tobaccoreviews.com

Tobacco Reviews is 100% user funded. Please help keep the site running.

Current Stats:    tobaccos: 3639 (0 new)   /   reviews: 35945 (107 new)   /   Users Online : 477   /   full report > Hall of Fame Search:
[advanced]


My Account
Log In
Join Now
 
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Support
Friends of TR
Donate
Support The Site
 
Connect
RSS
Facebook
Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 



Christmas Cheer 2003

Brand: McClelland
Tin Description: Hand-blended, premium pressed Virginia flake tobaccos. A fine vintage, naturally sweet, in limited quantity.
Country of Origin: US
Curing Group: Flue Cured
Contents:
Virginia
Cut: Broken Flake
Packaging: 100g Tin

No tin picture available



Average Ratings
Strength: Medium
Flavoring: None detected
Taste: Medium
Room Note: Pleasant to Tolerable
Recommendation: Recommended


The Reviews  

Please log in to add or edit a review. If you do not have an account yet, you can sign up for one here.

 
Showing reviews 1 through 10 of 10 reviews of this tobacco
 
Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Spike 12/28/2008 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable recommended
A fine quality Virginia. Fairly coarse and quite dry for a McClelland tobac. For devoted Viginnia fans only. Update: 12/28/08 Tried some very dry 2003 Christmas Cheer. Still a fine Virginia flake. Although bone dry, it smoked very nicely in a medium apple.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Pipestud 10/09/2005 Mild to Medium None detected Mild to Medium Pleasant somewhat recommended
I have tried just about every Christmas Cheer that McClelland's has offered (except the 1992 and 1993 editions) and this 2003 version was typically sweet and airy. Not a bell ringer as far as matured Virginia cakes go, but I did enjoy going through the tin. I smoked Christmas Cheer 2003 mostly in the evenings. It didn't produce enough kick to get my day started.

Typical of McClelland's Christmas Cheer tobaccos, this one was at a good moisture level and smoked clean and dry.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Ian Weeks 07/23/2005 Mild None detected Medium Pleasant to Tolerable highly recommended
Christmas Cheer is a regular for me. I usually smoke whatever is 3 to 4 years old. That being said I can't tell one bit of difference between 2001, 2002, and 2003.

It comes ready rubbed and is easy to further rub out and pack. I do not practice drying out my tobaccos and in fact upon opening tins I transfer the remaining tobacco to canning jars and lable them appropriatly.

I smoke Christmas Cheer in pipes that are dedicated exclusively to this particular series, not per year. Nothing else is smoked in these pipes.

I taste no casing or topping, and there is an absence of the spiceyness that I find in McClellands Blackwoods, or #27. It exhibits the usual Virginia Profile that I look for and the last half of the bowl is as usual with VA's stoved and much more flavorful than the first.

I highly recommend the Christmas Cheer Series for a smoker that enjoys VA rubbed flake and is not looking for the pizzaze of a more complex Dark Stoved blend such as McClelland Dark Star or #2035


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Beer 07/01/2005 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable recommended
A nice flake in the usual McClelland tradition: sweet and sour, slightly tart, fruity and flavorful, slighly grassy and very American.

It is definitely better and tastier than the 2002 edition, although similar in appearance (maybe slightly darker).

The ketchup smell is a bit more subdued than in other McC offerings, and as usual it doesn't translate to a ketchupy taste.

My only "complaint" is that other "ordinary" McC blends like Virginia 27 and Blackwoods Flake are even better, richer and tastier than this "special edition" (which is supposed to be great and unique)... but this doesn't make Christmas Cheer 2003 any less delicious for lovers of the typical Virginia taste of this legendary brand.

I am happy to have some more tins of this in the cellar, which should age wonderfully: you can't go wrong with a McClelland flake!


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
alfredo_buscatti 05/21/2005 Medium None detected Medium to Full Pleasant recommended
This review will discuss McClelland's Christmas Cheer 2003, McCranie's Red Flake and Wessex Classic Virginia.

Christmas Cheer 2003 (CC) is a red Virginia made from a 1998 Old Belt crop while McCranie?s Red Flake (RF) was made from a 1996 North Carolina crop. CC and RF are both medium-to-full-bodied.

