our whiskey. I'm running short on tobacco before my next order arrives. The pouch I receive actually had a manufacture flaw on the pouch and it was partly opened. so the perfume stench is minimal for now. (and the tobacco fortunately did not dry out).
To which end, I am going to try and introduce a whiskey/rum/bourbon to it to see if it neutralize the perfume. Will report on this in a week or two. Maybe longer. the tobacco itself looks ok actually so I feel a be guilty to waste it. that might change on the smoking but, it's worth a try anyways.
will report back.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Baccyman
|
08/14/2009 |
Medium
|
Medium to Strong
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant
|
|
| I must admit it... When I first tried this blend it reminded me of Field & Stream only stronger on the floral notes. I didn't care for it. So I put it away and 2 weeks later I gave it another try. Not as bad, I thought. I tried it a third time 3 months later and... I loved it! I am a Lakeland smoker (The mighty Condor being my favorite) and this fits nicely into that category. If you don't like the Lakeland style, don't bother. If you do, give it a try.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
PfeifenRaucher
|
08/03/2009 |
Medium
|
Strong
|
Medium to Full
|
Very Strong
|
|
| I agree with pretty much all the 3 & 4 star reviews below (what few there are!). This blend is clearly love it or hate it, but I do not think it is fair to say it is a badly made product.
If you are deciding whether to purchase this blend may I offer this advice:
1. Buy a SMALL 1.5 oz. pouch, NOT a tub. Then you won't regret it if you realize you don't like it.
2. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, devote a pipe you do not care about when trying this - it will leave a ghost in your pipe like nothing else out there, even after only one bowl IMHO. I smoked this in a Dr. Grabow I devote to soapy/perfumey Lakelands.
3. Ask yourself the following: Do I like anise-flavored things?
Not sure? Go buy some black licorice, black jelly beans and, if you are really wanting to test your love of anise, some strong European licorice candies like Salmiakki, Katjes, or Panda licorice. If you like the taste, proceed to hunt down a pouch of Mixture No. 79.
4. Ask yourself the following: Do I like perfumed/scented Lakeland tobaccos?
Mix. 79 is an American version of this niche of pipe tobacco. If you have never tried such tobaccos, Mix. 79 may be a cheaper way to decide whether you should plop down the dough for an expensive (in the US, at least) tin of Ennerdale Flake or Grousemoor.
This tobacco represents a style that is from another time...and, of course, tastes change in the course of 80+ years. But it is worth a try.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
wintermute
|
07/01/2009 |
Mild
|
Medium
|
Medium to Full
|
Strong
|
|
| When I pull the pouch out of the box, there is a strong smell of anise. When I open the pouch there is an even stronger smell of perfume. When I pack the pipe, the perfume smell meets me even before the first light. When you finally get around to setting this perfume counter on fire, the headache can really begin. I love Burley and strong tobaccos, but I don't like strong cologne.
I have come across a snus tobacco that has this same taste and the snus manufacturer claims a kind of tobacco called Gotland. Maybe that's the secret to Mixture No. 79!
Anyway, the makers of this stuff ought to be ashamed. And, consider this, a tub of this perfume-counter nightmare costs twice as much as Prince Albert. I have a faithful brier dedicated to the Prince, while I had to sit and apologize to the cob that was forced to endure this stuff!!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
JLong
|
06/25/2009 |
Medium
|
Very Mild
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Hoo boy, after reading the comments below, I feel like I'm sticking my neck out saying how much I like this blend so I'm giving it 2 stars as somewhat recomended. However, my personal taste buds give it 4 stars.
First off the pouch aroma is seductive and I've never smelled anything that smelt so good. Sweet and liquorishy is all I can really say.
It loads like a crimp cut. Easy to light and stays lit throughout the bowl.
I do like strong tobacco and that is what I get at light up. I get very little flavor at first. But, the tobacco and nicotene taste is there and I like it. About 3/4 bowl, pleasant hints of liquorice and sweetness come through the full bodied smoke. I don't sense any soapy or perfumy flavors others mentioned. After I finish a bowl, I am left very satisfied.
Will this become a daily smoke? Probably not as Balkans are my go to blends. I will however keep a pouch of this around when I need something different like I do with Prince Albert. Mixture 79 seems great for innatentive smoking like when putzing with yardwork or something. It's hard to puff this stuff wrong. I've been smoking it in a cob but will dedicate a Dr Grab to it because it's liable to ghost a bowl of something else.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
wosbald
|
06/22/2009 |
Medium to Strong
|
Very Strong
|
Very Mild
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| The tub aroma is of licorice, vanilla, and floral/herbal scents. The tobacco is a heavily sugared and flavored cavendished, coarsely plug-cut burley which should be broken so as to ensure easy burning and proper airflow.
This blend is pure burley of good quality, a mixture of light and brown, which has been significantly sweetened and highly flavored. The flavoring is straightforwardly stimulating and refreshingly aromatic. The smoke is mild, creamy, and sweet with a clean finish which leaves the palate refreshed for another bowl.
