tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4420 (0 new)   /   reviews: 51416 (67 new)   /   Users Online : 727   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



1792 Flake

Brand: Samuel Gawith
Blender: Samuel Gawith
Tin Description: Full strength, mellow tobacco comprising a blend of dark-fired Tanzanian leaf. Made in England.
Country of Origin: UK
Curing Group: Fire Cured
Contents:
Kentucky
Virginia
Flavoring:
Whisky
Tonquin Bean
Cut: Flake
Packaging: 50g Tin
Blend Notes: This is a full strength, mellow tobacco comprising a blend of dark fired Tanzanian leaf. It is Gawith's best-selling premium grade flake. It starts as 7 lbs. of hand stripped leaf and goes through a steaming process prior to being pressed. The cake, having been prepared, is wrapped in a select leaf and packed by hand into a 12 inch square. This cake is pressed and left for a minimum of two hours. Then, the pressed cake is placed into a steam press where it is baked at full heat for two to three hours. The baked cake has then taken on 1792's characteristic rich, dark color. It's hardening occurs during cooling. Once the process of cutting the flake and adding a tonquin flavor is carried out, hand wrapping and packing finalizes 1792, making it ready for rubbing into your pipe. Also sold as Cob Flake in Europe.

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Strong
Flavoring: Medium
Taste: Full
Room Note: Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 289 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
pipelicidad 09/19/2012 Strong Strong Full Very Strong recommended
If there is a pipe smoking mixture that escapes the simplistic often used classification of aromatic and english blends, the former being friendly with the new pipe smoker and with non- smokers, and the latter being more adequate to the experienced smoker, it must be this one. 1792 is an English mixture, but also an aromatic one, and is not suited for the novice pipes –because of its high nicotine content-, and, furthermore, the room note is awful. I can only make sense of this blend by thinking it was designed for the folks of the past: people who lived 200 years ago, who used to smoke in small bowl pipes due to the scarcity of tobacco, and who didn’t where used to eat food as aseptic and fresh as we are (imagine a world without refrigeration, with little availability of clean water, etc.), and rather use a perfume-like casing for their tobacco instead of edible stuff. In the world of that epoch, where horses could defecate in the streets freely, a tobacco that has a sweaty-dungy tin note makes sense. That being said, smoked in a small bowl pipe, and willing to make a trip to the past, this spartan aromatic blend is something quite lovely.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Razortooth 09/17/2012 Strong Strong Full Tolerable to Strong highly recommended
Smells like coalminers' armpits and tastes even better.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
sentientchimp 09/10/2012 Very Strong Medium to Strong Medium to Full Strong somewhat recommended
Having just finished a tin of excellent Dunhill Flake, I popped down to be tobacconist for another, only to discover that they were out of it. I quickly scanned the shelves for another flake and settled on the 1792, having done zero research on the blend beforehand. Judging by the rustic appearance of the packaging, I figured that it would be another straight VA along the lines of the Dunhill Flake. After getting home and cracking the tin, I was a bit disapointed to discover that I had wound up with a tonquin-flavored VA. It was extremely moist out of the tin, to the point that it had stained the paper inside. After some drying time, I packed a bowl in a Dublin-shaped meer and light up. The tonquin flavoring is quite strong, way more so than the only blend I can think of that's similarly flavored, Dunhill's Royal Yacht. Additionally, this is probably the most powerful blend I've ever had in terms of nicotine content. I like a good nicotine hit now and then when I'm smoking, and Dunhill Nightcap is one of my favorites, but this 1792 is really in a league of its own. Between the somewhat odd taste of the stuff and the intense nicotine buzz, I did find myself getting a bit nauseous initially. After a few days and a few more bowls, I seem to have grown a bit more accustomed to the stuff. That being said, I don't exactly enjoy smoking this stuff in quite the same way that I do with my favorite blends like Squadron Leader or MM 967. I can't help but feel a bit put off by the strong tonquin casing and the mighty nicotine kick. This is definitely not in my daily rotation, and I only smoke it on a full stomach and when I'm really in the mood for a strong buzz. I highly doubt that I'll be buying more of this, and I wouldn't recommend it too strongly to others. If you're looking for a Virginia blend with tonquin flavoring and a hefty nicotine dose, go for the Royal Yacht. It's flavoring is way more low-key, and the nicotine level is more manageable. That being said, the 1792 is quite unique and quite strong, and I can see how it might be the Holy Grail for some smokers.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
alfa 09/06/2012 Very Strong Very Strong Extra Full Pleasant to Tolerable not recommended
this is to strong and It smells like perfume .If it possible I give it zero.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
juvat 09/03/2012 Strong Strong Very Full Tolerable to Strong somewhat recommended
Not bad. Not great. I love the strong stuff, but this just leaves with me a feeling of "meh" taste wise. The tonquin bean flavoring is certainly unique and after a month since opening the tin, its taken on a slight vanilla smell to it. Either way, I think I'm going to let this one age a bit more. As it is now, I'll pass.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
AlexL 08/24/2012 Overwhelming Medium Extra Full Extra Strong not recommended
All that was written below is right: it’s wet; flakes are not even and in total disorder, and it’s incredibly stinking N-bomb. Still, I made some use of it: rubbing ¼ of flake and adding it to Red Rapparee, which has no nicotine at all. Otherwise I’d throw 2 tins to garbage. Thus I am satisfying my greediness, if not taste.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
PAmersmoker 08/23/2012 Medium Very Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
I found this to be a fairly strong tobacco but did not encounter the punch in the gut described by other users. I found it quite pleasant with a fair ammount of niccotine.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
WillySmokeIt 08/18/2012 Strong Medium Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
I don't know why so many find this tobacco to be so strong and have such violent reactions to it. I find it to be a good, steady smoke with none of puke factor that many claim exists. I love the taste and aroma of the stuff and can smoke it all day. My one problem is keeping the stuff burning, especially with the thick flakes that frequently show up. Damn! Some of those flakes are THICK!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Elijah 08/17/2012 Very Strong Extra Strong Overwhelming Very Strong not recommended
Exploring tobaccos proves to be a true pleasure until one meets Mr. Ugly.

