tobaccoreviews.com

Tobacco Reviews is 100% user funded. Please help keep the site running.

Current Stats:    tobaccos: 3639 (0 new)   /   reviews: 35945 (107 new)   /   Users Online : 473   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Support
Friends of TR
Donate
Support The Site
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Erinmore Mixture

Brand: Erinmore
Blender: Orlik AS
Tin Description: The recipe for Erinmore Mixture is a closely guarded secret which is revealed to only two people in each generation. It is known, however, that the tobaccos are selected from the premier tobacco growing regions of the world, naturally sweetened bright Virginia is hand blended with cool- smoking black Cavendish to produce the unique flavour and distinctive aroma of Erinmore. More than that we cannot reveal. A mellow aromatic tobacco with a cool taste and a slow-burning easy-smoking style.
Country of Origin: DK
Curing Group: Air Cured
Contents:
Black Cavendish
Virginia
Cut: Ribbon
Packaging: 50g Tin
Blend Notes: produced by Murray Sons & Co, Ltd until 2005



Average Ratings
Strength: Mild to Medium
Flavoring: Medium
Taste: Medium
Room Note: Pleasant to Tolerable
Recommendation: Somewhat Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 107 reviews of this tobacco
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Susanna Hoffs 06/10/2010 Mild to Medium Medium Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Can't really tell the difference between this and flake. Flake probably is more concentrate.. But it is a flake after all

Certainly fruity I guess, and I would say that this is the very next step up from OTC blends. In the UK St. Bruno, Condor and Clan (Yak!) are the general 3 that you find.

Erinmore would be the first rung of the ladder after the afore mentioned OTC blends mentioned.

Still it's not bad, I've certainly had a lot worse. (Peterson's Sweet Killarney, Sam Gawith's Perfection, Clan, and Alsbo Black)

Decent enough to reach for when your short of your premier blends..

No idea what all the fuss is over the pineapple issue. It's quite blatantly just a logo that relates to the company. Such as the lion and unicorn on her majesty's crest.

It has sweet FA to do with the flavour. Just coincidence...


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
KahveDelisi 06/08/2010 Medium Strong Medium Tolerable to Strong not recommended
the reason I quit pipe smoking for four years. Started all over with new pipes (roll eyes-roll eyes-roll eyes)

Edit: mine was production of Murray Sons & Co, Ltd


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Tazman 05/26/2010 Mild to Medium Medium Medium to Full Very Pleasant highly recommended
My favorite tobacco.Pleasant and fruity aroma,sweet aftertaste and of course wife doesn't complaining that it stinks:)


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
jazzmoke 05/25/2010 Mild to Medium Extremely Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
Not too good and not so nasty. I think I should judge it as an "english aromatic". The Virginias give it a nice consistence, and tha cavendish adds some flavor, it's a little spicy and I believe that is due to red virginias that I spotted in the mixture. It is not something that I will buy again, but I will surely buy other tobacco's from Erinmore. I do not regret buying it.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Kilmarnock Piper 05/18/2010 Medium Mild Medium Pleasant recommended
I have long been a fan of Erinmore Flake (new version). I do have a long-opened tin probably from the late 70s, and it is almost smokeable! I really want to try the Murray's era from an unopened tin that has not degraded so much. Well, I did score a tin of Murray's period Erinmore Mixture on Ebay that a reputable authority has dated for me to probably the late 80s. I have smoked a few bowls, and though I don't like it as much as the Orlik version of the flake, am happy to have it. The topping is different than that of the newer flake, but that is all I have to compare it to. It seems more flowery than fruity. I'm also not sure I like the Virginias in the Mixture as much as I like those in the flake. Still, a nice smoke, and a taste of history, even if it is still fairly recent history.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Logwood 05/18/2010 Mild Medium to Strong Mild to Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
The smell from an open tin is quite intense, with a very sweet fruity aroma. However, this does not translate over as much while it is being smoked, although it is still noticeable.

I have certainly enjoyed quite a few bowls of this blend, but I would have to say there are better options available when looking for a flavored tobacco.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Daggers62 04/27/2010 Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
I preferred this tobacco from all fo the other supermarket brands that I have tried. It burns fairly quickly and needs to be dried a little first.

If you want to put a cake on your bowl quickly then this will do it for you but is an enjoyable smoke. Leaves me with a nice warm aftertaste that makes me look forward to the next bowl.

A thumbs up from me.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Hector 04/27/2010 Mild Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable somewhat recommended
I will come back on this review as soon as I try more of this. I bought the package also by mistake but I'm not sorry about it. Also the smell is aromatic when you open the pack, the smoke is less aromatic than most of those candy like tobaccos. That's what I like about it. The thing that I LOVE about it is the smell and taste: it's exactly like the black cherry gem my mother makes every year. And i LOVE black cherry gem. For those that don't know, black cherries are small, dark cherries that are bitter. I think that's their secret ingredient.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Corncob Mechanic 04/24/2010 Mild to Medium Medium Medium Tolerable not recommended
Bought a tin of this mixture in part because its reviews were so polarized - also the price was right. Upon opening, the tin aroma reminded me of Grandads old snuff. Sweet and raisiny with a bit of "spiceyness". Couldn't wait to try it out in my corncob. WOW what a let down. Not sure what happens once you light this stuff up but it ain't pretty. Oh sure I could taste the virginias but the other taste was not so pleasant. Sort of like urine on a camp fire. Won't be smoking anymore of this. Wanna trade?