A high water mark for old-style american aromatics, Mixture No.79 is a constant delight which is never tiring or cloying. It quickly ghosts a briar. This went well in a chamber of any gauge.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Jim
|
06/15/2009 |
Medium
|
Medium to Strong
|
Overwhelming
|
Tolerable to Strong
|
|
| I tired this bend in the mid 1980's. My first reaction was who put pin-sol in my pipe. I smoked 1/4 of the bowl, promptly emptied it and threw the pouch in the trash.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
ark
|
05/30/2009 |
Medium
|
Medium to Strong
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| i got this blend for free at a cruddy little discount smoke shop in my area, and after reading the awful reviews here, i had to try it. I have to say that i did not hate my first bowl of the stuff, and found it unremarkable. a few days later and i decided to load up new cob that i have reserved for the testing of awful blends. I couldn't even finish it, in fact i took two puffs and tossed the bowl and pouch right into the trash. just awful, like smoking a senior center or your grandma's perfume cabinet. not worth the 2 bucks they charge. Stay away unless you make a hobby of trying bad blends like i do.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Thunktank
|
05/21/2009 |
Mild
|
Strong
|
Mild
|
Strong
|
|
| Normally I'm a sucker for standing up for the underdog. Which in this case represents Mixture No.79. But this junkyard dog needs to be impounded. It wasn't so much the taste that was awful, but the smell. It was utterly vile. Exactly like the perfume mentioned by many below. It isn't fitting for such a smell to come from one of my pipes. I'm grateful that I used a cheap cob to try it.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
robvolume
|
04/08/2009 |
Mild
|
Medium to Strong
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Not a winner in my book. I do enjoy the hint of anise I taste but its not enough to get over the perfume taste.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
strongirish
|
04/05/2009 |
Medium
|
Medium to Strong
|
Full
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Over the years, I like to smoke this occationally though it's too aromatic to smoke all the time. I don't think it deserves the bad rap it gets, it has is place and when in the mood for it, I like it. When I do, it gets positive comments on the room note. It is sweet, purfume tasting and is like eating an orange liquirice candy. But it has it's followers and has been around a long time. I does own the pipe after smoking so suggest it in a cob.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
gnossos
|
02/23/2009 |
Mild to Medium
|
Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| I don't know why lovers of lakelands don't stand up for this blend more - sure, I'd rather have a good rich slice of G&H in my pipe, but you know what? This stuff isn't half bad in the perfume-blend department. There's some halfway decent burley in there, too.
Shied away from this for a looooooong time because of how badly people talked about it, but finally I realized that what was said - tastes like soap, smells like granny's perfume - are exactly what I ENJOY about blends like Ennerdale, Condor, &etc.
Figured, what the heck. If I can find an OTC that approximates the lakeland enigma of enigmas, I'm in for the pocket change.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
appy
|
01/25/2009 |
Mild
|
Strong
|
Overwhelming
|
Overwhelming
|
|
| My Lord, M79. What a name. The other 78 must have been fatal when ingested. This concotion brings back the earliest of memories. Being of italian desent, we were givin instruction in smoking soon after we left the breast. On my grandfathers lap I would sit as he puffed up a typhoon with this blend. As I held my nose, I could still taste the horid remnants, like my grandmothers flower garden had been torched, of this tobacco, swearing on a stack of bibles never to smoke. Then low and behold there was the old classic Amphora red full aromatic. My God, I thought, this is what I will smoke when old enough. And so I did. My newly found hobbie of the briar, caused me to make many terrible decisions in the field. First and foremost was buying a foil of M79. The experiance still haunts me to this day. 79 cents of lunch money wasted, and a mouthfull of Tide without bleach. Even after 35 years of piping, and many many foul, rancid, overated tobaccos, M79 is still on the note to self, NEVER,EVER, attempt to ignite this toxic dung. All that I can imagine is that Mary W Shelly hoarfed a bowl or 2 of this fodder before composing Frankenstein. (no wonder the creature had a rotten brain)
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Blenheim Bard
|
01/20/2009 |
Medium to Strong
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Okay, we all know things change over time. In tobacco the quality and quantities of various components of a blend vary from time to time. the manufacturers try to cover this with their use of casings and flavourings. Then tobacco changes once it has been blended , while in storage. Sometimes for the better, sometimes not. The Mixture 79 I have came in a can with a ZIP Code and no UPC.(Zippy came along in the 1960's and UPC in the mid-seventies) So it is at least 30 years old. It came in a purchase of a lot and was not the reason for the purchase, but there it was.
On opening the tin there was no discernible smell other than the tobacco. None of the overpowering casing that other reviewers have castigated the fresh product for.
After a light steaming to bring the moisture level up to tolerable levels, despite being sealed it was a trifle on the dry side, and into a cob. (Having read other reviews I feared putting into something more precious to me.) Now I can't tell you whether this is due to changes in the formulation, or the result of aging, but this tin of Mixture 79 is quite acceptable, if somewhat bland. Very rough cut, burns well, easy to light.
I am not a burley devotee, but I do smoke it as a change of pace, so some of this will probably be blended in to soften mixtures I find a little harsh, but it was a welcome bonus on my purchase. Maybe on my next trip to the US I will pick up the new product just to see how it compares.
So if you like plain old American burley and you can find an old tin of Mixture 79 I suggest you try it. If you have a new tin and don't care for it, I suggest you give it a chance to mature, and just possibly you will find a pleasant surprise years down the road.
|
|
Showing reviews 41 through 60 of 120 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|