For the past few months I have been exploring the Peterson range (starting with Old Dublin) and some of the Amphora aromatic brands and other individuals here and there, finding them interesting with their good an bad, strengths and weaknesses.

Coming across the Samuel Gawith, I have decided to start exploring their range of tobaccos. And my journey begins with the 1792 Flake where I met UGLY.

Opening the can I was first challenged by the aroma, which was hard to comprehend. The former aromatics had always had an appetizing smell, and the English always complemented their strong stench with a unique charm. This one, was nothing like it.

Rubbing and letting dry, I have tried to smoke this tobacco several times. It begins with quite nice footsteps, but very soon ends with a disaster.

This tobacco WILL hurt your guts, it will also leave an annoying taste and smell over your hands, tongue and throat.

Unless you have lost your taste glands, or plan to loose them anytime soon, please stay away from this flake!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Flyguyid 08/06/2012 Extremely Strong Strong Medium to Full Overwhelming not recommended
I am a fan of SG flakes. I figured I would enjoy this product as well. I was wrong. When I opened the tin I noted that the aroma was a little weird (probably the Tonquin flavoring). I used the air pocket method, rubbing out the flake lightly. The tobacco lit well and burned well. The taste was initially pleasant but definitely strong. This tobacco tasted unlike anything I had smoked previously. As I smoked about 1/2 of the bowl, the room started spinning and a queasiness set in. Mind you, I regularly smoke full English blends such as Dunhill's Nightcap without such problems, but this was too much. Of course, the nausea affected the taste of the tobacco which now resembled something found in the bottom of a monkey cage... Two hours later, after my vertigo/nausea had subsided, I returned to my man cave and was smacked in the nose by the lingering stench of this tobacco. It took two weeks for the stench to clear. I thought I had ruined my flake pipe, but after three salt treatments it has returned to normal. I will keep the remainder of this tin as I plan to use it to prank my pipe smoking friends on camp outs. It was apparent that SG designed this flake for nicotine fiends only. If you are such a fiend, this is the tobacco for you! Recommendations: 1. Smoke this outside only. 2. Smoke this in a pipe you hate or in a cheap corn cob. 3. Do not smoke this on an empty stomach (however, I smoked this after lunch with no preventive benefits) 4. Keep a bucket handy. I would like to say I will never smoke this again... but again, women forget the pangs of childbirth and eventually have more children :).