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Acopio 04/22/2010 Mild to Medium Medium Medium Very Pleasant recommended
I really produces a feeling of calm from the first puff, easy to burn.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Aromaniac 04/17/2010 Mild Mild to Medium Medium Very Pleasant recommended
Another of those spring-time virginias with a twist! Smells and tastes great, and burns slow and easy. Narrow bowls are recommended.

Blackberry, peach and grasslike.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Tee-dub 04/12/2010 Mild Mild to Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant not recommended
I don't think I'm a particular fan of aromatics. So I am probably the wrong person to review this. I bought it only by accident.

All that said, I was expecting to dislike this, and I did--sort of, at least at first. But I tried it again, and here's the thing: I actually sort of enjoyed it. This doesn't suit my tastes, so this won't make a regular rotation, but I think I can appreciate why some others are so fond of it.

It is mild, cool, and dry. It burns nicely. The topping is fruity, but for the life of me I can't pin it down. At first, I thought it tasted of peach or apricot, but this faded away. Yes, there's a picture of a pineapple on the tin, but I suspect one only thinks of pineapple because of that picture. Another review said he tasted 'dark fruit' in this blend--currants, or figs, or dates. Hmmmm. Maybe. Licorice? I don't know.

Erinmore advertises that the 'secret' recipe makes for a "refreshing" smoke (their word), and I have to agree. It is cool, slightly sweet, and calming.

All in all, I can find no fault with this. It is pleasant enough, and agreeable if taken for what it is. But I will never ever buy this again.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
ynrozturk 04/05/2010 Medium Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable not recommended
I'm a fan of aromatics and I had high hopes for this tobacco. I had heard a lot about it so I decided to give it a try.

The tin aroma smells awesome. I instantly got the Virginia's in there, and that alone made me think I was in for a real treat.

Handling was easy; the moisture levels were good so it was easy to pack and light without any hassles. I loaded up my Croci and off we went.. to Hell.

This stuff, I don't know what it is, but the flavoring tastes like a mix of battery acid and some demented fruit way past it's prime. The smoke is harsh, strong, and just downright terrible. I couldn't believe it.. and I really like Erinmore Flake. I didn't think it was possible for this to be as bad as it was for me. Maybe it just didn't agree with my body chemistry.

I sipped patiently to the end of my bowl, fighting the urge to just dump it out. It's an aromatic which is not an aromatic, if that makes sense. The horrible flavor of whatever the hell they put in there should be banned from all existence.

Ugh.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Final Identity 04/02/2010 Mild Mild Mild Strong not recommended
This just plain old tastes bad. I thought I was getting Erinmore Balkan Mixture, but instead I only ended up with Erinmore Mixture. My mistake, I suppose, but you'd think a manufacturer or retailer would bother with the notion of making clear to us consumers what it was we were buying. So, points off for being misleading with the labeling on the outside of the tin, in the first place. And, more points off for what they put inside the tin.

Very nice shag cut. Comfortably moist, not too sticky. Smells slightly sweet and candy-like, like caramels or butterscotch maybe? Packs fine, does a good job of lighting too. And that's the end of the positives.

It has a soapy, chemical-like flavor. Though the subtle hints of tobacco taste are discernible underneath the foundational overtones of car wash and disinfectant, you know something has gone bad wrong when you're working to FIND the tobacco in your tobacco. It also leaves a "cigarette smoker's mouth" aftertaste, that dry dusky stink of your maiden aunt who retired to a trailer outside Palm Springs after twenty-five years with the Motor Vehicle licensing department and now she wants to KISS YOU.

Yick.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
wdsmith 03/31/2010 Mild Medium Mild to Medium Pleasant recommended
I am not an expert on aromatics, only smoke them once in a while. I've read many rather unpleasent reviews of this mixture but have had a good experience personally so I thought I would add my two cents. It would seem that the mixture is quite a different beast than the flake version but I can't tell a huge difference. Yes the casing is one that you either love or hate but once I set the match to it I did not notice it at all. For some time now I've been on a search for the tobacco that my old Sunday School teacher smoked, low these many years ago. It always seemed pleasant and comforting and is one reason why I started smoking a pipe in college (that and Jeremy Brett's expert portrayal of Doyle's famous consulting detective). I believe that I've found it....

Regarding the acutal experience of smoking this blend, it reminds me very much of Peterson's University flake (taste and aroma). While the moisture content is quite substantial, I did not notice any bite after leaving it to dry for about 10 minutes, the flavors of the Va's and Burleys were quite noticable. A wonderful surprise for me since I smoke English/Balkan blends and can't seem to taste any tobacco flavor in most aromatics. The black cavendish adds a spicy note which is very nice towards the end of the bowl. All in all a good change of pace for me and I would recommend this to someone looking for a nice blend for the wife but still would like to taste the tobacco. No "gravy" or gloop left behind that some previous reviewers noted. No ghosting in the pipe either.

