tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4419 (2 new)   /   reviews: 51400 (88 new)   /   Users Online : 782   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Skipper's Flake

Brand: Dan Tobacco
Blender: Dan Tobacco
Country of Origin: DE
Curing Group: Air Cured
Contents:
Virginia
Cut: Flake
Packaging: 50g Tin

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Medium to Strong
Flavoring: None detected
Taste: Medium to Full
Room Note: Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

 
Showing reviews 1 through 5 of 5 reviews of this tobacco
 
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
The German 12/30/2009 Medium to Strong None detected Medium to Full Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
My best friend bought a tin of this last time we visited Dan Pipe's facilities, and his verdict was that this was pretty close to Peterson's University Flake in strength, with less flavouring. So, of course, I gave it a few tries.

The presentation in the tin is relatively short slices of flake, thinly cut. The leaf is bright, the aroma pure VA. For me, a highly welcome first from Dan Tobacco.

Out of the tin, the slices are a little on the moist side, but rubbed out, it'll burn nicely. This stuff tastes great; I highly recommend for VA flake lovers; this is a bit of a must-try. The comparison with University Flake is a bit off; to me, UF is a fair bit stronger. Then again, for a pure VA flake, this stuff is excellent. I'd probably love it in a fold&sink cut; as it is, it is either the most miniscule bowls or rubbing it out. It works well either way, and I'll buy some more soon.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Skando 02/20/2009 Medium to Strong Extremely Mild Mild to Medium Tolerable to Strong recommended
UPDATE FEB19/2009:

I'm keeping to practice the same protocol of smoking intensively one tin at time during the working week. This week was reserved to Skipper's Flake.

I basically confirm my first review and maintain the same rating.

Just: 1) room note rating has been a bit revised, on the other hand the wife's rating never exceeds the simple toleration... 2) after five days in the leather bag SF is not dry yet, meaning that some humectant has been used - that's typical of Dan's; I notice a very faint note of anise her and there.

I have to admit that SF is near the top of my preferences, but also find myself bit bored... not to the extent of SG's BBF. The smoke is unidimensional, but the strength is very satisfying even in the morning.

I have grabbed and cellared a couple of tins.

ORIGINAL REVIEW: This is a very good fellow, of the likes of SG's FVF or CAO's Patriot Flake, or McConnell's Scottish Flake. Not very complex, but a completely satisfying medium to strong smoke. The kind of thing You would smoke in the afternoon after having smoked Capstan in the morning, just a darker and rustic continuation. Full bodied plain Virginias, the label tells, that's simply what this very good and honest flake is, to be smoked into small to medium bowls. I look forward to reading very soon some deeper reviews of the more experienced men at TR! Skipper's deserves. Three stars out of four.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
hagen 01/29/2009 Medium None detected Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
update: going through my reviews here, i find that i'll have to downgrade a good deal of the praise i've given so many blends. 4 stars should, i feel, be reserved for the blends i find truly exceptional. so, this is downgraded a bit. end update.

first of all: this is not air cured, but flue cured...

a couple of months ago, i bought a tin of skipper's flake. the first pipefull did not appeal to me. i found it somehow "off", and didn't like the flavouring i felt had been applied to it. i jarred it, thinking that it might improve with a little enclosed airing.

today, i've given it another try, and i was certainly right in thinking that it might improve. here goes:

tin aroma: very "old belt"'ish. clean and neat, tobaccoey, with only a hint of dried fruits or berries. perhaps a bit of fermented hay and some oat flavour.

it's a bit brittle (but perhaps the jar was not absolutely air tight), and easy to pack and light.

the first impression is that of well aged virginia, with absolutely no additives to be noticed. it's a bit sharp, and quite strong for a pure virginia. this reminds me very much of an old belt flake that w.ΓΈ.larsen used to make, only without the ghastly flavouring, and a bit stronger. a little malty, sweet in a non-obtrusive way, and a classical taste of grass and hay. being german, it's probably got quite a few additives, but i don't notice them in any way. they're certainly not as up front as in many other continental virginia flakes.

relights reveal deeper and more mellow flavours, and the sharpness recedes. i could well imagine that this is the backbone of the delightful va/per st. bernard from the same manufacturer.

it's a joy to smoke for anyone who cares for a standard virginia experience - and my guess is that it will be even better with a few years of aging.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Gunnar 01/03/2009 Strong None detected Full Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Another nice VA flake, quite strong for my taste. You should avoid it if you are afraid of tongue bite; has to be smoked extremely careful to avoid it.

This is how I finish my day - my last bowl before I go to sleep is almost always Skipper's Flake. Very tasty, and enough nicotine to survive the night...


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Fazby 05/22/2003 Very Strong Extremely Mild Medium to Full Tolerable not recommended
While this is a decent tasting Virgina, this is a bit too strong for me. Not to the extent of Gawith's 1792, but trailing close behind.


 
Showing reviews 1 through 5 of 5 reviews of this tobacco
 

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics