|
St. James Flake
| Brand: |
Samuel Gawith |
| Tin Description: |
A sumptuous blend of Virginias and Perique, this big, bold British style flake incorporates a generous proportion of St. James Parish, LA perique. |
| Country of Origin: |
UK |
| Curing Group: |
Flue Cured |
| Contents: |
Virginia
Perique
|
| Cut: |
Flake |
| Packaging: |
50g Tin |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Extremely Mild
|
| Taste: |
Medium to Full
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 94 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Cragganmore
|
04/03/2013 |
Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Normally I have high threshold when it comes to accepting sloppy presentations from Samuel Gawith and it's because I know that there is great quality in the product.
However... I've only had one tin of St. James Flake before this review and I will not be having another. Ever. When I purchase flake tobacco I expect flakes. This was delivered as a big, wet ball of tobacco. I had to let it age for a few months (which I normally do after a first curious sampling) and even then I couldn't get the pre-smoke preparation down. I'd either dry it too much (resulting in total perique-dominance) or too little (resulting in a soaky, wet and annoying smoke). Admitedly I had a few really terrific sessions with this but they were not the norm by any means. The level of perique would vary greatly which even caused me to discard a few bowls, something that I would normally never do.
I'm hoping I just caught a bad batch, which is why I won't rate it below 'somewhat recommended'. I expected more though...
Beardnote: spiced up virginia, fairly sniffworthy
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Pipenutt
|
03/18/2013 |
Mild to Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Very Mild
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I can't say much about what comes in tin's but the 2 ounce bulk came very wet and even after 24 hours of drying it was like leather or beef jerky. Would not rub out properly and require many relights. Much more hassle then it's worth for a flavor that was too mild for me. I won't waste my time or money buying it again.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Sir Claude
|
03/04/2013 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I must say I am not a fan of this VA/PER. On a different topic, SG tobaccos have started to seriously annoy me because of the high level of dampness of their products.
Aging their tins is difficult because of the rust that will develop in the inside of the tin, due to the too high a level of humidity.
Preparing them and smoking them requires patience, compromise and various strategies I came to realize I do not want to possess. A tobacco should not be so extreneous an effort to prepare.
Also, despite this tin being roughly 3 years old (a gift from an acquaintance that was marked "2010") this flake was still too damp and, despite over an hour of drying, bites.
There are too many good offerings out there that do not require specials skills and deliver an awsome, satisfying smoke.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
JimInks
|
03/02/2013 |
Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| This is one of the best VaPers I've ever smoked. Nice, very light fruit/raisin/plum note with some pepper and natural sweet Virginia taste, and a hint of chocolate if you are looking for it. And no Lakeland essence to mess it up! It does need some drying time, but if you dry it completely, you lose a little of the flavor. I cut it in very small, almost cube size, mixed in a few short, slim strips. It does require some relighting, but who cares? This isn't a contest to see how few matches you use. This is a contest that your taste buds wins out on every time you smoke it. A consistent flavor from top to bottom; well worth the price and the time it takes to get a hold of it.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
joeljcj2
|
03/01/2013 |
Mild to Medium
|
None detected
|
Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| bright clean vaper--enough perique to sharpen it just a bit---to semiquote an earlier reviewer--like a touch of tobasco in a bbq sauce. not very sweet, not so much lakeland--- far less floral than any of the other sg's or gawith-hogarth's. i find when sg flavors, they really flavor, but st james has none of that. it seems pure va mix, with that light tweak of perique. just a pure, rich tobacco taste. heavy enough to be my last pipe of the night favorite.--butit does become hard to find periodically.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
pacman357
|
02/17/2013 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Might be my favorite VA/Per at the moment. I have to confess, however, that I do mix a little granulated Perique in when prepping a bowl of this already tasty smoke. I like the extra tangy flavor and slight additional boost. Sort of like extra BBQ sauce on an already fine rack of beef ribs.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
cgar
|
01/19/2013 |
Medium
|
Extremely Mild
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Another nice SG blend. Tin presentation is very nice, flakes are a little moist but with a little drying it smokes beautifully. Another SG blend that I will keep on hand, and one that seems to be more available then FVF.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Abadakus
|
01/10/2013 |
Medium
|
Mild
|
Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| I, personally, would describe this blend as a mixture of dark Virginias, a tiny pinch of Perique and "a generous proportion" of sugar. Once you find a right way to treat the flakes of uneven thickness, it'll burn quite well and steadily. Tastes somehow smoother and much sweeter than most VaPers I've tried, but still is a nice and satisfying smoke. 100% worth it's price!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Capt
|
11/27/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| Wet in the tin. I take out 2 flakes, and nuke them for about 6-8 seconds. Rub them out and get to it.
This Perique shows a nice spice that is well balanced with the Va. Straight forward tobacco flavor, smooth all the way down. This blend does require several relights, but it could just be me. One of my top favorite flakes from SG. I've only smoked a tin of this, so my 3 star may change to a 4.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
ap
|
11/26/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| A sweet Vaper with just enough Perique to give you a nice spice smoke!! Delicious
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
donmartinthree
|
11/07/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I bought this tobacco for the first time about a year ago when I was in cologne and opened it straight out of the store, just to have a look and smell and I was so anxious to get back home to smoke it for the first time after that...
the smell out of the tin is very fruity, but dark, a lot like stewed plums and even a little bit chocolatey. it's definitely a heavily sweet-ish smell, but not like candy. savory-type sweetness, if you understand what I mean. Delicious. rich and dark...
Packing this is a challenge, as some flakes are extremely thick and also pretty moist, as with all SG flakes. I gave up on fold & stuff with this one. it tastes perfect as a very chunky ready rubbed. so you have a lot of little flake scraps and hardly any strands. more like broken flake, I guess. pack it loosely, light, tanp, relight, tamp, relight and off you go.
the flavors are like the smell... fruity, heavy, sweet, peppery, creamy...rich and dark. it's delicious! and after the tin is opened, it definitely develops over time. I had mine open for about half a year before I smoked it again and it was so much better. still very moist, but the flavors intensified and it became even smoother. the smoke feels like you could chew it in your mouth, that's how creamy this is.
I love it and never want to not have it again!
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
dnietosi
|
11/05/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| First,this is my first real Va/Per. Compared to other flakes this really need some drying unless you want to be lighting and relighting and annoyed.
But it can also be good as it will last longer once you open the thin and it will also "change" with the time.
When you light it you definitely get some of the sweetness of the Virginias (good ones and dark ones) some fruity flavor/raisins but soon enough you get the peppery flavor of the perique. You might like it you might hate it, nothing to do with the tobacco being good or bad. I used to smoke cigars and this seems to me very close to smoke a cigar mixed with some very good Virginia.
After a few relights it burnt all the way to the bottom of the bowl with no dottle just white thin ash.
Now the key, this thing got better through the bowl and made me sad to finish it. Have the feeling it is gonna get better and better as it dries to become a supreme smoke.
However, this is not the stuff i will smoke everyday. Keep that in mind.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
TheJayBee
|
11/01/2012 |
Strong
|
Extremely Mild
|
Full
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| This is my second Va/Per tobacco I try, the first one being also a flake from gawith and hoggarth (Louisiana Flake).
I honestly don't know which one I prefer... The smell from the tin is of strong fruity purée, with some notes of pot pourri which is amazing.
In the beginning, this one was more difficult to smoke as it was a bit wetter. I had to relight it a few more times.
However, this flake smokes much more neutrally and I just love it. It is strong, and really excellent, I think it has more perique than the G&H Louisiana flake. It has more body and character. Will definitely buy both again.
The smoke is thick and creamy, the taste is full and exquisite. No special aroma detected, maybe a hint of fig jam? I will maybe get more of a taste with the meer.
I just know it is a really excellent tobacco.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
TW
|
10/02/2012 |
Medium
|
Strong
|
Mild
|
Pleasant
|
|
| I bought a couple of tins of this as I generally like Virginia/perique blends, and it seems to get generally good reviews.
On opening, both tins were stacked with various sizes and thicknesses of sopping, wringing, dripping wet flakes. The interior of one tin was actually rusting from the moisture.
After closing the tins and leaving them for a month the tobacco was still dripping wet, so I left the lid off one tin for four days. I do not exagerate.
After four days drying, I reckoned the top couple of flakes were just about dry enough to take a light, so I tried rubbing one out. It didn't so much rub out as break apart into brittle chunks.
I stuffed it into a cob and applied a light, and kept trying until it caught. My first though was "nice, mild Virginia, but not much perique. No bite at all though - that's good".
About 1/4 of the way down the bowl the sugar started. Sweet, sticky, clinging sugar. And the more I smoked, the more the sugar came flowing out of the stem, like smoking vapourised candy floss. By 3/4 of a bowl my mouth felt so sticky I needed to rinse it out, so I tried a mouthful of diet Coke. The Coke tasted sour and bitter compared to the tobacco.
I gave up in disgust and emptied the bowl into the ashtray. The next day, the cob's cake was full of sugar crystals, the ash in the bowl looked like charcoal and smelled strongly of caramel and the dottle could be snapped like bits of toffee.
I hate throwing tobacco away at UK prices, but both tins went in the bin. As, a week later, did the cob. Nothing I tried could begin to exorcise the sugary ghost.
I may have had a couple of bad tins - going by the rest of the reviews I guess I did. But the poor standard of these tins makes me wonder about SG's quality control.
So, based on my experience, my advice is to avoid unless you like taking chances - and don't try St James in a pipe you don't mind throwing away.
There's no aromatic flavouring in this tobacco by the way - I've marked the flavouring as "strong" because of the overwhelming sugary casing.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
walesy61
|
09/04/2012 |
Medium to Strong
|
Mild
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| smoke sparingly nice on occasion
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Briar Tongue
|
08/25/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Description: The tin description is spot-on: A sumptuous blend of Virginias and Perique, this big, bold British style flake incorporates a generous proportion of St. James Parish.
First impressions: Like most SG blends, the tin label is simple and unpretentious. This is indicative of a quality pipe-tobacco blend, which should be judged by the contents and not by the branding. It has a picture of someone, whom I presume to be Samuel Gawith himself. This gives the tin a nice old-fashioned feel. Upon opening the tin, the aroma of matured Virginia and generous portion of Perique reveals an unmistakable depth of a quality flake tobacco. Unfolding the paper reveals beautifully presented tobacco with an almost motly-crue of leaf variation in the flakes. Due to the high-demand of this blend and drying time constraints, the flakes where on the moist side. This is a problem which can easily be solved though. I allowed a few days drying time until it was almost crispy. I received a good tip from my friend and fellow pipe-reviewer, Mo. After drying out the tobacco, place it back in the tin and allow for two-weeks "settling" time. I haven't tried this with SJF myself, but can take it with good authority from Mo. I'm not a big fan of the fold & stuff method as it is a recipe for inconsistent smokes. I rub it out completely and use the air-pocket method which appears to be working well for me. Upon first light I knew that I was going to enjoy this blend. The sweetish fullness from the Virginia and spicy strength from the Perique checks all tick-boxes in terms of what I classify a good VAPER to be. The burning qualities of this blend is excellent, requiring few relights common with many flake tobaccos. The remainder of the bowl was consistently good with not too much complexity. You don't have to concentrate too hard to enjoy this blend.
Last impressions: SJF has grown on me as I progressed through the tin. Due to the fullness & strength this blend offers, I have had consistently good smokes in various pipes/times of day/mood etc. This blend will age well and allow for some complexity to develop. St James Flake will have a permanent spot in my rotation. My second favorite VAPER after the king, Escudo.
Similar blends: I'm a bit hesitant to list similar blends as I haven't tried them all (I'm not pipestud:-). But I can say it reminds me of McClelland's St James Woods, although this is far better due to the strength & consistency. If you enjoy great vapers like Escudo, I think there's a good chance you'll enjoy SJF.
Final Notes: SG doesn't label the year of production, so I'm not sure how old this tin is. I presume its very young and I will update my review after I have aged this blend.
TBR rating: 4/4
Personal rating: 4/5 - For now I'm reserving one star to see how well this blend ages.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Badbrude
|
08/17/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| VaPer's have been in my rotation for many years. My standard had been McClelland's MC2015 bulk, which has a wonderful sweet and sour taste with an OK room note. Esoterica's Dorchester has the best room note of any VaPer I've smoked but burns too hot due to its cut. St James has taken over as my favorite, both with excellent taste and room note. SG has the perfect balance of Virginias and Perique. The tobacco is a bit moist so some drying is recommended.
I agree with the other reviewers' opinion about the tobacco aroma and room note. If no like VaPer's try this one. The only problem is availability in the States from time to time.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
mo
|
07/25/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium to Full
|
Tolerable
|
|
| This blends resembles FVF when looking at it. Tin presentation was typical Gawith, it looks like someone packed the flakes into the tin with his feet.
That being said, although tin presentation is lacking, this was a really really good smoke. It was very wet in the tin so i would recommend some airing before smoking.
The taste was creamy with the unmistakable kiss of Perique. Really good stuff. I rubbed out some flakes, did the fold and stuff method and there was some variation but not much.
It really differs from what one would normally expect from a Virginia/Perique blend. The tobaccos are heavily stoved and the flakes are very dark in colour.
Its very good but not great. YMMV.
For South African Pipers, Gawith blends are available from Sturks in Cape Town.
Mo, South Africa.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
derlict311
|
07/16/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Medium
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| For the Va/Per lovers, which I am quickly becoming, this is a superb flake. For the longest time anything with perique was a turnoff for me. Now, as my tastes have become more refined, I find a smattering of perique to be very relaxing. I don't have a lot of knowledge on Va/Pers generally, but I think this has got to be what they're all about. I like this nearly as much as FVF, although different.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Russell
|
06/05/2012 |
Medium
|
None detected
|
Very Full
|
Very Pleasant
|
|
| I bought this on a whim to see if it lives up to the hype and I was surprised and impressed. This has to be the smoothest tobacco I have ever smoked. As hard as I try, it just does not bite.
Smells very strongly of rotten mangoes in the tin, which told me it is loaded with perique. Was very wet as a Vaper ought to be to age properly, but a couple hours of drying a large bowl on the lid of a mason jar, and it was perfect.
Took 4 lighting attempts to get going, then burned like a dream to a very light powder. On the first puffs the large amount of perique was evident: not the burley imitation but the real thing, which a few sneezes made apparent, which I get from stronger perique mixtures if I have not had any for a while.
The room note was simply amazing. More flavour than most aromatics! Sour and sweet fruitiness, pepper, tobacco, and not even a hint of bitterness, with an amazing aftertaste. In fact, this has to be one of the best tasting, richest tobaccos I have ever tried. I don't think this is based on best brown or FVF, the virginias are darker and not as grassy.
This is so good I am going to cellar as much of this as I can get my hands on. St. James flake is hands down the best vaper I have ever smoked, and I have smoked most of them. Why I didn't try this one ages ago is a mystery.
Nicotine is medium, which is a surprise since it contains no dark fired (I smoke a lot of Gawith and Hoggarth dark flake/plug in both the scented and unscented versions in the evening) which left me feeling relaxed.
This might be your holy grail, if it isn't, it will be pretty close. Definitely going in the daily rotation.
Samuel Gawith either gets it perfect or rank (like 1792, which can be compared to fermented cow dung with some light vanilla-esque topping) and this is the best one of their line up I have tried to date.
|
|
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 94 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|