On a side note, my tin was blended by Stokkebye and I've never had a bad Stokkebye blend. A solid 3 stars.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Kathos 03/01/2010 Medium Medium Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Yes I agree that Erinmore Mixture does have a heavy casing, it's sweet in scent and pales little when smoked. I find that it smokes cool and easy, though if not dried for a few days before smoking it does tend to produce a very sour "gravy" in the bowl. I dry mine before smoking and I get no tongue bite or "gravy".

I enjoy smoking this blend as a change from time to time but it is far from my first choice in the gallery of fine tobaccos in the same price range.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Bard of Christ 02/04/2010 Mild Very Strong Mild Pleasant not recommended
This aromatic is what makes pipe smokers hate aromatics.

It smells nice enough, both in the tin and when smoked. I think the casing is something tropical, like a pineapple. The tobacco is cut short enough to fit in any size bowl. It packs and lights easily.

Once you get it lit, the "fun" starts. This tobacco is HARSH! It burns hot and wet, and the tobacco flavor is sour. I went through half a tin of this, and gave the rest away. That says a lot given the price of this tobacco!

With so many high-quality aromatics available (Wilke Cherry Cavendish, or Peterson Sunset Breeze, or Samuel Gawith Chocolate Flake) why would you settle for this tobacco? Even my local tobacconist (Boda Pipes of Greenville, SC) has a better bulk cavendish (Charles Towne) at half the price!

Not recommended by any stretch of the imagination.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
HereComesCharlie 02/03/2010 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable not recommended
I have never purchased a tin of pipe tobacco. In the 3 years that I have been smoking a pipe, I have bought house blends from the two wonderful tobacconists in my hometown. Each shop has helped me along, let me smell the large glass jars, and been willing to talk pipe tobacco for a generous amount of time. I have tried aromatics, English, and Virginias - the latter of which I still haven't quite figured out, but will I'm sure. I chose Erinmore as my first tinned tobacco. Why? Because I had to start somewhere. So with an open mind, I twisted the tin and was assaulted by a cloying, overwhelmingly sweet fragrance of apricots (people have suggested pineapple, which appears on the tin. Power of suggestion??). I have just enough experience to know that tobacco often tastes different than it smells, so I flashed it up in my beloved meerschaum, my "workhorse" pipe in which I test all new tobaccos. Long story short - the topping was absolutely nonexistant. What remained was just a nasty smoke with no redeeming quality that my olfactory/gustatory senses could discern.I even tried thinking "English" as I sipped, but no go. My next thought was "Dude...why?!?". I'll dry it out, and try again later, but in a country where 50 grams = 30 bucks, ya gotta give me something, Erinmore. Maybe it's me - maybe it's you. But I'm pretty sure it's you.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
muntajab 01/24/2010 Mild Strong Medium Pleasant not recommended
The first few bowls I smoked was not bad at all. Then I soon got this lemon's taste in my mouth and even my stomach. It is wet too, and if you have bought it (and had to see the bright side of it), well fill half the bowl and it will smoke better. You can enjoy it every now and then for a change, but I could not smoke it everyday.

I really don't like aromatics, you don't even feel you're smoking, you only get the harmful effects of smoking with the artificial taste of flavoring. If you want fruits, eat them fresh! if you want to enjoy a good smoking, well, choose pure tobacco. I think i am not going to buy aromatics anymore, except the coffee flavors; they sometimes can be great. Honey can be fine too, but the essential thing they need to put in mind is not to make the flavor overwhelming; this is childish.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
tpatriarche 01/23/2010 Mild to Medium Medium Very Mild Pleasant to Tolerable not recommended
Whatever the original Erinmore Mixture may have been, this is not it. My pouch, purchased in Canada (2010) says Made in Denmark by Rlik Tobacco (might be different in other countries). There is almost no black Cavendish in it; I would guess it's almost 100% bright Virginia Cavendish, shag cut. Doesn't burn very evenly.

I would expect an "Irish" tobacco to be stronger & more aromatic (as opposed to flavoured). The pouch aroma makes me think "Irish Whiskey" rather than pineapple or other fruit and is about the only Irish thing about it besides the name.

If you'd like a top quality pineapple flavoured Cavendish, look for Papeete (might be made by Brigham??, or might be a house blend), sold in bulk by specialty tobacconists (for sure Old Morris in Victoria). This is a satisfying smoke with the least tongue-bite of any tobacco I know.


 
Showing reviews 1 through 20 of 107 reviews of this tobacco

home back to top
©2001-2010 Jon Tillman. All rights reserved. Trademarks and copyrights incorporated herein are the exclusive property of the referenced entity. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and probably don't reflect the opinion(s) of Jon Tillman. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and Jon Tillman and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of the reviewer or Jon Tillman.