CC fails to deliver the consistently deeper red Virginia flavor that RF offers. While CC has bursts of RF?s consistently dusky red Virginia flavor-a flavor that in comparison is both darker and deeper than a signature brown Virginia, Rattrays Brown Clunee-such bursts are more atypical than constant. This is not to say that CC is not an enjoyable tobacco but simply that in the realm of red Virginia, RF is the winner.

RF?s tin notes state that softness is this tobacco?s chief characteristic. While I don?t disagree with this statement, I would add that RF?s deeper, richer flavor outdoes the competition. One wonders how the considerable tobacco wisdom of McClelland, whose most notable entry in the Virginia arena, its Christmas Cheer series, allowed itself to be content with anything less than a product just shy of perfection. Yet perhaps this has something to due with the time constraints of finding fine leaf in time to process it and still meet Christmas Cheer?s traditional release at the RTDA show.

We then come to Wessex Classic Virginia (CV), medium-to-full bodied, blended by Kohlhase, Kopp und Co. It has more in common with RF than CC and is comprised solely of mature Red Virginia. It has less flavor than RF but I tend to believe this a choice of the blender, not a flaw. It throbs with the rich, basal note of a curing process designed to produce a no-nonsense, straightforward, aged tobacco. Little complexity in comparison to CC, the most complex of these three tobaccos-if any Virginia can be called complex-just a delicious, singular, deep, red Virginia flavor. In comparison to CC, it has little of that tobacco?s grassy, reedy flavor components.

Ranking, in descending order: RF, CV, CC.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Jakob Kiilerich 03/23/2005 Medium Very Mild Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
This quite a nice blend. Upon opening the tin I detected notes of clove; yes I am almost certain that McClelland have added some of this christmas-like spice. It is not detectable when lit. The vinegar smell is not as pervasive as in other blends from this company, and the moisture level is a bit on the dry side compared to most McClellands. My tin is two years old, and I think the ageing has mellowed it out a bit, because this one do not bite at all.

CC2003 produces thick clouds of smooth and rich smoke, and there are many notes through the bowl. It is probably the best American pure VA I have ever had, and it makes me want to explore more from this company.

A fine product, recommended to every VA fan.

Jakob Kiilerich, Denmark.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
BostonPipe 10/12/2004 Medium None detected Medium Pleasant to Tolerable recommended
Overall a nice example of their Christmas Blend series. A steady, rich, Virginia that runs consistent the length of the bowl. As nice as it is, I feel confident that with aging, it will take on an even more characteristics and nuances to increase it to a mezmerising experience. A fine example of the broken flake genre.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
LoisKelly 10/04/2004 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable recommended
Every year Charlie Brown goes flying when Lucy pulls the football away at the last second.

Every year I pop open a tin of the current year's iteration of Xmas Cheer on release, only to ask myself why on Earth did I waste another tin of a tobacco that I know will not be ready for another five years. So this time, for a change, I decided to wait a whole year before opening a tin of MCC '03. Verdict- only four years too soon. I'm getting better, I suppose.

Tomorrow I will punish myself further by attempting to sample the '04 version. Some guys never learn.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Joe Patterson 06/25/2004 Mild to Medium None detected Medium Pleasant recommended
This is a nice straight VA flake -- not overpowering or underwhelming. It needs a bit of time to dry before smoking. (I typically rub it out and let it sit on a paper plate or napkin for an hour or so before loading. I usually buy 4 or 6 cans to store each year, and aging does mellow this blend nicely. Enjoy.

As a side note, it is interesting how different degrees of rubbing this blend out treat the flavor and burn quailities. Experiment for yourself.


Reviewed By: Date: Strength: Flavoring: Taste: Room Note: Recommendation:
Mephisto 01/19/2004 Medium None detected Medium Tolerable recommended
A limited tobacco and different every year...this year is rich and more in the traditional virginia tast than the last 2 years all of them however tend to the richer veriginias. A worth while treat and since it is limited you may not be ble to find this in the future however do give it a try and you will be pleasently rewarded. Smooth and slow with unique sweetness. The tobacco used is of great quality and produces unique taste. Mery Christmas!


 
Showing reviews 1 through 10 of 10 reviews of this tobacco
 

home back to top
©2001-2010 Jon Tillman. All rights reserved. Trademarks and copyrights incorporated herein are the exclusive property of the referenced entity. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and probably don't reflect the opinion(s) of Jon Tillman. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and Jon Tillman and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of the reviewer or Jon Tillman.