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Brother Of The Leaf 08/01/2012 Strong Mild to Medium Medium to Full Tolerable to Strong recommended
If you're anything short of an experienced pipe smoker stay away from this weed. It will punch you right in the gut, bash you over the head with a lead pipe, and leave you crying in the fetal position completely and utterly emasculated. This stuff smells of a bad blend of chocolate, leather, dirty socks, an old lady's favorite perfume, and hamster shavings. Rubbing this flake out will leave your hands coated in a green fog. Keeping it lit is near impossible, as this stuff seems to require the fiery lakes of hell itself to stay lit. It tastes of semi-sweet chocolate and a bit of leather. If you dare to venture into this tobacco's lair you may find yourself coming out pleased, as I did, or you may find yourself coming out with your insides ripped out of you through your throat. Basically, I have no idea why I like this blend, but I do. Drying this stuff out for a few hours before smoking will do it well.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pip 07/16/2012 Medium to Strong Medium Medium to Full Tolerable to Strong somewhat recommended
Hated the first bowl. Thought it was just a plain old nasty flake with a funky stink.. Maybe I has in a bad mood that day. One month later I decided to give old 1792 another whirl. I enjoyed the second bowl very much. I was not as moist and packed it looser and it make a world of difference. Good quality Virginian.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
albfneto 07/06/2012 Medium to Strong Medium Full Tolerable to Strong recommended
Is a different flake, different are the flavour, the scent and the taste. Their quality is good, for this, 2 stars, but is only for the smokers that like flakes and Virginia flakes, I'm not a specialist, i prefer english mixtures and aromatics. High Nicotine Strenght for me and the Tonquin Bean is not for all...


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
L.J. Bewley 07/06/2012 Medium to Strong Medium to Strong Medium to Full Tolerable not recommended
I'm really into my flakes at the moment. The last two flakes of Sam's house I've tried (Firedance and Full Virginia) were incredible, and are bound to be in my rotation for many, many years to come. This though is a disappointment. It smells just like a pet shop. Tastes quite like one too.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Badbrude 07/05/2012 Very Strong Medium Full Tolerable to Strong highly recommended
I've been smoking "middle of the road" blends for decades, VaPers, English blends, English Flakes, VA flakes et al. Then I stumbled upon Samuel Gawith a few years back. Sam, where have you been all my life? I purchased an array of tins, one of which was 1792. I liked all the SG varieties except this one. OMG! The strength had me reeling and the aroma was just a bit exotic for my taste. I stashed it in a cool, dark place and forgot about it.

Flash forward a year later. SG had become almost impossible to find in the States. I was aching for something new and recalled 1792. I packed a small bowl after a big dinner and tried it again. Voila! Smokes cool as a cucumber and I guess the aroma is one of those things you grow into, like well-aged brie.

It smoked cool, burning to the bottom with a white ash. The flavor is vanilla-ish but Tonquin is in a league of its own. It's now in my rotation but I'm careful to use only small bowls on a full stomach.

This is a one of a kind smoke, notwithstanding Bracken Flake, it's younger sibling. I recommend any serious pipe smoker try this exceptional product.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Capt 06/27/2012 Medium to Strong Medium Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
The tin note on this is one of a musty, damp basement where one does their wash. Packaged very moist, it requires 8 seconds in the micro to disperse some moisture, but leaves enough to prevent harshness.

This does deliver a decent nicotine hit, but not enough to scare anyone away. Rich smoke delivers that tonquin bean vanillaish aroma. Does require a few relights throughout the smoke, but that just proves you arent smoking too fast.

As a pipe smoker, I believe everyone owes it to smoke the entire SG spectrum, and start with this one.

4 out of 5 stars. Paired suprisingly well with a JD and Coke.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Mr. Bentley 06/08/2012 Strong Mild Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Upon opening the tin and taking a whiff, I was in heaven! This stuff has a wonderfull tin note- rich and complex and sweet- just inviting you to smoke it.

My first smoke with this was rather disappointing. I'm a noob who started out on English blends, and at first I found 1792 to be lacking in flavor, as much as I wanted to like i. Tried again...same thing.

I kept smoking this, only because I had no intentions of throwing it away. And since tyhere was really nothing distasteful about it, why not?

