tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 4419 (6 new)   /   reviews: 51390 (98 new)   /   Users Online : 721   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Rum & Maple

Brand: Lane Limited
Blender: Lane Limited
Tin Description: A familiar old classic, this blend expertly mixes Bright Virginias and rich Burleys with the contrasting flavors of Rum and Maple. An interesting and pleasant smoke.
Country of Origin: US
Curing Group: Air Cured
Contents:
Burley
Virginia
Flavoring:
Rum
Maple
Cut: Ribbon
Packaging: 50g Pouch, 100g Tin
Blend Notes: Also sold as Tinderbox Mashpee Maple

Images are temporarily disabled.



Average Ratings
Strength: Mild
Flavoring: Mild
Taste: Mild to Medium
Room Note: Pleasant
Recommendation: Somewhat Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 37 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Marvin 03/22/2012 Mild Very Mild Mild Pleasant somewhat recommended
i like this tobacco but it was much to mild and did not have enough flavor. i did not get a hint of maple but it tasted nice enough and didn't bite so overall its very mediocre.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
jpbass 12/20/2011 Mild Medium Medium Pleasant recommended
The maple is the predominant flavor here; the rum is very subtle. A very enjoyable aromatic. Lights and burns well right out of the pouch. I would buy it again.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
tleek 08/16/2011 Mild Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
I really enjoy this tobacco. I was expecting an intensely aromatic blend, but that is not what this blend is at all. There is a very odd but good tobacco taste, i mean you could tell this is an otc blend but it has a very odd but delicious taste, mostly burey, a little va and a little bit of taste from the topping. No rum really, but a little spiciness.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Room Note Professor 07/11/2010 Mild Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
Despite being discontinued in the US, this blend is still available in a number of countries.

I was pleasantly surprised after buying a pouch on a whim. I tried this tobacco a long time ago in my first weeks of pipe smoking and found it extremely bitey, irrespective of how slowly I smoked. I also found it too lacking in sweetness. Today, as a somewhat more experienced piper, the bite has turned into a pleasant, tangy mouthfeel and the lack of sweetness has turned into a positive.

The smell in the pouch is of burley, raisins, oranges, sherry and earth. Despite its name, this is not a rum cased tobacco. Once lit, the taste is of tobacco mixed with a non-sweet, almost spicy or incensy maple. This is a very unique taste.

The room note is old fashioned and manly. The tobacco aroma mixes well with the spicy maple; the tobacco aroma doesn’t disappear as with, for example, Dan’s Blue Note or Peterson’s Sunset Breeze. A lot of non-smokers like it despite the fact that Rum & Maple is not ashamed of being a tobacco.

A little tidbit: Rum & Maple is the trademark tobacco of Thabo Mbeki, former president of South Africa.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
paulw 06/11/2010 Mild Medium Medium Tolerable somewhat recommended
I got excited about trying this.I bought a can smoked the can, bought another. Slowed down long enough for the second purchase to actually notice that I didn't like the finish and the after taste


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
AbeCox 05/09/2010 Mild Medium Mild Very Pleasant somewhat recommended
As I begin to graduate out of the Aromatics, sometimes I just need to take a step back to simpler times of the pipe when I was still just a newbie at the whole game. This reminds me of my first smoke, and I'm pretty sure it was.

