|
Kendal's Cherry Cream Flake
| Brand: |
Gawith, Hoggarth & Co. |
| Tin Description: |
Creamy caramel and ripe cherries. A distinctive aromatic aroma to the medium strength tobacco base. |
| Country of Origin: |
UK |
| Curing Group: |
Flue Cured |
| Contents: |
Virginia
|
| Flavoring: |
Cherry
Caramel
|
| Cut: |
Flake |
| Packaging: |
Bulk |
|
Images are temporarily disabled.
|
Average Ratings
|
| Strength: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Flavoring: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Taste: |
Mild to Medium
|
| Room Note: |
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
| Recommendation: |
Somewhat Recommended
|
|
|
|
Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account
yet, you can sign up for one here.
|
Showing reviews 1 through 3 of 3 reviews of this tobacco
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
Wibblefishofdoom
|
10/14/2011 |
Mild
|
Mild
|
Mild
|
Pleasant to Tolerable
|
|
| I was quivering with anticipation when I opened the packet, the waft of a very creamy cherry - which was, admittedly, more of cream than cherry - graced itself upon my nostrils led me to hope this might be a rather good smoke. Sadly, upon the first draw from my pipe, I was a tad disappointed as the cream came through okay but the cherry seemed to be on a toilet break - and it didn't bother to flush. And nowhere, during the whole packet, did it bother to return. A pleasant enough smoke, and maybe if they'd left the cherry off the name I might have enjoyed it a little more. I'm not put off smoking it again but in no hurry either. I would just like to get the flavour I paid for.
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
renwardhoop
|
10/04/2010 |
Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Tolerable
|
|
| Typical GW's flake, moist and meaty with a delicious scent.
I'm agreeing with The Full English, this doesn't taste of cherry and I'm not convinced it smells of cherry either. Did someone mention caramel ? Not that either.
It is however a nice creamy flake and certainly sweet, but not sickly. Certainly not as chemically repellant as poor old Celtic Talisman.
Nougat ? Hmmm, maybe.
Strawberry chocolate ? Perhaps.
Whatever it is, it's quite alluring and not a million miles from the brilliant Firedance flake.
It's not a bad flake, but have a suspicion it might get sickening if smoked too often. Shall find out...
|
| Reviewed By: |
Date: |
Strength: |
Flavoring: |
Taste: |
Room Note: |
Recommendation: |
|
The Full English
|
04/06/2010 |
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Mild to Medium
|
Pleasant
|
|
| Dear me. There's something inherently foul at play when an aromatic (and supposedly a simply flavoured one) tastes absolutely nothing like its description. No cherry; no cream; nor the remotest hint of caramel. Just a massive hit of that much maligned Lakeland flora. I'd have even taken cheap cherryade flavouring over this for the sake of saying Gawith & Hoggarth actually made an effort. Indeed, my experience with this flake was so left-field that I found myself inspecting every other pouch from my tobacco sampler for fear that the tobacconist had mislabelled them.
This is not to say that Kendal Cherry Cream is a bad flake. By all accounts, the tobacco itself is typical of the Kendals: marvellous quality; cool and voluptuous, and all all round brilliant smoker. Puff hard enough and there is some underlying sweetness - but it's not cherry. I tried to get a handle on the flavour, and in smoking too fast, managed to deliver a shot of something extremely bitter and the bowl turned on me thus from thereon in. A new flake and a second bowl the following day revealed a much more well behaved character, with less floral essence and a shade more sweetness, but the bitter ghost always threatened in the final third.
In a regular situation, I'd be inclined to give this the thumbs up after wrestling with it for a couple of days - a possible two, even three stars at a push for the benefit of the flake itself. However, it's such a crime against trade descriptions that it's called "Cherry Cream," that it infuriatingly relegates itself. If the folks at Gawith & Hoggarth cared to re-brand it, giving it a much more deserving moniker and a truly faithful description, then there would be a lot of happier punters - myself included.
Try it and enjoy it - but not on the basis of a cherry aromatic.
|
|
Showing reviews 1 through 3 of 3 reviews of this tobacco
|
|


|