Well, the more I smoked it, the more I got to like it- and one day, the flavor just hit me! It's wonderful! Albeit, it's a rather subtle flavor- but as you acclimate to this tobacco, it does come out of hiding. I get some nice "cigar" taste/aroma from this...not sure that I taste the tonquin bean at all- but whatever it is, after having smoked 2/3's of a tin now, this has become my favorite smoke- and I crave it's flavor!

The beauty of 1792 is, that it is also an extremely weell-mannered tobacco- it doesn't burn too fast, and smokes very cool, even though I'm a fast puffer, and tend to heat up just about every other tobacco!

Sometimes I can keep this lit pretty well...other times, it's a bear.....but it doesn't matter, because either way, you are richly rewarded with luxuriant plumes of rich, flavorful smoke- and a lot of nicotine.

To me, this is what pipe-smoking is all about- not just something to puff on, which smells nice, while going about other activities- but rather, something to sit with in the evening, while watching a DVD, when it's quiet, and to just relax with and enjoy, and experience all it's richness and flavor, to drift into a another world of nicotine and thought.

Smoking this is truly an experience- something to be savored and enjoyed....something special. It's almost a ritual to sit and have a nice bowl of this. I usually only smoke once a day- but after smoking this, I'm always tempted to go back for more (and sometimes I do!)- and when smoking something else, I often find myself wanting to have at least a little of this afterwards.

This has become my favorite. (And don't let some of the reviews scare you, if you're a beginner. My recommendation is to start out with good tobaccos, like this- even if you end up not liking them, they will educate your palate more quickly, and at least give you a feel for what pipe-smoking can be all about (I had tried aromatics 30 years ago as a teen...and they put me off pipe-smoking until now! Start with the good stuff...it won't kill you- but will reward you by putting you on the fast track to high-quality, really enjoyable smokes!)

If I could only have one tobacco...this would be it!

UPDATE: Unfortunately, I have not yet even finished the entire tin of 1792, and I am becoming bored with it. It's a good occasional smoke, but is not really complex enough for daily use. Your mileage may vary. Surprisingly, contrary to many other reviewers, my tin arrived at a perfect moisture level...and dried out before long, so that I had to rehydrate the tobaccie.....


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
who broke my clay pipe? 05/21/2012 Strong Mild Full Tolerable to Strong recommended
50g tin. Uneven flakes with salt crystals,dark brown;presentation like loose i expect, but tinned for long shelf life.(i don't really give a shit about presentation as long as its good baccy)

Tin aroma interesting;i can see where people get the musty charity shop impression.For me it reminded me strait away of my old scout hut hall-hessian ropes,wax candles,paraffin lamps. Thinking military surplus,canvas,air cadets,damp army tent,in the trenches and a peculiar old school vintage vanilla?-I like this one already.

Packing the pipe i semi rub out a flake and stuff it in. Puffing on the pipe prior to lighting is a rather meaty leather dungy affair-sort of dried human pooey actually and mysterious.. I persevere.

Lighting up with matches i get a saltyness and playdoh factor remeniscent of Bobs Chocolate Flake minus the cocoa.Takes a few matches, i hope this pipe combination works(am using a vintage yello bole airograte early aluminium radiator stem.)I had to test out this yello bole eventually. Mainly getting a dark buttery virginia with maybe latakia and a herby soapy oriental and maybe some kentucky weight.

It doesn't want to light easy and perhaps it could do with a 20 minute drying preparation time or a narrower gauge bowl? Getting bored and tipping out,rubbing out and reloading,then lighting up again and purposely hyper ventilating to keep it lit,it is quite spicy up my nose. Not sure yet that its capable of being a sipper and i now just puff.

A lot of taste and maybe too much at once,i could do perhaps with a tighter draught pipe and a smaller bowl perhaps but dont know if it will compromise or change the taste favourably or unfavourably. Smells slightly starchy at the bowl end like when you let the iron hiss when ironing a shirt.A bracken composty earthy wilderness in the damp heath or fields springs to mind in my mouth. Damp stale combat fatigues on manuevres after a ten mile run-definately a man smell.

Boiled rice aroma and salt like par boiling your simmering rice,red kidney beans in taste. Luckily this tobacco reminds me of certain events in my life so i have other more realistic comparisons i can think of, otherwise i would have to say it does smell and taste slightly like inhaling the atmosphere in close proxmidity to the laundery basket.Certainly has a domestic dusty vacuum cleaner note to it as well.Slightly.