The flavor begins with only hints of sweetness at the very beginning of the bowl, and as time goes on the casing burns off and the flavor becomes a nutty-dry flavor that while pleasant, is not what I'm looking for in a pipe any more. It didn't bite, but it didn't really appeal to me either.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pipe_Lord 04/30/2010 Extremely Mild Mild Mild Pleasant somewhat recommended
I haven't had the honor of experiencing a grandiose amount of tobacco yet in my lifetime, but this stuff just seems to leave a want for something deeper. It yields a somewhat dry, nutty smoke (not rum or maple as the description reads), but it smells absolutely wonderful both in the bag and in the air. An excellent choice for beginners, as it is both mild and won't leave as much of a wet dottle in the bowl compared to Lane's 1Q. Overall, it has a somewhat flat flavor, but what flavor is present is definitely not unpleasant. Be wary of the occasional tongue bite!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
doc'spipe 12/29/2009 Mild Mild Mild Pleasant somewhat recommended
I smoked this during my early days of pipe smoking (over 33 years now) and was not impressed. No taste of either rum or maple and no tobacco taste for that matter. The reason I am reviewing this is that it has been said to be discontinued by Lane Ltd. However, while perusing the Dan Tobacco Catalog, I noticed it is listed (page 96) and available through them for those who are so inclined. The tin description is clearly the same, but is fancier than what we have been used to here in the USA.

Here's the link to the Dan Pipe website: http://www.danpipe.de

Go to the right and click on "English help." You will be directed to a page where you can download their entire catalog - a whopping 180 pages! Even when the Tinderbox produced their gorgeous full-colored catalogs back in the 80's, they weren't as good as Dan's. For all serious pipers, Dan's catalog is a gift! You won't be disappointed.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Alguhan 08/04/2009 Mild Mild to Medium Mild Pleasant not recommended
My review notes that I've wrote down, dates early 2003. After that date I didn't give this tobacco another chance. I couldn't finish a tin of 100gr. A sweet taste, hot burning, nothing about rum, nor maple. Just a flavored sweet, and cheap aromatic tobacco.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
The German 05/08/2009 Mild Mild to Medium Mild Pleasant not recommended
I first tried this blend during my Black Cavendish phase, a long time ago. At the time, this was an affordable tobacco (just the right price bracket for a college student), and my first pouch rewarded me with a very nice, sweet, somewhat rum-ish scent. The room note was beautiful, the taste helped in getting me off the BCs, and the tobacco burned down easily, without much maintenance, right down to the bottom of the pipe.

Then they changed the recipe (sometime in the early 1990s). I learned this from the next pouch I bought: I threw it away after a few pipefuls refused to be anything but goopy, horribly bitey, burning unevenly and otherwise misbehaving (with the sole exception of the room note, which was still delicious). I brought the pouch back to my tobacconist of the time, and complained that I had gotten a tainted pouch. He told me that I had not been the first to complain; and the pouch was not tainted, no, they had changed the tobacco. In consequence, so did I.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Harpua0077 02/24/2009 Very Mild Medium Very Mild Tolerable not recommended
Okay so I say not recommended, but I recommend it to. I recommend this to a new pipe smoker. I loved this tobacco when I started smoking a pipe. It seemed flavorful and the room note was decent. I would have kept this as an every day smoke. However I have been spoiled with very good tobaccos from MacBaren, Esoterica, McClelland, Dunhill, Butera, and Orlik. Since then this tobacco went down the toilet.

Today I find it burns to hot, the flavors once there seem very subtle now. The tobacco causes more pipe juice than most that I have smoked. Today I would go for something else that is for sure. However I still recommended it to a new pipe smoker as an introduction to aromatics. My Personal note Rating is a 3.1 I try to keep some around because it was my early favorit but I doubt I'll smoke a bowl more than once a month.

I have also done a video review of this tobacco. view it at

http://www.myspace.com/elemental_pipes

http://www.youtube.com

just search Lane Limited's Rum And Maple


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
CornCob 02/01/2009 Mild to Medium Very Mild Mild Pleasant recommended
Well Ive always loved this brand and im sad to here it has been discontinued. I find it packs very well in the pipe and stays lit all the way to the bottom. To me this mixture blends well with almost anything and is great by itself(it says something similar on the can)In my opinion you have to be a drugstore aficianado to apprecaite this blend. I always have some on hand amd find my self craving it a couple times a week.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Loboatomy 01/15/2009 Mild to Medium Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
I had smoked many a pouch this a few years ago when I was still learning how to smoke a pipe and formulating my preferences and I remember liking it but not being overly enthused secondary to it's "blandness" compared to some of the other tobaccos I was smoking then it sort of "dropped off the radar" and I wasn't able to find it in any of my local stores. I then moved onto other things and trod softly in the world of the virginias, made the leap to perique and fell in love with a black lady named Latakia...

However, I was browsing through a tobacconist a few towns over who had several packages on the shelf and I picked up two of them on a whim and tossed them onto the "drugstore pile" for later evaluation. My father happened to be over tonight and noticed one of the packages sitting in my tobacco nook and marvelled at it for a minute...turns out good old Blend #53 was his favorite pipeweed during WWII when he served as a merchant mariner in the pacific. He stopped smoking a pipe shortly after the war was over and re-started again in the late 70's at which time he moved on to "bigger and better" things. Of course, I broke it open, dad hauled out his big Grabow and we lit up.

To be candid, I took a two year long hiatus from pipesmoking from which I am emerging after a change in career/living arrangement etc. It's a wonderful experience to re-experience all of the tastes emerging from the tobaccos that I've had stashed away for all this time, but what is equally as interesting is that the break has enabled me to pinpoint more clearly my likes and dislikes in a way I wasn't able to when "in the jungle" of sampling and smoking many different types and styles of tobacco during a given week.

I've realized that I love the "American burley drugstore blends" even more than I thought I had before, and Rum and Maple turned out to be excellent on my second trip around. Only a slight hint of flavoring, mostly noticed as aroma when opening the pouch, the tobacco gravity filled the small Kaywoodie prince I had chosen (burleys smoke best out of a narrow bowl that is more tall than wide)and tamped with ease.The tobacco was at the perfect humidity and seemed to be mostly a cube type cut with a few stringy pieces thrown in, all golden brown to umber in color. Lighting was easy and positive, and the first couple of puffs contain a wonderfully light, "boozy" perfume that is more smelled than tasted. No hint of maple was apparent to me, but there is a discreet rummy note throughout which complements well the creamy nutty aroma of burley. From there, the tobacco burns well, and when smoked lightly gets neither wet, hot nor "bitey" though it does burn quicker than one might expect. As is characteristic with these types of tobacco, it got a bit "brash" towards the last 1/4 bowl at which point I usually do the dump. Burleys seem to be so low in natural sugar that they don't stove in the bottom of the bowl as do virginias and most of the casing dissipates during the preceeding 3/4 of the bowl making the ending harsh. At $2.50/pouch I feel that this is a worthwhile sacrifice.

I smoked two bowls of this tonight, and the now opened pouch will ride in my pocket tomorrow for further evaluation.If I like these two pouches as much as I did the smoke I had tonight I'll be purchasing a tin of this (also stocked by this same tobacconist) sometime soon. My father stated that after almost 60 years he really couldn't recall how similar it was to what he used to smoke back then (he's a confirmed McClelland man these days), but he liked it well enough and packed himself another big bowl "for the morning" before he left.

Could this be the proverbial "all day smoke"? Possibly, it's light, inexpensive and easy enough with a decent bit of nicotine, but I suspect that this will take a place in my "drugstore" rotation along with Middletons Cherry Blend, Revelation, Prince Albert, Hickory and Granger all of which I find myself leaning towards during this second incarnation as a pipesmoker.

Recommended, if you can find it...

UPDATE 1/15/09: Hickory is all but gone--a sad loss of a peculiarly american flavored burley. Now it's getting harder and harder for me to find this stuff and I fear that it's next on the list. I hadn't smoked it in probably a year so I opened a fresh pouch the other day and loaded a nice deep billiard and went for a drive. Still nice, still that whisping nuance of maple through most of the bowl. It's amazing how once you get onto a real burley kick that you start really noticing the delicacy of the flavors in these blends. Still reccommended.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
BigSwede 01/14/2009 Mild to Medium Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
*Update* I acquired a couple of no name canadians with large bowls this summer and noted that most of the codger burleys smoked very well in them (i.e. SWR, PA, etc). I recently dug out my tin of R&M, purchased over a year ago and tried it in the simpler pipes. VERY different smoking experienc. The flavor increases and while difficult to describe (almost but not quite sweet, smooth, kinda "marshmallowy") is more definite. Mostly its a pleasant burley base that seems to come through. These blends were developed, I think, for guys who smoked drugstore pipes and I think R&M smokes better in them. I'll be smoking this regularly.

Previous review: This is a pleasant, inoffensive and comfortable smoke. Like some of the other reviewers I found the flavor milder (from the 14 oz tin) than expected. Couldn't detect any rum and maybe found somethiing "mapley". I find it difficult to describe the flavoring. Some have compared it to Capt Black and while in the same ballpark, I found the R&M flavoring milder and less obtrusive. Burned a little fast but dry. I will smoke a pipeful of this from time to time and will enjoy it in that context, but it's not a tobacco thats likely to produce enthusiasm. If you enjoy mildly flavored burley mixes, its worth a try.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
ithomka 10/18/2008 Very Mild Mild Mild Pleasant recommended
Cheap tobacco but the Price/Value rate is enough good.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
jankoez 09/28/2008 Mild to Medium Medium Mild Pleasant not recommended
I must confess - I purchased this blend simply because I have smoked it once some 25 years ago, when it was at that time quite rare in my part of the World. Then it was something different... But today it is good looking, nice smelling tobacco without any thrill in smoking. Pleasant memories turn into big disappointment.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
pop-pop's pipe 08/21/2008 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant highly recommended
This is another House of Westminster/Larus/Lane Limited blend. It has been around since 1937. Back then, on the package, it stressed " Not too Sweet " and it's still like that today. This is a very mild, tasty, buttery like, soft smoke. Excellent aroma. It's predominatly a Burley base, with a little VA mixed in. This is another " Good Old Blend ". A Codger Burley! Soft but Satifying. I like this tobacco. 4 Stars in my book! Nostalgia and A good smoke, rolled into one. Good Nic Kick to Boot too!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
ex20adayman 03/19/2008 Mild to Medium Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
I should point out that the version of this I am reviewing is made under license in the EU. Packaging is the same though - orange pouch, tin or can.

I am really pleased with this tobacco. For a non-aromatic all day smoke I normally smoke Gold Block (a UK burley blend) and fancied trying some other burley blends. This is a good, straight tobacco with a hint of either honey or maple syrup in the pouch. I couldn't really detect any rum in either the aroma or taste. Whilst smoking it is fairly smooth and inoffensive with the faint hint of apples that I associate with burley blends. I reckon it possibly could bite if you puff really hard but it's not an issue for me as I use 9mm filter pipes. You can really switch off whilst smoking it which is why it is so popular I guess. I've been smoking it a lot.

Love the slogan on the pouch - "Men like its flavor. Women love its aroma"

Given it's low price I may be buying more of this.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
SMOKETSES 02/10/2008 Mild to Medium Very Mild Mild Tolerable somewhat recommended
Its perfume is very nice without being very sweet. The rough tobacco is drier than liquid. That was also a good sign. I felt a very aromatic taste but definitely I wouldn?t guess that there was rum or maple if it was not written on it. Cheap and good. That says it all.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
constantsmoker 10/30/2007 Mild to Medium Very Mild Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
A very pleasant Burley and Virginia combination at an affordable price. This has been a mainstay tobacco for many smokers (including myself) over the years. R&M may not have much evidence of either rum or maple, but it is an appealing, light aromatic that makes for a great, every day smoke. Remember, just because it is sold in a drug or variety store does not make it 'bad', tobacco snobs notwithstanding. You could do far worse.


 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 37 reviews of this tobacco

 


home back to top
2001-2013 SpecComm International, Inc. All rights reserved. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and don't reflect the opinion(s) of SpecComm International. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and SpecComm International and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of SpecComm International.

Real Time Web Analytics