Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

Showing reviews 1 through 3 of 3 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By:	Date:	Strength:	Flavoring:	Taste:	Room Note:	Recommendation:
AlexJordan	07/16/2010	Mild	Mild to Medium	Mild to Medium	Pleasant
The only thing pleasant about this blend is the room note. In the jar it smells chemical-laiden, and tastes about the same when smoked. The taste of this tobacco seemed "forced" and not like other naturally sweet Cavendish blends. It also gurgled, left a goop at the bottom of the bowl, and seemed to burn hotter than other similar blends. That said, I have a pipe-smoking buddy that really liked this blend. Your milage may vary.
Reviewed By:	Date:	Strength:	Flavoring:	Taste:	Room Note:	Recommendation:
bryantm3	11/30/2009	Mild	Very Strong	Overwhelming	Pleasant to Tolerable
This tobacco was disgusting. I only smoked it once because it made me so sick. In the jar, it doesn't even smell all that great; it smells like it's got too much flavoring and propylene glycol, but my father liked the smell and told me to try it. The tobacco taste is almost not even there, and the flavoring is like someone poured tar and liquourice and sugar into your pipe and lit it on fire. At the time, I had a Peterson system, and I opened it up after smoking, and it was completely covered with a thick layer of gunk on the inside. On a different note, people around you seem to think it smells nice, but that's not why I smoke a pipe. Avoid this one and the rest of the Tinderbox blends for that matter, minus The Professor.
Reviewed By:	Date:	Strength:	Flavoring:	Taste:	Room Note:	Recommendation:
Meisterlowin	09/24/2009	Very Mild	Mild to Medium	Mild	Pleasant
Edit: I dropped this to one star. After reading the post above about PG (which I didn't know anything about) I did some research and came to the conclusion that I don't want to smoke anything with that chemical in it if I can avoid it..
Showing reviews 1 through 3 of 3 reviews of this tobacco