What it definately does remind me of is the interior atmosphere of a 1960s MOD submarine.I went on once called HMS Dolphin:My neighbour was a submariner in the Royal Navy and he invited us(me ,my brother and my dad)to Portsmouth and gave us a walk round the Dolphin,Onyx and Onslaught.They were moored up along side eachother.1792 has a stale human sweatroom aroma about it and smells like a place where a bunch of soldiers or mariners have been hanging around.

I can smell WW2,coal burner,boilers and desparate men. Leaving the pipe and walking out of the room and revisiting after going to the bog i get an english tobacco room note which although alright for me,would probably be irritating for somebody else.Its not necessarily like a shoey/socky ammonia smell,but more of an upper body sweaty barracks smell.

Picking up the pipe again now its cooler i get the tonquin factor!I will try this in another pipe to see if i can bring more subtlety out of it.As it is ,it tastes(while going slow now)like what dunhill london mixture tastes like when going absolutely full steam ahead.I see why certain people might compare this to Nightcap(Nightcap is sweeter than this)but it tastes like full strength London Mixture to me albeit with the tonquin addition.

Yes i like it,i feel its unique,i don't regret the purchase and will probably keep some in my rotation and jar for cellaring. I like the visions and atmosphere it evokes and baccies that take me on a journey are good baccies(its why i smoke them actually)

Relighting is easier and i think this baccy would light better in the first place if i left a 1/4 inch gap at the top of the bowl for a better chimney effect.

The saltiness and all the other factors are combining to give me the Normandy Landings;i can see men,vehicles,guns,half tracks on landing crafts-smoke in the air noise and shouts and total bloody chaos(in my mouth) I can smell the smell of fear-somebody has urinated on the deck because there is no toilets and the tip and rock of the craft makes it trickle towards our stuff on the floor..Nobody cares because its the least of our worries...Another soldier is taking a well timed pre combat shit on the floor behind me saying"mind where you tread",,,"better out than in-you don't want to be carrying 3 pound of excess shit in your guts accross no-mans-land for no reason!"i say with a sea spray soaked and crooked woodbine hanging in my mouth..."Its just chewed bread" i say to myself as i remember my plumber father who laying on the floor arm deep, once unblocked a drain full of shit and bog paper with his brave bare arm and found the problem;somebody had flushed a pair of paisley Y fronts down the toilet..I laugh to myself and wonder if this will be the last time i ever laugh?"Are you alright "said the apprentice,,,"its just chewed bread" said my hard dad.

Anyway back to reality its not pooey at all,its just a very strong english with some human like nuances in the background. Probably not going to be an everyday smoke, but like a book on the shelf i will pick up where i left off from time to time. Probably just right for watching 'World At WAR' on the history channel with a drink of water(preferably in a genuine military issue canteen)to understand the poignant smell of 20th century human history.

Its worth 3 stars.

UPDATE an hour or so later;i feel i must add how strong the nicotine is actually,i have had a few bowls now and must say it has left me a little spun out like accute disorientation motion sickness.This is up there near the likes of the best ropes and plugs and irish flake.Definately catches up and i feel like a rest so watch out.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
pipelovingcalvinist 04/30/2012 Extremely Strong Mild to Medium Medium to Full Tolerable somewhat recommended
Well, I polished off a tin of this stuff but it was just too strong for me. I enjoyed the taste but the nic was a bit too much. This is a tobacco that I plan on coming back to in about a year. Perhaps I will feel differently then, but for now I just couldn't fully enjoy it.

Soli Deo gloria!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Sporter4551 04/25/2012 Very Strong Medium Medium Tolerable highly recommended
Ok, so I reading reviews on the Irish Flake and 1792 was mentioned as a likeness in strength. I remembered the tin I purchased three months ago so I sat out a small flake to dry out (3hrs). Upon lighting the bowl the feeling was there! Like a good sucker punch, this is all over you! After 10 min, I sat it down and came bac for more and more and ouch more! If you like the idea of getting up close with your tobacco this is the one for you!


Showing reviews 21 through 40 of 289 reviews of this tobacco

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics